Monte Carlo study of the magnetic properties of frozen and non-interacting nanoparticles
Source abstract
Abstract
The transition from the blocked to the superparamagnetic regime in non-interacting and frozen magnetite nanoparticles with diameters of about 10 nm was studied using the Monte Carlo method with the Metropolis algorithm. The behavior of the blocking temperature (T B) was analyzed for different nanoparticle systems. For ensembles of homogeneous nanoparticles, T B showed a linear dependence on the exchange constant, which is the main factor that determines T B. Comparatively, the dependence of T B on the magnetocrystalline anisotropy constant was much weaker and nonlinear. It was observed that T B decreases with the decreasing particle size following a finite-size scaling theory. Systems of nanoparticles with a core/dead-layer structure exhibited a lower T B than the corresponding homogeneous nanoparticles. It was verified that the presence of a thin, hard layer on the nanoparticles surface, where the exchange interaction was improved, produced a significant increase in the blocking temperature.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites · Magnetic properties of thin films · Theoretical and Computational Physics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Als-Nielsen J, Dietricht OW, Kunnmann W, Passell L (1971) Critical Behavior of the Heisenberg Ferromagnets EuQ and EuS. Phys Rev Lett 27:741–74410.1103/PhysRevLett.27.741 ↗
2. Arantes FR, Figueiredo, Neto AM, Cornejo DR (2011) Magnetic behavior of 10 nm-magnetite particles diluted in lyotropic liquid crystals. J Appl Phys 109:07E315.1–07E315.3. doi: 10.1063/1.354961610.1063/1.3549616 ↗
3. Batlle X, Labarta A (2002) Finite-size effects in fine particles: magnetic and transport properties. J Phys D 35:R15–R4210.1088/0022-3727/35/6/201 ↗
4. Berger L, Labaye Y, Tamine M, Coey JMD (2008) Ferromagnetic nanoparticles with strong surface anisotropy: spin structures and magnetization processes. Phys Rev B 77:104431.1–104431.10. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.10443110.1103/PhysRevB.77.104431 ↗
5. Bertotti G (1998) Hysteresis in magnetism for physicists, materials scientists and engineers. Academic Press, San Diego
6. Chen K, Ferrenberg AM, Landau DP (1993) Static critical behavior of three-dimensional classical Heisenberg models: a high-resolution Monte Carlo study. Phys Rev B 48:3249–325610.1103/PhysRevB.48.3249 ↗
7. Chen X, Sahoo S, Kleemann W, Cardoso S, Freitas PP (2004) Universal and scaled relaxation of interacting magnetic nanoparticles. Phys Rev B 70:172411.1–172411.4. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.172411
8. Daou TJ, Grenèche JM, Pourroy G, Buathong S, Derory A, Ulhaq-Bouillet C, Donnio B, Guillon D, Begin-Colin S (2008) Coupling agent effect on magnetic properties of functionalized magnetite-based nanoparticles. Chem Mater 20:5869–5875. doi: 10.1021/cm801405n10.1021/cm801405n ↗
9. Demortière A, Panissod P, Pichon BP, Pourroy G, Guillon D, Donnio B, Bégin-Colin S (2011) Size-dependent properties of magnetic iron oxide nanocrystals. Nanoscale 3:225–232. doi: 10.1039/c0nr00521e10.1039/C0NR00521E ↗
10. Hergt R, Dutz S, Müller R, Zeisberger M (2006) Magnetic particle hyperthermia: nanoparticle magnetism and materials development for cancer therapy. J Phys 18:S2919–S2934. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/18/38/S26
11. Iglesias O, Labarta A (2001) Finite-size and surface effects in maghemite nanoparticles: Monte Carlo simulations. Phys Rev B 63:184416.1–184416.11. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.18441610.1103/PhysRevB.63.184416 ↗
12. Iglesias O, Labarta A (2005) Influence of surface anisotropy on the hysteresis of magnetic nanoparticles. J Magn Magn Mater 290:738–741. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2004.11.35810.1016/j.jmmm.2004.11.358 ↗
13. Kesserwan H, Manfredi G, Bigot J-Y, Hervieux P-A (2011) Magnetization reversal in isolated and interacting single-domain nanoparticles. Phys Rev B 84:172407.1–172407.510.1103/PhysRevB.84.172407 ↗
14. Kittel C (1995) Introduction to solid state physics, 7th edn. Wiley, New York
15. Kodama RH (1999) Magnetic nanoparticles. J Magn Magn Mater 200:359–37210.1016/S0304-8853(99)00347-9 ↗
16. Landau DP (1976) Finite-size behavior of the simple-cubic Ising lattice. Phys Rev B 14:255–26210.1103/PhysRevB.14.255 ↗
17. Landau DP, Binder K (2000) A guide to Monte Carlo simulations in statistical physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
18. Leblanc MD, Plumer ML, Whitehead JP, Mercer JI (2010) Transition temperature and magnetic properties of the granular Ising model in two dimensions studied by Monte Carlo simulations: impact of intragrain spin structure. Phys Rev B 82:174435.1–174435.8. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.17443510.1103/PhysRevB.82.174435 ↗
19. Leite VS, Figueiredo W (2006) Mean-field and Monte Carlo calculations of the equilibrium magnetic properties of uniaxial ferromagnetic particles. Phys Lett A 359:300–307. doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2006.06.03910.1016/j.physleta.2006.06.039 ↗
20. Leostean C, Pana O, Turcu R, Soran ML, Macavei S, Chauvet O, Payen C (2011) Comparative study of core–shell iron/iron oxide gold covered magnetic nanoparticles obtained in different conditions. J Nanopart Res 13:6181–6192. doi: 10.1007/s11051-011-0313-310.1007/s11051-011-0313-3 ↗
21. Lu A-H, Salabas EL, Schüth F (2007) Magnetic nanoparticles: synthesis, protection, functionalization, and application. Angew Chem Int 46:1222–1244. doi: 10.1002/anie.20060286610.1002/anie.200602866 ↗
22. Mao Z, Chen X (2010) Magnetic relaxation in disordered exchange interacting systems with random anisotropy. Solid State Commun 150:2227–2230. doi: 10.1016/j.ssc.2010.09.03810.1016/j.ssc.2010.09.038 ↗
23. Mejía-López J, Mazo-Zuluaga J (2011) Energy contributions in magnetite nanoparticles: computation of magnetic phase diagram, theory, and simulation. J Nanopart Res 13:7115–7125. doi: 10.1007/s11051-011-0629-z10.1007/s11051-011-0629-z ↗
24. Metropolis N, Ulam S (1949) The Monte Carlo method. J Am Stat Assoc 44:335–341. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1949.1048331010.1080/01621459.1949.10483310 ↗
25. Neuberger T, Schöpf B, Hofmann H, Hofmann M, von Rechenberg B (2005) Superparamagnetic nanoparticles for biomedical applications: possibilities and limitations of a new drug delivery system. J Magn Magn Mater 293:483–495. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2005.01.06410.1016/j.jmmm.2005.01.064 ↗
26. Nie Z, Petukhova A, Kumacheva E (2010) Properties and emerging applications of self-assembled structures made from inorganic nanoparticles. Nat Nanotech 5:15–25. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2009.45310.1038/nnano.2009.453 ↗
27. Peczak P, Ferrenberg AM, Landau DP (1991) High-accuracy Monte Carlo study of the three-dimensional classical Heisenberg ferromagnet. Phys Rev B 43:6087–609310.1103/PhysRevB.43.6087 ↗
28. Porto M (2002a) Effect of positional disorder in systems of ultrafine ferromagnetic particles. Eur Phys J B 26:229–234. doi: 10.1140/epjb/e2002008410.1140/epjb/e20020084 ↗
29. Porto M (2002b) Relative significance of particle anisotropy in systems of ultrafine ferromagnetic particles. J Appl Phys 92:6057–6061. doi: 10.1063/1.151387310.1063/1.1513873 ↗
30. Porto M (2005) Ordered systems of ultrafine ferromagnetic particles. Eur Phys J B 45:369–375. doi: 10.1140/epjb/e2005-00186-310.1140/epjb/e2005-00186-3 ↗
31. Reiss G, Hütten A (2005) Magnetic nanoparticles: applications beyond data storage. Nat Mater 4:725–72610.1038/nmat1494 ↗
32. Russ S, Bunde A (2011) Relaxation in ordered systems of ultrafine magnetic particles: effect of the exchange interaction. J Phys 23:126001.1–1260011. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/23/12/126001
33. Sato T, Iijima T, Seki M, Inagaki N (1987) Magnetic properties of ultrafine ferrite particles. J Magn Magn Mater 65:252–25610.1016/0304-8853(87)90044-8 ↗
34. Serantes D, Baldomir D, Pereiro M, Arias JE, Mateo–Mateo C, Buján-Núñez MC, Vázquez-Vázquez C, Rivas J (2008) Interplay between the magnetic field and the dipolar interaction on a magnetic nanoparticle system: a Monte Carlo study. J Non-Cryst Solids 354:5224–5226. doi: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.07.04010.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.07.040 ↗
35. Serantes D, Baldomir D, Pereiro M, Hoppe CE, Rivadulla F, Rivas J (2010) Nonmonotonic evolution of the blocking temperature in dispersions of superparamagnetic nanoparticles. Phys Rev B 82:134433.1–134433.6. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.13443310.1103/PhysRevB.82.134433 ↗
36. Skumryev V, Stoyanov S, Zhang Y, Hadjipanayis G, Givord D, Nogués J (2003) Beating the superparamagnetic limit with exchange bias. Nature 423:850–85310.1038/nature01687 ↗
37. Srivastava CM, Srinivasan G, Nanadikar NG (1979) Exchange constants in spinel ferrites. Phys Rev B 19:499–50810.1103/PhysRevB.19.499 ↗
38. Stanley HE (1999) Scaling, universality, and renormalization: three pillars of modern critical phenomena. Rev Mod Phys 71:S358–S36610.1103/RevModPhys.71.S358 ↗
39. Yang HT, Liu HL, Song NN, Du HF, Zhang XQ, Cheng ZH, Shen J, Li LF (2011) Determination of the critical interspacing for the noninteracting magnetic nanoparticle system. Appl Phys Lett 98:153112.1–153112.3. doi: 10.1063/1.3574917