journal article·2016-07

‘You caught me off guard’: Probing the futures of complex engineered nanomaterials

Jathan Sadowski, David H. Guston

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 18· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

This paper applies principles and methods from the framework of anticipatory governance to the case of what the National Research Council calls “complex engineered nanomaterials” (CENM). This framework does not aim to generate crystal ball visions or definitive answers, but rather provides guidance for uncovering, understanding, and addressing social, ethical, environmental, and policy issues that stem from emerging technologies. Thus, in anticipation of increased CENM research, CENM products, and their different governance challenges, we aim to lay the groundwork for the anticipatory governance of CENMs by mapping out what—according to the engineers and scientists, we interviewed who are working at the research level of these CENMs—will be the main issues and themes that we need to pay attention to in the near future. The structured interviews focused on three groups of questions: (1) potential and/or actual applications and/or products from the participant’s research; (2) environmental health and safety issues pertaining to both the participant’s research and CENMs generally; and (3) the future of CENMs. Without a foundational understanding to build on, social scientists, policymakers, and regulatory agencies will be at a loss about how to govern CENMs before they are widely implemented in society.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Barben D, Fisher E, Selin C, Guston D (2008) Anticipatory governance of nanotechnology: foresight, engagement, and integration. In: Hackett E, Amsterdamska O, Lynch M, Wajcman J (eds) The handbook of science and technology studies, 3rd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 979–1000
2. Bosso C (2010) Governing uncertainty: environmental regulation in the age of nanotechnology. Earthscan Press, Washington
3. Collingridge D (1980) The social control of technology. St. Martin’s Press, New York
4. Delgado A, Kjølberg KL, Wickson F (2011) Public engagement coming of age: from theory to practice in STS encounters with nanotechnology. Public underst sci 20(6):826–84510.1177/0963662510363054 ↗
5. Fisher E (2007) Ethnographic invention: probing the capacity of laboratory decisions. Nanoethics 1(2):155–16510.1007/s11569-007-0016-5 ↗
6. Guston DH (2008a) Innovation policy: not just a jumbo shrimp. Nature 454:940–94110.1038/454940a ↗
7. Guston DH (2008b) Preface. In: Fisher E, Selin C, Wetmore JM (eds) The yearbook of nanotechnology in society: presenting futures, vol 1. Springer, New York, pp v–viii
8. Guston DH (2014) Understanding ‘anticipatory governance’. Soc Stud Sci 44(2):218–24210.1177/0306312713508669 ↗
9. Kuzma J, Roberts JP (2015). “Transformation or adaptation? Active nanomaterials and risk governance.” CNS-ASU working paper
10. National Research Council (2009) Review of federal strategy for nanotechnology-related environmental, health, and safety research. The National Academies Press, Washington
11. Renn O, Roco MC (2006) Nanotechnology and the need for risk governance. J Nanopart Res 8(2):153–19110.1007/s11051-006-9092-7 ↗
12. Schuurbiers D, Fisher E (2009) Lab-scale intervention. EMBO Rep 10(5):424–42710.1038/embor.2009.80 ↗
13. Selin C (2011) Negotiating plausibility: intervening in the future of nanotechnology. Sci Eng Ethics 17(4):723–73710.1007/s11948-011-9315-x ↗
14. Selin C, Rawlings KC, de Ridder-Vignone K, Sadowski J, Allende CA, Gano G, Davies S, Guston DH (2016) Experiments in Engagement: designing PEST for capacity building. Public Underst Sci. doi: 10.1177/096366251562097010.1177/0963662515620970 ↗
15. Smith JE, Saritas O (2011) Science and technology foresight baker’s dozen: a pocket primer of comparative and combined foresight methods. Foresight 13(2):79–9610.1108/14636681111126265 ↗
16. Subramanian V, Youtie J, Porter AL, Shapira P (2010) Is there a shift to ‘active nanostructures’? J Nanopart Res 12(1):1–1010.1007/s11051-009-9729-4 ↗
17. Suominen A, Lee Y, Shapira P, Youtie J (2015). “A bibliometric analysis of the development of next generation complex engineered nanomaterials.” CNS-ASU working paper10.1007/s11051-016-3578-8 ↗
18. Wender BA, Foley RW, Prado-Lopez V, Ravikumar D, Eisenberg DA, Hottle TA, Sadowski J, Flanagan WP, Fisher A, Laurin L, Bates ME, Linkov I, Seager TP, Fraser MP, Guston DH (2014) Illustrating anticipatory life cycle assessment for emerging photovoltaic technologies. Environ Sci Technol 48(18):10531–1053810.1021/es5016923 ↗
19. Youtie J, Porter AL, Shapira P, Tang L, Benn T (2011) The use of environmental health and safety research in nanotechnology research. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 11(1):158–16610.1166/jnn.2011.3840 ↗