Electronic properties of a silicon carbide nanotube under uniaxial tensile strain: a density function theory study
Source abstract
Abstract
The electronic properties of an armchair (4,4) single-walled silicon carbide nanotube (SWSiCNT) with the length and diameter of 22.4 and 6.93 A, respectively under different tensile strains are investigated by density functional theory (DFT) calculation. The change of highest occupied molecular orbital and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (HOMO–LUMO) gap of the nanotube has been observed during the elongation process. Our results show that the gap will significantly decrease linearly with the increase of axial strain. Two different slopes are found before and after an 11% strain in the profiles of the HOMO–LUMO gap. The radial buckling has been performed to investigate the radial geometry of nanotube. The partial density of states (PDOS) of two neighboring Si and C atoms of the nanotube are further studied to demonstrate the strain effect on the electronic structure of SiC nanotube. The PDOS results exhibit that the occupied states of Si atom and the unoccupied states of C atom are red-shifted and blue-shifted under stretching, respectively. Mulliken charge analysis reveals that Si and C atoms will become less ionic under the larger strain. The electron differences of silicon carbide nanotube (SiCNT) on tensile loading are also studied.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Graphene research and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Alam KM, Ray AK (2007) A hybrid density functional study of zigzag sic nanotubes. Nanotechnology 18(49):495706. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/18/49/49570610.1088/0957-4484/18/49/495706 ↗
2. Alam KM, Ray AK (2008) Hybrid density functional study of armchair sic nanotubes. Phys Rev B 77(3):035436. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.03543610.1103/PhysRevB.77.035436 ↗
3. Baierle RJ, Piquini P, Neves LP, Miwa RH (2006) Ab initio study of native defects in sic nanotubes. Phys Rev B 74(15):155425. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.15542510.1103/PhysRevB.74.155425 ↗
4. Baughman RH, Zakhidov AA, de Heer WA (2002) Carbon nanotubes: the route toward applications. Science 297(5582):787–792. doi: 10.1126/science.106092810.1126/science.1060928 ↗
5. Baumeier B, Kruger P, Pollmann J (2007) Structural, elastic, and electronic properties of SiC, BN, and BeO nanotubes. Phys Rev B 76(8):085407. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.08540710.1103/PhysRevB.76.085407 ↗
6. Chandra N, Namilae S, Shet C (2004) Local elastic properties of carbon nanotubes in the presence of stone-wales defects. Phys Rev B 69(9):094101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.09410110.1103/PhysRevB.69.094101 ↗
7. Choi HJ, Ihm J, Louie SG, Cohen ML (2000) Defects, quasibound states, and quantum conductance in metallic carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev Lett 84(13):2917–2920. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.291710.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2917 ↗
8. Delley B (1990) An all-electron numerical-method for solving the local density functional for polyatomic-molecules. J Chem Phys 92(1):508–517. doi: 10.1063/1.45845210.1063/1.458452 ↗
9. Delley B (2000) From molecules to solids with the dmol3 approach. J Chem Phys 113(18):7756–7764. doi: 10.1063/1.131601510.1063/1.1316015 ↗
10. Ebrahimi A, Ehteshami H, Mohammadi M (2008) Density functional calculations of response of single-walled armchair carbon nanotubes to axial tension. Comput Mater Sci 41(4):486–492. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2007.05.00610.1016/j.commatsci.2007.05.006 ↗
11. Enyashin AN, Ivanovskii AL (2005) Mechanical and electronic properties of a C/BN nanocable under tensile deformation. Nanotechnology 16(8):1304–1310. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/16/8/05410.1088/0957-4484/16/8/054 ↗
12. Gali A (2006) Ab initio study of nitrogen and boron substitutional impurities in single-wall sic nanotubes. Phys Rev B 73(24):245415. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.24541510.1103/PhysRevB.73.245415 ↗
13. Gali A (2007) Ab initio theoretical study of hydrogen and its interaction with boron acceptors and nitrogen donors in single-wall silicon carbide nanotubes. Phys Rev B 75(8):085416. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.08541610.1103/PhysRevB.75.085416 ↗
14. Gomez-Navarro C, De Pablo PJ, Gomez-Herrero J, Biel B, Garcia-Vidal FJ, Rubio A, Flores F (2005) Tuning the conductance of single-walled carbon nanotubes by ion irradiation in the Anderson localization regime. Nat Mater 4(7):534–539. doi: 10.1038/nmat141410.1038/nmat1414 ↗
15. Hamann DR, Schluter M, Chiang C (1979) Norm-conserving pseudopotentials. Phys Rev Lett 43(20):1494–1497. doi: 101103/physRevlett.43.149410.1103/PhysRevLett.43.1494 ↗
16. Iijima S (1991) Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 354(6348):56–58. doi: 10.1038/354056a010.1038/354056a0 ↗
17. Kaniber SM, Song L, Kotthaus JP, Holleitner AW (2009) Photocurrent properties of freely suspended carbon nanotubes under uniaxial strain. Appl Phys Lett 94(26):261106. doi: 10.1063/1.315947210.1063/1.3159472 ↗
18. Langreth DC, Perdew JP (1980) Theory of nonuniform electronic systems. 1. Analysis of the gradient approximation and a generalization that works. Phys Rev B 21(12):5469–5493. doi: 101103/PhysRevB.21.546910.1103/PhysRevB.21.5469 ↗
19. Li Z, Wang CY, Zhang X, Ke SH, Yang WT (2008) Transport properties of an armchair carbon nanotube with a double vacancy under stretching. J Phys Condens Matter 20(34):345225. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/20/34/34522510.1088/0953-8984/20/34/345225 ↗
20. Mavrandonakis A, Froudakis GE, Schnell M, Muhlhauser M (2003) From pure carbon to silicon-carbon nanotubes: an ab initio study. Nano Lett 3(11):1481–1484. doi: 10.1021/nl034325010.1021/nl0343250 ↗
21. Mayer I (1986) Bond orders and valences from abinitio wave-functions. Int J Quantum Chem 29(3):477–483. doi: 10.1002/qua.56029032010.1002/qua.560290320 ↗
22. Menon M, Richter E, Mavrandonakis A, Froudakis G, Andriotis AN (2004) Structure and stability of SiC nanotubes. Phys Rev B 69(11):115322. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.11532210.1103/PhysRevB.69.115322 ↗
23. Moradian R, Behzad S, Chegel R (2008) Ab initio density functional theory investigation of structural and electronic properties of silicon carbide nanotube bundles. Physica B 403(19–20):3623–3626. doi: 10.1016/j.physb.2008.05.04010.1016/j.physb.2008.05.040 ↗
24. Perdew JP, Burke K, Ernzerhof M (1996) Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 77(18):3865–3868. doi: 10.1103/PhyRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
25. Pham-Huu C, Keller N, Ehret G, Ledoux MJ (2001) The first preparation of silicon carbide nanotubes by shape memory synthesis and their catalytic potential. J Catal 200(2):400–410. doi: 10.1006/jcat.2001.321610.1006/jcat.2001.3216 ↗
26. Song XH, Liu S, Yan H, Gan ZY (2009) First-principles study on effects of mechanical deformation on outer surface reactivity of carbon nanotubes. Physica E 41(4):626–630. doi: 10.1016/j.physe.2008.11.00210.1016/j.physe.2008.11.002 ↗
27. Srolovitz D, Maeda K, Vitek V, Egami T (1981) Structural defects in amorphous solids statistical-analysis of a computer-model. Phil Mag A 44(4):847–866. doi: 10.1080/0141861810823955310.1080/01418618108239553 ↗
28. Sun XH, Li CP, Wong WK, Wong NB, Lee CS, Lee ST, Teo BK (2002) Formation of silicon carbide nanotubes and nanowires via reaction of silicon (from disproportionation of silicon monoxide) with carbon nanotubes. J Am Chem Soc 124(48):14464–14471. doi: 10.1021/ja027399710.1021/ja0273997 ↗
29. Terrones M, Terrones H, Banhart F, Charlier JC, Ajayan PM (2000) Coalescence of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Science 288(5469):1226–1229. doi: 10.1126/science.288.5469.122610.1126/science.288.5469.1226 ↗
30. Tombler TW, Zhou CW, Alexseyev L, Kong J, Dai HJ, Lei L, Jayanthi CS, Tang MJ, Wu SY (2000) Reversible electromechanical characteristics of carbon nanotubes under local-probe manipulation. Nature 405(6788):769–772. doi: 10.1038/3501551910.1038/35015519 ↗
31. Wang XQ, Wang BL, Zhao JJ, Wang GH (2008) Structural transitions and electronic properties of the ultrathin sic nanotubes under uniaxial compression. Chem Phys Lett 461(4–6):280–284. doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2008.07.04010.1016/j.cplett.2008.07.040 ↗
32. Wu RQ, Yang M, Lu YH, Feng YP, Huang ZG, Wu QY (2008) Silicon carbide nanotubes as potential gas sensors for CO and HCN detection. J Phys Chem C 112(41):15985–15988. doi: 10.1021/jp804727c10.1021/jp804727c ↗
33. Zhang YH, Meng J, Zhang XQ, Li H, Taft CA (2009) Pressure effects on the structural, electronic, and optical properties of Sin@SWCNTS. Int J Quantum Chem 109(6):1385–1395. doi: 10.1002/qua.2194610.1002/qua.21946 ↗
34. Zhao JX, Ding YH (2008) Silicon carbide nanotubes functionalized by transition metal atoms: a density-functional study. J Phys Chem C 112(7):2558–2564. doi: 10.1021/jp073722m10.1021/jp073722m ↗
35. Zhao JX, Ding YH (2009) Can silicon carbide nanotubes sense carbon dioxide? J Chem Theory Comput 5(4):1099–1105. doi: 10.1021/ct900006910.1021/ct9000069 ↗
36. Zhao MW, Xia YY, Li F, Zhang RQ, Lee ST (2005) Strain energy and electronic structures of silicon carbide nanotubes: density functional calculations. Phys Rev B 71(8):085312. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.08531210.1103/PhysRevB.71.085312 ↗