Transport and abatement of fluorescent silica nanoparticle (SiO2 NP) in granular filtration: effect of porous media and ionic strength
Source abstract
Abstract
The extensive production and application of engineered silica nanoparticles (SiO2 NPs) will inevitably lead to their release into the environment. Granular media filtration, a widely used process in water and wastewater treatment plants, has the potential for NP abatement. In this work, laboratory-scale column experiments were performed to study the transport and retention of SiO2 NPs on three widely used porous materials, i.e., sand, anthracite, and granular activated carbon (GAC). Synthetic fluorescent core-shell SiO2 NPs (83 nm) were used to facilitate NP detection. Sand showed very low capacity for SiO2 filtration as this material had a surface with limited surface area and a high concentration of negative charge. Also, we found that the stability and transport of SiO2 NP were strongly dependent on the ionic strength of the solution. Increasing ionic strength led to NP agglomeration and facilitated SiO2 NP retention, while low ionic strength resulted in release of captured NPs from the sand bed. Compared to sand, anthracite and GAC showed higher affinity for SiO2 NP capture. The superior capacity of GAC was primarily due to its porous structure and high surface area. A process model was developed to simulate NP capture in the packed bed columns and determine fundamental filtration parameters. This model provided an excellent fit to the experimental data. Taken together, the results obtained indicate that GAC is an interesting material for SiO2 NP filtration.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · Membrane Separation Technologies · Arsenic contamination and mitigation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Adamczyk Z, Nattich M, Barbasz J (2009) Deposition of colloid particles at heterogeneous and patterned surfaces. Adv Colloid Interfac 147-48:2–17. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2008.12.00310.1016/j.cis.2008.12.003 ↗
2. Amosa MK (2016) Sorption of water alkalinity and hardness from high-strength wastewater on bifunctional activated carbon: process optimization, kinetics and equilibrium studies. Environ Technol 37:2016–2039. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2016.113963110.1080/09593330.2016.1139631 ↗
3. Amosa MK, Jami MS, Alkhatib MFR (2016) Electrostatic biosorption of COD, Mn and H2S on EFB-based activated carbon produced through steam pyrolysis: an analysis based on surface chemistry, equilibria and kinetics. Waste Biomass Valori 7:109–124. doi: 10.1007/s12649-015-9435-710.1007/s12649-015-9435-7 ↗
4. Bai RB, Zhang X (2001) Polypyrrole-coated granules for humic acid removal. J Colloid Interf Sci 243:52–60. doi: 10.1006/jcis.2001.784310.1006/jcis.2001.7843 ↗
5. Basu H, Singhal RK, Pimple MV, Kumar A, Reddy AVR (2015) Association and migration of uranium and thorium with silica colloidal particles in saturated subsurface zone. J Radioanal Nucl Ch 303:2283–2290. doi: 10.1007/s10967-014-3677-x10.1007/s10967-014-3677-x ↗
6. Bian SW, Mudunkotuwa IA, Rupasinghe T, Grassian VH (2011) Aggregation and dissolution of 4 nm ZnO nanoparticles in aqueous environments: influence of pH, ionic strength, size, and adsorption of humic acid. Langmuir 27:6059–6068. doi: 10.1021/la200570n10.1021/la200570n ↗
7. Bradford SA, Simunek J, Bettahar M, van Genuchten MT, Yates SR (2006) Significance of straining in colloid deposition: evidence and implications. Water Resour Res 42:W12s15,. doi: 10.1029/2005wr00479110.1029/2005wr004791 ↗
8. El Badawy AM, Luxton TP, Silva RG, Scheckel KG, Suidan MT, Tolaymat TM (2010) Impact of environmental conditions (pH, ionic strength, and electrolyte type) on the surface charge and aggregation of silver nanoparticles suspensions. Environ Sci Technol 44:1260–1266. doi: 10.1021/es902240k10.1021/es902240k ↗
9. Fruijtier-Polloth C (2012) The toxicological mode of action and the safety of synthetic amorphous silica—a nanostructured material. Toxicology 294:61–79. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2012.02.00110.1016/j.tox.2012.02.001 ↗
10. Holden PA et al (2014) Evaluation of exposure concentrations used in assessing manufactured nanomaterial environmental hazards: are they relevant? Environ Sci Technol 48:10541–10551. doi: 10.1021/es502440s10.1021/es502440s ↗
11. Howe KJ, Hand DW, Crittenden JC, Trussell RR, Tchobanoglous G (2012) Principles of water treatment. Wiley, New Jersey
12. Hu J, Wang DM, Forthaus BE, Wang JM (2012) Quantifying the effect of nanoparticles on As(V) ecotoxicity exemplified by nano-Fe2O3 (magnetic) and nano-Al2O3. Environ Toxicol Chem 31:2870–2876. doi: 10.1002/etc.201310.1002/etc.2013 ↗
13. Inyang M, Gao B, Wu L, Yao Y, Zhang M, Liu L (2013) Filtration of engineered nanoparticles in carbon-based fixed bed columns. Chem Eng J 220:221–227. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.01.05410.1016/j.cej.2013.01.054 ↗
14. Jarvie HP et al (2009) Fate of silica nanoparticles in simulated primary wastewater treatment. Environ Sci Technol 43:8622–8628. doi: 10.1021/es901399q10.1021/es901399q ↗
15. Jiang JK, Oberdorster G, Biswas P (2009) Characterization of size, surface charge, and agglomeration state of nanoparticle dispersions for toxicological studies. J Nanopart Res 11:77–89. doi: 10.1007/s11051-008-9446-410.1007/s11051-008-9446-4 ↗
16. Jin C, Normani SD, Emelko MB (2015) Surface roughness impacts on granular media filtration at favorable deposition conditions: experiments and modeling. Environ Sci Technol 49:7879–7888. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b0199810.1021/acs.est.5b01998 ↗
17. Johnson WP, Pazmino E, Ma HL (2010) Direct observations of colloid retention in granular media in the presence of energy barriers, and implications for inferred mechanisms from indirect observations. Water Res 44:1158–1169. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.12.01410.1016/j.watres.2009.12.014 ↗
18. Keller AA, Lazareva A (2014) Predicted releases of engineered nanomaterials: from global to regional to local. Environ Sci Tech Let 1:65–70. doi: 10.1021/ez400106t10.1021/ez400106t ↗
19. Lecoanet HF, Bottero JY, Wiesner MR (2004) Laboratory assessment of the mobility of nanomaterials in porous media. Environ Sci Technol 38:5164–5169. doi: 10.1021/es035230310.1021/es0352303 ↗
20. Li YV, Cathles LM (2014) Retention of silica nanoparticles on calcium carbonate sands immersed in electrolyte solutions. J Colloid Interf Sci 436:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2014.08.07210.1016/j.jcis.2014.08.072 ↗
21. Lin WS, Huang YW, Zhou XD, Ma YF (2006) In vitro toxicity of silica nanoparticles in human lung cancer cells. Toxicol Appl Pharm 217:252–259. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2006.10.00410.1016/j.taap.2006.10.004 ↗
22. Liu Y, Tourbin M, Lachaize S, Guiraud P (2014) Nanoparticles in wastewaters: hazards, fate and remediation. Powder Technol 255:149–156. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2013.08.02510.1016/j.powtec.2013.08.025 ↗
23. Lu QL, Sorial GA (2004) Adsorption of phenolics on activated carbon—impact of pore size and molecular oxygen. Chemosphere 55:671–679. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.11.04410.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.11.044 ↗
24. Morlay C, Joly JP (2010) Contribution to the textural characterisation of Filtrasorb 400 and other commercial activated carbons commonly used for water treatment. J Porous Mat 17:535–543. doi: 10.1007/s10934-009-9322-310.1007/s10934-009-9322-3 ↗
25. Noell AL, Thompson JL, Corapcioglu MY, Triay IR (1998) The role of silica colloids on facilitated cesium transport through glass bead columns and modeling. J Contam Hydrol 31:23–56. doi: 10.1016/S0169-7722(97)00054-510.1016/S0169-7722(97)00054-5 ↗
26. Nowack B, Bucheli TD (2007) Occurrence, behavior and effects of nanoparticles in the environment. Environ Pollut 150:5–22. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.00610.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.006 ↗
27. Otero-Gonzalez L, Field JA, Calderon IAC, Aspinwall CA, Shadman F, Zeng C, Sierra-Alvarez R (2015) Fate of fluorescent core-shell silica nanoparticles during simulated secondary wastewater treatment. Water Res 77:170–178. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.03.02110.1016/j.watres.2015.03.021 ↗
28. Petosa AR, Jaisi DP, Quevedo IR, Elimelech M, Tufenkji N (2010) Aggregation and deposition of engineered nanomaterials in aquatic environments: role of physicochemical interactions. Environ Sci Technol 44:6532–6549. doi: 10.1021/es100598h10.1021/es100598h ↗
29. Rottman J, Platt LC, Sierra-Alvarez R, Shadman F (2013) Removal of TiO2 nanoparticles by porous media: effect of filtration media and water chemistry. Chem Eng J 217:212–220. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.11.11710.1016/j.cej.2012.11.117 ↗
30. Salih HH, Patterson CL, Sorial GA, Sinha R, Krishnan R (2011) The fate and transport of the SiO2 nanoparticles in a granular activated carbon bed and their impact on the removal of VOCs. J Hazard Mater 193:95–101. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.07.03010.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.07.030 ↗
31. Shellenberger K, Logan BE (2002) Effect of molecular scale roughness of glass beads on colloidal and bacterial deposition. Environ Sci Technol 36:184–189. doi: 10.1021/es015515k10.1021/es015515k ↗
32. Tamai H, Nagai Y, Suzawa T (1983) Interfacial electrical studies on the deposition of polymer latexes onto fabrics and the removal of these deposited latexes. 6. Latex deposition on fibers. 6. Deposition state and interaction energy. J Colloid Interf Sci 91:464–471. doi: 10.1016/0021-9797(83)90360-010.1016/0021-9797(83)90360-0 ↗
33. Vitorge E, Szenknect S, Martins JMF, Gaudet JP (2013) Size- and concentration-dependent deposition of fluorescent silica colloids in saturated sand columns: transport experiments and modeling. Environ Sci-Proc Imp 15:1590–1600. doi: 10.1039/c3em30860j10.1039/c3em30860j ↗
34. Wang C, Bobba AD, Attinti R, Shen CY, Lazouskaya V, Wang LP, Jin Y (2012) Retention and transport of silica nanoparticles in saturated porous media: effect of concentration and particle size. Environ Sci Technol 46:7151–7158. doi: 10.1021/es300314n10.1021/es300314n ↗
35. Yang H, Liu C, Yang DF, Zhang HS, Xi ZG (2009) Comparative study of cytotoxicity, oxidative stress and genotoxicity induced by four typical nanomaterials: the role of particle size, shape and composition. J Appl Toxicol 29:69–78. doi: 10.1002/jat.138510.1002/jat.1385 ↗
36. Yu T, Malugin A, Ghandehari H (2011) Impact of silica nanoparticle design on cellular toxicity and hemolytic activity. ACS Nano 5:5717–5728. doi: 10.1021/nn201390410.1021/nn2013904 ↗