New era of nanoparticles facilitated co-delivery in cancer therapy: two heads are better than one
Source abstract
Abstract
Combinational chemotherapeutics gained attention in 1950s, when a sharp reduction in mortality of cancer patients was observed with simultaneous usage of selected anticancer drugs with diverse mechanisms of action. However, later toxicity concerns slowed their wider adoption. Hitches, like multidrug resistance further account for the inactivity of many of the anticancer drugs for numerous cancers, rang another alarm. In such situations, the treatment itself becomes a matter of concern for patients and clinicians. Nanotechnology emerged as a refuge to counter the threat of resistance and toxicities apprehension and at the same time elevates the efficacy as compared to non-nanotherapy counterparts. Subsequently, breakthroughs in biotherapeutics, theranostics, and targeting ligands changed the paradigm of nanoparticulate combinational therapy. Careful selection of drug cocktail into the single architecture of nanoparticles helps to co-deliver the drugs of different natures, to the same target simultaneously without any haywire distribution menace. With the everlasting necessity for nanotherapeutic co-delivery in cancer, it is of utmost importance to understand how far we have reached and why we are still lagging on the clinical front. The present review aims to bring updated information in the area of nanoparticle-based co-delivered therapeutics. Additionally, current progress and challenges have been reviewed in depth to present a holistic overview. Graphical Abstract
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery · Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Blackadar CB (2016) Historical review of the causes of cancer. World J Clin Oncol 7(1):5410.5306/wjco.v7.i1.54 ↗
2. Hussain SP, Hofseth LJ, Harris CCJNRC (2003) Radical causes of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 3(4):276–28510.1038/nrc1046 ↗
3. Loeb LA, Loeb KR, Anderson JP (2003) Multiple mutations and cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100(3):776–78110.1073/pnas.0334858100 ↗
4. Huber PE et al (2005) Trimodal cancer treatment: beneficial effects of combined antiangiogenesis, radiation, and chemotherapy. Can Res 65(9):3643–365510.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1668 ↗
5. Cassileth BR, Deng G (2004) Complementary and alternative therapies for cancer. Oncologist 9(1):80–8910.1634/theoncologist.9-1-80 ↗
6. Zugazagoitia J et al (2016) Current challenges in cancer treatment. Clin Ther 38(7):1551–156610.1016/j.clinthera.2016.03.026 ↗
7. Turajlic S, Sottoriva A, Graham T, Swanton CJNRG (2019) Resolving genetic heterogeneity in cancer. Nat Rev Genet 20(7):404–41610.1038/s41576-019-0114-6 ↗
8. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA (2000) The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100(1):57–7010.1016/S0092-8674(00)81683-9 ↗
9. Ion D et al (2022) An up-to-date review of natural nanoparticles for Ccancer management. Pharmaceutics 14(1):1810.3390/pharmaceutics14010018 ↗
10. Cao J, Huang D, Peppas NA (2020) Advanced engineered nanoparticulate platforms to address key biological barriers for delivering chemotherapeutic agents to target sites. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 167:170–18810.1016/j.addr.2020.06.030 ↗
11. Gottesman MM, Fojo T, Bates SE (2002) Multidrug resistance in cancer: role of ATP–dependent transporters. Nat Rev Cancer 2(1):48–5810.1038/nrc706 ↗
12. Mansoori B et al (2017) The different mechanisms of cancer drug resistance: a brief review. Adv Pharmaceut Bull 7(3):33910.15171/apb.2017.041 ↗
13. Maeda H, Khatami MJC, medicine t (2018) Analyses of repeated failures in cancer therapy for solid tumors: poor tumor-selective drug delivery, low therapeutic efficacy and unsustainable costs. Clin Trans Med 7(1):1–2010.1186/s40169-018-0185-6 ↗
14. Goldstein LJ (1996) MDR1 gene expression in solid tumours. Eur J Cancer 32(6):1039–105010.1016/0959-8049(96)00100-1 ↗
15. Lyman GH (2009) Impact of chemotherapy dose intensity on cancer patient outcomes. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 7(1):99–10810.6004/jnccn.2009.0009 ↗
16. Brahimi-Horn MC, Chiche J, Pouysségur J (2007) Hypoxia and cancer. J Mol Med 85(12):1301–130710.1007/s00109-007-0281-3 ↗
17. Vaupel P, Mayer AJC, Reviews M (2007) Hypoxia in cancer: significance and impact on clinical outcome. Cancer Metastasis Rev 26(2):225–23910.1007/s10555-007-9055-1 ↗
18. Halaby RJCDR (2019) Influence of lysosomal sequestration on multidrug resistance in cancer cells. Cancer Drug Resistance 2(1):31
19. Hopper-Borge E et al (2004) Analysis of the drug resistance profile of multidrug resistance protein 7 (ABCC10) resistance to docetaxel. Can Res 64(14):4927–493010.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3111 ↗
20. Simmons AD, Nguyen M, Pintus EJ (2020) Polyclonal BRCA2 mutations following carboplatin treatment confer resistance to the PARP inhibitor rucaparib in a patient with mCRPC: a case report. BMC Cancer 20(1):1–610.1186/s12885-020-6657-2 ↗
21. Cornelissen J et al (1994) MDR-1 expression and response to vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone chemotherapy in multiple myeloma refractory to alkylating agents. J Clin Oncol 12(1):115–11910.1200/JCO.1994.12.1.115 ↗
22. Wang S-F et al (2013) 7-Ketocholesterol induces P-glycoprotein through PI3K/mTOR signaling in hepatoma cells. Biochem Pharmacol 86(4):548–56010.1016/j.bcp.2013.06.006 ↗
23. Lin X et al (2012) Perifosine downregulates MDR1 gene expression and reverses multidrug-resistant phenotype by inhibiting PI3K/Akt/NF-κB signaling pathway in a human breast cancer cell line. Neoplasma 59(3):248–25610.4149/neo_2012_032 ↗
24. Li S et al (2018) Quercetin enhances chemotherapeutic effect of doxorubicin against human breast cancer cells while reducing toxic side effects of it. Biomed Pharmacoth 100:441–44710.1016/j.biopha.2018.02.055 ↗
25. Limtrakul P, Khantamat O, Pintha KJ (2005) Inhibition of P-glycoprotein function and expression by kaempferol and quercetin. J Chemother 17(1):86–9510.1179/joc.2005.17.1.86 ↗
26. Lin JH, Yamazaki M (2003) Role of P-glycoprotein in pharmacokinetics: clinical implications. Clin Pharmacokinet 42:59–9810.2165/00003088-200342010-00003 ↗
27. de Gooijer MC et al (2018) The impact of P-glycoprotein and breast cancer resistance protein on the brain pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a panel of MEK inhibitors. Int J Cancer 142(2):381–39110.1002/ijc.31052 ↗
28. Wang L et al (2016) Doxorubicin-induced systemic inflammation is driven by upregulation of toll-like receptor TLR4 and endotoxin leakagegut flora promoted doxotubicin-induced inflammation. Can Res 76(22):6631–664210.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-3034 ↗
29. Pugazhendhi A et al (2018) Toxicity of doxorubicin (Dox) to different experimental organ systems. Life Sci 200:26–3010.1016/j.lfs.2018.03.023 ↗
30. Cravo AS, Mrsny RJ (2013) A time travel journey through cancer therapies. Springer, Cancer Targeted Drug Delivery, pp 3–35
31. DeVita VT Jr (1975) Single agent versus combination chemotherapy. CA A Cancer J Clin 25(3):152–15810.3322/canjclin.25.3.152 ↗
32. Chou T-C (2006) Theoretical basis, experimental design, and computerized simulation of synergism and antagonism in drug combination studies. Pharmacol Rev 58(3):621–68110.1124/pr.58.3.10 ↗
33. Gediya LK, Njar VC (2009) Promise and challenges in drug discovery and development of hybrid anticancer drugs. Expert Opin Drug Discov 4(11):1099–111110.1517/17460440903341705 ↗
34. Service RF (2000) Is nanotechnology dangerous? Science 290(5496):1526–1527. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.290.5496.152610.1126/science.290.5496.1526 ↗
35. Zein R, Sharrouf W, Selting K (2020) Physical properties of nanoparticles that result in improved cancer targeting. J Oncol 2020:5194780. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/519478010.1155/2020/5194780 ↗
36. Lin J et al (2020) Understanding the synergistic effect of physicochemical properties of nanoparticles and their cellular entry pathways. Comm Biol 3(1):1–1010.1038/s42003-020-0917-1 ↗
37. Chopra H et al (2022) Nano-based targeting strategies for cancer treatment. Int J Surg (London, England) 105:10686410.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106864 ↗
38. Sindhu RK et al (2017) Development methods and applications of nanoscience in pharmaceuticals. Archives Med Pharmaceutical Sci Res (AMPSR) 1(01):11–15
39. Barani M et al (2021) Nanodiagnosis and nanotreatment of colorectal cancer: An overview. J Nanopart Res 23:1–2510.1007/s11051-020-05129-6 ↗
40. Shukla T, Upmanyu N, Pandey SP, Sudheesh MS (2019) Site-specific drug delivery, targeting, and gene therapy. In: Nanoarchitectonics in biomedicine. William Andrew Publishing, pp 473–50510.1016/B978-0-12-816200-2.00013-X ↗
41. Matsumura Y, Maeda HJ (1986) A new concept for macromolecular therapeutics in cancer chemotherapy: mechanism of tumoritropic accumulation of proteins and the antitumor agent smancs. Cancer Res 46(1):6387–6392
42. Clemons TD et al (2018) Distinction between active and passive targeting of nanoparticles dictate their overall therapeutic efficacy. Langmuir 34(50):15343–1534910.1021/acs.langmuir.8b02946 ↗
43. Mayer LD, Janoff AS (2007) Optimizing combination chemotherapy by controlling drug ratios. Mol Interventions 7(4):21610.1124/mi.7.4.8 ↗
44. Kim HP et al (2011) Liposomal encapsulation of a synergistic molar ratio of cytarabine and daunorubicin enhances selective toxicity for acute myeloid leukemia progenitors as compared to analogous normal hematopoietic cells. Exp Hematol 39(7):741–75010.1016/j.exphem.2011.04.001 ↗
45. Li S-D, Huang LJ (2008) Pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of nanoparticles. Mol Pharm 5(4):496–50410.1021/mp800049w ↗
46. Wei G et al (2021) Recent progress in nanomedicine for enhanced cancer chemotherapy. Theranostics 11(13):637010.7150/thno.57828 ↗
47. Eftekhari RB et al (2019) Co-delivery nanosystems for cancer treatment: a review. Pharmaceut Nanotechnol 7(2):90–11210.2174/2211738507666190321112237 ↗
48. Vakilinezhad MA, Amini A, Dara T, Alipour S (2019) Methotrexate and curcumin co-encapsulated PLGA nanoparticles as a potential breast cancer therapeutic system: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 184:11051510.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.110515 ↗
49. Yu Z et al (2020) Ratiometric co-delivery of doxorubicin and docetaxel by covalently conjugating with mPEG-poly (β-malic acid) for enhanced synergistic breast tumor therapy. Polym Chem 11(46):7330–733910.1039/D0PY01130D ↗
50. Wu K et al (2013) Silibinin inhibits β-catenin/ZEB1 signaling and suppresses bladder cancer metastasis via dual-blocking epithelial–mesenchymal transition and stemness. Cell Signal 25(12):2625–263310.1016/j.cellsig.2013.08.028 ↗
51. Mahira S et al (2019) Cabazitaxel and silibinin co-encapsulated cationic liposomes for CD44 targeted delivery: a new insight into nanomedicine based combinational chemotherapy for prostate cancer. Biomed Pharmacoth 110:803–81710.1016/j.biopha.2018.11.145 ↗
52. Warburg O (1925) The metabolism of carcinoma cells. The J Cancer Res 9(1):148–16310.1158/jcr.1925.148 ↗
53. Ray P et al (2020) pH-sensitive Nanodrug carriers for codelivery of ERK inhibitor and gemcitabine enhance the inhibition of tumor growth in pancreatic Cancer. Mol Pharm 18(1):87–10010.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.0c00499 ↗
54. Sun J-H et al (2018) Co-delivery nanoparticles of doxorubicin and chloroquine for improving the anti-cancer effect in vitro. Nanotechnology 30(8):08510110.1088/1361-6528/aaf51b ↗
55. Assanhou AG et al (2015) Reversal of multidrug resistance by co-delivery of paclitaxel and lonidamine using a TPGS and hyaluronic acid dual-functionalized liposome for cancer treatment. Biomaterials 73:284–29510.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.09.022 ↗
56. Zhang M et al (2018) Nanoparticle co-delivery of wortmannin and cisplatin synergistically enhances chemoradiotherapy and reverses platinum resistance in ovarian cancer models. Biomaterials 169:1–1010.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.03.055 ↗
57. Jamil A et al (2019) Co-delivery of gemcitabine and simvastatin through PLGA polymeric nanoparticles for the treatment of pancreatic cancer: in-vitro characterization, cellular uptake, and pharmacokinetic studies. Drug Develop Industrial Phar 45(5):745–75310.1080/03639045.2019.1569040 ↗
58. Gao J et al (2019) Co-delivery of docetaxel and salinomycin to target both breast cancer cells and stem cells by PLGA/TPGS nanoparticles. Int J Nanomed 14:919910.2147/IJN.S230376 ↗
59. Amjadi S, Hamishehkar H, Ghorbani M (2019) A novel smart PEGylated gelatin nanoparticle for co-delivery of doxorubicin and betanin: a strategy for enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of chemotherapy. Materials Science Engineering: C 97:833–84110.1016/j.msec.2018.12.104 ↗
60. Bian Y, Guo D, development and therapy (2020) Targeted therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: co-delivery of sorafenib and curcumin using lactosylated pH-responsive nanoparticles. Drug Design, Develop Therapy 14:64710.2147/DDDT.S238955 ↗
61. Yan J et al (2020) Fabrication of a pH/redox-triggered mesoporous silica-based nanoparticle with microfluidics for anticancer drugs doxorubicin and paclitaxel codelivery. ACS Appl Bio Mater 3(2):1216–122510.1021/acsabm.9b01111 ↗
62. Zheng H et al (2020) Nanoparticle mediated codelivery of nifuratel and doxorubicin for synergistic anticancer therapy through STAT3 inhibition. Colloids Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 193:11110910.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111109 ↗
63. Huo M et al (2020) Co-delivery of silybin and paclitaxel by dextran-based nanoparticles for effective anti-tumor treatment through chemotherapy sensitization and microenvironment modulation. J Control Release 321:198–21010.1016/j.jconrel.2020.02.017 ↗
64. Wang S et al (2013) Laponite nanodisks as an efficient platform for doxorubicin delivery to cancer cells. Langmuir 29(16):5030–503610.1021/la4001363 ↗
65. Zhou Y et al (2018) Mesoporous silica nanoparticles for drug and gene delivery. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B 8(2):165–17710.1016/j.apsb.2018.01.007 ↗
66. Mukherjee A, Paul M, Mukherjee SJC (2019) Recent progress in the theranostics application of nanomedicine in lung cancer. Cancers 11(5):59710.3390/cancers11050597 ↗
67. Dimcevski G et al (2016) A human clinical trial using ultrasound and microbubbles to enhance gemcitabine treatment of inoperable pancreatic cancer. J Control Release 243:172–18110.1016/j.jconrel.2016.10.007 ↗
68. Prabhakar A, Banerjee R (2019) Nanobubble liposome complexes for diagnostic imaging and ultrasound-triggered drug delivery in cancers: a theranostic approach. ACS Omega 4(13):15567–1558010.1021/acsomega.9b01924 ↗
69. Parhi P, Sahoo SK, science i (2015) Trastuzumab guided nanotheranostics: a lipid based multifunctional nanoformulation for targeted drug delivery and imaging in breast cancer therapy. J Coll Interface Sci 451:198–21110.1016/j.jcis.2015.03.049 ↗
70. Ferber S et al (2014) Polymeric nanotheranostics for real-time non-invasive optical imaging of breast cancer progression and drug release. Cancer Lett 352(1):81–8910.1016/j.canlet.2014.02.022 ↗
71. Huang H-K et al (2017) A novel cancer nanotheranostics system based on quantum dots encapsulated by a polymer-prodrug with controlled release behaviour. Aust J Chem 70(12):1302–131110.1071/CH17277 ↗
72. Wen C-Y et al (2016) Fluorescent/magnetic micro/nano-spheres based on quantum dots and/or magnetic nanoparticles: preparation, properties, and their applications in cancer studies. Nanoscale 8(25):12406–1242910.1039/C5NR08534A ↗
73. Mahani M et al (2021) Doxorubicin delivery to breast cancer cells with transferrin-targeted carbon quantum dots: an in vitro and in silico study. J of Drug Delivery Sci Technol 62:10234210.1016/j.jddst.2021.102342 ↗
74. Yildiz T, Gu R, Zauscher S, Betancourt T (2018) Doxorubicin-loaded protease-activated near-infrared fluorescent polymeric nanoparticles for imaging and therapy of cancer. Int J Nanomed 13:696110.2147/IJN.S174068 ↗
75. Zhang W et al (2015) Doxorubicin-loaded magnetic nanoparticle clusters for chemo-photothermal treatment of the prostate cancer cell line PC3. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 466(2):278–28210.1016/j.bbrc.2015.09.036 ↗
76. Kong T et al (2018) Doxorubicin conjugated carbon dots as a drug delivery system for human breast cancer therapy. Cell Prolif 51(5):e1248810.1111/cpr.12488 ↗
77. Lee GY et al (2013) Theranostic nanoparticles with controlled release of gemcitabine for targeted therapy and MRI of pancreatic cancer. ACS Nano 7(3):2078–208910.1021/nn3043463 ↗
78. Sengul AB, Asmatulu E (2020) Toxicity of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles: a review. Environ Chem Lett 18(5):1659–168310.1007/s10311-020-01033-6 ↗
79. Kossatz S et al (2015) Efficient treatment of breast cancer xenografts with multifunctionalized iron oxide nanoparticles combining magnetic hyperthermia and anti-cancer drug delivery. Breast Cancer Res 17(1):1–1710.1186/s13058-015-0576-1 ↗
80. Piehler S et al (2020) Iron oxide nanoparticles as carriers for DOX and magnetic hyperthermia after intratumoral application into breast cancer in mice: impact and future perspectives. Nanomaterials 10(6):101610.3390/nano10061016 ↗
81. Ma Y, Mou Q, Zhu X, Yan D (2017) Small molecule nanodrugs for cancer therapy. Materials Today Chem 4:26–3910.1016/j.mtchem.2017.01.004 ↗
82. Wu J et al (2018) Chemodrug-gated biodegradable hollow mesoporous organosilica nanotheranostics for multimodal imaging-guided low-temperature photothermal therapy/chemotherapy of cancer. ACS App Mat Interfaces 10(49):42115–4212610.1021/acsami.8b16448 ↗
83. Feng Q et al (2018) Hypoxia-specific therapeutic agents delivery nanotheranostics: a sequential strategy for ultrasound mediated on-demand tritherapies and imaging of cancer. J Control Release 275:192–20010.1016/j.jconrel.2018.02.011 ↗
84. Wang K et al (2022) Spatial specific delivery of combinational chemotherapeutics to combat intratumoral heterogeneity. J Control Release 348:1004–101510.1016/j.jconrel.2022.06.046 ↗
85. AbdElhamid AS et al (2018) Layer-by-layer gelatin/chondroitin quantum dots-based nanotheranostics: combined rapamycin/celecoxib delivery and cancer imaging 13(14):1707–1730
86. Cai H et al (2021) Cathepsin B-responsive and gadolinium-labeled branched glycopolymer-PTX conjugate-derived nanotheranostics for cancer treatment. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B 11(2):544–55910.1016/j.apsb.2020.07.023 ↗
87. Feng Y et al (2018) Breast cancer development and progression: Risk factors, cancer stem cells, signaling pathways, genomics, and molecular pathogenesis. Genes diseases 5(2):77–10610.1016/j.gendis.2018.05.001 ↗
88. Marhelava K et al (2019) Targeting negative and positive immune checkpoints with monoclonal antibodies in therapy of cancer. Cancers 11(11):175610.3390/cancers11111756 ↗
89. Chames P, Van Regenmortel M, Weiss E, Baty D (2009) Therapeutic antibodies: successes, limitations and hopes for the future. Br J Pharmacol 157(2):220–23310.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00190.x ↗
90. Wilson GD, Bentzen SM, Harari PM (2006) Biologic basis for combining drugs with radiation. In: Seminars in radiation oncology. WB Saunders, vol 16, p 2–910.1016/j.semradonc.2005.08.001 ↗
91. Lu R-M et al (2020) Development of therapeutic antibodies for the treatment of diseases. J Biomed Sci 27(1):1–3010.1186/s12929-019-0592-z ↗
92. Jin S et al (2022) Emerging new therapeutic antibody derivatives for cancer treatment. Signal Transduction Targeted Therapy 7(1):1–2810.1038/s41392-021-00868-x ↗
93. Lin L et al (2016) Efficacy of cetuximab-based chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer according to RAS and BRAF mutation subgroups: a meta-analysis. Molecular clinical oncology 4(6):1017–102410.3892/mco.2016.836 ↗
94. Hurwitz H et al (2004) Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 350(23):2335–234210.1056/NEJMoa032691 ↗
95. Begun C (2022) Promising results for chemo immunotherapy combination against pancreatic cancer. Penn Medicine, Philadelphia
96. Peng M et al (2021) Novel combination therapies for the treatment of bladder cancer. Front Oncol 10:53952710.3389/fonc.2020.539527 ↗
97. Hecht M et al (2016) Cetuximab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy or radiotherapy in recurent and/or metastatic SCCHN in a non-selected patient cohort (interim analysis of the phase IV SOCCER trial). Annals of Oncology 27:vi34310.1093/annonc/mdw376.46 ↗
98. Pietrantonio F, Morano F, Corallo S, Miceli R, Lonardi S, Raimondi A, Cremolini C et al (2019) Maintenance therapy with panitumumab alone vs panitumumab plus fluorouracil-leucovorin in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncology 5(9):1268–127510.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1467 ↗
99. Takaoka T et al (2016) Panitumumab in combination with irinotecan plus S-1 (IRIS) as second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancer Chemoth Pharmacol 78(2):397–40310.1007/s00280-016-3096-5 ↗
100. Leone F et al (2013) Panitumumab in combination with infusional oxaliplatin and oral capecitabine for conversion therapy in patients with colon cancer and advanced liver metastases: the MetaPan study 119(19):3429–3435