Nanotechnology research output: bibliometric analysis with special reference to India
Source abstract
Abstract
For the last few decades, nanotechnology has emerged as one of the key subject areas in which aggressive development is taking place. The multidisciplinary approach of nanotechnology has opened up a new sphere of research in warfare, engineering, medicine, physics, textile, energy, biology, chemistry, automobiles, agriculture, etc. It has influenced society in every walk of life. Realizing the potential of nanotechnology, the countries across the world have been spending massive amounts and aggressively initiating various programs in research and development of nanotechnology. In this study, efforts are being made to measure the nanotechnology research output published in the form of scholarly literature. The data, for the period of 2014 to 2018, were extracted from the Scopus abstract and citation database and analyzed by using bibliometric techniques. The findings show that China has surpassed the USA by producing more number of scholarly publications in the area of nanotechnology but indicated reservation while collaborating with other countries, whereas the USA has been the second-highest producer of nanotechnology research output and preferred as the most favored nation by other countries to collaborate with in the field of nanotechnology. India attained the third position with respect to nanotechnology publications but has low international collaboration and the quality of publications is also a concern. The findings also show the negative growth of nanotechnology research publications in recent years.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanotechnology research and applications · Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Alvarz PJ, Colvin V, Lead J, Stone V (2009) Research priorities to advance eco-responsible nanotechnology. ACS Nano 3:1616–1619. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn900683510.1021/nn9006835 ↗
2. Arora SK, Porter AL, Youtie J, Shapira P (2013) Capturing new developments in an emerging technology: an updated search strategy for identifying nanotechnology research outputs. Scientometrics. 95:351–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0903-610.1007/s11192-012-0903-6 ↗
3. Beumer K, Bhattacharya S (2013) Emerging technologies in India: developments, debates and silences about nanotechnology. Sci Public Policy 40:628–643. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct01610.1093/scipol/sct016 ↗
4. Bhattacharya S, Shilpa S (2011) Mapping nanotechnology research and innovation in India. DESIDOC J Library Inf Technol 31(5):349–35810.14429/djlit.31.5.1191 ↗
5. Bhattacharya S, Shilpa S, Bhati M (2012) China and India: the two new players in the nanotechnology race. Scientometrics. 93:59–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0651-710.1007/s11192-012-0651-7 ↗
6. Bhushan B (2010) Introduction to nanotechnology. In: Bhushan B (ed) Springer handbook of nanotechnology. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02525-9_110.1007/978-3-642-02525-9_1 ↗
7. Dong H, Gao Y, Sinko PJ, Wu Z, Xu J, Jia L (2016) The nanotechnology race between China and the United States. Nano Today 11:7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2016.02.00110.1016/j.nantod.2016.02.001 ↗
8. Dzenis Y (2004) Spinning continuous fibers for nanotechnology. Science. 304:1917–1919. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.109907410.1126/science.1099074 ↗
9. Feynman RP (1992) There’s plenty of room at the bottom. J Microelectromech Syst 1:60–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/84.12805710.1109/84.128057 ↗
10. Feynman RP (2018) There’s plenty of room at the bottom. In: Hey AJG (ed) Feynman and computation: exploring the limits of computers. CRC Press, London, pp 63–6710.1201/9780429500459-7 ↗
11. Gu H, Schulte J (2005) Scientific development and industrial application of nanotechnology in China. In: Schulte J (ed) Nanotechnology: global strategies, Industry Trends and Applications. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 7–24
12. Guan J, Ma N (2007) China’s emerging presence in nanoscience and nanotechnology: a comparative bibliometric study of several nanoscience ‘giants’. Res Policy 36:880–886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.02.00410.1016/j.respol.2007.02.004 ↗
13. Hulla JE, Sahu SC, Hayes AW (2015) Nanotechnology: history and future. Hum Exp Toxicol 34:1318–1321. https://doi.org/10.1177/096032711560358810.1177/0960327115603588 ↗
14. Karpagam R, Gopalakrishnan S, Natarajan M, Babu BR (2011) Mapping of nanoscience and nanotechnology research in India: a scientometric analysis, 1990–2009. Scientometrics. 89:501–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0477-810.1007/s11192-011-0477-8 ↗
15. Kostoff R, Koytcheff R, Lau C (2007) Global nanotechnology research metrics. Scientometrics. 70:565–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-0303-510.1007/s11192-007-0303-5 ↗
16. Kumar A (2014) Nanotechnology development in India: an overview. Research and information system for developing countries. RIS discussion paper 193. http://www.ris.org.in/images/RIS_images/pdf/DP%20193%20Amit%20Kumar.pdf. Accessed 29 Oct 2019
17. Liu X, Zhang P, Li X, Chen H, Dang Y, Larson C, Roco MC, Wang X (2009) Trends for nanotechnology development in China, Russia, and India. J Nanopart Res 11:1845–1866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-009-9698-710.1007/s11051-009-9698-7 ↗
18. Mappes T, Jahr N, Csaki A, Vogler N, Popp J, Fritzsche W (2012) The invention of immersion ultramicroscopy in 1912—the birth of nanotechnology? Angew Chem Int Ed 51:11208–11212. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20120468810.1002/anie.201204688 ↗
19. Maynard AD, Aitken RJ, Butz T, Colvin V, Donaldson K, Oberdorster G, Philbert MA, Ryan J, Seaton A, Stone V, Tinkle SS, Tran L, Walker NJ, Warheit DB (2006) Safe handling of nanotechnology. Nature. 444:267–269. https://doi.org/10.1038/444267a10.1038/444267a ↗
20. Meyer M, Persson O (1998) Nanotechnology-interdisciplinarity, patterns of collaboration and differences in application. Scientometrics. 42:195–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0245835510.1007/BF02458355 ↗
21. Mohan L, Prakasan ER, Kademani BS, Surwase G, Kumar A, Kumar V (2010) Research trends in nanoscience and nanotechnology in India. DESIDOC J Lib Inf Technol 30(2):40–5810.14429/djlit.30.6 ↗
22. Nazim M, Ahmad M (2008) A bibliometric analysis on nanotechnology research. Ann Libr Inf Stud 55(4):292–299
23. Poole CP Jr, Owens FJ (2003) Introduction to nanotechnology. John Wiley, Hoboken
24. Porter AL, Youtie J (2009) How interdisciplinary is nanotechnology? J Nanopart Res 11:1023–1041. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-009-9607-010.1007/s11051-009-9607-0 ↗
25. Press Information Bureau, Government of India (2019) Continuation of the mission on nano science and technology in the 12th Plan Period’. https://pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=103969. Accessed 28 Oct 2019
26. Radicchi F, Castellano C (2011) Rescaling citations of publications in physics. Phys Rev E 83. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.83.04611610.1103/PhysRevE.83.046116 ↗
27. Rediguiery CF (2009) Study on the development of nanotechnology in advanced countries and in Brazil. Braz J Pharm Sci. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-8250200900020000210.1590/S1984-82502009000200002 ↗
28. Roco MC (2001) International strategy for nanotechnology research. J Nanopart Res 3:353–360. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101324862101510.1023/A:1013248621015 ↗
29. Roco MC (2003) Broader societal issues of nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 5:181–189. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:102554851243810.1023/A:1025548512438 ↗
30. Rueda G, Gerdsri P, Kocaoglu DF (2007) Bibliometrics and social network analysis of the nanotechnology field. In: PICMET'07-2007 Portland international conference on management of engineering & technology, IEEE, Portland, pp. 2905-2911, https://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2007.434963310.1109/PICMET.2007.4349633 ↗
31. Sanchez F, Sobole K (2010) Nanotechnology in concrete–a review. Constr Build Mater 24:2060–2071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.03.01410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.03.014 ↗
32. Singh T, Patnaik A, Gangil B, Chauhan R (2015) Optimization of tribo-performance of brake friction materials: effect of nano filler. Wear. 324-325:10–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2014.11.02010.1016/j.wear.2014.11.020 ↗
33. Subramanyam K (1983) Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: a review. J Inf Sci 6(1):33–3810.1177/016555158300600105 ↗
34. Suominen A, Li Y, Youtie J, Shapira P (2016) A bibliometric analysis of the development of next generation active nanotechnologies. J Nanopart Res 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-016-3578-810.1007/s11051-016-3578-8 ↗
35. Tang L, Shapira P (2011) China–US scientific collaboration in nanotechnology: patterns and dynamics. Scientometrics. 88:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0376-z10.1007/s11192-011-0376-z ↗
36. Taniguchi N, Arakawa C, Kobayashi T (1974) On the basic concept of ‘nano-technology’. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Production Engineering. Japan Society of Precision Engineering, Tokyo, pp 18–23
37. Terekhov AI (2017) Bibliometric spectroscopy of Russia’s nanotechnology: 2000–2014. Scientometrics. 110:1217–1242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2234-510.1007/s11192-016-2234-5 ↗
38. Theodore L, Kunz RG (2005) Nanotechnology: environmental implications and solutions. John Wiley, Hoboken10.1002/0471752010 ↗
39. Whitesides GM (2005) Nanoscience, nanotechnology, and chemistry. Small. 1:172–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20040013010.1002/smll.200400130 ↗
40. Wilson M, Kannangara K, Smith G, Simmons M, Raguse B (2002) Nanotechnology: basic science and emerging technologies. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Florida10.1201/9781420035230 ↗