Length-scale and strain rate-dependent mechanism of defect formation and fracture in carbon nanotubes under tensile loading
Source abstract
Abstract
Electromagnetic and thermo-mechanical forces play a major role in nanotube-based materials and devices. Under high-energy electron transport or high current densities, carbon nanotubes fail via sequential fracture. The failure sequence is governed by certain length scale and flow of current. We report a unified phenomenological model derived from molecular dynamic simulation data, which successfully captures the important physics of the complex failure process. Length-scale and strain rate-dependent defect nucleation, growth, and fracture in single-walled carbon nanotubes with diameters in the range of 0.47 to 2.03 nm and length which is about 6.17 to 26.45 nm are simulated. Nanotubes with long length and small diameter show brittle fracture, while those with short length and large diameter show transition from ductile to brittle fracture. In short nanotubes with small diameters, we observe several structural transitions like Stone-Wales defect initiation, its propagation to larger void nucleation, formation of multiple chains of atoms, conversion to monatomic chain of atoms, and finally complete fracture of the carbon nanotube. Hybridization state of carbon-carbon bonds near the end cap evolves, leading to the formation of monatomic chain in short nanotubes with small diameter. Transition from ductile to brittle fracture is also observed when strain rate exceeds a critical value. A generalized analytical model of failure is established, which correlates the defect energy during the formation of atomic chain with aspect ratio of the nanotube and strain rate. Variation in the mechanical properties such as elastic modulus, tensile strength, and fracture strain with the size and strain rate shows important implications in mitigating force fields and ways to enhance the life of electronic devices and nanomaterial conversion via fracture in manufacturing.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Graphene research and applications · Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Agrawal PM, Sudalayandi BS, Raff LM, Komanduri R (2008) Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of the dependence of C −C bond lengths and bond angles on the tensile strain in single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNT). Comput Mater Sci 41(4):450–45610.1016/j.commatsci.2007.05.001 ↗
2. Baloch KH, Voskanian N, Bronsgeest M, Cumings J (2012) Remote Joule heating by a carbon nanotube. Nat Nanotechnol 7(5):316–31910.1038/nnano.2012.39 ↗
3. Bonard JM, Klinke C, Dean KA, Coll BF (2003) Degradation and failure of carbon nanotube field emitters. Phys Rev B 67(11):115,40610.1103/PhysRevB.67.115406 ↗
4. Brenner DW (1990) Empirical potential for hydrocarbons for use in simulating the chemical vapor deposition of diamond films. Phys Rev B 42(15):9458–947110.1103/PhysRevB.42.9458 ↗
5. Collins PG, Hersam M, Arnold M, Martel R, Avouris P (2001) Current saturation and electrical breakdown in multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev Lett 86(14):3128–313110.1103/PhysRevLett.86.3128 ↗
6. Dereli G, Süngü B (2007) Temperature dependence of the tensile properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes: O(N) tight-binding molecular-dynamics simulations. Phys Rev B 75(184):104
7. Fereidoon A, Ghorbanzadeh AM, Ganji MD, Jahanshahi M (2012) Density functional theory investigation of the mechanical properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Comput Mater Sci 53:377–38110.1016/j.commatsci.2011.08.007 ↗
8. Gadzuk JW, Plummer EW (1973) Field emission energy distribution (FEED). Rev Mod Phys 45(3):487–54810.1103/RevModPhys.45.487 ↗
9. Gupta S, Dharamvir K, Jindal VK (2005) Elastic moduli of single-walled carbon nanotubes and their ropes. Phys Rev B 72(165):428
10. Huang JY, Chen S, Jo SH, Wang Z, Han DX, Chen G, Dresselhaus MS, Ren ZF (2005) Atomic-scale imaging of wall-by-wall breakdown and concurrent transport measurements in multiwall carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev Lett 94 (23):236– 802
11. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD: Visual Molecular Dynamics. J Mol Graph 14:33–3810.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 ↗
12. Jiang JW, Wang JS (2011) Joule heating and thermoelectric properties in short single-walled carbon nanotubes: electron-phonon interaction effect. J Appl Phys 110(12):124,31910.1063/1.3671069 ↗
13. Kingrey D, Khatib O, Collins PG (2006) Electronic fluctuations in nanotube circuits and their sensitivity to gases and liquids. Nano Lett 6:1564–156810.1021/nl060058x ↗
14. Meo M, Rossi M (2007) A molecualr-mechanics based finite element model for strength prediction of single wall carbon nanotubes. Mater Sci Eng A 454:170–17710.1016/j.msea.2006.11.158 ↗
15. Nardelli MB, Yakobson BI, Bernholc J (1998) Brittle and ductile behavior in carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev Lett 81:4656–465910.1103/PhysRevLett.81.4656 ↗
16. Narendar S, Roy Mahapatra D, Gopalakrishnan S (2011) Prediction of nonlocal scaling parameter for armchair and zigzag single-walled carbon nanotubes based on molecular structural mechanics, nonlocal elasticity and wave propagation. Int J Eng Sci 49(6):509–52210.1016/j.ijengsci.2011.01.002 ↗
17. Obitayo W, Liu T (2012) A review: carbon nanotube-based piezoresistive strain sensors. J Sens e652:438
18. Plimpton S (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys 117:1–1910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
19. Ranjbartoreh AR, Wang G (2010) Consideration of mechanical properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes under various loading conditions. J Nanopart Res 12:537–54310.1007/s11051-009-9808-6 ↗
20. Rinzler AG, Hafner JH, Nikolaev P, Lou L, Kim SG, Tománek D, Nordlander P, Colbert DT, Smalley RE (1995) Unraveling nanotubes: field emission from an atomic wire. Science 269:1550–155310.1126/science.269.5230.1550 ↗
21. Samsonidze GG, Samsonidze GG, Yakobson BI (2002) Energetics of Stone-Wales defects in deformations of monoatomic hexagonal layers. Comput Mater Sci 23:62–7210.1016/S0927-0256(01)00220-8 ↗
22. Seidel RV, Graham AP, Rajasekharan B, Unger E, Liebau M, Duesberg GS, Kreupl F, Hoenlein W (2004) Bias dependence and electrical breakdown of small diameter single-walled carbon nanotubes. J Appl Phys 96 (11):6694– 669910.1063/1.1807523 ↗
23. Singh DK, Giri PK, Iyer PK (2011) Evidence for defect-enhanced photoluminescence quenching of fluorescein by carbon nanotubes. J Phys Chem C 115(49):24,067–24,07210.1021/jp207392d ↗
24. Sinha N, Mahapatra DR, Sun Y, Yeow JTW, Melnik RVN, Jaffray DA (2007) Carbon nanotube thin film field emitting diode: understanding the system response based on multiphysics modelling. J Comput Theor Nanosci 4:535–54910.1166/jctn.2007.2339 ↗
25. Sinha N, Mahapatra DR, Sun Y, Yeow JTW, Melnik RVN, Jaffray DA (2008) Electromechanical interactions in a carbon nanotube based thin film field emitting diode. Nanotechnology 19(2):025,70110.1088/0957-4484/19/02/025701 ↗
26. Song J, Jiang H, Shi DL, Feng XQ, Huang Z, Yu MF, Hwang KC (2006) Stone-Wales transformation: precursor of fracture in carbon nanotubes. Int J Mech Sci 48:1464–147010.1016/j.ijmecsci.2006.03.019 ↗
27. Stuart SJ, Tutein AB, Harrison JA (2000) A reactive potential for hydrocarbons with intermolecular interactions. J Chem Phys 112:6472–648510.1063/1.481208 ↗
28. Subramaniyan AK, Sun CT (2008) Continuum interpretation of virial stress in molecular simulations. Int J Solids Struct 45:4340–434610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.03.016 ↗
29. Swope WC, Andersen HC, Berens PH, Wilson KR (1982) A computer simulation method for the calculation of equilibrium constants for the formation of physical clusters of molecules: application to small water clusters. J Chem Phys 76:63710.1063/1.442716 ↗
30. Tang C, Wanlin G, Changfeng C (2009) Molecular dynamics simulation of tensile elongation of carbon nanotubes: temperature and size effects. Physical Review B 79:155,436–1–155,436–910.1103/PhysRevB.79.155436 ↗
31. Tiwary CS, Javvaji B, Kumar C, Mahapatra DR, Ozden S, Ajayan PM, Chattopadhyay K (2015) Chemical-free graphene by unzipping carbon nanotubes using cryo-milling. Carbon 89:217–22410.1016/j.carbon.2015.03.036 ↗
32. Tsutsui M, Taninouchi YK, Kurokawa S, Sakai A (2006) Electrical breakdown of short multiwalled carbon nanotubes. J Appl Phys 094(9):302
33. Varadan VK (ed) (2012) Electromagnetic characteristics of carbon nanotubes with strain, vol 834410.1117/12.918103 ↗
34. Wang J, Lu C, Wang Q, Xiao P, Ke F, Bai Y, Shen Y, Wang Y, Chen B, Liao X, Gao H (2012) Self-healing in fractured GaAs nanowires. Acta Mater 60:5593–560010.1016/j.actamat.2012.07.013 ↗
35. Wei W, Liu Y, Wei Y, Jiang K, Peng LM, Fan S (2006) Tip cooling effect and failure mechanism of field-emitting carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett 7(1):64–6810.1021/nl061982u ↗
36. Williams L, Kumsomboone V, Ready W, Walker M (2010) Lifetime and failure mechanisms of an arrayed carbon nanotube field emission cathode. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 57(11):3163–316810.1109/TED.2010.2069563 ↗
37. Yuzvinsky TD, Mickelson W, Aloni S, Konsek SL, Fennimore AM, Begtrup GE, Kis A, Regan BC, Zettl A (2005) Imaging the life story of nanotube devices. Appl Phys Lett 87(8):083,10310.1063/1.2012529 ↗
38. Zhang Y, Zheng L, Sun G, Zhan Z, Liao K (2012) Failure mechanisms of carbon nanotube fibers under different strain rates. Carbon 50:2887–289310.1016/j.carbon.2012.02.057 ↗
39. Zhao J, Zhu J (2011) Electron microscopy and in situ testing of mechanical deformation of carbon nanotubes. Micron 42(7):663–67910.1016/j.micron.2011.04.004 ↗