journal article·2017-02Open access

A complex network approach for nanoparticle agglomeration analysis in nanoscale images

Bruno Brandoli Machado, Leonardo Felipe Scabini, Jonatan Patrick Margarido Orue, Mauro Santos de Arruda, Diogo Nunes Goncalves, Wesley Nunes Goncalves, Raphaell Moreira, Jose F Rodrigues-Jr

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 19· Issue 2

Abstract

Complex networks have been widely used in science and technology because of their ability to represent several systems. One of these systems is found in Biochemistry, in which the synthesis of new nanoparticles is a hot topic. However, the interpretation of experimental results in the search of new nanoparticles poses several challenges. This is due to the characteristics of nanoparticles images and due to their multiple intricate properties; one property of recurrent interest is the agglomeration of particles. Addressing this issue, this paper introduces an approach that uses complex networks to detect and describe nanoparticle agglomerates so to foster easier and more insightful analyses. In this approach, each detected particle in an image corresponds to a vertice and the distances between the particles define a criterion for creating edges. Edges are created if the distance is smaller than a radius of interest. Once this network is set, we calculate several discrete measures able to reveal the most outstanding agglomerates in a nanoparticle image. Experimental results using images of Scanning Tunneling Microscopy (STM) of gold nanoparticles demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed approach over several samples, as reflected by the separability between particles in three usual settings. The results also demonstrated efficacy for both convex and non-convex agglomerates.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Complex Network Analysis Techniques · Cell Image Analysis Techniques · Molecular Communication and Nanonetworks

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. A-L Barabasi ZO (2004) Network biology: understanding the cell’s functional organization. Nat Rev Genet 5(2):101–113. doi: 10.1038/nrg127210.1038/nrg1272 ↗
2. Antiqueira L, Oliveira-Jr O, da Fontoura Costa L, das Graças Volpe Nunes M (2009) A complex network approach to text summarization. Inf Sci 179(5):584–599. 10.1016/j.ins.2008.10.032 , http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002002550800452010.1016/j.ins.2008.10.032 ↗
3. B K JHS, LM G, SB L (2011) Experimental considerations on the cytotoxicity of nanoparticles. Nanomedicine 6(5):929–941. doi: 10.2217/nnm.11.7710.2217/nnm.11.77 ↗
4. Barabási AL, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439):509–51210.1126/science.286.5439.509 ↗
5. Boccaletti S, Latora V, Moreno Y, Chavez M, Hwang DU (2006) Complex networks: structure and dynamics. Phys Rep 424(4):175–30810.1016/j.physrep.2005.10.009 ↗
6. Brunelli R (2009) Template matching techniques in computer vision: theory and practice. Wiley Publishing10.1002/9780470744055 ↗
7. Canny J (1986) A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 8(6):679–698. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.1986.476785110.1109/TPAMI.1986.4767851 ↗
8. Chen S, Zhao M, Wu G, Yao C, Zhang J (2012) Recent advances in morphological cell image analysis. Comput Math Methods Med 2012:101,536:1–101,536:10. doi: 10.1155/2012/10153610.1155/2012/101536 ↗
9. Costa L, Rodrigues FA, Travieso G, Villas Boas PR (2007) Characterization of complex networks: a survey of measurements. Adv Phys 56(1):167–24210.1080/00018730601170527 ↗
10. Ding Y, Bukkapatnam STS (2015) Challenges and needs for automating nano image processing for material characterization. Proc SPIE 9556. Nanoengineering: Fabrication, Properties, Optics, and Devices XII 9556:95,560Z–955,607. doi: 10.1117/12.218625110.1117/12.2186251 ↗
11. Duda RO, Hart PE (1972) Use of the hough transformation to detect lines and curves in pictures. Commun ACM 15(1):11–15. doi: 10.1145/361237.36124210.1145/361237.361242 ↗
12. Emin S, Singh SP, Han L, Satoh N, Islam A (2011) Colloidal quantum dot solar cells. Solar Energy 85(6):1264–1282. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2011.02.005 . http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038092X1100033810.1016/j.solener.2011.02.005 ↗
13. Erdos P, Renyi A (1960) On the evolution of random graphs. Publ Math Inst Hungar Acad Sci 5:17–61
14. Eustace J, Wang X, Cui Y (2015) Community detection using local neighborhood in complex networks. Physica A 436:665–677. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2015.05.044 , http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037843711500459810.1016/j.physa.2015.05.044 ↗
15. Fisker R, Carstensen J, Hansen M, Bødker F, Mørup S (2000) Estimation of nanoparticle size distributions by image analysis. J Nanopart Res 2(3):267–277. doi: 10.1023/A:101002331677510.1023/A:1010023316775 ↗
16. Gonçalves WN, Martinez AS, Bruno OM (2012) Complex network classification using partially self-avoiding deterministic walks. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary J Nonlinear Sci 22(3):033,139. doi: 10.1063/1.473751510.1063/1.4737515 ↗
17. Gonçalves WN, Machado BB, Bruno OM (2015) A complex network approach for dynamic texture recognition. Neurocomputing 153:211–220. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2014.11.034 , http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092523121401567710.1016/j.neucom.2014.11.034 ↗
18. Hassellöv M, Kaegi R (2009) Analysis and characterization of manufactured nanoparticles in aquatic environments Environmental and Human Health Impacts of Nanotechnology. Wiley, pp 211–266. doi: 10.1002/9781444307504.ch610.1002/9781444307504.ch6 ↗
19. Kaue Dalmaso Peron T, da Fontoura Costa L, Rodrigues FA (2012) The structure and resilience of financial market networks. Chaos 22(1):013,11710.1063/1.3683467 ↗
20. Kim DA, Hwong AR, Stafford D, Hughes DA, O’Malley AJ, Fowler JH, Christakis NA (2015) Social network targeting to maximise population behaviour change: a cluster randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 386(9989):145–153. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60095-2 . http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014067361560095210.1016/S0140-6736(15)60095-2 ↗
21. Larsen RJ, Marx ML (2012) An introduction to mathematical statistics and its applications, 5th ed. Prentice Hall, Boston, MA
22. Li X, Wang L, Fan Y, Feng Q, Cui F (2012) Biocompatibility and toxicity of nanoparticles and nanotubes. J Nanomater 2012:6–6. doi: 10.1155/2012/54838910.1155/2012/548389 ↗
23. Liao M, Qian Zhao Y, Hua Li X, Shan Dai P, Wen Xu X, Kai Zhang J, Ji Zou B (2016) Automatic segmentation for cell images based on bottleneck detection and ellipse fitting. Neurocomputing 173(3):615–622. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2015.08.006 , http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092523121501140610.1016/j.neucom.2015.08.006 ↗
24. Lorenz C, Goetz NV, Scheringer M, Wormuth M, Hungerbühler K (2011) Potential exposure of german consumers to engineered nanoparticles in cosmetics and personal care products. Nanotoxicology 5(1):12–29. doi: 10.3109/17435390.2010.48455410.3109/17435390.2010.484554 ↗
25. MC Jones JAR (1992) Displaying the important features of large collections of similar curves. Am Stat 46(2):140–145. http://www.jstor.org/stable/268418410.1080/00031305.1992.10475870 ↗
26. Masciangioli T, Zhang WX (2003) Peer reviewed: environmental technologies at the nanoscale. Environ Sci Technol 37(5):102A–108A. doi: 10.1021/es032399810.1021/es0323998 ↗
27. Muneesawang P, Sirisathitkul C (2015) Size measurement of nanoparticle assembly using multilevel segmented tem images. J Nanomater 2015:58:58–58:58. doi: 10.1155/2015/79050810.1155/2015/790508 ↗
28. Muneesawang P, Sirisathitkul C, Sirisathitkul Y (2015) Multi-level segmentation procedure for measuring the size distribution of nanoparticles in transmission electron microscope images. Sci Adv Mater 7(4):769–783. doi: 10.1166/sam.2015.193010.1166/sam.2015.1930 ↗
29. Newman ME (2004) Who is the best connected scientist?a study of scientific coauthorship networks. In: Ben-Naim E, Frauenfelder H, Toroczkai Z (eds) Complex Networks, Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 650, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp 37–370. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-44485-5_1610.1007/978-3-540-44485-5_16 ↗
30. Park C, Huang JZ, Huitink D, Kundu S, Mallick BK, Liang H, Ding Y (2012) A multi-stage, semi-automated procedure for analyzing the morphology of nanoparticles. IIE Trans 7:507–522. doi: 10.1080/0740817X.2011.58786710.1080/0740817X.2011.587867 ↗
31. Park C, Huang J, Ji J, Ding Y (2013) Segmentation, inference and classification of partially overlapping nanoparticles. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 35(3):669–681. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2012.16310.1109/TPAMI.2012.163 ↗
32. Porter A, Rafols I (2009) Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics 81(3):719–745. doi: 10.1007/s11192-008-2197-210.1007/s11192-008-2197-2 ↗
33. Sugahara KN, Teesalu T, Karmali PP, Kotamraju VR, Agemy L, Girard OM, Hanahan D, Mattrey RF, Ruoslahti E (2009) Tissue-penetrating delivery of compounds and nanoparticles into tumors. Cancer Cell 16(6):510–520. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.10.013 . http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S153561080900382110.1016/j.ccr.2009.10.013 ↗
34. Tan PN, Steinbach M, Kumar V (2005) Introduction to data mining. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston
35. Tenenbaum JB, Silva Vd, Langford JC (2000) A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Science 290(5500):2319–2323. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5500.2319 , http://science.sciencemag.org/content/290/5500/2319.full.pdf10.1126/science.290.5500.2319 ↗
36. Tyler JR, Wilkinson DM, Huberman BA (2003) Communities and technologies. Kluwer, B.V., Deventer, The Netherlands, The Netherlands, pp 81–96. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=966263.966268x10.1007/978-94-017-0115-0_5 ↗
37. Van Doren EA, De Temmerman PJR, Francisco MAD, Mast J (2011) Determination of the volume-specific surface area by using transmission electron tomography for characterization and definition of nanomaterials. J Nanobiotechnol 9(1):110.1186/1477-3155-9-17 ↗
38. Vural U, Oktay A (2014) Segmentation of fe3o4 nano particles in tem images Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU), 2014 22nd, IEEE Computer Library, pp 1849–1852. doi: 10.1109/SIU.2014.683061310.1109/SIU.2014.6830613 ↗
39. Watts DJ, Strogatz SH (1998) Collective dynamics of ’small-world’ networks. Nature 393 (6684):440–44210.1038/30918 ↗
40. Zhang T, Jia W, Zhu Y, Yang J (2015) Automatic tracking of neural stem cells in sequential digital images. Biocybernetics Biomed Eng 36(1):66–75. doi: 10.1016/j.bbe.2015.10.001 , http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S020852161500072810.1016/j.bbe.2015.10.001 ↗