Photoelectrochemical properties of Cu2O/CuO microstructure grown on cu foil using dielectric barrier discharge plasmas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · ZnO doping and properties · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (65)
Show source-provided references
1. Yao H, Wang X, Li K, Cheng L, Zhang C, Zhou J, Cao Z, Wang H, Meng G, Huang M, Jiang H (2022) Strong electronic coupling between ruthenium single atoms and ultrafine nanoclusters enables economical and effective hydrogen production. Appl Catal B Environ 12137810.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121378 ↗
2. Peter L (2021) Fundamental aspects of photoelectrochemical water splitting at semiconductor electrodes. Curr Opin Green Sustain Chem 31:10050510.1016/j.cogsc.2021.100505 ↗
3. Srivastava R, Chattopadhyay J, Santos DM (2023) Solar-Driven Green Hydrogen Generation and Storage, 1st edn. Elsevier, pp 103–128
4. Khalid M, Walvekar R, Vaka M (2023) Solar Energy Harvesting, Conversion, and Storage: Materials, Technologies, and Applications, 1st edn. Elsevier
5. Reedijk J, Kenneth R (2023) Poeppelmeier, Comprehensive Inorganic Chemistry III, Third edn. Elsevier, pp 594–627
6. Mohapatra S, Nguyen TA, Nguyen-Tri P (2019) Noble Metal-Metal Oxide Hybrid Nanoparticles: Fundamentals and Applications Micro and Nano Technologies, 1st edn. Woodhead Publishing, pp 585–606
7. Chen S, Huang D, Xu P, Xue W, Lei L, Cheng M, Wang R, Liu X, Deng R (2020) Semiconductor-based photocatalysts for photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical water splitting: will we stop with photocorrosion. J Mater Chem A 8:2322
8. Li Z, Luo W, Zhang M, Feng J, Zou Z (2013) Photoelectrochemical cells for solar hydrogen production: current state of promising photoelectrodes, methods to improve their properties, and outlook. Energy Environ Sci 6:37010.1039/C2EE22618A ↗
9. Clarizia L, Nadagouda MN, Dionysiou DD (2023) Recent advances and challenges of photoelectrochemical cells for hydrogen production. Curr Opin Green Sustain Chem 41:10082510.1016/j.cogsc.2023.100825 ↗
10. Karaca AE, Dincer I (2023) Design and experimental investigation of a new photoelectrochemical reactor for green hydrogen production. Chem Eng Sci 265:11818110.1016/j.ces.2022.118181 ↗
11. Fujishima A, Honda K (1972) Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature 238:37–3810.1038/238037a0 ↗
12. Sur S, Mondal R (2023) Musthafa Ottakam Thotiyl, OH- /H+ dual-ion energy assisted electricity effective photoelectrochemical water splitting. J Photochem Photobiol 16:10019010.1016/j.jpap.2023.100190 ↗
13. Harb M, Cavallo L (2018) Toward the design of new suitable materials for solar water splitting using density functional theory. ACS Omega 3:1812310.1021/acsomega.8b02884 ↗
14. Li H, Guo C, Xiong Y, Yang Y (2020) Electric field induced band modulation of WS2-GeC heterostructures for efficient photocatalytic water splitting: A density functional theory study. Mater Chem Phys 244:12273210.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.122732 ↗
15. Jiang C, Moniz SJ, Wang A, Zhang T, Tang J (2017) Photoelectrochemical devices for solar water splitting e materials and challenges. Chem Soc Rev 46:4466010.1039/C6CS00306K ↗
16. Zhou T, Zang Z, Wei J, Zheng J, Hao J, Ling F, Tang X, Liang F, Zhou M (2018) Efficient charge carrier separation and excellent visible light photoresponse in Cu2O nanowires. Nano Energy 50:118–12510.1016/j.nanoen.2018.05.028 ↗
17. John S (2019) Samba Siva Vadla, Somnath C. Roy, High photoelectrochemical activity of CuO nanoflakes grown on Cu foil. Electrochim Acta 319:390–39910.1016/j.electacta.2019.07.008 ↗
18. Sabry RS, Alkareem RA (2018) Synthesis of ZnO-CuO flower-like hetero-nanostructures as volatile organic compounds (VOCs) sensor at room temperature. Mater Science-Poland 36:452–45910.2478/msp-2018-0055 ↗
19. Shen L, Mo Q-L, Yang X, Xiao F-X (2023) Maneuvering cuprous oxide-based photocathodes for solar-to-fuel conversion. Coord Chem Rev 477:21494810.1016/j.ccr.2022.214948 ↗
20. Toe CY, Scott J, Amal R, Ng YH (2019) Recent advances in suppressing the photocorrosion of cuprous oxide for photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical energy conversion. J Photochem Photobiol C: Photochem 40:191–21110.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2018.10.001 ↗
21. Masudy-Panah S, Siavash Moakhar R, Chua CS, Tan HR, Wong TI, Chi D, Dalapati GK (2016) Nanocrystal Engineering of Sputter-Grown CuO Photocathode for Visible-Light-Driven Electrochemical Water Splitting. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:1206–121310.1021/acsami.5b09613 ↗
22. Rajendran K, Pandurangan N, Vinod CP, Khan TS, Gupta S, Haider MA, Jagadeesan D (2021) CuO as a reactive and reusable reagent for the hydrogenation of nitroarenes. Appl Catal B Environ 297:12041710.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120417 ↗
23. Yin TH, Liu BJ, Lin YW, Li YS, Lai CW, Lan YP, Choi C, Chang HC, Choi Y (2022) Electrodeposition of Copper Oxides as Cost-Effective Heterojunction Photoelectrode Materials for Solar Water Splitting. Coatings 12:183910.3390/coatings12121839 ↗
24. Paracchino A, Laporte V, Sivula K, Grätzel M, Thimsen E (2011) Highly active oxide photocathode for photoelectrochemical water reduction. Nat Mater 10:456–46110.1038/nmat3017 ↗
25. Chen S, Liu T, Zheng Z, Ishaq M, Liang G, Fana P, Chen T, Tang J (2022) Recent progress and perspectives on Sb2Se3-based photocathodes for solar hydrogen production via photoelectrochemical water splitting. J Energy Chem 67:508–52310.1016/j.jechem.2021.08.062 ↗
26. Dong C, Liu Z, Guo Z, Yan W, Ruan M (2020) Decorating Cu2O photocathode with noble-metal-free Al and NiS cocatalysts for efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting by light harvesting management and charge separation design. Chem Eng J 381:12265510.1016/j.cej.2019.122655 ↗
27. Dalapati GK, Masudy‐Panah S, Moakhar RS, Chakrabortty S, Ghosh S, Kushwaha A, Katal R, Chua CS, Xiao G, Tripathy S, Ramakrishna S (2020) Nanoengineered advanced materials for enabling hydrogen economy: functionalized grapheneincorporated cupric oxide catalyst for efficient solar hydrogen production. Global Chall 4:190008710.1002/gch2.201900087 ↗
28. Jeong D, Jo W, Jeong J, Kim T, Han S, Son M-K, Jung H (2022) Characterization of Cu2O/CuO heterostructure photocathode by tailoring CuO thickness for photoelectrochemical water splitting. RSC Adv 12:2632–264010.1039/D1RA08863G ↗
29. Zhang S, Cao X-B, Wu J, Zhu L-W, Li G (2016) Preparation of hierarchical CuO@TiO2 nanowire film and its application in photoelectrochemical water splitting. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc 26:2094–210110.1016/S1003-6326(16)64324-8 ↗
30. Tawfik WZ, Hassan MA, Johar MA, Ryu SW, Lee JK (2019) Highly conversion efficiency of solar water splitting over p-Cu2O/ZnO photocatalyst grown on a metallic substrate. J Catal 374:276–28310.1016/j.jcat.2019.04.045 ↗
31. Ha J-w, Ryu H, Lee W-J, Bae J-S (2017) Efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting using CuO nanorod/Al2O3 heterostructure photoelectrodes with different Al layer thicknesses. Phys B: Condens 519:95–10110.1016/j.physb.2017.05.052 ↗
32. Ghorbani M, Nazar ARS, Farhadian M, Tangestaninejad S (2023) Efficient tetracycline degradation and electricity production in photocatalytic fuel cell based on ZnO nanorod/BiOBr/UiO-66-NH2 photoanode and Cu2O/CuO photocathode. Energy 272:12711410.1016/j.energy.2023.127114 ↗
33. Peddada LM, Cho PP, Dulgaj S, Annapragada R, Kanuparthy PR (2023) Facile synthesis of green engineered CuO/Cu2O-C nano heterostructures with the controlled Cu2O content for the photodegradation of crystal violet. Results Opt 13:10053710.1016/j.rio.2023.100537 ↗
34. Park K-W, Kolpak AM (2019) Optimal methodology for explicit solvation prediction of band edges of transition metal oxide photocatalysts. Commun Chem 79:1–10
35. Welegergs GG, Mehabaw ZM, Gebretinsae HG, Tsegay MG, Kotsedi L, Khumalo Z, Matinisie N, Aytuna ZT, Mathur S, Nuru ZY, Dube S (2023) Electrodeposition of nanostructured copper oxide (CuO) coatings as spectrally solar selective absorber: Structural, optical and electrical properties. Infrared Phys Technol 133:10482010.1016/j.infrared.2023.104820 ↗
36. Dai D, Huang P-Y, Wu T-Y, Shih C-H, Chang L (2023) Epitaxial electrodeposition of Cu2O on Ag substrates in sulfate baths. J Cryst Growth 603:12698310.1016/j.jcrysgro.2022.126983 ↗
37. Lakshmanan A, Alex ZC, S.R. (2022) Meher, Cu2O thin films grown by magnetron sputtering as solar cell absorber layers. Mater Sci Semicond Process 148:10681810.1016/j.mssp.2022.106818 ↗
38. Zhang J, Xiang G, Liu Y, Zhang J, Peng W, Zhou Y, Yue Z, Zhang X, Song C, Jin Y, Wang P, Wang H, Yang Z (2023) Preparation of CuO films at different sputtering powers and the effect of operating temperatures on the photovoltaic characteristics of p-CuO/n-Si heterojunction. Vacuum 209:11176910.1016/j.vacuum.2022.111769 ↗
39. Jeong SH, Aydil ES (2009) Heteroepitaxial growth of Cu2O thin film on ZnO by metal organic chemical vapor deposition. J Cryst Growth 311:4188–419210.1016/j.jcrysgro.2009.07.020 ↗
40. Chua D, Kim SB, Li K, Gordon R (2019) Low Temperature Chemical Vapor Deposition of Cuprous Oxide Thin Films Using a Copper(I) Amidinate Precursor. ACS Appl Energy Mater 11:7750–775610.1021/acsaem.9b01683 ↗
41. Kumar N, Parui SS, Limbu S, Mahato DK, Tiwari N, Chauhan RN (2021) Structural and optical properties of sol–gel derived CuO and Cu2O nanoparticles. Mater Today: Proc 41:237–241
42. Banu T, Jamal M, Gulshan F (2023) Opto-structural properties and photocatalytic activities of CuO NPs synthesized by modified sol-gel and Co-precipitation methods: A comparative study. Results Mater 19:10041910.1016/j.rinma.2023.100419 ↗
43. Baba K, Bulou S, Choquet P, Boscher ND, Baba K, Bulou S, Choquet P, Boscher ND (2017) Photocatalytic anatase TiO2 thin films on polymer optical fiber using atmospheric-pressure plasma. ACS Appl. Mater Interfaces 15:13733–1374110.1021/acsami.7b01398 ↗
44. Pourali N, Lai K, Gregory J, Gong Y, Hessel V, Rebrov EV (2022) Study of plasma parameters and gas heating in the voltage range of nondischarge to full-discharge in a methane-fed dielectric barrier discharge. Plasma Process Polym:1–1010.1002/ppap.202200086 ↗
45. Toivola M, Halme J, Miettunen K, Aitola K, Lund PD (2009) Nanostructured dye solar cells on flexible substrates—Review. Int J Energy Res 33:1145–116010.1002/er.1605 ↗
46. NIST Standard Reference Database 78 (Version 5.10), https://doi.org/10.18434/T4W30F, October 2022.10.18434/T4W30F ↗
47. Baida Mohsen Ahmed, "Plasma parameters Generated from Iron Spectral Lines by using LIBS Technique", IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, (2020).
48. Ahmed BM, Muslim SHA, Khoudair MJ (2020) Determine Emissions Plasma Iron by Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopic in Atmospheric Environment. Minar Inter J App Sci and Tech 2:100–106
49. Meng F, Li J, Cushing SK, Zhi M, Wu N (2013) Solar Hydrogen Generation by Nanoscale p–n Junction of p-type Molybdenum Disulfide/n-type Nitrogen-Doped Reduced Graphene Oxide. J Am Chem Soc 135:10286–1028910.1021/ja404851s ↗
50. Kyesmen PI, Nombona N, Diale M (2021) A promising three-step heat treatment process for preparing CuO films for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution from water. ACS Omega 49:33398–3340810.1021/acsomega.1c03796 ↗
51. Lukes P, Dolezalova E, Sisrova I, Clupek M (2014) Aqueous-phase chemistry and bactericidal effects from an air discharge plasma in contact with water: evidence for the formation of peroxynitrite through a pseudo-second-order post-discharge reaction of H2O2 and HNO2. Plasma Sources Sci Technol 23:01501910.1088/0963-0252/23/1/015019 ↗
52. Wu H, Sun P, Feng H, Zhou H, Wang R, Liang Y, Lu J, Zhu W, Zhang J, Fang J (2012) Reactive Oxygen Species in a Non-thermal Plasma Microjet and Water System: Generation, Conversion, and Contributions to Bacteria Inactivation—An Analysis by Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy. Plasma Sources Sci Technol 9:417–424
53. Cabello A, Abad A, Izquierdo MT, Gayán P, de Diego LF, García-Labiano F, Adánez J (2022) Qualification of operating conditions to extend oxygen carrier utilization in the scaling up of chemical looping processes. J Chem Eng 430:13260210.1016/j.cej.2021.132602 ↗
54. Ginting M, Taslima S, Sebayang K, Aryanto D, Sudiro T, Sebayang P (2017) Preparation and characterization of zinc oxide doped with ferrite and chromium. AIP Conf Proc 1862:03006210.1063/1.4991166 ↗
55. He K, Chen N, Wang C, Wei L, Chen J (2018) Method for Determining Crystal Grain Size by X-Ray Diffraction. Cryst Res Technol 53:170015710.1002/crat.201700157 ↗
56. Das A, Nair RG (2020) Effect of aspect ratio on photocatalytic performance of hexagonal ZnO nanorods. J Alloys Compd 817:15327710.1016/j.jallcom.2019.153277 ↗
57. Jasim MM, Dakhil OA, Hussein EH, Abdullah HI (2020) Enhanced photoelectrochemical properties of NiO nanoparticles-decorated TiO2 nanotube arrays for water splitting. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 31:10707–10714
58. Radecka M, Kusior A, Trenczek-Zajac A, Zakrzewska K (2018) Oxide nanomaterials for photoelectrochemical hydrogen energy sources. Adv Inorg Chem 72:145–18310.1016/bs.adioch.2018.05.001 ↗
59. Balik M, Bulut V, Edogan IY (2018) Optical, structural and phase transition properties of Cu2O, CuO and Cu2O/CuO: their photoelectrochemical sensor applications. Inter J Hydro Ener 44:18755
60. Fan D (2017) Qing-Yun Chen, Yun-Hai Wang, Effect of annealing process on the heterostructure CuO/Cu2O as a highly efficient photocathode for photoelectrochemical water reduction. J Phys Chem Solids 104:139–14410.1016/j.jpcs.2016.12.029 ↗
61. Han J, Xu Z, Zhoua X, Li C (2015) Cu2O/CuO photocathode with improved stability for photoelectrochemical water reduction. RSC Adv 5:10790–1079410.1039/C4RA13896A ↗
62. Ma J, Wang Q, Li L, Zong X, Sun H, Tao R, Fan X (2021) Fe2O3 nanorods/CuO nanoparticles p-n heterojunction photoanode: Effective charge separation and enhanced photoelectrochemical properties. J Colloid Interface Sci 602:32–4210.1016/j.jcis.2021.05.140 ↗
63. Cheng L, Fang T, Hu H, Wang Y, Liu X, Zhou S, Junli F, Wang W (2020) Synthesis and enhanced bias-free photoelectrochemical water-splitting activity of ferroelectric BaTiO3/Cu2O heterostructures under solar light irradiation. Ceram Int 47:11379–11386
64. Kaur G, Satsangi VR, Dass S, Shrivastav R (2020) 3D-nano-hetero-structured n/n junction, CuO/Ru–ZnO thin films, for hydrogen generation with enhanced photoelectrochemical performances. Int J Hydrog 45:21051–2106710.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.009 ↗
65. Pannan I (2021) Kyesmen, Nolwazi Nombona, Mmantsae Diale, Heterojunction of nanostructured α-Fe2O3/CuO for enhancement of photoelectrochemical water splitting. J Alloys Compd 863:15872410.1016/j.jallcom.2021.158724 ↗