Optimization of magnetic fluid hyperthermia with respect to nanoparticle shape-related parameters: case of magnetite ellipsoidal nanoparticles
Source abstract
Abstract
Issues related to the optimization of heat transfer mechanisms dominated by superparamagnetic relaxation are considered in the case of AC (alternating current) magnetic field hyperthermia procedures. The key role in the conversion of electromagnetic energy to the thermal one via the superparamagnetic relaxation mechanism is played by the magnetic anisotropy of nanoparticles, easily to be controlled via the shape anisotropy component. The optimization process has been discussed in the case of magnetite (Fe3O4) ellipsoidal nanoparticles with dominant shape anisotropy dispersed in different media. Nanoparticles of different sizes and aspect ratios have been considered in correlation with those specific parameters of the actuating AC magnetic field which respect an established biological safely criterion. It has been proven that the dissipated power can be maximized for a given set of biological compatible RF (radiofrequency) field parameters (frequency and field amplitude at the sample space) only for specific pairs of particle sizes and aspect ratios. For instance, it has been shown that ellipsoidal magnetite nanoparticles with 10 nm equatorial size and aspect ratio of 2 are optimal for a maximum transferred power under radiofrequency excitations of 250 kHz and field amplitude of 20 kA/m, if high viscosity dispersion media are used. The methodology for deriving the optimal shape (geometrical) parameters of a specific type of nanoparticles in conditions of using available radiofrequency excitations, or vice versa, for deriving the optimal radiofrequency working parameters in the case of ferrofluids with specific nanoparticles (type and geometry) is described and discussed in detail.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery · Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles · Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Blanco-Andujar C, Walter A, Cotin G, Bordeianu C, Mertz D, Felder-Flesch D, Begin-Colin S (2016) Design of iron oxide-based nanoparticles for MRI and magnetic hyperthermia. Nanomedicine (Lond) 11(14):1889–1910. https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm-2016-500110.2217/nnm-2016-5001 ↗
2. Branquinho LC, Carriaõ MS, Costa AC, Zufelato N, Sousa MH, Miotto R, Ivkov R, Bakuzis AF (2013) Effect of magnetic dipolar interactions on nanoparticle heating efficiency: implications for cancer hyperthermia. Sci Rep 3:2887. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep0288710.1038/srep02887 ↗
3. Chang D, Lim M, Goos J, Qiao R, Ng YY, Mansfeld F, Jackson M, Davis TP, Kavallaris M (2018) Biologically targeted magnetic hyperthermia: potential and limitations. Front Pharmacol 9:831. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.0083110.3389/fphar.2018.00831 ↗
4. Coïsson M, Barrera G, Celegato F, Martino L, Kane S N, Saroj Raghuvanshi S, Vinai F, Tiberto P (2017) Hysteresis losses and specific absorption rate measurements in magnetic nanoparticles for hyperthermia applications. 1861(6): 1545–1558. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2016.12.00610.1016/j.bbagen.2016.12.006 ↗
5. Corato R, Espinosa A, Lartigue L, Tharaud M, Chat S, Pellegrino T, Ménager C, Gazeau F, Wilhelm C (2014) Magnetic hyperthermia efficiency in the cellular environment for different nanoparticle designs. Biomaterials 35:6400–6411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.03610.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.036 ↗
6. Costas A, Florica C, Matei E, Toimil-Molares ME, Stavarache I, Kuncser A, Kuncser V, Enculescu I (2018) Magnetism and magnetoresistance of single Ni–Cu alloy nanowires. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 9:2345–2355. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.9.21910.3762/bjnano.9.219 ↗
7. Diab DEH, Clerc P, Serhan N, Fourmy D, Gigoux V (2018) Combined treatments of magnetic intra-lysosomal hyperthermia with doxorubicin promotes synergistic anti-tumoral activity. Nanomaterials 8:468. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano807046810.3390/nano8070468 ↗
8. Donahue, M. J.; Porter, D. G. (1999) OOMMF User’s guide, version 1.0. National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg doi:https://doi.org/10.6028/nist.ir.6376 . The software is available at https://math.nist.gov/oommf/10.6028/nist.ir.6376 ↗
9. Dortmund Data Bank (2019) http://ddbonline.ddbst.de/VogelCalculation/VogelCalculationCGI.exe?component=Water
10. Engelmann UM, Roeth AA, Eberbeck D, Buhl EM, Neumann UP, Schmitz-Rode T, Slabu I (2018) Combining bulk temperature and nanoheating enables advanced magnetic fluid hyperthermia efficacy on pancreatic tumor cells. Sci Rep 8:13210. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31553-910.1038/s41598-018-31553-9 ↗
11. Espinosa A, Corato R, Kolosnjaj-Tabi J, Flaud P, Pellegrino P, Wilhelm C (2016) Duality of Iron oxide nanoparticles in Cancer therapy: amplification of heating efficiency by magnetic hyperthermia and photothermal bimodal treatment. ACS Nano 10:2436–2446. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b0724910.1021/acsnano.5b07249 ↗
12. Guardia P, Corato R, Lartigue L, Wilhelm C, Espinosa A, Garcia-Hernandez M, Gazeau F, Manna L, Pellegrino T (2012) Water-soluble Iron oxide nanocubes with high values of specific absorption rate for cancer cell hyperthermia treatment. ACS Nano 6(4):3080–3091. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn204813710.1021/nn2048137 ↗
13. Hedayatnasab Z, Abnisa F, Wan Daud WMA (2017) Review on magnetic nanoparticles for magnetic nanofluid hyperthermia application. Mater. Des 123:174–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.03610.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.036 ↗
14. Hergt R, Dutz S (2007) Magnetic particle hyperthermia—biophysical limitations of a visionary tumour therapy. JMMM 311:187–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.10.115610.1016/j.jmmm.2006.10.1156 ↗
15. Huang HW, Liauth CT (2011) Review: therapeutical applications of heat in cancer therapy. J Med Biol Eng 32(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.5405/jmbe.93210.5405/jmbe.932 ↗
16. Iacob N, Schinteie G, Palade P, Kuncser V (2015a) Approach for an improved experimental evaluation of the specific absorption rate in magnetic fluid hyperthermia. J Nanopart Res 17:190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-015-2997-210.1007/s11051-015-2997-2 ↗
17. Iacob N, Schinteie G, Palade P, Ticos CM, Kuncser V (2015b) Stepped heating procedure for experimental SAR evaluation of ferrofluids. Eur Phys J E 38:57. https://doi.org/10.1140/epje/i2015-15057-810.1140/epje/i2015-15057-8 ↗
18. Iacob N, Schinteie G, Bartha C, Palade P, Vekas L, Kuncser V (2016) Effects of magnetic dipolar interactions on the specific time constant in superparamagnetic nanoparticle systems. J Phys D 49(29):295001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/49/29/29500110.1088/0022-3727/49/29/295001 ↗
19. Kuncser V, Palade P, Kuncser A, Greculeasa S, Schinteie G (2014) Engineering magnetic properties of nanostructures via size effects and interphase interactions. In: Kuncser V., Miu L. (eds) Size effects in nanostructures. Springer Series in Materials Science, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 169–23710.1007/978-3-662-44479-5_7 ↗
20. Kuncser A, Antohe S, Kuncser V (2017) A general perspective on the magnetization reversal in cylindrical soft magnetic nanowires with dominant shape anisotropy. JMMM 423:34–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.09.06610.1016/j.jmmm.2016.09.066 ↗
21. Kuncser A, Iacob N, Kuncser V (2019) On the relaxation time of interacting superparamagnetic nanoparticles and implications for magnetic fluid hyperthermia. BJNANO 10:1280–1289
22. Lervik A, Bresme F, Kjelstrup S (2008) Heat transfer in soft nanoscale interfaces: the influence of interface curvature. Soft Matter 5:2407–2414. https://doi.org/10.1039/b817666c10.1039/b817666c ↗
23. Morrish AH (2001) The physical principles of magnetism. Wiley-IEE Press, New York10.1109/9780470546581 ↗
24. Nagayama G, Matsumoto T, Fukushima K, Tsuruta T (2017) Scale effect of slip boundary condition at solid–liquid interface. Sci Rep 7:43125. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep4312510.1038/srep43125 ↗
25. Palihawadana-Arachchige M, Nemala H, Naik VM, Naik R (2017) Effect of magnetic dipolar interactions on temperature dependent magnetic hyperthermia in ferrofluids. J Appl Phys 121:023901. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.497387910.1063/1.4973879 ↗
26. Périgo EA, Hemery G, Sandre O, Ortega D, Garaio E, Plazaola F, Teran FJ (2015) Fundamentals and advances in magnetic hyperthermia. Appl PhysRev 2:041302. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.493568810.1063/1.4935688 ↗
27. Rosensweig RE (2002) Heating magnetic fluid with alternating magnetic field. JMMM 252:370–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-8853(02)00706-010.1016/S0304-8853(02)00706-0 ↗
28. Spirou SV, Basini M, Lascialfari A, Sangregorio C, Innocenti C (2018) Magnetic hyperthermia and radiation therapy: radiobiological principles and current practice. Nanomaterials 8:401. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano806040110.3390/nano8060401 ↗
29. Tang Y, Jin T, Flesch CR (2017) Numerical temperature analysis of magnetic hyperthermia considering nanoparticle clustering and blood vessels. IEEE Trans Magn 53:10–16. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2017.272242510.1109/TMAG.2017.2722425 ↗
30. Tang Y, Flesch CR, Zhang C, Jin T (2018) Numerical analysis of the effect of non-uniformity of the magnetic field produced by a solenoid on temperature distribution during magnetic hyperthermia. JMMM 449:455–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2017.10.07610.1016/j.jmmm.2017.10.076 ↗
31. Thanh NTK (2018) Clinical applications of magnetic nanoparticles design to diagnosis manufacturing to medicine. CRC Press, New York10.1201/9781315168258 ↗
32. Tannous C, Gieraltowski J (2008) The Stoner–Wohlfarth model of ferromagnetism. Eur J Phys 29:475–487. https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/29/3/00810.1088/0143-0807/29/3/008 ↗
33. Weaver JB, Kuehlert E (2012) Measurement of magnetic nanoparticle relaxation time. Med Phys 39(5):2765–2770. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.370177510.1118/1.3701775 ↗
34. Wang Q, Deng ZS, Liu J (2012) Theoretical evaluations of magnetic nanoparticle-enhanced heating on tumor embedded with large blood vessels during hyperthermia. J Nanopart Res 14:974. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-012-0974-610.1007/s11051-012-0974-6 ↗