Estimation of lattice strain and structural study of BaTiO3/PS polymer composite using X-ray peak profile analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
Barium titanate-polystyrene polymer composite (BaTiO3/PS) was synthesized by the solvent evaporation method while filler barium titanate was synthesized by the solid-state reaction method. The prepared sample was characterized by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The crystalline nature and phase of the prepared samples were confirmed by X-ray diffraction analysis. The average particle sizes of BaTiO3 and BaTiO3/PS were estimated as 161 nm and 119 nm by SEM morphographs. The Williamson–Hall (W–H), size–strain plot (SSP), and Halder–Wagner (H-W) techniques were employed to determine the crystallite size and inherent lattice strain using X-ray peak broadening analyses. The values of crystallite size computed using the modified Debye–Scherrer equation, W–H approach, and SSP are extremely similar and strongly correlated. It was also observed that crystallite size and lattice strain were not highly correlated.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Dielectric materials and actuators
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Emelianov N (2015) Structure and dielectric properties of composite material based on surface-modified BaTiO3 nanoparticles in polystyrene. Eur Phys J Appl Phys 69:10401. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjap/201414034310.1051/epjap/2014140343 ↗
2. Ismail FA, Osman RAM, Idris MS (2016) Review on dielectric properties of rare earth doped barium titanate. Penang, Malaysia, 090005. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.495878610.1063/1.4958786 ↗
3. Rath MK, Pradhan GK, Pandey B et al (2008) Synthesis, characterization and dielectric properties of europium-doped barium titanate nanopowders. Mater Lett 62:2136–2139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2007.11.03310.1016/j.matlet.2007.11.033 ↗
4. Böhning M, Goering H, Hao N et al (2005) Polycarbonate/SiC nanocomposites-influence of nanoparticle dispersion on molecular mobility and gas transport: Polycarbonate/SiC nanocomposites. Polym Adv Technol 16:262–268. https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.57010.1002/pat.570 ↗
5. Schadler LS (2003) Polymer-based and polymer-filled nanocomposites. In: Ajayan PM, Schadler LS, Braun PV (eds) Nanocomposite science and technology, 1st ed. Wiley, 77–153. https://doi.org/10.1002/3527602127.ch210.1002/3527602127.ch2 ↗
6. Castrillo PD, Olmos D, Amador DR, González-Benito J (2007) Real dispersion of isolated fumed silica nanoparticles in highly filled PMMA prepared by high energy ball milling. J Colloid Interface Sci 308:318–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2007.01.02210.1016/j.jcis.2007.01.022 ↗
7. Olmos D, Martín EV, González-Benito J (2014) New molecular-scale information on polystyrene dynamics in PS and PS–BaTiO3 composites from FTIR spectroscopy. Phys Chem Chem Phys 16:24339–24349. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CP03516J10.1039/C4CP03516J ↗
8. Foote NM (1944) Thermoplastic flow of polystyrene. Ind Eng Chem 36:244–248. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie50411a01310.1021/ie50411a013 ↗
9. Badheka P, Magadala V, Devaraju NG et al (2006) Effect of dehydroxylation of hydrothermal barium titanate on dielectric properties in polystyrene composite. J Appl Polym Sci 99:2815–2821. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.2289010.1002/app.22890 ↗
10. Yang K, Huang X, Xie L et al (2012) Core–shell structured polystyrene/BaTiO3 hybrid nanodielectrics prepared by in situ RAFT polymerization: a route to high dielectric constant and low loss materials with weak frequency dependence. Macromol Rapid Commun 33:1921–1926. https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.20120036110.1002/marc.201200361 ↗
11. Guo HZ, Mudryk Y, Ahmad MI et al (2012) Structure evolution and dielectric behavior of polystyrene-capped barium titanate nanoparticles. J Mater Chem 22:23944–23951. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2JM35600G10.1039/C2JM35600G ↗
12. Schneider R, Weigert F, Lesnyak V et al (2016) pH and concentration dependence of the optical properties of thiol-capped CdTe nanocrystals in water and D 2 O. Phys Chem Chem Phys 18:19083–19092. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CP03123D10.1039/C6CP03123D ↗
13. Sarkar S, Das R (2018) Shape effect on the elastic properties of Ag nanocrystals. Micro Nano Lett 13:312–315. https://doi.org/10.1049/mnl.2017.034910.1049/mnl.2017.0349 ↗
14. Arya A, Sharma AL (2017) Polymer electrolytes for lithium ion batteries: a critical study. Ionics 23:497–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-016-1908-610.1007/s11581-016-1908-6 ↗
15. Sheha E, Liu F, Wang T et al (2020) Dual polymer/liquid electrolyte with BaTiO3 electrode for magnesium batteries. ACS Appl Energy Mater 3:5882–5892. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.0c0081010.1021/acsaem.0c00810 ↗
16. Sheha E, Kamar EM, Fan L-Z (2021) Study the structure and electrochemical performance of BaTiO3/S electrode for magnesium-ion batteries. Mater Lett 284:129033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2020.12903310.1016/j.matlet.2020.129033 ↗
17. Ye J, Zhang B, Jin Y et al (2020) 3D segregated architecture BaTiO3/polystyrene composites with enhanced dielectric constant fabricated via hot pressing core–shell polystyrene@BaTiO3 composite microspheres. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 31:3101–3110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-020-02856-310.1007/s10854-020-02856-3 ↗
18. Hanemann T, Gesswein H, Schumacher B (2011) Development of new polymer–BaTiO3-composites with improved permittivity for embedded capacitors. Microsyst Technol 17:195–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-010-1197-310.1007/s00542-010-1197-3 ↗
19. Piana F, Cacciotti I, Šlouf M et al (2018) One-pot preparation of surface-functionalized barium titanate nanoparticles for high-K polystyrene composite films prepared via floating method. J Mater Sci 53:11343–11354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2457-310.1007/s10853-018-2457-3 ↗
20. Dang Z-M, Zheng Y, Xu H-P (2008) Effect of the ceramic particle size on the microstructure and dielectric properties of barium titanate/polystyrene composites. J Appl Polym Sci 110:3473–3479. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.2885610.1002/app.28856 ↗
21. Altomare A, Corriero N, Cuocci C et al (2015) QUALX2. 0: a qualitative phase analysis software using the freely available database POW_COD. J Appl Crystallogr 48:598–603. https://doi.org/10.1107/S160057671500231910.1107/S1600576715002319 ↗
22. Yogamalar R, Srinivasan R, Vinu A et al (2009) X-ray peak broadening analysis in ZnO nanoparticles. Solid State Commun 149:1919–1923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssc.2009.07.04310.1016/j.ssc.2009.07.043 ↗
23. Prabhu YT, Rao KV, Kumar VSS, Kumari BS (2014) X-ray analysis by Williamson-Hall and size-strain plot methods of ZnO nanoparticles with fuel variation. World Journal of Nano Science and Engineering 2014. https://doi.org/10.4236/wjnse.2014.4100410.4236/wjnse.2014.41004 ↗
24. Rabiei M, Palevicius A, Monshi A et al (2020) Comparing methods for calculating nano crystal size of natural hydroxyapatite using X-ray diffraction. Nanomaterials 10:1627. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano1009162710.3390/nano10091627 ↗
25. Nath D, Singh F, Das R (2020) X-ray diffraction analysis by Williamson-Hall, Halder-Wagner and size-strain plot methods of CdSe nanoparticles-a comparative study. Mater Chem Phys 239:122021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.12202110.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.122021 ↗
26. Pandiyarajan T, Karthikeyan B (2012) Cr doping induced structural, phonon and excitonic properties of ZnO nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res 14:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-011-0647-x10.1007/s11051-011-0647-x ↗
27. Augustin M, Balu T (2017) Estimation of lattice stress and strain in zinc and manganese ferrite nanoparticles by Williamson-Hall and size-strain plot methods. Int J Nanosci 16:1650035. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219581X1650035610.1142/S0219581X16500356 ↗
28. Eibl O, Pongratz P, Skalicky P, Schmelz H (1988) Dislocations in BaTiO3 ceramics. Physica status solidi (a) 108:495–502. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.221108020310.1002/pssa.2211080203 ↗
29. Mote VD, Purushotham Y, Dole BN (2012) Williamson-Hall analysis in estimation of lattice strain in nanometer-sized ZnO particles. J Theor Appl Phys 6:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/2251-7235-6-610.1186/2251-7235-6-6 ↗
30. Tagliente MA, Massaro M (2008) Strain-driven (0 0 2) preferred orientation of ZnO nanoparticles in ion-implanted silica. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect B 266:1055–1061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2008.02.03610.1016/j.nimb.2008.02.036 ↗
31. Shaalan N, Hamad D, Abdel-Latief A, Abdel-Rahim M (2016) Preparation of quantum size of tin oxide: Structural and physical characterization. Prog Nat Sci: Mater Int 26:145–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2016.03.00210.1016/j.pnsc.2016.03.002 ↗
32. Rosenberg Y, Machavariani VS, Voronel A et al (2000) Strain energy density in the x-ray powder diffraction from mixed crystals and alloys. J Phys: Condens Matter 12:8081. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/12/37/30710.1088/0953-8984/12/37/307 ↗
33. Chen C, Wang A, Fei L (2011) Effects of ultrasonic on preparation of alumina powder by wet chemical method. Adv Sci Lett 4:1249–1253. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2011.158910.1166/asl.2011.1589 ↗
34. Hua I, Hoechemer RH, Hoffmann MR (1995) Sonolytic hydrolysis of p-nitrophenyl acetate: the role of supercritical water. J Phys Chem 99:2335–2342. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100008a01510.1021/j100008a015 ↗