Aqueous foam loaded TiO2 nano-catalysts for promoting photodegradation of methylene blue
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work, the photodegradation of methylene blue was investigated by constructing a novel photocatalysis reactor, which was filled with aqueous foam. Nanoscale TiO2 particles were used as photocatalyst. In order to obtain stable foam phase, cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) was used as the frother, and its suitable initial concentration in the feeding solution was 0.20 g/L. Under the suitable conditions of loading liquid volume 200 mL, initial concentration of TiO2 nano-catalysts in the feeding solution 5.0 g/L, inner diameter of foam column 18 mm, aperture diameter of gas distributor 125 μm, and circulating velocity of bulk solution 500 mL/h, the maximum degradation percentage of methylene blue was 97.6 ± 1.2%. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) analysis suggested that the entrainment effect of rising bubbles and the circulation flow of bulk solution inside the aqueous foam did not cause the conspicuous aggregation of TiO2 nano-catalysts under the suitable conditions, but their surface roughness decreased. Meanwhile, foam entrainment had not a significant impact on the polydispersity of TiO2 nano-catalysts. In contrast to the photodegradation of methylene blue in aqueous solution, the photocatalysis process using aqueous foam is the intensity of light received by TiO2 nano-catalyst increases, and irradiation period is less. This work is expected to provide new insight into the rational design of photocatalysis reactor, to facilitate the harmless treatment of dyestuff wastewater. Graphical abstract
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. Gao Y, Deng SQ, Jin X, Cai SL, Zheng SR, Zhang WG (2019) The construction of amorphous metal-organic cage-based solid for rapid dye adsorption and time-dependent dye separation from water. Chem Eng J 357:129–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.09.12410.1016/j.cej.2018.09.124 ↗
2. Ismail M, Akhtar K, Khan MI, Kamal T, Khan MA, Asiri MA, Seo J, Khan SB (2019) Pollution, toxicity and carcinogenicity of organic dyes and their catalytic bio-remediation. Curr Pharm Design 25:3645–3663. https://doi.org/10.2174/138161282566619102114202610.2174/1381612825666191021142026 ↗
3. Garcia-Segura S, Ocon JD, Chong MN (2018) Electrochemical oxidation remediation of real wastewater effluents-a review. Process Saf Environ 113:48–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2017.09.01410.1016/j.psep.2017.09.014 ↗
4. Wang J, Zhang T, Mei Y, Pan B (2018) Treatment of reverse-osmosis concentrate of printing and dyeing wastewater by electro-oxidation process with controlled oxidation-reduction potential (ORP). Chemosphere 201:621–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.03.05110.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.03.051 ↗
5. Zhang H, Li Y, Cheng B, Ding C, Zhang Y (2020) Synthesis of a starch-based sulfonic ion exchange resin and adsorption of dyestuffs to the resin. Int J Biol Macromol 161:561–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.01710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.017 ↗
6. Kothai A, Sathishkumar C, Muthupriya R, Dharchana R (2021) Experimental investigation of textile dyeing wastewater treatment using aluminium in electro coagulation process and Fenton’s reagent in advanced oxidation process. Mater Today 45:1411–1416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.09410.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.094 ↗
7. Falk GS, Borlaf M, López-Muñoz MJ, Fariñas JC, Neto JR, Moreno R (2018) Microwave-assisted synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles: photocatalytic activity of powders and thin films. J Nanopart Res 20(2):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-018-4140-710.1007/s11051-018-4140-7 ↗
8. Zhao H, Li Y (2021) Removal of heavy metal ion by floatable hydrogel and reusability of its waste material in photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes. J Environ Chem Eng 9:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.10531610.1016/j.jece.2021.105316 ↗
9. Ye Y, Feng Y, Bruning H, Yntema D, Rijnaarts HHM (2018) Photocatalytic degradation of metoprolol by TiO2 nanotube arrays and UV-LED: effects of catalyst properties, operational parameters, commonly present water constituents, and photo-induced reactive species. Appl Catal B-Environ 220:171–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.08.04010.1016/j.apcatb.2017.08.040 ↗
10. Tang M, Ao Y, Wang C, Wang P (2020) Rationally constructing of a novel dual Z-scheme composite photocatalyst with significantly enhanced performance for neonicotinoid degradation under visible light irradiation. Appl Catal B-Environ 270:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.11891810.1016/j.apcatb.2020.118918 ↗
11. Sundar KP, Kanmani S (2020) Progression of photocatalytic reactors and it’s comparison: a review. Chem Eng Res Des 154:135–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2019.11.03510.1016/j.cherd.2019.11.035 ↗
12. Phan TTN, Nikoloski AN, Bahri PA, Li D (2018) Optimizing photocatalytic performance of hydrothermally synthesized LaFeO3 by tuning material properties and operating conditions. J Environ Chem Eng 6(1):1209–1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2018.01.03310.1016/j.jece.2018.01.033 ↗
13. Ahmad N, Bhatnagar S, Ali SS, Dutta R (2015) Phytofabrication of bioinduced silver nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Int J Nanomed 10:7019–7030. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S9447910.2147/IJN.S94479 ↗
14. Sudarsanam P, Peeters E, Makshina EV, Parvulescu VI, Sels BF (2019) Advances in porous and nanoscale catalysts for viable biomass conversion. Chem Soc Rev 48(8):2366–2421. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CS00452H10.1039/C8CS00452H ↗
15. Ahmad N, Bhatnagar S, Saxena R, Iqbal D, Ghosh AK, Dutta R (2017) Biosynthesis and characterization of gold nanoparticles: kinetics, in vitro and in vivo study. Mat Sci Eng 78:553–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.03.28210.1016/j.msec.2017.03.282 ↗
16. Wu W, Shevchenko EV (2018) The surface science of nanoparticles for catalysis: electronic and steric effects of organic ligands. J Nanopart Res 20(9):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-018-4319-y10.1007/s11051-018-4319-y ↗
17. Khatoon A, Khan F, Ahmad N, Shaikh S, Rizvi SMD, Shakil S, Al-Qahtani MH, Abuzenadah AM, Tabrez S, Ahmed ABF, Alafnan A, Islam H, Iqbal D, Dutta R (2018) Silver nanoparticles from leaf extract of Mentha piperita: eco-friendly synthesis and effect on acetylcholinesterase activity. Life Sci 209:430–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2018.08.04610.1016/j.lfs.2018.08.046 ↗
18. De la Cruz N, Romero V, Dantas RF, Marco P, Bayarri B, Giménez J, Esplugas S (2013) o-Nitrobenzaldehyde actinometry in the presence of suspended TiO2 for photocatalytic reactors. Catal Today 209:209–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2012.08.03510.1016/j.cattod.2012.08.035 ↗
19. Habibi D, Faraji AR, Sheikh D, Sheikhi M, Abedi S (2014) Application of supported Mn(III), Fe(III) and Co(II) as heterogeneous, selective and highly reusable nano catalysts for synthesis of arylaminotetrazoles, and DFT studies of the products. RSC Adv 4(88):47625–47636. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ra06463a10.1039/c4ra06463a ↗
20. Najafabadi SM, Rashidi F (2019) Performance of a multistage rotating mesh support photoreactor immobilized with TiO2 on photocatalytic degradation of PNP: reactor construction and optimization. Chem Eng Process 146:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2019.10766810.1016/j.cep.2019.107668 ↗
21. Lyu XJ, Liu Y, Chen C, Sima M, Lyu JF, Ma ZY, Huang S (2020) Enhanced use of foam fractionation in the photodegradation of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS). Sep Purif Technol 253:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2020.11748810.1016/j.seppur.2020.117488 ↗
22. Hu N, Wu Z, Jin L, Li Z, Liu W, Huang D, Yang C (2019) Nanoparticle as a novel foam controller for enhanced protein separation from sweet potato starch wastewater. Sep Purif Technol 209:392–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2018.07.06410.1016/j.seppur.2018.07.064 ↗
23. Sheng Y, Xue M, Zhang S, Wang Y, Zhai X, Ma L, Liu X (2020) Role of nanoparticles in the performance of foam stabilized by a mixture of hydrocarbon and fluorocarbon surfactants. Chem Eng Sci 228:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2020.11597710.1016/j.ces.2020.115977 ↗
24. Chen S, Wang C, Yin Y, Chen K (2016) Synthesis of photo-responsive azobenzene molecules with different hydrophobic chain length for controlling foam stability. RSC Adv 6:60138–60144. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra06459k10.1039/c6ra06459k ↗
25. Portillo-Vélez NS, Olvera-Neria O, Hernández-Pérez I, Rubio-Ponce A (2013) Localized electronic states induced by oxygen vacancies on anatase TiO2 (101) surface. Surf Sci 616:115–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susc.2013.06.00610.1016/j.susc.2013.06.006 ↗
26. Feizpoor S, Habibi-Yangjeh A (2018) Integration of Ag2WO4 and AgBr with TiO2 to fabricate ternary nanocomposites: novel plasmonic photocatalysts with remarkable activity under visible light. Mater Res Bull 99:93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2017.10.02810.1016/j.materresbull.2017.10.028 ↗
27. Dimitrakopoulou D, Rethemiotaki I, Frontistis Z, Xekoukoulotakis NP, Venieri D, Mantzavinos D (2012) Degradation, mineralization and antibiotic inactivation of amoxicillin by UV-A/TiO2 photocatalysis. J Environ Manage 98:168–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.01.01010.1016/j.jenvman.2012.01.010 ↗
28. Wei Y, Wang J, Yu R, Wan J, Wang D (2019) Constructing SrTiO3-TiO2 heterogeneous hollow multi-shelled structures for enhanced solar water splitting. Angew Chem Int Edit 58(5):1422–1426. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20181236410.1002/anie.201812364 ↗
29. Peng Y, Ji J, Chen D (2015) Ultrasound assisted synthesis of ZnO/reduced graphene oxide composites with enhanced photocatalytic activity and anti-photocorrosion. Appl Surf Sci 356:762–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.07010.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.070 ↗
30. Renard D, Tian S, Ahmadivand A, DeSantis CJ, Clark BD, Nordlander P, Halas NJ (2019) Polydopamine-stabilized aluminum nanocrystals: aqueous stability and benzo[a]pyrene detection. ACS Nano 13(3):3117–3124. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b0844510.1021/acsnano.8b08445 ↗
31. Koe WS, Lee JW, Chong WC, Pang YL, Sim LC (2020) An overview of photocatalytic degradation: photocatalysts, mechanisms, and development of photocatalytic membrane. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(3):2522–2565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07193-510.1007/s11356-019-07193-5 ↗
32. Rafiee E, Noori E, Zinatizadeh AA, Zangeneh H (2018) Surfactant effect on photocatalytic activity of Ag-TiO2/PW nanocomposite in DR16 degradation: characterization of nanocomposite and RSM process optimization. Mat Sci Semicon Proc 83:115–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2018.04.02110.1016/j.mssp.2018.04.021 ↗
33. Khan AM, Mehmood A, Sayed M, Nazar MF, Ismail B, Khan RA, Ullah H, Rehman HMA, Khan AY, Khan AR (2017) Influence of acids, bases and surfactants on the photocatalytic degradation of a model dye rhodamine B. J Mol Liq 236:395–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2017.04.06310.1016/j.molliq.2017.04.063 ↗
34. Aoudjit F, Cherifi O, Halliche D (2019) Simultaneously efficient adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of sodium dodecyl sulfate surfactant by one-pot synthesized TiO2/layered double hydroxide materials. Sep Sci Technol 54:1095–1105. https://doi.org/10.1080/01496395.2018.152735210.1080/01496395.2018.1527352 ↗
35. Qu Y, Wang W, Jing L, Song S, Shi X, Xue L, Fu H (2010) Surface modification of nanocrystalline anatase with CTAB in the acidic condition and its effects on photocatalytic activity and preferential growth of TiO2. Appl Surf Sci 257:151–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.06.05410.1016/j.apsusc.2010.06.054 ↗
36. Baram N, Starosvetsky D, Starosvetsky J, Epshtein M, Armon R, Ein-Eli Y (2011) Photocatalytic inactivation of microorganisms using nanotubular TiO2. Appl Catal B-Environ 101:212–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2010.09.02410.1016/j.apcatb.2010.09.024 ↗
37. Yoshikawa N, Kimura T, Kawase Y (2003) Oxidative degradation of nonionic surfactants with TiO2 photocatalyst in a bubble column reactor. Can J Chem Eng 81:719–724. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.545081035110.1002/cjce.5450810351 ↗
38. Umer M, Tahir M, Azam MU, Tahir B, Jaffar MM, Alias H (2019) Montmorillonite dispersed single wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs)/TiO2 heterojunction composite for enhanced dynamic photocatalytic H2 production under visible light. Appl Clay Sci 174:110–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2019.03.02910.1016/j.clay.2019.03.029 ↗
39. Wang H, Wei X, Du Y, Wang D (2019) Effect of water-soluble polymers on the performance of dust-suppression foams: wettability, surface viscosity and stability. Colloid Surf A 568:92–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.01.06210.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.01.062 ↗
40. Zalucky J, Wagner M, Schubert M, Lange R, Hampel U (2017) Hydrodynamics of descending gas-liquid flows in solid foams: liquid holdup, multiphase pressure drop and radial dispersion. Chem Eng Sci 168:480–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2017.05.01110.1016/j.ces.2017.05.011 ↗
41. Schwarze M, Rost A, Weigel T, Schomäcker R (2009) Selection of systems for catalyst recovery by micellar enhanced ultrafiltration. Chem Eng Process 48:356–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2008.04.01410.1016/j.cep.2008.04.014 ↗
42. Ainslie MA, Leighton TG (2011) Review of scattering and extinction cross-sections, damping factors, and resonance frequencies of a spherical gas bubble. J Acoust Soc Am 130:3184–3208. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.362832110.1121/1.3628321 ↗
43. Liu G, Yao G, Xu J, Yan X (2020) Spatial decoupling of light absorption and scattering centers in plasmon-assisted bubble column evaporator for solar steam generation. ES Energ Environ Sci 9:41–49. https://doi.org/10.30919/esee8c45010.30919/esee8c450 ↗
44. Wang Y, Nan F, Zheng H, Wu Z (2012) Effects of temperature and trehalose on foam separation of nisin from the culture broth produced by Lactococcus lactis subspecies lactis W28. J Dairy Sci 95:5588–5596. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-570910.3168/jds.2012-5709 ↗
45. Wang W, Liu Z, Zheng C, Xu C, Liu Y, Wang G (2003) Synthesis of CdS nanoparticles by a novel and simple one-step, solid-state reaction in the presence of a nonionic surfactant. Mater Lett 57:2755–2760. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-577X(02)01371-X10.1016/S0167-577X(02)01371-X ↗
46. Soleimani F, Madaah Hosseini HR, Ordikhani F, Mokhtari-Dizaji M (2016) Enhancing sonocatalytic properties of TiO2 nanocatalysts by controlling the surface conditions: effect of particle size and PVA modification. Desalin Water Treat 57:28378–28385. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2016.118574610.1080/19443994.2016.1185746 ↗
47. Zhou YD, Liu QL, Yang C, Zhao ZY (2018) Interfacial micro-structure and properties of TiO2/SnO2 heterostructures with rutile phase: a DFT calculation investigation. Appl Surf Sci 451:258–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.05.01010.1016/j.apsusc.2018.05.010 ↗
48. Coward T, Lee JG, Caldwell GS (2015) The effect of bubble size on the efficiency and economics of harvesting microalgae by foam flotation. J Appl Phycol 27:733–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-014-0384-510.1007/s10811-014-0384-5 ↗
49. Jia L, Liu W, Cao J, Wu Z, Yang C (2021) Foam fractionation for effective removal of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from water body: strengthening foam drainage by artificially inducing foam evolution. J Environ Manage 291:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.11262810.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112628 ↗
50. Wang Y, Wu Z, Li R, Zhang Z (2013) Enhancing foam drainage using inclined foam channels of different angles for recovering the protein from whey wastewater. Colloid Surface A 419:28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.11.04510.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.11.045 ↗
51. Dickinson JE, Laskovski D, Stevenson P, Galvin KP (2010) Enhanced foam drainage using parallel inclined channels in a single-stage foam fractionation column. Chem Eng Sci 65:2481–2490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2009.12.02710.1016/j.ces.2009.12.027 ↗
52. Koehler SA, Hilgenfeldt S, Stone HA (2004) Foam drainage on the microscale: I. Modeling flow through single Plateau borders. J Colloid Int Sci 276:420–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2003.12.06110.1016/j.jcis.2003.12.061 ↗
53. Kamani H, Nasseri S, Khoobi M, Nodehi RN, Mahvi AH (2016) Sonocatalytic degradation of humic acid by N-doped TiO2 nano-particle in aqueous solution. J Environ Health Sci Eng 14:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40201-016-0242-210.1186/s40201-016-0242-2 ↗
54. Almomani F, Bhosale R, Khraisheh M, Kumar A, Tawalbeh M (2019) Photocatalytic conversion of CO2 and H2O to useful fuels by nanostructured composite catalysis. Appl Surf Sci 483:363–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.03.30410.1016/j.apsusc.2019.03.304 ↗
55. Shimojo AA, Fernandes ARV, Ferreira NR, Sanchez-Lopez E, Santana MH, Souto EB (2019) Evaluation of the influence of process parameters on the properties of resveratrol-loaded NLC using 22 full factorial design. Antioxidants 8(8):272–285. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox808027210.3390/antiox8080272 ↗
56. Esmaili H, Kotobi A, Sheibani S, Rashchi F (2018) Photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue by nanostructured Fe/FeS powder under visible light. Int J Min Met Mater 25:244–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-018-1567-x10.1007/s12613-018-1567-x ↗
57. Zeng L, Sun H, Peng T, Lv X (2019) Comparison of the phase transition and degradation of methylene blue of TiO2, TiO2/montmorillonite mixture and TiO2/montmorillonite composite. Front Chem 7:1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2019.0053810.3389/fchem.2019.00538 ↗
58. Hu X, Sun Z, Song J, Zhang G, Zheng S (2018) Facile synthesis of nano-TiO2/stellerite composite with efficient degradation of phenol. Adv Powder Technol 29:1644–1654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2018.03.03010.1016/j.apt.2018.03.030 ↗
59. Mohammed MK (2020) Carbon nanotubes loaded ZnO/Ag ternary nanohybrid with improved visible light photocatalytic activity and stability. Optik 217:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.16486710.1016/j.ijleo.2020.164867 ↗
60. Jafari H, Afshar S (2016) Improved photodegradation of organic contaminants using nano-TiO2 and TiO2-SiO2 deposited on Portland cement concrete blocks. Photochem Photobiol 92:87–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/php.1255410.1111/php.12554 ↗