Optimal sample preparation for nanoparticle metrology (statistical size measurements) using atomic force microscopy
Source abstract
Abstract
Optimal deposition procedures are determined for nanoparticle size characterization by atomic force microscopy (AFM). Accurate nanoparticle size distribution analysis with AFM requires non-agglomerated nanoparticles on a flat substrate. The deposition of polystyrene (100 nm), silica (300 and 100 nm), gold (100 nm), and CdSe quantum dot (2–5 nm) nanoparticles by spin coating was optimized for size distribution measurements by AFM. Factors influencing deposition include spin speed, concentration, solvent, and pH. A comparison using spin coating, static evaporation, and a new fluid cell deposition method for depositing nanoparticles is also made. The fluid cell allows for a more uniform and higher density deposition of nanoparticles on a substrate at laminar flow rates, making nanoparticle size analysis via AFM more efficient and also offers the potential for nanoparticle analysis in liquid environments.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Bornside DE, Macosko CW, Scriven LE (1987) On the modeling of spin coating. J Imag Technol 13(4):122–130
2. Brust M, Kiely CJ (2002) Some recent advances in nanostructure preparation from gold and silver particles: a short topical review. Colloids Surf A 202:175–186. doi: 10.1016/S0927-7757(01)01087-110.1016/S0927-7757(01)01087-1 ↗
3. Fujita M, Yamaguchi Y (2006) Development of three-dimensional structure formation simulator of colloidal nanoparticles during drying. J Chem Eng Jpn 39(1):83–89. doi: 10.1252/jcej.39.8310.1252/jcej.39.83 ↗
4. Ghosh M, Fan F, Stebe KJ (2007) Spontaneous pattern formation by dip coating of colloidal suspensions on homogeneous surfaces. Langmuir 23:2180–2183. doi: 10.1021/la062150e10.1021/la062150e ↗
5. Hong YK, Kim H, Lee G, Kim W, Park JL, Cheon J, Koo JY (2002) Controlled two-dimensional distribution of nanoparticles by spin-coating method. Appl Phys Lett 80:844–846. doi: 10.1063/1.144581110.1063/1.1445811 ↗
6. Hoo CM, Starostin N, West P, Mecartney ML (2008) A comparison of atomic force microscopy (AFM) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) methods to characterize nanoparticle size distributions. J Nanopart Res 10:89–96. doi: 10.1007/s11051-008-9435-710.1007/s11051-008-9435-7 ↗
7. Juillerat F, Solak H, Bowen P, Hoffmann H (2005) Fabrication of large-area ordered arrays of nanoparticles on patterned substrates. Nanotechnology 16:1311–1316. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/16/8/05510.1088/0957-4484/16/8/055 ↗
8. Leite ED, Lee EJH, Ribeiro C, Longo E (2006) Controlled thickness deposition of ultrathin ceramic films by spin coating. J Am Ceram Soc 89(6):2016–2020. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.00992.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.00992.x ↗
9. Lin XM, Jaeger HM, Sorensen CM, Klabunde KJ (2001) Formation of long-range-ordered nanocrystal superlattices on silicon nitride substrates. J Phys Chem B 105(17):3353–3357. doi: 10.1021/jp010206210.1021/jp0102062 ↗
10. Nakade S, Saito Y, Kubo W, Kitamura T, Wada Y, Yanagida S (2003) Influence of TiO2 nanoparticle size on electron diffusion and recombination in dye-sensitized TiO2 solar cells. J Phys Chem B 107:8607–8611. doi: 10.1021/jp034773w10.1021/jp034773w ↗
11. Ogi T, Modesto-Lopez LB, Iskandar F, Okuyama K (2007) Fabrication of a large area monolayer of silica particles on a sapphire substrate by a spin coating method. Colloid Surf A 297:71–7810.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.10.027 ↗
12. Schmidt HK (2000) Nanoparticles for ceramic and nanocomposite processing. Mol Cryst Liquid Cryst 353:165–179. doi: 10.1080/1058725000802565710.1080/10587250008025657 ↗
13. Shi FG (1994) Size dependent thermal vibrations and melting in nanocrystals. J Mater Res 9(5):1307–1313. doi: 10.1557/JMR.1994.130710.1557/JMR.1994.1307 ↗
14. Taminiau TH, Segerink FB, Moerland RJ, Kuipers L, Van Hulst NF (2007) Near-field driving of a optical monopole antenna. J Opt A 9:S315–S321. doi: 10.1088/1464-4258/9/9/S0610.1088/1464-4258/9/9/S06 ↗
15. Thomson T, Toney MF, Raoux S, Lee SL, Sun S, Murray CB, Terris BD (2004) Structural and magnetic model of self-assembled FePt nanoparticle arrays. J Appl Phys 96(2):1197–1201. doi: 10.1063/1.175939310.1063/1.1759393 ↗
16. Wang D, Möhwald H (2004) Rapid fabrication of binary colloidal crystals by stepwise spin-coating. Adv Mater 16(3):244–247. doi: 10.1002/adma.20030556510.1002/adma.200305565 ↗
17. Xia D, Brueck SRJ (2004) A facile approach to directed assembly of patterns of nanoparticles using interference lithography and spin coating. Nano Lett 4(7):1295–1299. doi: 10.1021/nl049355x10.1021/nl049355x ↗
18. Xia D, Biswas A, Li D, Bruek SRJ (2004) Directed self-assembly of silica nanoparticles into nanometer-scale patterned surfaces using spin coating. Adv Mater 16:1427–1432. doi: 10.1002/adma.20040009510.1002/adma.200400095 ↗
19. Xiong X, Makaram P, Busnaina A, Bakhtari K, Somu S, McGruer N, Park J (2006) Large scale directed assembly of nanoparticles using nanotrench templates. Appl Phys Lett 89:193108. doi: 10.1063/1.238506710.1063/1.2385067 ↗
20. Xiong X, Busnaina A, Selvarasah S, Somu S, Wei M, Mead J, Chen C, Aceros J, Makaram P, Dokmeci MR (2007) Directed assembly of gold nanoparticle nanowires and networks for nanodevices. Appl Phys Lett 91:063101. doi: 10.1063/1.276396710.1063/1.2763967 ↗
21. Zheng J, Zhu Z, Chen H, Liu Z (2000) Nanopatterned assembling of colloidal gold nanoparticles on silicon. Langmuir 16:4409–4412. doi: 10.1021/la991332o10.1021/la991332o ↗