Multipoint contact modeling of nanoparticle manipulation on rough surface
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper, the atomic force microscopy (AFM)-based 2-D pushing of nano/microparticles investigated on rough substrate by assuming a multipoint contact model. First, a new contact model was extracted and presented based on the geometrical profiles of Rumpf, Rabinovich and George models and the contact mechanics theories of JKR and Schwartz, to model the adhesion forces and the deformations in the multipoint contact of rough surfaces. The geometry of a rough surface was defined by two main parameters of asperity height (size of roughness) and asperity wavelength (compactness of asperities distribution). Then, the dynamic behaviors of nano/microparticles with radiuses in range of 50–500 nm studied during their pushing on rough substrate with a hexagonal or square arrangement of asperities. Dynamic behavior of particles were simulated and compared by assuming multipoint and single-point contact schemes. The simulation results show that the assumption of multipoint contact has a considerable influence on determining the critical manipulation force. Additionally, the assumption of smooth surfaces or single-point contact leads to large error in the obtained results. According to the results of previous research, it anticipated that a particles with the radius less than about 550 nm start to slide on smooth substrate; but by using multipoint contact model, the predicted behavior changed, and particles with radii of smaller than 400 nm begin to slide on rough substrate for different height of asperities, at first.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Alducin D, Casillas G, Mendoza-Santoyo F, Ponce A, José-Yacamán M (2015) Kinematics of gold nanoparticles manipulation in situ transmission electron microscopy. J Nanopart Res 17:1–710.1007/s11051-015-2898-4 ↗
2. Ashhab M, Salapaka MV, Dahleh M, Mezić I (1999) Dynamical analysis and control of microcantilevers. Automatica 35:1663–167010.1016/S0005-1098(99)00077-1 ↗
3. Audry MC, Ramos S, Charlaix E (2009) Adhesion between highly rough alumina surfaces: an atomic force microscope study. J Colloid Interface Sci 331(2):371--37810.1016/j.jcis.2008.11.050 ↗
4. Beach E, Tormoen G, Drelich J, Han R (2002) Pull-off force measurements between rough surfaces by atomic force microscopy. J Colloid Interface Sci 247:84–9910.1006/jcis.2001.8126 ↗
5. Cooper K, Ohler N, Gupta A, Beaudoin S (2000) Analysis of contact interactions between a rough deformable colloid and a smooth substrate. J Colloid Interface Sci 222:63–7410.1006/jcis.1999.6561 ↗
6. Dedkov G (1999) Friction on the nanoscale: new physical mechanisms. Mater Lett 38:360–36610.1016/S0167-577X(98)00190-6 ↗
7. Dorogin LM, Vlassov S, Polyakov B, Antsov M, Lõhmus R, Kink I, Romanov AE (2013) Real-time manipulation of ZnO nanowires on a flat surface employed for tribological measurements: experimental methods and modeling. Phys Status Solidi B 250:305–31710.1002/pssb.201248445 ↗
8. Falvo MR, Superfine R (2000) Mechanics and friction at the nanometer scale. J Nanopart Res 2:237–24810.1023/A:1010017130136 ↗
9. Fatah N (2009) Study and comparison of micronic and nanometric powders: analysis of physical, flow and interparticle properties of powders. Powder Technol 190:41–4710.1016/j.powtec.2008.04.055 ↗
10. Fujiwara R, Hemthavy P, Takahashi K, Saito S (2015) Pulse voltage determination for electrostatic micro manipulation considering surface conductivity and adhesion of glass particle. AIP Adv. doi: 10.1063/1.492109010.1063/1.4921090 ↗
11. Fuller K, Tabor D (1975) The effect of surface roughness on the adhesion of elastic solids. Proc Royal Soc London A: Math, Phys Eng Sci 345:327–34210.1098/rspa.1975.0138 ↗
12. George M, Goddard D (2006) The characterisation of rough particle contacts by atomic force microscopy. J Colloid Interface Sci 299:665–67210.1016/j.jcis.2006.03.021 ↗
13. Greenwood J, Williamson J (1966) Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Proc Royal Soc London A: Math Phys Eng Sci 295:300–31910.1098/rspa.1966.0242 ↗
14. Israelachvili JN (1992) Intermolecular and surface forces. Academic Press, London
15. Johnson KL (1985) Contact mechanics. Cambridge university press, New York10.1017/CBO9781139171731 ↗
16. Kim DH, Park J, Kim B, Kim K (2002) Modeling and simulation of nano-robotic nano-manipulation with an AFM probe. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems, Jeonbbuauk, October 20020
17. Kim HJ, Kang KH, Kim DE (2013) Sliding and rolling frictional behavior of a single ZnO nanowire during manipulation with an AFM. Nanoscale 5:6081–608710.1039/c3nr34029e ↗
18. Korayem M, Kavousi A, Ebrahimi N (2011) Dynamic analysis of tapping-mode AFM considering capillary force interactions. Scientia Iranica 18:121–12910.1016/j.scient.2011.03.014 ↗
19. Korayem M, Omidi E (2012) Robust controlled manipulation of nanoparticles using atomic force microscope. IET Micro Nano Lett 7:927–99310.1049/mnl.2012.0293 ↗
20. Korayem M, Zakeri M (2009) Sensitivity analysis of nanoparticles pushing critical conditions in 2-D controlled nanomanipulation based on AFM. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 41:714–72610.1007/s00170-008-1519-0 ↗
21. Korayem M, Zakeri M (2011) Dynamic modeling of manipulation of micro/nanoparticles on rough surfaces. Appl Surf Sci 257:6503–651310.1016/j.apsusc.2011.02.055 ↗
22. Kudryavtsev YV, Gelinck E, Fischer HR (2009) Theoretical investigation of van der Waals forces between solid surfaces at nanoscales. Surf Sci 603:2580–258710.1016/j.susc.2009.06.007 ↗
23. Li Q, Rudolph V, Peukert W (2006) London-van der Waals adhesiveness of rough particles. Powder Technol 161:248–25510.1016/j.powtec.2005.10.012 ↗
24. Miyazaki H, Sato T (1996) Mechanical assembly of three-dimensional microstructures from fine particles. Adv Robot 11:169–18510.1163/156855397X00308 ↗
25. Rabinovich YI, Adler JJ, Ata A, Singh RK, Moudgil BM (2000a) Adhesion between nanoscale rough surfaces: I Role Asperity geometry. J Coll Interface Sci 232:10–1610.1006/jcis.2000.7167 ↗
26. Rabinovich YI, Adler JJ, Ata A, Singh RK, Moudgil BM (2000b) Adhesion between nanoscale rough surfaces: II Measurement and comparison with theory. J Colloid Interface Sci 232:17–2410.1006/jcis.2000.7168 ↗
27. Rumpf H, Bull FA (1990) Particle technology. Chapman and Hall, London10.1007/978-94-011-7944-7 ↗
28. Schwarz UD (2003) A generalized analytical model for the elastic deformation of an adhesive contact between a sphere and a flat surface. J Colloid Interface Sci 261:99–10610.1016/S0021-9797(03)00049-3 ↗
29. Sitti M (2001) Nanotribological characterization system by AFM based controlled pushing.In: Proceedings of the 1th International Conference Nanotechnology IEEE, Maui HI, October 201110.1109/NANO.2001.966401 ↗
30. Sitti M, Hashimoto H (2000) Controlled pushing of nanoparticles: modeling and experiments. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 5:199–21110.1109/3516.847093 ↗
31. Tafazzoli A, Sitti M (2004a) Dynamic behavior and simulation of nanoparticle sliding during nanoprobe-based positioning. In: Proceedings of the international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, ASME, Anaheim, California, November 200410.1115/IMECE2004-62470 ↗
32. Tafazzoli A, Sitti M (2004b) Dynamic modes of nanoparticle motion during nanoprobe-based manipulation. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference Nanotechnology IEEE, August10.1109/NANO.2004.1392241 ↗
33. Xie H, Onal C, Régnier S, Sitti M (2011) Atomic force microscopy based nanorobotics: modelling, simulation, setup building, and experiments. Springer, Berlin
34. Zakeri M, Faraji J (2014) Modeling of the rough spherical nanoparticles manipulation on a substrate based on the AFM nanorobot. Appl Phys A 117:1947–196210.1007/s00339-014-8668-9 ↗