A quantitative understanding on effects of finest nanograins on nanovoid growth in nanocrystalline materials
Source abstract
Abstract
For evaluating the effects of finest nanograins, whose grain size ranging from 2 to 4 nm, on nanovoid growth in nanocrystalline (NC) materials, we proposed a new theoretical model composed of finest nanograins evenly located at the triple junctions of conventional NC materials (grain size ranging from 10 to 100 nm). In the framework of the model, the mechanism of nanovoid growth is the dislocation emission. The blocking effect of finest nanograin on the motion of dislocations emitted from the nanovoid surface was taken into consideration. The critical condition required for dislocations emitted from the nanovoid surface and the influences of the finest nanograin on the nanovoid growth were calculated separately. The quantitatively analyzed results showed that finest nanograins could significantly suppress the growth of nanovoids compared with the triple junctions without finest nanograins. Therefore, the fracture toughness of the NC materials could be enhanced by finest nanograins.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Asaro RJ, Krysl P, Kad B (2003) Deformation mechanism transitions in nanoscale FCC metals. Philos Mag Lett 83:733–743. doi: 10.1080/0950083031000161454010.1080/09500830310001614540 ↗
2. Belova IV, Murch GE (2003) Diffusion in nanocrystalline materials. J Phys Chem Solids 64:873–878. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3697(02)00421-310.1016/S0022-3697(02)00421-3 ↗
3. Bhatia MA, Solanki KN, Moitra A, Tschopp MA (2012) Investigating damage evolution at the nanoscale: molecular dynamics simulations of nanovoid growth in single-crystal aluminum. Metall Mater Trans A 44:617–626. doi: 10.1007/s11661-012-1082-z10.1007/s11661-012-1082-z ↗
4. Chen G, Zhang K, Wang G, Han W (2004) The superplastic deep drawing of a fine-grained alumina–zirconia ceramic composite and its cavitation behavior. Ceram Int 30:2157–2162. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2003.12.00210.1016/j.ceramint.2003.12.002 ↗
5. Cuitiño AM, Ortiz M (1996) Ductile fracture by vacancy condensation in f.c.c. single crystals. Acta Mater 44:427–436. doi: 10.1016/1359-6454(95)00220-010.1016/1359-6454(95)00220-0 ↗
6. Dao M, Lu L, Asaro R, Dehosson J, Ma E (2007) Toward a quantitative understanding of mechanical behavior of nanocrystalline metals. Acta Mater 55:4041–4065. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.03810.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.038 ↗
7. Dorigato A, Pegoretti A (2010) The role of alumina nanoparticles in epoxy adhesives. J Nanopart Res 13:2429–2441. doi: 10.1007/s11051-010-0130-010.1007/s11051-010-0130-0 ↗
8. Fang TH, Li WL, Tao NR, Lu K (2011) Revealing extraordinary intrinsic tensile plasticity in gradient nano-grained copper. Science 331:1587–1590. doi: 10.1126/science.120017710.1126/science.1200177 ↗
9. Fedorov AA, Gutkin MY, Ovid’ko IA (2003) Transformations of grain boundary dislocation pile-ups in nano- and polycrystalline materials. Acta Mater 51:887–898. doi: 10.1016/s1359-6454(02)00433-010.1016/S1359-6454(02)00433-0 ↗
10. Fischer FD, Antretter T (2009) Deformation, stress state and thermodynamic force for a growing void in an elastic–plastic material. Int J Plast 25:1819–1832. doi: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2008.11.00710.1016/j.ijplas.2008.11.007 ↗
11. Fu S-Y, Mai Y-W, Du S-Y, Hui D (2012) Nanomechanics and nanocomposites: mechanical behaviors. Composites B 43:1–2. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.04.02110.1016/j.compositesb.2011.04.021 ↗
12. Gleiter H (2008) Our thoughts are ours, their ends none of our own: are there ways to synthesize materials beyond the limitations of today? Acta Mater 56:5875–5893. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.08.02810.1016/j.actamat.2008.08.028 ↗
13. Guo X, Yang G, Weng GJ, Zhu LL (2015) Numerical simulation of ballistic performance of bimodal nanostructured metals. Mater Sci Eng A 630:13–26. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.01.08110.1016/j.msea.2015.01.081 ↗
14. He Y, Xu Z, Yang Q, Wu F, Liang L (2015) Supramolecular modification of multi-walled carbon nanotubes with β-cyclodextrin for better dispersibility. J Nanopart Res. doi: 10.1007/s11051-015-2866-z
15. Hu L, Zhou J (2011) Void evolution in nanocrystalline metal film under uniform tensile stress. Mater Sci Eng A 528:860–867. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2010.10.03210.1016/j.msea.2010.10.032 ↗
16. Hu L, Huo R, Zhou J, Wang Y, Zhang S (2012) The effects of the finest grains on the mechanical behaviours of nanocrystalline materials. J Nanopart Res. doi: 10.1007/s11051-011-0677-4
17. Huang M, Li Z, Wang C (2007) Discrete dislocation dynamics modelling of microvoid growth and its intrinsic mechanism in single crystals. Acta Mater 55:1387–1396. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.09.04110.1016/j.actamat.2006.09.041 ↗
18. Idrissi H, Wang B, Colla MS, Raskin JP, Schryvers D, Pardoen T (2011) Ultrahigh strain hardening in thin palladium films with nanoscale twins. Adv Mater 23:2119–2122. doi: 10.1002/adma.20100416010.1002/adma.201004160 ↗
19. Khan AS, Farrokh B, Takacs L (2008a) Compressive properties of Cu with different grain sizes: sub-micron to nanometer realm. J Mater Sci 43:3305–3313. doi: 10.1007/s10853-008-2508-210.1007/s10853-008-2508-2 ↗
20. Khan AS, Farrokh B, Takacs L (2008b) Effect of grain refinement on mechanical properties of ball-milled bulk aluminum. Mater Sci Eng A 489:77–84. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2008.01.04510.1016/j.msea.2008.01.045 ↗
21. Kobler A et al (2015) Nanotwinned silver nanowires: structure and mechanical properties. Acta Mater 92:299–308. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.02.04110.1016/j.actamat.2015.02.041 ↗
22. Koch CC (2007) Structural nanocrystalline materials: an overview. J Mater Sci 42:1403–1414. doi: 10.1007/s10853-006-0609-310.1007/s10853-006-0609-3 ↗
23. Kottada RS, Chokshi AH (2000) The high temperature tensile and compressive deformation characteristics of magnesia doped alumina. Acta Mater 48:3905–3915. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00180-410.1016/S1359-6454(00)00180-4 ↗
24. Levitas VI, Attariani H (2012) Mechanochemical continuum modeling of nanovoid nucleation and growth in reacting nanoparticles. J Phys Chem C 116:54–62. doi: 10.1021/jp205536510.1021/jp2055365 ↗
25. Lin IH, Thomson R (1986) Cleavage, dislocation emission, and shielding for cracks under general loading. Acta Metall 34:187–206. doi: 10.1016/0001-6160(86)90191-410.1016/0001-6160(86)90191-4 ↗
26. Liu H, Zhou J, Zhang S, Wang Y, Wang L, Dong S (2014) Modeling the strain-hardening effect and plastic deformation of nanocrystalline FCC metals dispersed with the finest grains. J Nanopart Res. doi: 10.1007/s11051-014-2449-4
27. Lubarda VA (2011) Emission of dislocations from nanovoids under combined loading. Int J Plast 27:181–200. doi: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2010.04.00510.1016/j.ijplas.2010.04.005 ↗
28. Lubarda VA, Schneider MS, Kalantar DH, Remington BA, Meyers MA (2004) Void growth by dislocation emission. Acta Mater 52:1397–1408. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2003.11.02210.1016/j.actamat.2003.11.022 ↗
29. Marek I, Vojtěch D, Michalcová A, Kubatík TF (2015) High-strength bulk nano-crystalline silver prepared by selective leaching combined with spark plasma sintering. Mater Sci Eng A 627:326–332. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.01.01410.1016/j.msea.2015.01.014 ↗
30. Miller RE, Shenoy VB (2000) Size-dependent elastic properties of nanosized structural elements. Nanotechnology 11:139–147. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/11/3/30110.1088/0957-4484/11/3/301 ↗
31. Ovid’ko IA, Sheinerman AG (2009) Grain size effect on crack blunting in nanocrystalline materials. Scr Mater 60:627–630. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.12.02810.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.12.028 ↗
32. Prasad MJNV, Suwas S, Chokshi AH (2009) Microstructural evolution and mechanical characteristics in nanocrystalline nickel with a bimodal grain-size distribution. Mater Sci Eng A 503:86–91. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2008.01.09910.1016/j.msea.2008.01.099 ↗
33. Shenoy VB (2005) Atomistic calculations of elastic properties of metallic FCC crystal surfaces. Phys Rev B 71:09410410.1103/PhysRevB.71.094104 ↗
34. Sinha T, Kulkarni Y (2014) Alternating brittle and ductile response of coherent twin boundaries in nanotwinned metals. J Appl Phys 116:183505. doi: 10.1063/1.490147210.1063/1.4901472 ↗
35. Traiviratana S, Bringa EM, Benson DJ, Meyers MA (2008) Void growth in metals: atomistic calculations. Acta Mater 56:3874–3886. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.04710.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.047 ↗
36. Wang L, Zhou J, Liu Y, Zhang S, Wang Y, Xing W (2011) Nanovoid growth in nanocrystalline metal by dislocation shear loop emission. Mater Sci Eng A 528:5428–5434. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.03.07410.1016/j.msea.2011.03.074 ↗
37. Wang F, Dai Y, Zhao J, Li Q, Zhang B (2014) Effect of size on fracture and tensile manipulation of gold nanowires. J Nanopart Res. doi: 10.1007/s11051-014-2752-0
38. Wu Y et al (2014) The effects of intergranular sliding on the fracture toughness of nanocrystalline materials with finest grains. J Mater Res 29:1086–1094. doi: 10.1557/jmr.2014.8910.1557/jmr.2014.89 ↗
39. Youssef KM, Scattergood RO, Murty KL, Horton JA, Koch CC (2005) Ultrahigh strength and high ductility of bulk nanocrystalline copper. Appl Phys Lett 87:091904. doi: 10.1063/1.203412210.1063/1.2034122 ↗
40. Zhao Y, Fang Q, Liu Y (2015) Effect of nanograin boundary sliding on nanovoid growth by dislocation shear loop emission in nanocrystalline materials. Eur J Mech A 49:419–429. doi: 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2014.09.00310.1016/j.euromechsol.2014.09.003 ↗
41. Zhu B, Asaro RJ, Krysl P, Bailey R (2005) Transition of deformation mechanisms and its connection to grain size distribution in nanocrystalline metals. Acta Mater 53:4825–4838. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.06.03310.1016/j.actamat.2005.06.033 ↗