journal article·2018-07

Synthesis of Cu-doped δ-FeOOH nanoparticles by a wet chemical method

Naoki Nishida, Shota Amagasa, Yoshio Kobayashi, Yasuhiro Yamada

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 20· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

Cu-doped maghemite (γ-Fe2O3) and Cu-doped feroxyhyte (δ-FeOOH) nanoparticles were synthesized using a wet chemical method. The synthesis was performed starting from a mixture of iron and copper salts. Cu-doped γ-Fe2O3 and Cu metal nanoparticles were obtained from a solution with a high Cu/Fe ratio, whereas Cu-doped δ-FeOOH nanoparticles were obtained from a solution with a low Cu/Fe ratio. The size of the nanoparticles was below 10 nm. The superparamagnetic behavior of the nanoparticles was determined from their Mossbauer spectra. The hyperfine magnetic field of Cu-doped δ-FeOOH nanoparticles was larger than that of undoped δ-FeOOH nanoparticles. The Cu content of the intermediate species plays an important role in the oxidation process. The intermediate species in the precipitates before rinsing was speculated to be Cu1-xFeIIxFeIII2O4 (x = 0.4–0.7), which was subsequently oxidized in air to form Cu-doped γ-Fe2O3 or Cu-doped δ-FeOOH, depending on the amount of Cu.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Iron oxide chemistry and applications · Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites · Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. Cesar I, Kay A, Martinez JAG, Grätzel M (2006) Translucent thin film Fe2O3 photoanodes for efficient water splitting by sunlight: nanostructure-directing effect of Si-doping. J Am Chem Soc 128:4582–4583. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja060292p10.1021/ja060292p ↗
2. Chung FH (1974) Quantitative interpretation of X-ray diffraction patterns of mixtures. I. Matrix-flushing method for quantitative multicomponent analysis. J Appl Crystallogr 7:519–525. https://doi.org/10.1107/S002188987401037510.1107/S0021889874010375 ↗
3. Faria M, Rosemberg RS, Bomfeti CA, Monteiro DS, Barbosa F, Oliveira LC, Rodriguez M, Pereira MC, Rodrigues JL (2014) Arsenic removal from contaminated water by ultrafine δ-FeOOH adsorbents. Chem Eng J 237:47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.10.00610.1016/j.cej.2013.10.006 ↗
4. Guivar JAR, Sadrollahi E, Menzel D, Fernandes EGR, López EO, Torres MM, Arsuaga JM, Arencibia A, Litterst FJ (2017) Magnetic, structural and surface properties of functionalized maghemite nanoparticles for copper and lead adsorption. RSC Adv 7:28763–28779. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA02750H10.1039/C7RA02750H ↗
5. Liu X, Liu J, Zhang SH, Nan ZD, Shi Q (2016) Structural, magnetic, and thermodynamic evolutions of Zn-doped Fe3O4 nanoparticles synthesized using a one-step solvothermal method. J Phys Chem C 120:1328–1341. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b1061810.1021/acs.jpcc.5b10618 ↗
6. Lu AH, Salabas EL, Schüth F (2007) Magnetic nanoparticles: synthesis, protection, functionalization, and application. Angew Chem Int Ed 46:1222–1244. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20060286610.1002/anie.200602866 ↗
7. Murad E (1998) Clays and clay minerals: what can Mössbauer spectroscopy do to help understand them? Hyperfine Interact 117:39–70. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101263512487410.1023/A:1012635124874 ↗
8. Nishida N, Amagasa S, Kobayashi Y, Yamada Y (2016a) Synthesis of superparamagnetic δ-FeOOH nanoparticles by a chemical method. Appl Surf Sci 387:996–1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.06.17910.1016/j.apsusc.2016.06.179 ↗
9. Nishida N, Amagasa S, Kobayashi Y, Yamada Y (2016b) One-pot production of copper ferrite nanoparticles using a chemical method. Hyperfine Interact. 237(111). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10751-016-1321-610.1007/s10751-016-1321-6 ↗
10. Pereira MC, Garcia EM, Silva AC, Lorencon E, Ardisson JD, Murad E, Fabris JD, Matencio T, Ramalho TD, Rocha MVJ (2011) Nanostructured δ-FeOOH: a novel photocatalyst for water splitting. J Mater Chem 21:10280–10282. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1JM11736J10.1039/c1jm11736j ↗
11. Pinakidou F, Katsikini M, Paloura EC, Simeonidis K, Mitraka E, Mitrakas M (2016) Monitoring the role of Mn and Fe in the As-removal efficiency of tetravalent manganese feroxyhyte nanoparticles from drinking water: an X-ray absorption spectroscopy study. J Colloid Interface Sci 477:148–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2016.05.04110.1016/j.jcis.2016.05.041 ↗
12. Polyakov AY, Goldt AE, Sorkina TA, Perminova IV, Pankratov DA, Goodilin EA, Tretyakov YD (2012) Constrained growth of anisotropic magnetic δ-FeOOH nanoparticles in the presence of humic substances. CrystEngComm 14:8097–8102. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CE25886B10.1039/c2ce25886b ↗
13. Rocha TS, Nascimento ES, Silva AC, Oliveira HS, Garcia EM, Oliveira LCA, Monteiro DS, Rodriguez M, Pereira MC (2013) Enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen generation from water by Ni(OH)2 loaded on Ni-doped δ-FeOOH nanoparticles obtained by one-step synthesis. RSC Adv 3:20308–20314. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RA43561J10.1039/c3ra43561j ↗
14. Schwertmann U, Cornell RM (2000) Iron oxides in the laboratory: preparation and characterization. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim10.1002/9783527613229 ↗
15. Yuan H, Liu E, Yin Y, Zhang W, Wong PKJ, Zheng JG, Huang Z, Ou H, Zhai Y, Xu Q, Du J, Zhai H (2016) Enhancement of magnetic moment in ZnxFe3−xO4 thin films with dilute Zn substitution. Appl Phys Lett 108:232403. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.495346210.1063/1.4953462 ↗