journal article·2010-02

Consideration of mechanical properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes under various loading conditions

Ali Reza Ranjbartoreh, Guoxiu Wang

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 12· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

In this article, mechanical properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) with various radiuses under tensile, compressive and lateral loads are considered. Stress–strain curve, elastic modulus, tensile, compressive and rotational stiffness, buckling behaviour, and critical axial compressive load and pressure of eight different zigzag and armchair SWCNTs are investigated to figure out the effect of radius and chirality on mechanical properties of nanotubes. Using molecular dynamic simulation (MDS) method, it can be explained that SWCNTs have higher Young’s modulus and tensile stiffness than compressive elastic modulus and compressive stiffness. Critical axial force of zigzag SWCNT is independent from the radius, but that of armchair type rises by increasing of radius, also these two types show different buckling modes.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research · Nanotechnology research and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Charlier JC, Michenaud JP (1993) Energetics of multilayered carbon tubles. Phys Rev Lett 70(12):1858–186110.1103/PhysRevLett.70.1858 ↗
2. Cornwell CF, Wille LT (1997) Elastic properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes in compression. Solid State Commun 101(8):555–55810.1016/S0038-1098(96)00742-9 ↗
3. Frey JT, Doren DJ (2005) TubeGen 3.3. University of Delaware, Newark, DE. Available via web-interface, http://turin.nss.udel.edu/research/tubegenonline.html . Accessed 21 Aug 2009
4. Hernández E, Goze C, Bernier P, Rubio A (1998) Elastic properties of C and BxCyNz composite. Phys Rev Lett 80:4502–450510.1103/PhysRevLett.80.4502 ↗
5. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD—visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 4:33–3810.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 ↗
6. Jin Y, Yuan FG (2003) Simulation of elastic properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Compos Sci Technol 63:1507–151510.1016/S0266-3538(03)00074-5 ↗
7. Krishnan A, Dujardin E, Ebbesen TW, Yianilos PN, Treacy MMJ (1998) Young’s modulus of single-walled nanotubes. Phys Rev B 58(20):14013–1401910.1103/PhysRevB.58.14013 ↗
8. Lier GV, Alsenoy CV, Doren VV, Geerlings P (2000) Ab initio study of the elastic properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes and grapheme. Chem Phys Lett 326:181–18510.1016/S0009-2614(00)00764-8 ↗
9. Liu JZ, Zheng QS, Jiang Q (2001) Effect of a rippling mode on resonances of carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev Lett 86:4843–484610.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4843 ↗
10. Meo M, Rossi M (2006) Young’s modulus of single wall carbon nanotubes by molecular-mechanics based finite element modeling. Compos Sci Technol 66:1597–160510.1016/j.compscitech.2005.11.015 ↗
11. Plimpton SJ (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comp Phys 117: 1–19. Available via DIALOG, from http://lammps.sandia.gov . Accessed 10 Aug 200910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
12. Plimpton SJ, Pollock R, Stevens M (1997) Particle-mesh Ewald and rRESPA for parallel molecular dynamics simulations. In: Proceedings of the eighth SIAM conference on parallel processing for scientific computing, Minneapolis, MN, USA
13. Popov VN, Doren VEV, Balkanski M (2000) Elastic properties of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev B 61:3078–308410.1103/PhysRevB.61.3078 ↗
14. Ranjbartoreh AR, Wang GX, GhorbanpourArani A, Loghman A (2008) Comparative consideration of axial stability of single- and double-walled carbon nanotube and its inner and outer tubes. Physica E 41:202–208. doi: 10.1016/j.physe.2008.06.02610.1016/j.physe.2008.06.026 ↗
15. Schabel MC, Martins JL (1992) Energetics of interplanar binding in graphite. Phys Rev B 46(11):7185–718810.1103/PhysRevB.46.7185 ↗
16. Tombler TW, Zhou CW, Alexseyev L, Kong J, Dai HJ, Lei L et al (2000) Reversible electro-mechanical characteristics of carbon nanotubes under local-probe manipulation. Nature 405:769–77310.1038/35015519 ↗
17. Treacy MMJ, Ebbesen TW, Gibson JM (1996) Exceptionally high Young’s modulus observed for individual carbon nanotubes. Nature 381:678–680. doi: 10.1038/381678a010.1038/381678a0 ↗
18. Xin H, Han Q, Yao XH (2007) Buckling and axially compressive properties of perfect and defective single-walled carbon nanotubes. Carbon 45:2486–2495. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2007.08.03710.1016/j.carbon.2007.08.037 ↗
19. Yakobson BI, Brabec CJ, Bernholc J (1996) Nanomechanics of carbon tubes: instabilities beyond the linear response. Phys Rev Lett 76:2511–251410.1103/PhysRevLett.76.2511 ↗
20. Yao N, Lordi V (1998) Young’s modulus of single-walled carbon nanotubes. J Appl Phys 84:1939–194310.1063/1.368323 ↗
21. Yu MF, Files BS, Arepalli S, Ruoff RS (2000) Tensile loading of ropes of single wall carbon nanotubes and their mechanical properties. Phys Rev Lett 84:5552–555510.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5552 ↗