journal article·2022-11Open access

Void space and secondary oriented attachment mechanisms in cerium oxide nanorods

C. Brambila, J. Nutter, M. Molinari, D. C. Sayle, T. Sakthivel, S. Seal, G. Möbus

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 24· Issue 11

Abstract

Abstract Two new processes occurring during nanorod annealing of ceria are disclosed, both belonging to the wider “oriented attachment” (OA) scheme of crystal growth, which commonly drives nanoparticles growing into nanorods. The first new process is an inversion of the standard OA, where the usual solid particles are replaced by well-facetted shape-equilibrated voids inside larger single crystals. The internal facetted voids are then found to aggregate during dry heat treatment into rod-shaped elongated voids growing eventually towards nanotubes. For the case of CeO2, a perfect equivalence is found between positive OA, involving cuboctahedral {111}/{100} nanoparticles turning into {110}/{100} nanorods, and negative or void space OA, where cuboctahedral voids turn into negative tubular rods of same indexing. The second OA process (“secondary OA”) concerns aggregation of small nanorod segments into larger, double, or quadruple sized nanorods, with perfection of alignment and bonding exceeding simple van der Waals forces. Eventually, the new rods merge into single crystal grain boundary–free larger rods, but with an external shape, including double-ended rods, indicating their origin from several rods. Both processes are found on identical samples and occur in parallel.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Sun C, Li H, Chen L (2012) Nanostructured ceria-based materials: synthesis, properties, and applications. Energy Environ Sci 5:8475–8505. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ee22310d10.1039/c2ee22310d ↗
2. Seal S, Jeyaranjan A, Neal CJ et al (2020) Engineered defects in cerium oxides: tuning chemical reactivity for biomedical, environmental, & energy applications. Nanoscale 12:6879–6899. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NR01203C10.1039/D0NR01203C ↗
3. Gangopadhyay S, Frolov DD, Masunov AE, Seal S (2014) Structure and properties of cerium oxides in bulk and nanoparticulate forms. J Alloy Compd 584:199–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.09.01310.1016/j.jallcom.2013.09.013 ↗
4. Trovarelli A, Llorca J (2017) Ceria catalysts at nanoscale: how do crystal shapes shape catalysis? ACS Catal 7:4716–4735. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.7b0124610.1021/acscatal.7b01246 ↗
5. Mullins DR (2015) The surface chemistry of cerium oxide. Surf Sci Rep 70:42–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfrep.2014.12.00110.1016/j.surfrep.2014.12.001 ↗
6. Sayle TXT, Caddeo F, Zhang X et al (2016) Structure–activity map of ceria nanoparticles, nanocubes, and mesoporous architectures. Chem Mater 28:7287–7295. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0253610.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02536 ↗
7. Aneggi E, Wiater D, de Leitenburg C et al (2014) Shape-dependent activity of ceria in soot combustion. ACS Catal 4:172–181. https://doi.org/10.1021/cs400850r10.1021/cs400850r ↗
8. Castanet U, Feral-Martin C, Demourgues A et al (2019) Controlling the 111}/{110 surface ratio of cuboidal ceria nanoparticles. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 11:11384–11390. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b2166710.1021/acsami.8b21667 ↗
9. Sayle TXT, Molinari M, Das S et al (2013) Environment-mediated structure, surface redox activity and reactivity of ceria nanoparticles. Nanoscale 5:6063. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3nr00917c10.1039/c3nr00917c ↗
10. Bhatta UM, Reid D, Sakthivel T et al (2013) Morphology and surface analysis of pure and doped cuboidal ceria nanoparticles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 117:24561–24569. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp405993v10.1021/jp405993v ↗
11. Zhang D, Du X, Shi L, Gao R (2012) Shape-controlled synthesis and catalytic application of ceria nanomaterials. Dalton Trans 41:14455–14475. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2dt31759a10.1039/c2dt31759a ↗
12. Du N, Zhang H, Chen B et al (2007) Ligand-free self-assembly of ceria nanocrystals into nanorods by oriented attachment at low temperature. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 111:12677–12680. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp074011r10.1021/jp074011r ↗
13. Sayle TXT, Inkson BJ, Karakoti A et al (2011) Mechanical properties of ceria nanorods and nanochains; the effect of dislocations, grain-boundaries and oriented attachment. Nanoscale 3:1823. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0nr00980f10.1039/c0nr00980f ↗
14. Sayle TXT, Cantoni M, Bhatta UM et al (2012) Strain and architecture-tuned reactivity in ceria nanostructures; enhanced catalytic oxidation of CO to CO2. Chem Mater 24:1811–1821. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm300343610.1021/cm3003436 ↗
15. Sakthivel T, Das S, Kumar A et al (2013) Morphological phase diagram of biocatalytically active ceria nanostructures as a function of processing variables and their properties. ChemPlusChem 78:1446–1455. https://doi.org/10.1002/cplu.20130030210.1002/cplu.201300302 ↗
16. Xu Y, Mofarah SS, Mehmood R et al (2021) Design strategies for ceria nanomaterials: untangling key mechanistic concepts. Mater Horiz 8:102–123. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0MH00654H10.1039/D0MH00654H ↗
17. Symington AR, Harker RM, Storr MT et al (2020) Thermodynamic evolution of cerium oxide nanoparticle morphology using carbon dioxide. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 124:23210–23220. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0743710.1021/acs.jpcc.0c07437 ↗
18. Symington AR, Molinari M, Moxon S et al (2020) Strongly bound surface water affects the shape evolution of cerium oxide nanoparticles. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 124:3577–3588. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b0904610.1021/acs.jpcc.9b09046 ↗
19. Minervini L (1999) Defect cluster formation in M2O3-doped CeO2. Solid State Ionics 116:339–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738(98)00359-210.1016/S0167-2738(98)00359-2 ↗
20. Liu X, Zhou K, Wang L et al (2009) Oxygen vacancy clusters promoting reducibility and activity of ceria nanorods. J Am Chem Soc 131:3140–3141. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja808433d10.1021/ja808433d ↗
21. Florea I, Feral-Martin C, Majimel J et al (2013) Three-dimensional tomographic analyses of CeO 2 nanoparticles. Cryst Growth Des 13:1110–1121. https://doi.org/10.1021/cg301445h10.1021/cg301445h ↗
22. Sakthivel TS, Reid DL, Bhatta UM et al (2015) Engineering of nanoscale defect patterns in CeO2 nanorods via ex situ and in situ annealing. Nanoscale 7:5169–5177. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4NR07308H10.1039/C4NR07308H ↗
23. Brambila C, Sayle DC, Molinari M et al (2021) Tomographic study of mesopore formation in ceria nanorods. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 125:10077–10089. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c0122110.1021/acs.jpcc.1c01221 ↗
24. Zhang S, Chang C-R, Huang Z-Q et al (2016) High catalytic activity and chemoselectivity of sub-nanometric Pd clusters on porous nanorods of CeO 2 for hydrogenation of nitroarenes. J Am Chem Soc 138:2629–2637. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b1141310.1021/jacs.5b11413 ↗
25. Castell MR (2003) Wulff shape of microscopic voids in UO2 crystals. Phys Rev 68:235411. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.68.23541110.1103/PhysRevB.68.235411 ↗
26. Han WQ, Wu L, Klie RF, Zhu Y (2007) Enhanced optical absorption induced by dense nanocavities inside titania nanorods. Adv Mater 19:2525–2529. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20070054010.1002/adma.200700540 ↗
27. Penn RL, Banfield JF (1999) Morphology development and crystal growth in nanocrystalline aggregates under hydrothermal conditions: insights from titania. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 63:1549–1557. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(99)00037-X10.1016/S0016-7037(99)00037-X ↗
28. Penn RL (1979) Banfield JF (1998) Imperfect oriented attachment: dislocation generation in defect-free nanocrystals. Science 281:969–971. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.281.5379.96910.1126/science.281.5379.969 ↗
29. De Yoreo JJ, Gilbert PUPA, Sommerdijk NAJM et al (2015) Crystallization by particle attachment in synthetic, biogenic, and geologic environments. Science 349(6247):aaa6760. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa676010.1126/science.aaa6760 ↗
30. Bahrig L, Hickey SG, Eychmüller A (2014) Mesocrystalline materials and the involvement of oriented attachment – a review. CrystEngComm 16:9408–9424. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CE00882K10.1039/C4CE00882K ↗
31. Godinho M, Ribeiro C, Longo E, Leite ER (2008) Influence of microwave heating on the growth of gadolinium-doped cerium oxide nanorods. Cryst Growth Des 8:384–386. https://doi.org/10.1021/cg700872b10.1021/cg700872b ↗
32. Zhang H, de Yoreo JJ, Banfield JF (2014) A unified description of attachment-based crystal growth. ACS Nano 8:6526–6530. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn503145w10.1021/nn503145w ↗
33. Thomele D, Baumann SO, Schneider J et al (2021) Cubes to cubes: organization of MgO particles into one-dimensional and two-dimensional nanostructures. Cryst Growth Des 21:4674–4682. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.1c0053510.1021/acs.cgd.1c00535 ↗
34. Zhang R, Lu K, Zong L et al (2017) Gold supported on ceria nanotubes for CO oxidation. Appl Surf Sci 416:183–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.04.15810.1016/j.apsusc.2017.04.158 ↗
35. Tang Z-R, Zhang Y, Xu YJ (2011) A facile and high-yield approach to synthesize one-dimensional CeO2 nanotubes with well-shaped hollow interior as a photocatalyst for degradation of toxic pollutants. RSC Adv 1:1772–1777. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1ra00518a10.1039/c1ra00518a ↗
36. Wang Z, Yu R (2019) Hollow micro/nanostructured ceria-based materials: synthetic strategies and versatile applications. Adv Mater 31:1800592. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20180059210.1002/adma.201800592 ↗
37. Martin P, Parker SC, Sayle DC, Watson GW (2007) Atomistic modeling of multilayered ceria nanotubes. Nano Lett 7:543–546. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl062673710.1021/nl0626737 ↗
38. Stelmachowski P, Ciura K, Indyka P, Kotarba A (2017) Facile synthesis of ordered CeO 2 nanorod assemblies: morphology and reactivity. Mater Chem Phys 201:139–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.08.03810.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.08.038 ↗
39. Chen DJ, Wang YJ, Wei K et al (2007) Self-organization of hydroxyapatite nanorods through oriented attachment. Biomaterials 28:2275–2280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.01.03310.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.01.033 ↗
40. Kim B-H, Kullgren J, Wolf MJ et al (2019) Multiscale modeling of agglomerated ceria nanoparticles: interface stability and oxygen vacancy formation. Front Chem 7:203. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2019.0020310.3389/fchem.2019.00203 ↗
41. Lin M, Fu ZY, Tan HR et al (2012) Hydrothermal synthesis of CeO2 nanocrystals: Ostwald ripening or oriented attachment? Cryst Growth Des 12:3296–3303. https://doi.org/10.1021/cg300421x10.1021/cg300421x ↗