journal article·2026-04

Ultrasonication-assisted 2D carbon/polymer nanocomposites for the improvement of mechanical and thermal performance in lightweight material applications

Sandeep Kumar Singh

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 28· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Thermal properties of materials · Tribology and Wear Analysis · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (85)

Show source-provided references
1. Salehabadi A, Umar MF, Ahmad A, Ahmad MI, Ismail N, Rafatullah M (2020) Carbon‐based nanocomposites in solid‐state hydrogen storage technology: an overview. Int J Energy Res 44(14):11044–11058. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.567410.1002/er.5674 ↗
2. Singh SK, Singh TJ, Halder S, Khan NI (2025) Investigation of mechanical and thermo‐mechanical properties of dopamine‐functionalized TiO 2 /epoxy nanocomposites. Polym Compos 46(13):12457–12479. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2975510.1002/pc.29755 ↗
3. Chen X et al (2021) MXene/polymer nanocomposites: preparation, properties, and applications. Polym Rev 61(1):80–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583724.2020.172917910.1080/15583724.2020.1729179 ↗
4. Latif Z, Ali M, Lee E-J, Zubair Z, Lee KH (2023) Thermal and mechanical properties of nano-carbon-reinforced polymeric nanocomposites: a review. J Compos Sci 7(10):441. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs710044110.3390/jcs7100441 ↗
5. Singh V, Joung D, Zhai L, Das S, Khondaker SI, Seal S (2011) Graphene based materials: past, present and future. Prog Mater Sci 56(8):1178–1271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.03.00310.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.03.003 ↗
6. Young RJ, Kinloch IA, Gong L, Novoselov KS (2012) The mechanics of graphene nanocomposites: a review. Compos Sci Technol 72(12):1459–1476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.05.00510.1016/j.compscitech.2012.05.005 ↗
7. Kausar A (2019) Polymer/carbon-based quantum dot nanocomposite: forthcoming materials for technical application. J Macromol Sci A 56(4):341–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/10601325.2019.157861410.1080/10601325.2019.1578614 ↗
8. Leau S-A, Lete C, Lupu S (2023) Nanocomposite materials based on metal nanoparticles for the electrochemical sensing of neurotransmitters. Chemosensors 11(3):179. https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors1103017910.3390/chemosensors11030179 ↗
9. Hegde SS et al (2024) A novel and ultrasensitive high-surface porous carbon-based electrochemical biosensor for early detection of dengue virus. Biosens Bioelectron X 20:100525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosx.2024.10052510.1016/j.biosx.2024.100525 ↗
10. Wan Y-J, Gong L-X, Tang L-C, Wu L-B, Jiang J-X (2014) Mechanical properties of epoxy composites filled with silane-functionalized graphene oxide. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 64:79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.04.02310.1016/j.compositesa.2014.04.023 ↗
11. Bao C, Guo Y, Song L, Kan Y, Qian X, Hu Y (2011) In situ preparation of functionalized graphene oxide/epoxy nanocomposites with effective reinforcements. J Mater Chem 21(35):13290. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1jm11434d10.1039/c1jm11434d ↗
12. Khan NI, Halder S, Wang J (2019) Diels-alder based epoxy matrix and interfacial healing of bismaleimide grafted GNP infused hybrid nanocomposites. Polym Test 74:138–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.12.02110.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.12.021 ↗
13. Turkenburg DH, Fischer HR (2015) Diels-alder based, thermo-reversible cross-linked epoxies for use in self-healing composites. Polymer 79:187–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2015.10.03110.1016/j.polymer.2015.10.031 ↗
14. Wu DY, Meure S, Solomon D (2008) Self-healing polymeric materials: a review of recent developments. Prog Polym Sci 33(5):479–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.02.00110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.02.001 ↗
15. Yazdi G, Iakimov T, Yakimova R (2016) Epitaxial graphene on SiC: a review of growth and characterization. Crystals 6(5):53. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst605005310.3390/cryst6050053 ↗
16. Kumar Singh S, Jackson Singh T (2024) Study of mechanical properties and water absorption behavior of TiO2 nanofiller-enhanced glass fiber-reinforced polymer composites: a review. Techno-societal 2022. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 799–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34644-6_8210.1007/978-3-031-34644-6_82 ↗
17. Malaki M, Maleki A, Varma RS (2019) MXenes and ultrasonication. J Mater Chem A 7(18):10843–10857. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TA01850F10.1039/C9TA01850F ↗
18. Abdullah A, Pak A, Abdullah MM, Shahidi A, Malaki M (2014) Study of the behavior of ultrasonic piezo-ceramic actuators by simulations. Electron Mater Lett 10(1):37–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13391-013-3098-y10.1007/s13391-013-3098-y ↗
19. Gallego-Juárez JA, Graff KF (2015) “Introduction to power ultrasonics,.” Power Ultrasonics. Elsevier, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-78242-028-6.00001-610.1016/B978-1-78242-028-6.00001-6 ↗
20. Abdullah A, Malaki M, Baghizadeh E (2012) On the impact of ultrasonic cavitation bubbles. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 226(3):681–694. https://doi.org/10.1177/095440621141476910.1177/0954406211414769 ↗
21. Xu H, Zeiger BW, Suslick KS (2013) Sonochemical synthesis of nanomaterials. Chem Soc Rev 42(7):2555–2567. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CS35282F10.1039/C2CS35282F ↗
22. Gallego-Juarez KFGMLA (2023) Power ultrasonics: applications of high-intensity ultrasound. Electronics and optical materials 35:927–992
23. Kojima Y, Asakura Y, Sugiyama G, Koda S (2010) The effects of acoustic flow and mechanical flow on the sonochemical efficiency in a rectangular sonochemical reactor. Ultrason Sonochem 17(6):978–984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2009.11.02010.1016/j.ultsonch.2009.11.020 ↗
24. Singh SK, Singh LD, Vijay K, Sonker PK, Verma YK (2025) Improved mechanical and tribological performance of GFRP laminate composites with TiO 2 – SiC hybrid fillers in modified epoxy matrix for automotive applications. Polym Compos. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.7042210.1002/pc.70422 ↗
25. Merouani S, Hamdaoui O (2016) The size of active bubbles for the production of hydrogen in sonochemical reaction field. Ultrason Sonochem 32:320–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.03.02610.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.03.026 ↗
26. Suslick KS (1990) Sonochemistry. Science 247(4949):1439–1445. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.247.4949.143910.1126/science.247.4949.1439 ↗
27. Mashtalir O et al (2013) Intercalation and delamination of layered carbides and carbonitrides. Nat Commun 4(1):1716. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms266410.1038/ncomms2664 ↗
28. Xiao X, Wang H, Urbankowski P, Gogotsi Y (2018) Topochemical synthesis of 2D materials. Chem Soc Rev 47(23):8744–8765. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CS00649K10.1039/C8CS00649K ↗
29. Singh SK, Nayak B, Singh TJ, Halder S (2023) Investigating the role of synthesized reduced graphene oxide and graphite micro-fillers on mechanical and fretting wear performance of glass fiber epoxy-based composite. High Perform Polym 35(9):946–962. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954008323119608710.1177/09540083231196087 ↗
30. Verma YK, Singh AK, Singh SK, Dutta S, Paswan MK (2025) Comprehensive analysis of enhanced thermal and mechanical properties in vacuum pressure impregnated (VPI) treated Chimono bamboo fibers through surface treatment with sodium hydroxide and graphene oxide: in-depth characterization and insights into the performance of graphene oxide-based natural hybrid composites. J Wood Chem Technol 45(1):43–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773813.2025.245555810.1080/02773813.2025.2455558 ↗
31. Tripathi SN, Saini P, Gupta D, Choudhary V (2013) Electrical and mechanical properties of PMMA/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites prepared via in situ polymerization. J Mater Sci 48(18):6223–6232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7420-810.1007/s10853-013-7420-8 ↗
32. Salavagione HJ, Martínez G, Gómez MA (2009) Synthesis of poly(vinyl alcohol)/reduced graphite oxide nanocomposites with improved thermal and electrical properties. J Mater Chem 19(28):5027. https://doi.org/10.1039/b904232f10.1039/b904232f ↗
33. Phiri J, Johansson L-S, Gane P, Maloney T (2018) A comparative study of mechanical, thermal and electrical properties of graphene-, graphene oxide- and reduced graphene oxide-doped microfibrillated cellulose nanocomposites. Compos Part B Eng 147:104–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.01810.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.018 ↗
34. Singh SK, Singh TJ, Nayak B, Sonker PK, Singh MA (2024) Analysis of the impact of exfoliated graphene oxide on the mechanical performance and in-plane fracture resistance of epoxy-based nanocomposite. High Perform Polym 36(9–10):487–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954008324127820910.1177/09540083241278209 ↗
35. Singh SK, Singh TJ, Singh LD, Sonker PK, Mazumder B (2024) Experimental study on the impact of hybrid GFRP composites with graphene oxide and silicon carbide fillers on mechanical and wear properties. J Adhes Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2024.243898810.1080/01694243.2024.2438988 ↗
36. Wang X, Xing W, Zhang P, Song L, Yang H, Hu Y (2012) Covalent functionalization of graphene with organosilane and its use as a reinforcement in epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol 72(6):737–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.01.02710.1016/j.compscitech.2012.01.027 ↗
37. Wan YJ, Guan LZ, Gong LX, Yan D, Tang LC, Wu LB, Jiang JX, Lai GQ. (2024) Toward effective and tunable interphases in graphene oxide/epoxy composites by grafting different chain lengths of polyetheramine onto graphene oxide. J Mater Chem A Mater 2:15058.10.1039/C4TA02429J ↗
38. Zhang S et al (2018) Polydopamine functional reduced graphene oxide for enhanced mechanical and electrical properties of waterborne polyurethane nanocomposites. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 15(6):1333–1341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-018-0082-310.1007/s11998-018-0082-3 ↗
39. Kang D, Shin Y, Jo HJ, Ko H, Shin HS (2017) Mechanical properties of poly(dopamine)‐coated graphene oxide and poly(vinyl alcohol) composite fibers coated with reduced graphene oxide and their use for piezoresistive sensing. Particle & Particle Systems Characterization. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppsc.20160038210.1002/ppsc.201600382 ↗
40. Sandhya PK, Sreekala MS, Padmanabhan M, Jesitha K, Thomas S (2019) Effect of starch reduced graphene oxide on thermal and mechanical properties of phenol formaldehyde resin nanocomposites. Compos Part B Eng 167:83–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.00910.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.009 ↗
41. Ucpinar Durmaz B, Ozturk C, Aytac A (2020) Reduced graphene oxide reinforced PET / PBT nanocomposites: compatibilization and characterization. Polym. Eng. Sci. 60(10):2606–2618. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.2549810.1002/pen.25498 ↗
42. Zhang Y, Hu J, Zhu S, Qin T, Ji F (2019) A ‘trampoline’ nanocomposite: tuning the interlayer spacing in graphene oxide/polyurethane to achieve coalesced mechanical and memory properties. Compos Sci Technol 180:14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.04.03310.1016/j.compscitech.2019.04.033 ↗
43. Singh SK, Singh TJ, Halder S, Khan NI, Sonker PK (2025) Improvement of fracture toughness of epoxy nanocomposites through in‐plane crack propagation resistance offered by wet ball‐milled graphene oxide. Polym Adv Technol. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.7046210.1002/pat.70462 ↗
44. Borah LN, Halder S, Choudhury P (2023) Epoxy composites integrated with functionalized wet‐milled graphitic nanoparticles: featuring enhanced mechanical performance and in‐plane fracture resistance. Polym Compos 44(11):7985–7996. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2768110.1002/pc.27681 ↗
45. Khan NI, Halder S, Das S, Goyat MS (2021) Graphitic nanoparticles functionalized with epoxy moiety for enhancing the mechanical performance of hybrid carbon fiber reinforced polymer laminated composites. Polym Compos 42(2):678–692. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2585710.1002/pc.25857 ↗
46. Das S, Halder S, Paul B, Khan NI, Goyat MS (2022) Impact of silanized milled graphite nanoparticles on thermo-mechanical properties of epoxy nanocomposite. Mater Chem Phys 278:125601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.12560110.1016/j.matchemphys.2021.125601 ↗
47. Halder S, Borah LN, Choudhury P (2023) Functionalized milled graphitic nanoparticle for improving in-plane crack propagation resistance to enhance fracture toughness and energy of epoxy nanocomposites. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4399323.10.2139/ssrn.4399323 ↗
48. Lim J-V, Bee S-T, Sin LT, Ratnam CT, Abdul Hamid ZA (2021) A review on the synthesis, properties, and utilities of functionalized carbon nanoparticles for polymer nanocomposites. Polymers (Basel). 13(20):3547. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1320354710.3390/polym13203547 ↗
49. Iijima S (1991) Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 354(6348):56–58. https://doi.org/10.1038/354056a010.1038/354056a0 ↗
50. Tarfaoui M, Lafdi K, El Moumen A (2016) Mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes based polymer composites. Compos Part B Eng 103:113–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.08.01610.1016/j.compositesb.2016.08.016 ↗
51. Esbati AH, Irani S (2018) Effect of functionalized process and CNTs aggregation on fracture mechanism and mechanical properties of polymer nanocomposite. Mech Mater 118:106–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2018.01.00110.1016/j.mechmat.2018.01.001 ↗
52. Mu C et al (2016) Modification of carbon nanotubes by a novel biomimetic approach towards the enhancement of the mechanical properties of polyurethane. Polymer 92:231–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2016.03.08510.1016/j.polymer.2016.03.085 ↗
53. Koliyoor J, Hegde SS, Ismayil, Bhat BR (2025) Exploring the microstructural properties of hydroxypropyl‐methylcellulose‐based solid polymer electrolytes: a promising candidate for flexible electrical double‐layer capacitor. Polym Int 74(11):965–980. https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.70001.10.1002/pi.70001 ↗
54. Ferreira FV et al (2017) Dodecylamine functionalization of carbon nanotubes to improve dispersion, thermal and mechanical properties of polyethylene based nanocomposites. Appl Surf Sci 410:267–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.09810.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.098 ↗
55. Cha J, Jun GH, Park JK, Kim JC, Ryu HJ, Hong SH (2017) Improvement of modulus, strength and fracture toughness of CNT/Epoxy nanocomposites through the functionalization of carbon nanotubes. Compos B Eng 129:169–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.07010.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.070 ↗
56. Deep N, Mishra P (2018) Evaluation of mechanical properties of functionalized carbon nanotube reinforced PMMA polymer nanocomposite. Karbala Int J Mod Sci 4(2):207–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kijoms.2018.02.00110.1016/j.kijoms.2018.02.001 ↗
57. De Bortoli LS, de Farias R, Mezalira DZ, Schabbach LM, Fredel MC (2022) Functionalized carbon nanotubes for 3D-printed PLA-nanocomposites: effects on thermal and mechanical properties. Mater Today Commun 31:103402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10340210.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103402 ↗
58. Yang C-K, Lee Y-R, Hsieh T-H, Chen T-H, Cheng T-C (2018) Mechanical property of multiwall carbon nanotube reinforced polymer composites. Polym Polym Compos 26(1):99–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/09673911180260011210.1177/096739111802600112 ↗
59. Shadlou S, Alishahi E, Ayatollahi MR (2013) Fracture behavior of epoxy nanocomposites reinforced with different carbon nano-reinforcements. Compos Struct 95:577–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.08.00210.1016/j.compstruct.2012.08.002 ↗
60. Vennerberg D, Rueger Z, Kessler MR (2014) Effect of silane structure on the properties of silanized multiwalled carbon nanotube-epoxy nanocomposites. Polymer 55(7):1854–1865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2014.02.01810.1016/j.polymer.2014.02.018 ↗
61. Das S, Halder S, Wang J, Goyat MS, Anil Kumar A, Fang Y (2017) Amending the thermo-mechanical response and mechanical properties of epoxy composites with silanized chopped carbon fibers. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf 102:347–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.07.02610.1016/j.compositesa.2017.07.026 ↗
62. Kumar Singh S, Halder S, Jackson singh T (2024) Synthesis, characterization, and application of hydroxyapatite grafted over pristine charcoal /activated charcoal for removal of pb2+ ions from aqueous solution. Mater Today Proc 106:107–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.07.15010.1016/j.matpr.2023.07.150 ↗
63. Alhabeb M et al (2017) Guidelines for synthesis and processing of two-dimensional titanium carbide (Ti 3 C 2 T x MXene). Chem Mater 29(18):7633–7644. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0284710.1021/acs.chemmater.7b02847 ↗
64. Geng D et al (2017) Direct synthesis of large‐area 2D Mo 2 C on in situ grown graphene. Advanced Materials 29:35. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201700072.10.1002/adma.201700072 ↗
65. Xie Y et al (2014) Role of surface structure on li-ion energy storage capacity of two-dimensional transition-metal carbides. J Am Chem Soc 136(17):6385–6394. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja501520b10.1021/ja501520b ↗
66. Naguib M et al (2011) Two‐dimensional nanocrystals produced by exfoliation of Ti 3 AlC 2. Adv Mater 23(37):4248–4253. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20110230610.1002/adma.201102306 ↗
67. Choi E et al (2022) Enhanced stability of Ti3C2Tx MXene enabled by continuous ZIF-8 coating. Carbon N Y 191:593–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2022.02.03610.1016/j.carbon.2022.02.036 ↗
68. Pramitha A et al (2026) Enhancing the electrochemical performance of manganese oxide thin film electrodes via borax incorporation: experimental and theoretical insights. J Power Sources 668:239306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2026.23930610.1016/j.jpowsour.2026.239306 ↗
69. Malaki M, Varma RS (2020) Mechanotribological aspects of MXene‐reinforced nanocomposites. Adv Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20200315410.1002/adma.202003154 ↗
70. Sliozberg Y, Andzelm J, Hatter CB, Anasori B, Gogotsi Y, Hall A (2020) Interface binding and mechanical properties of MXene-epoxy nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 192:108124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10812410.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108124 ↗
71. Liu L et al (2021) Functionalizing MXene towards highly stretchable, ultratough, fatigue- and fire-resistant polymer nanocomposites. Chem Eng J 424:130338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.13033810.1016/j.cej.2021.130338 ↗
72. Monastyreckis G, Mishnaevsky L, Hatter CB, Aniskevich A, Gogotsi Y, Zeleniakiene D (2020) Micromechanical modeling of MXene-polymer composites. Carbon 162:402–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2020.02.07010.1016/j.carbon.2020.02.070 ↗
73. Shi Y et al (2019) Strengthening, toughing and thermally stable ultra-thin MXene nanosheets/polypropylene nanocomposites via nanoconfinement. Chem Eng J 378:122267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.12226710.1016/j.cej.2019.122267 ↗
74. Shi Y, Liu C, Duan Z, Yu B, Liu M, Song P (2020) Interface engineering of MXene towards super-tough and strong polymer nanocomposites with high ductility and excellent fire safety. Chem Eng J 399:125829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.12582910.1016/j.cej.2020.125829 ↗
75. Ronchi RM, Marchiori CFN, Araujo CM, Arantes JT, Santos SF (2020) Thermoplastic polyurethane – Ti3C2(Tx) MXene nanocomposite: the influence of functional groups upon the matrix–reinforcement interaction. Appl Surf Sci 528:146526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14652610.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146526 ↗
76. Zeng Y et al (2022) Significantly improved dielectric and mechanical performance of Ti3C2Tx MXene/silicone rubber nanocomposites. J Alloys Compd 905:164172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.16417210.1016/j.jallcom.2022.164172 ↗
77. Yan X, Fang J, Gu J, Zhu C, Qi D (2022) Flame retardancy, thermal and mechanical properties of novel intumescent flame retardant/mxene/poly(vinyl alcohol) nanocomposites. Nanomaterials 12(3):477. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1203047710.3390/nano12030477 ↗
78. Das S, Halder S, Islam Khan N (2019) Mechanical properties of oxidized fullerene C60/epoxy nanocomposite. Mater Today Proc 18:655–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.46110.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.461 ↗
79. Das S, Halder S, Kumar K (2016) A comprehensive study on step-wise surface modification of C60: effect of oxidation and silanization on dynamic mechanical and thermal stability of epoxy nanocomposite. Mater Chem Phys 179:120–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2016.04.08510.1016/j.matchemphys.2016.04.085 ↗
80. Das S, Halder S, Sinha A, Imam MA, Khan NI (2018) Assessing nanoscratch behavior of epoxy nanocomposite toughened with silanized fullerene. ACS Appl Nano Mater 1(7):3653–3662. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.8b0076310.1021/acsanm.8b00763 ↗
81. Wei X, Yang X, Ma A, Zhang J, Peng P, Dong J (2021) Fullerene C60/Eucommia ulmoides rubber nanocomposite films with excellent UV-blocking performance for controlling wheat scab fungus. Ind Crops Prod 162:113301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.11330110.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113301 ↗
82. Chen J, Luo K, Zhu J, Yu J, Wang Y, Hu Z (2019) Reversibly cross-linked fullerene/polyamide composites based on Diels-Alder reaction. Compos Sci Technol 176:9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.03.02110.1016/j.compscitech.2019.03.021 ↗
83. Su Y, Ran S, Fang Z, Guo Z (2020) Fullerene-induced crystallization toward improved mechanical properties of solvent casting polycarbonate films. Appl Phys A 126(4):293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-020-03473-x10.1007/s00339-020-03473-x ↗
84. Rajagopalan M, Oh IIllustrate the flow chart representation Illustrate the flow chart representation -K, Palanivel J, Sabarathinam S, Cifuentes-Faura J (2022) Fabrication and characterizations of electro-mechanical actuators based on fullerene-reinforced biocompatible polymer. Sens Actuators A Phys 339:113510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2022.11351010.1016/j.sna.2022.113510 ↗
85. Study of optical, thermal, mechanical and microstructural properties of fullerene/poly (vinylidene fluoride) polymer nanocomposites. Biointerface Res Appl Chem 13(2):121. https://doi.org/10.33263/BRIAC132.121.10.33263/BRIAC132.121 ↗