Quantum studies of the interaction of nanostructured graphene with polymethyl methacrylate for dental applications
Source abstract
Abstract
In the most recent literature, it has been reported that the properties of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) for dental and biomedical applications are substantially improved by embedding graphene. However, there are few theoretical and atomistic simulation works reported in scientific journals that support clinical and experimental research on the subject. In this work, a theoretical process based on methods of the density functional theory (DFT) is presented to study at the quantum level the interaction of PMMA with graphene sheets. Specifically, an atomic model will be obtained, in its most stable state, of the polymethyl methacrylate-graphene (PG) compound to later determine its most active or maximum reactivity points and zones. In future perspectives, we will use the model and the results obtained in this work to carry out studies at the quantum, atomic, and molecular levels of the interaction of the PG compound with the cells of the buccal gums in order to find durability, biocompatibility, hardness, and antibacterial activity of the PG structure embedded in the buccal gum cell.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · Graphene research and applications · Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. El Bahra S, Ludwig K, Samran A, Freitag-Wolf S, Kern M (2013) Linear and volumetric dimensional changes of injection-molded PMMA denture base resins. Dent Mater 29:1091–1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.07.02010.1016/j.dental.2013.07.020 ↗
2. Wen J, Jiang F, Yeh CK, Sun Y (2016) Controlling fungal biofilms with functional drug delivery denture biomaterials. Colloids Surf B 140:19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.12.02810.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.12.028 ↗
3. Cuijpers VMI, Jaroszewicz J, Anil S, Aldosari AAF, Walboomers XF, Jansen JA (2014) Resolution, sensitivity, and in vivo application of high-resolution computed tomography for titanium-coated polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 25(3):359–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.1212810.1111/clr.12128 ↗
4. Shahmohammadi M, Pensa E, Bhatia H, Yang B, Jursich G, Takoudis CG (2020) Enhancing the surface properties and functionalization of polymethyl methacrylate with atomic layer-deposited titanium(IV) oxide. J Mater Sci 55:17151–17169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-020-05274-210.1007/s10853-020-05274-2 ↗
5. Kaur H, Thakur A (2022) Applications of poly (methyl methacrylate) polymer in dentistry: a review. Mater Today: Proc 50(5):1619–1625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.12510.1016/j.matpr.2021.09.125 ↗
6. Matteis V, Cascione M, Toma CC, Albanese G, Giorgi ML, Corsalini M, Rinaldi R (2019) Silver nanoparticles addition in poly(methyl methacrylate) dental matrix: topographic and antimycotic studies. Int J Mol Sci 20(19):4691. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms2019469110.3390/ijms20194691 ↗
7. Agarwalla SV, Malhotra R, Rosa V (2019) Translucency, hardness and strength parameters of PMMA resin containing graphene-like material for CAD/CAM restorations. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater 100(3):103388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.10338810.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103388 ↗
8. Astudillo-Rubio D, Delgado-Gaete A, Bellot-Arcís C, Montiel-Company JM, Pascual-Moscardó A, Almerich-Silla JM (2018) Mechanical properties of provisional dental materials: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plos One 13(2):e0193162. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.019626410.1371/journal.pone.0196264 ↗
9. Kim SH, Watts DC (2004) Effect of glass-fiber reinforcement and water storage on fracture toughness (KIC) of polymer-based provisional crown and FPD materials. Int J Prosthodont 17(3):318–322
10. Faruq O, Sarkar K, Lee BT (2023) Physicochemical property and cytocompatibility of HyA-PEG loaded PMMA based bone cement. Mat. Chem. Phys 295:127142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.12714210.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.127142 ↗
11. Wiegand A, Stucki L, Hoffmann R, Attin T, Stawarczyk B (2015) Repairability of CAD/CAM high-density PMMA- and composite-based polymers. Clin Oral Investig 19:2007–2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1411-x10.1007/s00784-015-1411-x ↗
12. Matsuo H, Suenaga H, Takahashi M, Suzuki O, Sasaki K, Takahashi N (2015) Deterioration of polymethyl methacrylate dentures in the oral cavity. Dent Mater J 34(2):234–239. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2014-08910.4012/dmj.2014-089 ↗
13. Jung-Hwan L, Jeong-Ki J, Dong-Ae K, Kapil Dev P, Hae-Won K, Hae-Hyoung L (2018) Nano-graphene oxide incorporated into PMMA resin to prevent microbial adhesion. Dent Mater 34(4):e63–e72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.01.01910.1016/j.dental.2018.01.019 ↗
14. Wang R, Tao J, Yu B, Dai L (2014) Characterization of multiwalled carbon nanotube-polymethyl methacrylate composite resins as denture base materials. J Prosthet Dent 111(4):318–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.07.01710.1016/j.prosdent.2013.07.017 ↗
15. Díez-Pascual AM (2022) PMMA-based nanocomposites for odontology applications: a state-of-the-art. Int J Mol Sci 23(18):10288. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23181028810.3390/ijms231810288 ↗
16. Soleymani Eil Bakhtiari S, Bakhsheshi-Rad HR, Karbasi S, Tavakoli M, Razzaghi M, Ismail AF, Ramakrishna S, Berto F (2020) Polymethyl methacrylate-based bone cements containing carbon nanotubes and graphene oxide: an overview of physical, mechanical, and biological properties. Polymers 12:1469. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1207146910.3390/polym12071469 ↗
17. Yang K, Feng L, Hong H, Cai W, Liu Z (2013) Preparation and functionalization of graphene nanocomposites for biomedical applications. Nat Protoc 8(12):2392–2403. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2013.14610.1038/nprot.2013.146 ↗
18. Sabouhi M, Amini-Pozveh M, Bajoghli F, Dastjerd HR, Mohammadi R (2022) Synthesis and characterization of antifungal nanocomposite AgSiO2 polymethyl methacrylate. Eur J Dent 16(1):109–114. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-173183110.1055/s-0041-1731831 ↗
19. de Oliveira Limírio JPJ, de Luna Gomes JM, Alves Rezende MCR, AraújoLemos CA, Daltron Rosa CD, del R, PizaPellizzer E, (2022) Mechanical properties of polymethyl methacrylate as a denture base: conventional versus CAD-CAM resin - a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. J Prosthet Dent 128(6):1221–1229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.03.01810.1016/j.prosdent.2021.03.018 ↗
20. Jastrzębska AM, Kurtycz P, Olszyna AR (2012) Recent advances in graphene family materials toxicity investigations. J Nanopart Res 14(12):1320–1340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-012-1320-810.1007/s11051-012-1320-8 ↗
21. Guazzo R, Gardin C, Bellin G, Sbricoli L, Ferroni L, SaverioLudovichetti F, Piattelli A, Antoniac I, Bressan E, Zavan B (2018) Graphene-based nanomaterials for tissue engineering in the dental field. Nanomaterials 8(5):349. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano805034910.3390/nano8050349 ↗
22. Cordeiro MM, Dong Z, Kaneko T, Zhang Z, Miyazawa M, Shi S, Smith AJ, Nör JE (2008) Dental pulp tissue engineering with stem cells from exfoliated deciduous teeth. J Endod 34(8):962–969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.04.00910.1016/j.joen.2008.04.009 ↗
23. Ohlsson E, Galler KM, Widbiller M (2022) A compilation of study models for dental pulp regeneration. Int J Mol Sci 23(22):14361. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23221436110.3390/ijms232214361 ↗
24. Frazer RQ, Byron RT, Osborne PB, West KP (2015) PMMA: an essential material in medicine and dentistry. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 15(6):629–639. https://doi.org/10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.v15.i6.6010.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.v15.i6.60 ↗
25. Gad MM, Fouda SM, Al-Harbi FA, Näpänkangas R (2017) Raustia A (2017) PMMA denture base material enhancement: a review of fiber, filler, and nanofiller addition. Int J Nanomedicine 12:3801–3812. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S13072210.2147/IJN.S130722 ↗
26. Kenry, Lee WC, Loh KP, Lim CT (2018) When stem cells meet graphene: opportunities and challenges in regenerative medicine. Biomaterial 155:236–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.10.00410.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.10.004 ↗
27. Zhang Y, Ali SF, Dervishi E, Xu Y, Li Z, Casciano D, Biris AS (2010) Cytotoxicity effects of graphene and single-wall carbon nanotubes in neural phaeochromocytoma-derived PC12 cells. ACS Nano 4(6):3181–3186. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn100717610.1021/nn1007176 ↗
28. Sasidharan A, Panchakarla LS, Chandran P, Menon D, Nair S, Rao CNR, Koyakutty M (2011) Differential nano-bio interactions and toxicity effects of pristine versus functionalized graphene. Nanoscale 3(6):2461–2464. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1nr10172b10.1039/c1nr10172b ↗
29. Bai J, Zhong X, Jiang S, Huang Y, Duan X (2010) Graphene nanomesh. Nat Nanotechnol 5(3):190–194. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2010.810.1038/nnano.2010.8 ↗
30. Singh R, Ullah S, Rao N, Singh M, Patra I, Darko DA, Issac CPJ, Esmaeilzadeh-Salestani K, Kanaoujiya R, Vijayan, (2022) Synthesis of three-dimensional reduced-graphene oxide from graphene oxide. J Nanomater 8731429:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/873142910.1155/2022/8731429 ↗
31. Perdew JP, Wang Y (1992) Accurate and simple analytic representation of the electron-gas correlation energy". Phys Rev, B Condens Matter 45(23):13244–13249. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.45.1324410.1103/physrevb.45.13244 ↗
32. Eichinger BE, Rigby DR, Muir MH (1995) Computational chemistry applied to materials design-contact lenses. Comp Polym Sci 5(4):147–163
33. Frenking G, Shaik S (2014) The chemical bond. Chemical bonding across the periodic table. Edited by. Wiley- VCH, Darmstadt Germany. ISBN 978–3–527–33315–8
34. Parr RG, Yang W (1994) Density-functional theory of atoms and molecules, Oxford University Press, New Clarendon Press, Oxford, Printed in USA. ISBN 0–19–504279–4
35. Pearson RG (2005) Chemical Hardness: Applications from Molecules to Solids, Wiley-VCH, Printed in USA. ISBN 13: 978–3–527–29482–4, 978–3–527–60617–7
36. Chattaraj PK, Girim S (2009) Electrophilicity index within a conceptual DFT framework. Annu Rep Sect C: Phys Chem 105:13–39. https://doi.org/10.1039/B802832J10.1039/B802832J ↗
37. Allison TC, Tong YYJ (2013) Application of the condensed Fukui function to predict reactivity in core–shell transition metal nanoparticles. Electrochim Acta 101:334–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2012.12.07210.1016/j.electacta.2012.12.072 ↗
38. Castro-Neto AH, Guinea F, Peres NMR, Novoselov KS, Geim AK (2009) The electronic properties of graphene. Rev Mod Phys 81(1):109–162. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.10910.1103/RevModPhys.81.109 ↗
39. Gao H, Liu Z (2017) DFT study of NO adsorption on pristine graphene. RSC Adv 7:13082–13091. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA27137E10.1039/C6RA27137E ↗
40. Dejpasand MT, Saievar-Iranizad E, Bayat A, Montaghemi A, Ardekani SR (2020) Tuning HOMO and LUMO of three region (UV, Vis and IR) photoluminescent nitrogen doped graphene quantum dots for photodegradation of methylene blue. Mat. Res. Bull 128:110886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2020.11088610.1016/j.materresbull.2020.110886 ↗
41. Seenithurai S, Pandyan RK, Kumar SV, Mahendran M (2013) Electronic properties of boron and nitrogen doped graphene. Nano Hybrids 5:65–83. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/NH.5.6510.4028/www.scientific.net/NH.5.65 ↗
42. Bregnocchi A, Zanni E, Uccelletti D, Marra F, Cavallini D, De Angelis F, de Bellis G, Bossù M, Ierardo G, Polimeni A, Sarto MS (2017) Graphene-based dental adhesive with anti-biofilm activity. J Nanobiotechnology 15(1):89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-017-0322-110.1186/s12951-017-0322-1 ↗
43. Zanni E, Chandraiahgari CR, De Bellis G, Montereali MR, Armiento G, Ballirano P, Polimeni A, Sarto MS, Uccelletti D (2016) Zinc oxide nanorods-decorated graphene nanoplatelets: a promising antimicrobial agent against the cariogenic bacterium Streptococcus mutans. Nanomaterials 6(10):179. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano610017910.3390/nano6100179 ↗
44. Pinto AM, Gonçalves IC, Magalhães FD (2013) Graphene-based materials biocompatibility: a review. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 111:188–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.05.02210.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.05.022 ↗