Effects of aging temperature on the size and morphology of Cu(OH)2 and CuO nanoparticles
Source abstract
Abstract
By using Y-shaped tubular reactor, Cu(OH)2 nanoparticles in the form of nanostrands or nanowires were synthesized from copper nitrate and sodium hydroxide aqueous solutions by varying aging temperature between 5 and 40 °C. Phase pure Cu(OH)2 was obtained after aging below 20 °C, while CuO appeared at 30 °C and became a sole crystalline phase at 40 °C. The average representative particle size and its distribution breadth of CuO, obtained after dehydration at 160 °C, were reduced from 58 ± 30 to 17 ± 7 nm, respectively, by decreasing the aging temperature of the precedent Cu(OH)2 from 20 to 5 °C. The effects of aging temperature of Cu(OH)2 on the crystalline phase and particle morphology of as-aged Cu(OH)2 and of CuO after thermal dehydration were discussed in terms of the polar component of the solvation free energy for the nuclei-growth processes of Cu(OH)2. The latter is associated with the ionic charge of the aqueous phase, and predominated by the increasing dielectric constant of the solvent, i.e., water with decreasing temperature. After dip coating the dialyzed Cu(OH)2 colloidal dispersion on a Ni substrate and heated at 160 °C under reduced pressure, deposition of the equiaxed CuO particles of 150 ± 20 nm was observed. The effects of drying condition on the morphology of the nanoparticle deposition were also discussed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · ZnO doping and properties · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Cudennec Y, Riou A, Gérault Y, Lecerf (2000) A Crystallographical and chemical hypothesis for the formation process of CuO(s) and Cu(OH)2(s) from Na2Cu(OH)4(s). C R Acad Sci Paris Sér IIc 3(8):661–666
2. Fernandez DP, Goodwin ATH, Sebgers J (1995) Measurements of the relative permittivity of liquid water at frequencies in the range of 0.1 to 10 kHz and at temperatures between 273.1 and 373.2 K at ambient-pressure. J. Themophys 16(4):929–955
3. Hu MZC, Payzant EA, Byers CH (2000) Sol-gel and ultrafine particle formation via dielectric tuning of inorganic salt-alcohol-water solutions. J Colloid Interface Sci 222(1):20–3610.1006/jcis.1999.6610 ↗
4. Izumi F, Ikeda T (2000) A Rietveld-analysis program RIETAN-98 and its applications to zeolites. Eur. Powder Diffraction, Pts 1 and 2. 321-3: 198-203
5. Kitashima S, Kuroda A, Hirose K, Senna M, Yermakov AYe, Uimin MA (2007) Complex formation processes at the surface of Cu–O composite nanoparticles with and without external magnetic field. J Alloys Compd 434–435:646–64910.1016/j.jallcom.2006.08.239 ↗
6. Li C, Yin Y, Hou H, Fan N, Yuan F, Shi Y, Meng Q (2010) Preparation and characterization of Cu(OH)2 and CuO nanowires by the coupling route of microemulsion with homogenous precipitation. Solid State Commun 150(13–14):585–58910.1016/j.ssc.2009.12.039 ↗
7. Livage J (1998) Sol-gel synthesis of heterogeneous catalysts from aqueous solutions. Catal Today 41(1–3):3–1910.1016/S0920-5861(98)00034-0 ↗
8. Lu CH, Qi LM, Yang JH, Zhang DY, Wu NZ, Ma JM (2004) Simple template-free solution route for the controlled synthesis of Cu(OH)2 and CuO nanostructures. J Phys Chem B 108(46):17825–1783110.1021/jp046772p ↗
9. Luo YH, Huang JG, Jin JA, Peng XS, Schmitt W, Ichinose I (2006) Formation of positively charged copper hydroxide nanostrands and their structural characterization. Chem Mater 18(7):1795–180210.1021/cm052270s ↗
10. Min Y, Wang T, Chen Y (2010) Microwave-assistant synthesis of ordered CuO micro-structures on Cu substrate. Appl. Surface Sci. 257(1):132–13710.1016/j.apsusc.2010.06.049 ↗
11. Rahnama A, Gharagozlou M (2012) Preparation and properties of semiconductor CuO nanoparticles via a simple precipitation method at different reaction temperatures. Opt Quant Electron 44(6–7):313–32210.1007/s11082-011-9540-1 ↗
12. Rietveld HM (1969) A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures. J Appl Cryst 2:65–7110.1107/S0021889869006558 ↗
13. Rodriguez JA, Kim JY, Hanson JC, Perez M, Frenkel AI (2003) Reduction of CuO in H2: in situ time-resolved XRD studies. Catal Lett 85(3–4):247–25410.1023/A:1022110200942 ↗
14. Sahooli M, Sabbaghi S, Saboori R (2012) Synthesis and characterization of mono sized CuO nanoparticles. Mater Lett 81:169–17210.1016/j.matlet.2012.04.148 ↗
15. Singh DP, Ojha AK, Srivastava ON (2009) Synthesis of Different Cu(OH)2 and CuO (Nanowires, Rectangles, Seed-, Belt-, and Sheetlike) nanostructures by simple wet chemical route. J Phys Chem C 113(9):3409–341810.1021/jp804832g ↗
16. Song X, Sun S, Zhang W, Yu H, Fan W (2004) Synthesis of Cu(OH)2 Nanowires at Aqueous − Organic Interfaces. J Phys Chem B 108(17):5200–520510.1021/jp036270w ↗
17. Tait CD, Janecky DR, Rogers PSZ (1991) Speciation of aqueous valladium (II) chloride solutions using optical spectroscopies. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 55(5):1253–126410.1016/0016-7037(91)90304-N ↗
18. Vidyasagar CC, Arthoba Naik Venkatesha ATG, Viswanatha R (2012) Solid-state synthesis and effect of temperature on optical properties of CuO nanoparticles. Nano-Micro Lett 4(2):73–7710.1007/BF03353695 ↗
19. Wu RJ, Ma ZY, Gu ZG, Yang Y (2010) Preparation and characterization of CuO nanoparticles with different morphology through a simple quick-precipitation method in DMAC–water mixed solvent. J Alloys Compd 504(1):45–4910.1016/j.jallcom.2010.05.062 ↗
20. Xu Y, Chen D, Jiao X (2005) Fabrication of CuO pricky microspheres with tunable size by a simple solution route. J Phys Chem B 109(28):13561–1356610.1021/jp051577b ↗
21. Xu H, Wang W, Zhu W, Zhou L, Ruan M (2007) Hierarchical-oriented attachment: from one-dimensional Cu(OH)2 nanowires to two-dimensional CuO nanoleaves. Cryst Growth Design 7(12):2720–272410.1021/cg060727k ↗
22. Yamada H, Zheng XG, Soejima Y, Kawaminami M (2004) Lattice distortion and magnetolattice coupling in CuO. Phys Rev B 69(10):104104-1–104104-710.1103/PhysRevB.69.104104 ↗
23. Yang HM, Ouyang J, Tang AD, Xiao Y, Li XW, Dong XD, Yu YM (2006) Electrochemical synthesis and photocatalytic property of cuprous oxide nanoparticles. Mater Res Bull 41(7):1310–131810.1016/j.materresbull.2006.01.004 ↗
24. Yermakov A Ye, Feduschakb TA, Uimina MA, Mysika AA, Gavikoa VS, Chupakhinc ON, Shishmakovc AB, Kharchukc VG, Petrovc LA, Kotovd YA, Vosmerikov AV, Korolyova AV (2004) Reactivity of nanocrystalline copper oxide and its modification under magnetic field. Solid State Ionics 172(1–4):317–32310.1016/j.ssi.2004.05.014 ↗
25. Yermakov AY, Uimin MA, Mysik AA, Vykhodets VB, Kurennykh TE, Sokolov VI, Gaviko VS, Schegoleva NN, Gruzdev NB (2006) Magnetism and structure of Cu2O1 + x and 3d-doped TiO2 − x nanopowders. J Mag Mag Mater 310(2):2102–210410.1016/j.jmmm.2006.10.780 ↗
26. Zou G, Li H, Zhang D, Xiong K, Dong C, Qian Y (2006) Well-aligned arrays of CuO nanoplatelets. J Phys Chem B 110(4):1632–163710.1021/jp0557363 ↗