Quantifying the thermodynamic interactions of polyhedral boranes in solution to guide nanocomposite fabrication
Source abstract
Abstract
The solubility of boron containing nanoparticles in a variety of solvents is quantified using static light scattering in conjunction with refractometry. Four polyhedral boranes were tested in this work, using refractometry to obtain dn/dc, while static light scattering quantifies A2. A2 obtained from these measurements was then used to calculate χ, the solute–solvent interaction parameter, and the Hildebrand solubility parameter, δ, which provides a quantifiable method to identify good solvents. Of the nanoparticles studied, 1,3-di-o-carboranylpropane is thermodynamically stable in toluene, with a χ less than 0.5, a solubility limit of 2.47 mg/mL, and all solutions remaining clear with no visible particle settling. For all of the particles tested, there was good correlation between the physical observations of the solutions, χ, and δ. For instance, lower values of χ correspond to a smaller radius of gyration (Rg). A list of suitable solvents based on δ is also presented.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation · Thermal and Kinetic Analysis · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Ausman KD, Piner R, Lourie O, Ruoff RS (2000) Organic solvent dispersions of single-walled carbon nanotubes: toward solutions of pristine nanotubes. J Phys Chem 104:8911–891510.1021/jp002555m ↗
2. Bahr JL, Mickelson ET, Bronikowski MJ, Smalley RE, Tour JM (2001) Dissolution of small diameter single-wall carbon nanotubes in organic solvents? Chem Commun 193–19410.1039/b008042j ↗
3. Barton AM (1993) Handbook of solubility parameters, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
4. Bender M (1952) The use of light scattering for determining particle size and molecular weight and shape. J Chem Educ 29:15–1810.1021/ed029p15 ↗
5. Bergin SD, Nicolosi V, Streich PV, Giordani S, Su Z, Windle AH, Ryan P, Niraj PP, Wang ZT, Carpenter L, Blau WJ, Boland JJ, Hamilton JP, Coleman JN (2008) Towards solutions of single-walled carbon nanotubes in common solvents. Adv Mater 20:1876–188110.1002/adma.200702451 ↗
6. Bergin SD, Sun Z, Strich P, Hamilton J, Coleman JN (2010) New solvents for nanotubes: approaching the dispersibility of surfactants. J Phys Chem C 114:231–23710.1021/jp908923m ↗
7. Brandrup J, Immergut EH, Grulke EA, Abe A, Bloch DR (2005) Polymer handbook. Wiley, New York
8. Brice BA, Halwer A (1951) Differential refractometer. J Opt Soc Am 41:1033–103710.1364/JOSA.41.001033 ↗
9. Chen J, Hamon MA, Hu H, Chen Y, Rao AM, Ekland PC, Haddon RC (1998) Solution properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Science 282:95–9810.1126/science.282.5386.95 ↗
10. Cheng Q, Debnath S, Gregan E, Byrne HJ (2008) Effect of solvent solubility parameters on the dispersion of single-walled carbon nanotubes. J Phys Chem C 112:20154–2015810.1021/jp8067188 ↗
11. Coleman JN, Khan U, Blau WJ, Gun’ko YK (2006) Small but strong: a review of the mechanical properties of carbon nanotube–polymer composites. Carbon 44:1624–165210.1016/j.carbon.2006.02.038 ↗
12. Debye P (1947) Molecular-weight determination by light scattering. J Phys Colloid Chem 51:18–3210.1021/j150451a002 ↗
13. DiPaola-Baranyi G, Guillet JE (1978) Estimation of solubility parameters for poly(vinyl acetate) by inverse gas chromatography. J Chromatogr 166:349–35610.1016/S0021-9673(00)95616-4 ↗
14. Fisher CH (2004) The T/2V 1/2 ratio: solubility parameter substitute. J Am Oil Chem Soc 81:519–52110.1007/s11746-004-0934-3 ↗
15. Giacomelli MG, Chalut KJ, Ostrander JH, Wax A (2010) Review of the application of T-matrix calculations for determining the structure of cell nuclei with angle-resolved light scattering measurements. IEEE J Sel Top Quant Electron 16:900–90810.1109/JSTQE.2009.2031984 ↗
16. Hassellov M, Readman JW, Ranville JF, Ranville JF, Tiede K (2008) Nanoparticle analysis and characterization methodologies in environmental risk assessment of engineered nanoparticles. Ecotoxicology 17:344–36110.1007/s10646-008-0225-x ↗
17. Hernandez Y, Lotya M, Rickard D, Bergin SD, Coleman JN (2010) Measurement of multicomponent solubility parameters for graphene facilitates solvent discovery. Langmuir 26:3208–321310.1021/la903188a ↗
18. Hertel T, Walkup RE, Avouris P (1998) Deformation of carbon nanotubes by surface van der Waals forces. Phys Rev 58:13870–1387310.1103/PhysRevB.58.13870 ↗
19. Huglin MB (1972) Light scattering from polymer solutions. Academic Press, New York
20. Hussain F, Hojjati M, Okamoto M, Gorga RE (2006) Review article: polymer–matrix nanocomposites, processing, manufacturing, and application: an overview. J Compos Math 40:1511–157510.1177/0021998306067321 ↗
21. Jemmis ED (1982) Overlap control and stability of polyhedral molecules. Closo-carboranes. J Am Chem Soc 104:7017–702010.1021/ja00389a021 ↗
22. Kadish KM, Ruoff RS (2000) Fullerenes chemistry, physics, and technology. Wiley Interscience, New York
23. King JW (1995) Determination of the solubility parameter of soybean. Oil by inverse gas chromatography. Lebensm Wiss Technol 28:190–19510.1016/S0023-6438(95)91398-X ↗
24. Kulkarni PP, Jafvert CT (2008) CT solubility of C60 in solvent mixtures. Environ Sci Tech 42:845–85110.1021/es071062t ↗
25. Landi BJ, Ruf HJ, Worman JJ, Raffaelle RP (2004) Effects of alkyl amide solvents on the dispersion of single-wall carbon nanotubes. J Phys Chem B 108:17089–1709510.1021/jp047521j ↗
26. Maker JM, Beaudoin JJ (2003) Carbon nanotubes and their application in the construction industry. In: International symposium on nanotechnology in construction proceedings, Paisley, Scotland10.1039/9781847551528-00331 ↗
27. Miller FP, Vandome AF, McBrewster J (2010) Flory Huggins solution theory. VDM Publishing, New York
28. Misra R, Alidedeoglu AH, Jarett WL, Morgan SE (2009) Molecular miscibility and chain dynamics in POSS/polystyrene blends: control of POSS preferential dispersion states. Polymer 50:2906–291810.1016/j.polymer.2009.03.057 ↗
29. Morgan DA, Sloan J, Green MLH (2002) Direct imaging of o-carborane molecules within single walled carbon nanotubes. Chem Commun 20:2442–244310.1039/b207594f ↗
30. Pan X, Glatz CE (2003) Solvent effects on the second virial coefficient of subtilisin and solubility. Cryst Growth Des 3:203–20710.1021/cg025600j ↗
31. Rouff RS, Tse DS, Malhotra R, Lorents DC (1993) Solubility of fullerene (C60) in a variety of solvents. J Phys Chem 97:3379–338310.1021/j100115a049 ↗
32. Rubinstein M, Colby RH (2003) Polymer physics. Oxford University Press, Oxford10.1093/oso/9780198520597.001.0001 ↗
33. Sierra AQ, Mora AVD (1995) Size-shape determination of nonspherical particles in suspension by means of full and depolarized static light scattering. Appl Optics 34:6256–626210.1364/AO.34.006256 ↗
34. Sivaraman N, Dhamodaran I, Kaliappan TG, Srinivasan PR, Vasudeva Rao Mathews CK (1992) Solubility of C60 in organic solvents. J Org Chem 57:6077–607910.1021/jo00048a056 ↗
35. Song YS, Rae RY (2005) Influence of dispersion states of carbon nanotubes on physical properties of epoxy nanocomposites. Carbon 43:1378–138510.1016/j.carbon.2005.01.007 ↗
36. Sperling LH (2006) Introduction to physical polymer science. Wiley, New York
37. Velev OD, Kaler EW, Lenhoff AM (1998) Protein interactions in solution characterized by light and neutron scattering: comparison of lysozyme and chymotrypsinogen. Biophys J 75:2682–269710.1016/S0006-3495(98)77713-6 ↗
38. Williams RE (1972) Carborane polymers. Pure Appl Chem 29:569–58310.1351/pac197229040569 ↗
39. Zhi C, Bando Y, Tang C, Honda S, Sato K, Kuwahara H, Golberg D (2006) Purification of boron nitride nanotubes through polymer wrapping. J Phys Chem B 110:1525–152810.1021/jp054941f ↗