journal article·2018-05

Thermal treatment to enhance saturation magnetization of superparamagnetic Ni nanoparticles while maintaining low coercive force

Toshitaka Ishizaki, Kenichi Yatsugi, Kunio Akedo

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 20· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Superparamagnetic nanoparticles capped by insulators have the potential to decrease eddy current and hysteresis losses. However, the saturation magnetization (Ms) decreases significantly with decreasing the particle size. In this study, superparamagnetic Ni nanoparticles having the mean size of 11.6 ± 1.8 nm were synthesized from the reduction of Ni(II) acetylacetonate in oleylamine with the addition of trioctylphosphine, indicating the coercive force (Hc) less than 1 Oe. Thermal treatments of the Ni nanoparticles were investigated as a method to enhance the Ms. The results indicated that the M s was enhanced by an increase of the Ni mass ratio with increasing thermal treatment temperature. However, the decomposition behavior of the capping layers indicated that their alkyl chains actively decomposed at temperatures above 523 K to form Ni3P via reaction between Ni and P, resulting in particle growth with a significant increase in the Hc. Therefore, the optimal temperature was determined to be 473 K, which increased the Ni ratio without formation of Ni3P while maintaining particle sizes with superparamagnetic properties. Further, the Ms could be improved by 22% (relative to the as-synthesized Ni nanoparticles) after thermal treatment at 473 K while maintaining the Hc to be less than 1 Oe.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles · Magnetic Properties and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Albert PA, Kovac Z, Lilienthal HR, McGuire TR, Nakamura Y (1967) Effect of phosphorus on the magnetization of nickel. J Appl Phys 38:1258–11-2. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.170956810.1063/1.1709568 ↗
2. Bedanta S, Kleemann W (2009) Supermagnetism. J Phys D Appl Phys 42:013001–011-28. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/42/1/01300110.1088/0022-3727/42/1/013001 ↗
3. Carenco S, Boissière C, Nicole L, Sanchez C, Floch PL, Mézailles N (2010) Controlled design of size-tunable monodisperse nickel nanoparticles. Chem Mater 22:1340–1349. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm902007g10.1021/cm902007g ↗
4. Chen Y, Peng DL, Lin D, Luo X (2007) Preparation and magnetic properties of nickel nanoparticles via the thermal decomposition of nickel organometallic precursor in alkylamines. Nanotechnology 18:505703–5051–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/18/50/50570310.1088/0957-4484/18/50/505703 ↗
5. Chen Y, Luo X, She H, Yue GH, Peng DL (2009) Size- and structure-controlled synthesis and characterization of nickel nanoparticles. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 9:5157–5163. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2009.120610.1166/jnn.2009.1206 ↗
6. Cushing BL, Kolesnichenko VL, O’Connor CJ (2004) Recent advances in the liquid-phase syntheses of inorganic nanoparticles. Chem Rev 104:3893–3946. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr030027b10.1021/cr030027b ↗
7. Dobbrow C, Schmidt AM (2012) Improvement of the oxidation stability of cobalt nanoparticles. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 3:75–81. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.3.910.3762/bjnano.3.9 ↗
8. He X, Shi H (2012) Size and shape effects on magnetic properties of Ni nanoparticles. Particuology 10:497–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2011.11.01110.1016/j.partic.2011.11.011 ↗
9. He X, Zhong W, Au CT, Du Y (2013) Size dependence of the magnetic properties of Ni nanoparticles prepared by thermal decomposition method. Nanoscale Res Lett 8:446–1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-8-44610.1186/1556-276X-8-446 ↗
10. Herman DAJ, Cheong-Tilley S, McGrath AJ, McVey BFP, Lein M, Tilley RD (2015) How to choose a precursor for decomposition solution-phase synthesis: the case of iron nanoparticles. Nano 7:5951–5954. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5NR00718F10.1039/C5NR00718F ↗
11. Huaman JLC, Hironaka N, Tanaka S, Shinoda K, Miyamura H, Jeyadevan B (2013) Size-controlled monodispersed nickel nanocrystals using 2-octanol as reducing agent. CrystEngComm 15:729–737. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CE26433A10.1039/C2CE26433A ↗
12. Ishizaki T, Yatsugi K, Akedo K (2016) Effect of particle size on the magnetic properties of Ni nanoparticles synthesized with trioctylphosphine as the capping agaent. Nanomaterials 6:172–1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano609017210.3390/nano6090172 ↗
13. Kachi T (2014) Recent progress of GaN power devices for automotive applications. Jpn J Appl Phys 53(10):100210–100211. https://doi.org/10.7567/JJAP.53.10021010.7567/JJAP.53.100210 ↗
14. Kin M, Kura H, Ogawa T (2016) Core loss and magnetic susceptibility of superparamagnetic Fe nanoparticle assembly. AIP Adv 6:125013–1251–7. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.497205910.1063/1.4972059 ↗
15. Krishnan KM, Pakhomov AB, Bao Y, Blomqvist P, Chun Y, Gonzales M, Griffin K, Ji X, Roberts BK (2006) Nanomagnetism and spin electronics: materials, microstructure and novel properties. J Mater Sci 41:793–815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-6564-110.1007/s10853-006-6564-1 ↗
16. Lacroix LM, Huls NF, Ho D, Sun X, Cheng K, Sun S (2011) Stable single-crystalline body centered cubic Fe nanoparticles. Nano Lett 11:1641–1645. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl200110t10.1021/nl200110t ↗
17. LaGrow AP, Ingham B, Cheong S, Williams GV, Dotzler C, Toney MF, Jefferson DA, Corbos EC, Bishop PT, Cookson J, Tillery RD (2012) Synthesis, alignment, and magnetic properties of monodisperse nickel nanocubes. J Am Chem Soc 134:855–858. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja210209r10.1021/ja210209r ↗
18. Lee IS, Lee N, Park J, Kim BH, Yi YW, Kim T, Kim TK, Lee IH, Paik SR, Hyeon T (2006) Ni/NiO core/shell nanoparticles for selective binding and magnetic separation of histidine-tagged proteins. J Am Chem Soc 128:10658–10659. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja063177n10.1021/ja063177n ↗
19. Lim CW, Lee IS (2010) Magnetically recyclable nanocatalyst systems for the organic reactions. Nano Today 5:412–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2010.08.00810.1016/j.nantod.2010.08.008 ↗
20. Liu Y, Yi Y, Shao W, Shao Y (2013) Microstructure and magnetic properties of soft magnetic powder cores of amorphous and nanocrystalline alloys. J Magn Magn Mater 330:119–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2012.10.04310.1016/j.jmmm.2012.10.043 ↗
21. Liu HJ, Su HL, Geng WB, Sun ZG, Song TT, Tong XC, Zou ZQ, Wu YC, Du YW (2016) Effect of particle size distribution on the magnetic properties of Fe-Si-Al powder core. J Supercond Nov Magn 29:463–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10948-015-3282-410.1007/s10948-015-3282-4 ↗
22. Luo X, Chen Y, Yue GH, Peng DL, Luo X (2009) Preparation of hexagonal close-packed nickel nanoparticles via a thermal decomposition approach using nickel acetate tetrahydrate as a precursor. J Alloys Compd 476:864–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.09.11710.1016/j.jallcom.2008.09.117 ↗
23. Mandel K, Hutter F, Gellermann C, Sextl G (2013) Stabilisation effects of superparamanetic nanoparticles on clustering in nanocomposite microparticles and on magnetic behavior. J Magn Magn Mater 331:269–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2012.11.05310.1016/j.jmmm.2012.11.053 ↗
24. Mourdikoudis S, Simeonidis K, Vilalta-Clemente A, Tuna F, Tsiaoussis I, Angelakeris M, Dendrinou-Samara C, Kalogirou O (2009) Controlling the crystal structure of Ni nanoparticles by the use of alkylamines. J Magn Magn Mater 321:2723–2728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2009.03.07610.1016/j.jmmm.2009.03.076 ↗
25. Mu M, Li Q, Gilham DJ, Lee FC, Ngo KDT (2014) New core loss measurement method for high-frequency magnetic materials. IEEE Trans Power Electron 29:4374–4381. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2013.228683010.1109/TPEL.2013.2286830 ↗
26. Okumura H (2015) A roadmap for future wide bandgap semiconductor power electronics. MRS Bull 40:439–444. https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs.2015.9710.1557/mrs.2015.97 ↗
27. Pan Y, Jia R, Zhao J, Liang J, Liu Y, Liu C (2014) Size-controlled synthesis of monodisperse nickel nanoparticlesand investigation of their magnetic and catalytic properties. Appl Surf Sci 316:276–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.07.20310.1016/j.apsusc.2014.07.203 ↗
28. Reusch D, Strydom J (2015) Evaluation of gallium nitride transistors in high frequency resonant and soft-switching dc-dc converters. IEEE Trans Power Electron 30:5151–5158. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2014.236479910.1109/TPEL.2014.2364799 ↗
29. Safari S, Castellazi A, Wheeler P (2014) Experimental and analytical performance evaluation of SiC power devices in the matrix converter. IEEE Trans Power Electron 29:2584–2596. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2013.228974610.1109/TPEL.2013.2289746 ↗
30. Shokrollahi H, Janghorban K (2007) Soft magnetic composite materials (SMCs). J Mater Process Technol 189:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.02.03410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.02.034 ↗
31. Sidhaye DS, Bala T, Srinath S, Srikanth H, Poddar P, Sastry M, Prasad BLV (2009) Preparation of nearly monodisperse nickel nanoparticles by a facile solution based methodology and their ordered assemblies. J Phys Chem C 113:3426–3429. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp807542w10.1021/jp807542w ↗
32. Tajima S, Hattori T, Kondoh M, Kishimoto H, Sugiyama T, Kikko T (2005) Properties of high-density magnetic composite fabricated from iron powder coated with a new type phosphate insulator. IEEE Trans Magn 41:3280–3282. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2005.85472210.1109/TMAG.2005.854722 ↗
33. Xia Y, Xiong Y, Lim B, Skrabalak SE (2009) Shape-controlled synthesis of metal nanocrystals: simple chemistry meets complex physics? Angew Chem Int Ed 48:60–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20080224810.1002/anie.200802248 ↗
34. Xie DZ, Lin KH, Lin ST (2014) Effects of processed parameters on the magnetic performance of a powder magnetic core. J Magn Magn Mater 353:34–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2013.10.01410.1016/j.jmmm.2013.10.014 ↗
35. Zhang HT, Wu G, Chen XH, Qiu XG (2006) Synthesis and magnetic properties of nickel nanocrystals. Mater Res Bull 41:495–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2005.09.01910.1016/j.materresbull.2005.09.019 ↗