DataVXJournal of Nanoparticle ResearchPaper
journal article·2026-03

Development of ruthenium(0) nanoparticles supported on natural clinoptilolite zeolite for hydrogen production from methanolysis of ammonia borane

İbrahim Gözeten

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 28· Issue 3
Publisher page
Bibliographic record

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

Nanomaterials

OpenAlex topics: Hydrogen Storage and Materials · Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction · Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (71)

Show source-provided references
1. Nas MS, Calimli MH, Acidereli H, et al (2021) Polymer-based nanomaterials to use in hydrogen acquisition and hydrogen energy storage. Nanomat Hydrog Storage Appl 153–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819476-8.00013-X10.1016/B978-0-12-819476-8.00013-X ↗
2. Ocampo RA, Arias-Velandia J, Lenis JA et al (2025) Microwave-assisted synthesis of MgH2 nanoparticles for hydrogen storage applications. J Nanopart Res 27(2):52. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11051-025-06217-110.1007/S11051-025-06217-1 ↗
3. Kobayashi Y, Matsuda S, Imamura K, Kobayashi H (2017) Hydrogen generation by reaction of Si nanopowder with neutral water. J Nanopart Res 19(5):176. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11051-017-3873-Z10.1007/S11051-017-3873-Z ↗
4. Karatas Y, Yurderi M, Gulcan M et al (2014) Palladium(0) nanoparticles supported on hydroxyapatite nanospheres: active, long-lived, and reusable nanocatalyst for hydrogen generation from the dehydrogenation of aqueous ammonia–borane solution. J Nanopart Res 16(8):2547. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11051-014-2547-310.1007/S11051-014-2547-3 ↗
5. Boldrin A, Hansen SF, Baun A et al (2014) Environmental exposure assessment framework for nanoparticles in solid waste. J Nanopart Res 16(6):2394. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11051-014-2394-210.1007/S11051-014-2394-2 ↗
6. Zhang N, Liu G, Sun Y et al (2021) H2 evolution upon hydrolysis of ammonia-borane catalyzed by porphyrin stabilized nanocatalysts. Catal Lett 151(8):2272–2278. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10562-020-03501-810.1007/S10562-020-03501-8 ↗
7. Bartoli M, Etzi M, Lettieri S et al (2025) Complex waste stream utilization for hydrogen evolution: ammonia borane hydrolysis over red mud catalyst under mild conditions. Catal Lett 155(8):273. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10562-025-05112-710.1007/S10562-025-05112-7 ↗
8. Karatas Y, Acidereli H, Gulcan M, Sen F (2020) A novel highly active and reusable carbon based platinum-ruthenium nanocatalyst for dimethylamine-borane dehydrogenation in water at room conditions. Sci Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41598-020-64046-910.1038/S41598-020-64046-9 ↗
9. Gözeten I, Calimli MH, Nas MS et al (2023) Palladium-loaded on calcined ulexite (Pd(0)@CU) nanoparticles for the catalytic hexavalent chromium reduction. Int J Environ Sci Technol 21:1745–1766. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13762-023-05263-3/METRICS10.1007/S13762-023-05263-3/METRICS ↗
10. Guo J, Ma D, Sun F et al (2022) Substituent engineering in g-C3N4/COF heterojunctions for rapid charge separation and high photo-redox activity. Sci China Chem 65:1704–1709. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11426-022-1350-1/METRICS10.1007/S11426-022-1350-1/METRICS ↗
11. Kamran M, Turzyński M (2024) Exploring hydrogen energy systems: a comprehensive review of technologies, applications, prevailing trends, and associated challenges. J Energy Storage 96:112601. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EST.2024.11260110.1016/J.EST.2024.112601 ↗
12. Rehman S, Kotb KM, Zayed ME et al (2024) Techno-economic evaluation and improved sizing optimization of green hydrogen production and storage under higher wind penetration in Aqaba Gulf. J Energy Storage 99:113368. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EST.2024.11336810.1016/J.EST.2024.113368 ↗
13. Jin C, Liu X, Sun T et al (2021) Preparation and performance improvement of methanol and palm oil/palm kernel oil blended fuel. Fuel Process Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUPROC.2021.10699610.1016/J.FUPROC.2021.106996 ↗
14. Erken E, Yildiz Y, Kilbaş B, Şen F (2016) Synthesis and characterization of nearly monodisperse Pt nanoparticles for C1 to C3 alcohol oxidation and dehydrogenation of dimethylamine-borane (DMAB). J Nanosci Nanotechnol 16:5944–5950. https://doi.org/10.1166/JNN.2016.1168310.1166/JNN.2016.11683 ↗
15. Sahiner N, Seven F (2014) The use of superporous p(AAc (acrylic acid)) cryogels as support for Co and Ni nanoparticle preparation and as reactor in H2 production from sodium borohydride hydrolysis. Energy 71:170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2014.04.03110.1016/J.ENERGY.2014.04.031 ↗
16. Saka C (2022) Facile fabrication of P-doped g-C3N4 particles with nitrogen vacancies for efficient dehydrogenation of sodium borohydride methanolysis. Fuel 313:122688. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUEL.2021.12268810.1016/J.FUEL.2021.122688 ↗
17. Çalişkan S, Zahmakiran M, Özkar S (2010) Zeolite confined rhodium(0) nanoclusters as highly active, reusable, and long-lived catalyst in the methanolysis of ammonia-borane. Appl Catal B 93:387–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APCATB.2009.10.01310.1016/J.APCATB.2009.10.013 ↗
18. İzgi MS, Onat E, Enisoğlu M et al (2026) The effect of trichloroacetic acid molecule-derived carbon quantum dot-doped ru nanoclusters on ammonia borane dehydrogenation: experimental and density functional tight binding model. J Mol Struct 1354:144871. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MOLSTRUC.2025.14487110.1016/J.MOLSTRUC.2025.144871 ↗
19. Onat E, Ekinci S, Izgi MS et al (2026) Sustainable hydrogen production from NaBH4 using Co@CHE catalyst: experimental and MLP-based modeling for autonomous fuel systems. Fuel 406:136999. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUEL.2025.13699910.1016/J.FUEL.2025.136999 ↗
20. İzgi MS, Onat E, Faal S et al (2026) Catalytic dehydrogenation efficiency of carbon quantum supported Ni nanoparticles and synthesized via dimethylformamide (DMF). Int J Hydrogen Energy 198:152801. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2025.15280110.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2025.152801 ↗
21. Ramachandran PV, Gagare PD (2007) Preparation of ammonia borane in high yield and purity, methanolysis, and regeneration. Inorg Chem 46:7810–7817. https://doi.org/10.1021/IC700772A10.1021/IC700772A ↗
22. Onat E, Alan Y, Savcı A et al (2026) Green-synthesized Co@VHE nanocatalyst from Verbascum insulare for enhanced hydrogen generation and biological applications. Biomass Bioenergy 204:108435. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2025.10843510.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2025.108435 ↗
23. Zhan WW, Zhu QL, Xu Q (2016) Dehydrogenation of ammonia borane by metal nanoparticle catalysts. ACS Catal 6:6892–6905. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSCATAL.6B02209/ASSET/IMAGES/MEDIUM/CS-2016-022092_0012.GIF10.1021/ACSCATAL.6B02209/ASSET/IMAGES/MEDIUM/CS-2016-022092_0012.GIF ↗
24. Tunç N, Rakap M (2020) Preparation and characterization of Ni-M (M: Ru, Rh, Pd) nanoclusters as efficient catalysts for hydrogen evolution from ammonia borane methanolysis. Renew Energy 155:1222–1230. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RENENE.2020.04.07910.1016/J.RENENE.2020.04.079 ↗
25. Özhava D, Özkar S (2018) Nanoceria supported rhodium(0) nanoparticles as catalyst for hydrogen generation from methanolysis of ammonia borane. Appl Catal B Environ 237:1012–1020. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APCATB.2018.06.06410.1016/J.APCATB.2018.06.064 ↗
26. Peng S, Liu J, Zhang J, Wang F (2015) An improved preparation of graphene supported ultrafine ruthenium (0) NPs: very active and durable catalysts for H2 generation from methanolysis of ammonia borane. Int J Hydrogen Energy 40:10856–10866. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2015.06.11310.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2015.06.113 ↗
27. Bağuç IB, Yurderi M, Saydan Kanberoğlu G, Bulut A (2020) Hydrotalcite framework stabilized ruthenium nanoparticles Ru/HTaL : efficient heterogeneous catalyst for the methanolysis of ammonia-borane. Turk J Chem 44:364–377. https://doi.org/10.3906/KIM-1910-4410.3906/KIM-1910-44 ↗
28. Yurderi M, Bulut A, Zahmakiran M et al (2014) Ruthenium(0) nanoparticles stabilized by metal-organic framework (ZIF-8): highly efficient catalyst for the dehydrogenation of dimethylamine-borane and transfer hydrogenation of unsaturated hydrocarbons using dimethylamine-borane as hydrogen source. Appl Catal B Environ 160:534–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APCATB.2014.06.00910.1016/J.APCATB.2014.06.009 ↗
29. Xue Y, Zhao J, Huang L et al (2023) Stabilizing ruthenium dioxide with cation-anchored sulfate for durable oxygen evolution in proton-exchange membrane water electrolyzers. Nat Commun 14(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-43977-710.1038/s41467-023-43977-7 ↗
30. Kantürk FA (2019) Improved catalytic performance of metal oxide catalysts fabricated with electrospinning in ammonia borane methanolysis for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 44:28451–28462. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2019.02.01710.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2019.02.017 ↗
31. Amoo KO, Onyeozili EN, Kalu EE et al (2016) Activity of varying compositions of Co–Ni–P catalysts for the methanolysis of ammonia borane. Int J Hydrogen Energy 41:21221–21235. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2016.08.16410.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2016.08.164 ↗
32. Su X, Li S (2021) PVP-stabilized Co–Ni nanoparticles as magnetically recyclable catalysts for hydrogen production from methanolysis of ammonia borane. Int J Hydrogen Energy 46:14384–14394. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2021.01.21710.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2021.01.217 ↗
33. Murathan HB, Özkan G, Akkuş MS et al (2018) Hydrogen production from the methanolysis of ammonia borane by Pd-Co/Al2O3 coated monolithic catalyst. Int J Hydrogen Energy 43:10728–10733. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2018.01.03810.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2018.01.038 ↗
34. Ye H, Mohar J, Wang Q et al (2016) Peroxidase-like properties of Ruthenium nanoframes. Sci Bull 61:1739–1745. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11434-016-1193-910.1007/S11434-016-1193-9 ↗
35. Özhava D, Özkar S (2016) Rhodium(0) nanoparticles supported on nanosilica: highly active and long lived catalyst in hydrogen generation from the methanolysis of ammonia borane. Appl Catal B Environ 181:716–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APCATB.2015.08.03810.1016/J.APCATB.2015.08.038 ↗
36. Özhava D, Özkar S (2015) Rhodium(0) nanoparticles supported on hydroxyapatite nanospheres and further stabilized by dihydrogen phosphate ion: a highly active catalyst in hydrogen generation from the methanolysis of ammonia borane. Int J Hydrogen Energy 40:10491–10501. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2015.06.14410.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2015.06.144 ↗
37. Xu D, Dai P, Liu X et al (2008) Carbon-supported cobalt catalyst for hydrogen generation from alkaline sodium borohydride solution. J Power Sources 182:616–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JPOWSOUR.2008.04.01810.1016/J.JPOWSOUR.2008.04.018 ↗
38. Li X, Fan G, Zeng C (2014) Synthesis of ruthenium nanoparticles deposited on graphene-like transition metal carbide as an effective catalyst for the hydrolysis of sodium borohydride. Int J Hydrogen Energy 39:14927–14934. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2014.07.02910.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2014.07.029 ↗
39. Saha S, Basak V, Dasgupta A et al (2014) Graphene supported bimetallic G–Co–Pt nanohybrid catalyst for enhanced and cost effective hydrogen generation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 39:11566–11577. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2014.05.13110.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2014.05.131 ↗
40. Sahiner N, Sengel SB (2017) Environmentally benign halloysite clay nanotubes as alternative catalyst to metal nanoparticles in H2 production from methanolysis of sodium borohydride. Fuel Process Technol 158:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUPROC.2016.12.00910.1016/J.FUPROC.2016.12.009 ↗
41. Dai H, Kang XD, Wang P (2010) Ruthenium nanoparticles immobilized in montmorillonite used as catalyst for methanolysis of ammonia borane. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35:10317–10323. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2010.07.16410.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2010.07.164 ↗
42. Khalily MA, Yurderi M, Haider A et al (2018) Atomic layer deposition of ruthenium nanoparticles on electrospun carbon nanofibers: a highly efficient nanocatalyst for the hydrolytic dehydrogenation of methylamine borane. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:26162–26169. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSAMI.8B0482210.1021/ACSAMI.8B04822 ↗
43. Vinokurov V, Stavitskaya A, Glotov A et al (2018) Halloysite nanotube-based cobalt mesocatalysts for hydrogen production from sodium borohydride. J Solid State Chem 268:182–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSSC.2018.08.04210.1016/J.JSSC.2018.08.042 ↗
44. Kurudirek MM, Özdemir Y, Türkmen I, Levet A (2010) A study of chemical composition and radiation attenuation properties in clinoptilolite-rich natural zeolite from Turkey. Radiat Phys Chem 79:1120–1126. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RADPHYSCHEM.2010.06.00310.1016/J.RADPHYSCHEM.2010.06.003 ↗
45. Mishra DK, Dabbawala AA, Hwang JS (2013) Ruthenium nanoparticles supported on zeolite Y as an efficient catalyst for selective hydrogenation of xylose to xylitol. J Mol Catal A Chem 376:63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MOLCATA.2013.04.01110.1016/J.MOLCATA.2013.04.011 ↗
46. Yilmaz S, Ucar S, Artok L, Gulec H (2005) The kinetics of citral hydrogenation over Pd supported on clinoptilolite rich natural zeolite. Appl Catal A Gen 287:261–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APCATA.2005.04.00210.1016/J.APCATA.2005.04.002 ↗
47. Coughlan B, Narayanan S, McCann WA, Carroll WM (1977) Ruthenium zeolite catalysts: a characterization by gas adsorption, thermogravimetry and catalytic activity for the hydrogenation of benzene. J Catal 49:97–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9517(77)90242-110.1016/0021-9517(77)90242-1 ↗
48. Alver BE, Sakizci M, Yörükoǧullari E (2010) Investigation of clinoptilolite rich natural zeolites from Turkey: a combined XRF, TG/DTG, DTA and DSC study. J Therm Anal Calorim 100:19–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10973-009-0118-010.1007/S10973-009-0118-0 ↗
49. Gözeten İ, Tunç M (2022) Palladium nanoparticles supported on aluminum oxide (Al2O3) for the catalytic hexavalent chromium reduction. J Nanopart Res 24(1):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11051-021-05389-W10.1007/S11051-021-05389-W ↗
50. GÖzeten İ, Tunç M (2022) Palladium nanoparticles supported on multı-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) for the catalytic hexavalent chromium reduction. Mater Chem Phys 278:125628. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATCHEMPHYS.2021.12562810.1016/J.MATCHEMPHYS.2021.125628 ↗
51. Gözeten İ, Tunç M (2022) Palladium nanoparticles supported on activated carbon (C) for the catalytic hexavalent chromium reduction. Water Air Soil Pollut. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11270-021-05479-410.1007/S11270-021-05479-4 ↗
52. Durak H, Gulcan M, Zahmakiran M et al (2014) Hydroxyapatite-nanosphere supported ruthenium(0) nanoparticle catalyst for hydrogen generation from ammonia-borane solution: kinetic studies for nanoparticle formation and hydrogen evolution. RSC Adv 4:28947–28955. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA03213F10.1039/C4RA03213F ↗
53. Akbayrak S, Erdek P, Özkar S (2013) Hydroxyapatite supported ruthenium(0) nanoparticles catalyst in hydrolytic dehydrogenation of ammonia borane: insight to the nanoparticles formation and hydrogen evolution kinetics. Appl Catal B Environ 142–143:187–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APCATB.2013.05.01510.1016/J.APCATB.2013.05.015 ↗
54. Cheng LY, Qin LL, Liu FJ et al (2024) Electrochemiluminescent (ECL) aptasensor for lysozyme using a graphene quantum dot (GQD)-ruthenium bipyridine-silica nanocomposite. Anal Lett. https://doi.org/10.1080/00032719.2024.235852810.1080/00032719.2024.2358528 ↗
55. Wu D, Tan L, Ma C et al (2022) Competitive self-assembly interaction between ferrocenyl units and amino acids for entry into the cavity of β-cyclodextrin for chiral electroanalysis. Anal Chem 94:6050–6056. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.ANALCHEM.2C0077710.1021/ACS.ANALCHEM.2C00777 ↗
56. Ruíz-Baltazar A, Esparza R, Gonzalez M et al (2015) Preparation and characterization of natural zeolite modified with iron nanoparticles. J Nanomater. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/36476310.1155/2015/364763 ↗
57. Shameli K, Ahmad MB, Zargar M et al (2011) Synthesis of silver nanoparticles in montmorillonite and their antibacterial behavior. Int J Nanomedicine 6:581–590. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S1711210.2147/IJN.S17112 ↗
58. Mansouri N, Rikhtegar N, Ahmad Panahi H et al (2013) Porosity, characterization and structural properties of natural zeolite - clinoptilolite - as a sorbent. Environ Prot Eng 39:139–152. https://doi.org/10.5277/EPE13011110.5277/EPE130111 ↗
59. Vinodh R, Deviprasath C, Muralee Gopi CVV et al (2020) Novel 13X zeolite/PANI electrocatalyst for hydrogen and oxygen evolution reaction. Int J Hydrogen Energy 45:28337–28349. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2020.07.19410.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2020.07.194 ↗
60. Gözeten İ, Karakaş K, Karataş Y et al (2023) The catalytic activity of halloysite-supported Ru nanoparticles in the methanolysis of sodium borohydride for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 48:35838–35849. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2023.05.29710.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2023.05.297 ↗
61. Cheng H, Lin W, Li X et al (2014) Selective hydrogenation of m-dinitrobenzene to m-nitroaniline over Ru-SnOx/Al2O3 catalyst. Catalysts 4:276–288. https://doi.org/10.3390/CATAL403027610.3390/CATAL4030276 ↗
62. Karatas Y, Gülcan M, Sen F (2019) Catalytic methanolysis and hydrolysis of hydrazine-borane with monodisperse Ru NPs@nano-CeO2 catalyst for hydrogen generation at room temperature. Int J Hydrogen Energy 44:13432–13442. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2019.04.01210.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2019.04.012 ↗
63. Balcerzak J, Redzynia W, Tyczkowski J (2017) In-situ XPS analysis of oxidized and reduced plasma deposited ruthenium-based thin catalytic films. Appl Surf Sci 426:852–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APSUSC.2017.07.24810.1016/J.APSUSC.2017.07.248 ↗
64. Chen X, Wang X, Fang D (2020) A review on C1s XPS-spectra for some kinds of carbon materials. Fullerenes Nanotubes Carbon Nanostruct. https://doi.org/10.1080/1536383X.2020.179485110.1080/1536383X.2020.1794851 ↗
65. Miao S, Liu Z, Han B et al (2006) Ru nanoparticles immobilized on montmorillonite by ionic liquids: a highly efficient heterogeneous catalyst for the hydrogenation of benzene. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 45:266–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/ANIE.20050263210.1002/ANIE.200502632 ↗
66. Gözeten İ (2025) Volcanic ash-supported ruthenium nanoparticles as effective catalysts for hydrogen production from ammonia borane methanolysis. J Indian Chem Soc 102:101714. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JICS.2025.10171410.1016/J.JICS.2025.101714 ↗
67. Sun D, Mazumder V, Metin Ö, Sun S (2012) Methanolysis of ammonia borane by Copd nanoparticles. ACS Catal 2:1290–1295. https://doi.org/10.1021/CS300211Y10.1021/CS300211Y ↗
68. Erdoǧan H, Metin Ö, Özkar S (2009) In situ-generated PVP-stabilized palladium(0) nanocluster catalyst in hydrogen generation from the methanolysis of ammonia-borane. Phys Chem Chem Phys 11:10519–10525. https://doi.org/10.1039/B916459F10.1039/B916459F ↗
69. Kalidindi SB, Vernekar AA, Jagirdar BR (2009) Co–Co2B, Ni–Ni3B and Co–Ni–B nanocomposites catalyzed ammonia–borane methanolysis for hydrogen generation. Phys Chem Chem Phys 11:770–775. https://doi.org/10.1039/B814216E10.1039/B814216E ↗
70. Feng Y, Li Y, Liao Q et al (2023) Modulation the electronic structure of hollow structured CuO-NiCo2O4 nanosphere for enhanced catalytic activity towards methanolysis of ammonia borane. Fuel 332:126045. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUEL.2022.12604510.1016/J.FUEL.2022.126045 ↗
71. Chen QQ, Li Q, Hou CC et al (2019) Enhancing electrostatic interactions to activate polar molecules: ammonia borane methanolysis on a Cu/Co(OH)2 nanohybrid. Catal Sci Technol 9:2828–2835. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CY00584F10.1039/C9CY00584F ↗