The innovation policy of nanotechnology development and convergence for the new Korean government
Source abstract
Abstract
Since 2001, Korea has been establishing and executing policy for the development of nanotechnology in accordance with the National Comprehensive Development Plan of Nanotechnology (NCDPN) periods I, II, and III. NCDPN has been focused on innovation in wide spectrum of technology development, and NT-based convergence technologies are expected to contribute 35 % of the total GDP (about 5.02 billion won) with 1.2 million of job creation in KOREA at 2020. Establishment of new strategies for innovating and commercializing nanotechnology is an emerging global issue in major countries including the United States, Japan, Germany, and Korea, with particular concerns for safety in the implementations of nanotechnology (EHS). Under these circumstances, Korea needs to create a post-catch-up strategy beyond fast-follower approach, to compete effectively with nanotechnology-leading countries. This study analyzes the current status of Korean nanotechnology development and relevant policies, and suggests future policy directions for the new Korean government based on innovative competition theory.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovation Policy and R&D · Technology Assessment and Management · University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Athanassopoulos A (2003) Strategic groups, frontier benchmarking and performance differences: evidence from the UK retail grocery industry. J Manag Stud 40(4):921–95310.1111/1467-6486.00365 ↗
2. Collaboration Synergies Inc. (2009) Manufacturing Enterprise 3.0
3. Cooper TF, Ofria C (2002) Evolution of stable ecosystems in populations of digital organisms. In: Standish RK, Bedau MA, Abbass HA (eds) Artificial life VIII. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 227–232
4. D’Aveni RA (1994) Hypercompetition: managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. Free Press, New York
5. Korea Ceramic Technology Institute (2010) Precise status of nano-corporations and demand survey of R&D
6. Levinson M (2013) U.S. Manufacturing in International Perspective, CRS report for Congress
7. LUX Research (2010) National competitiveness ranking by nanotechnology
8. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2007, 2008, 2009a, 2010, 2011a, 2012) Nanotechnology development execution plan
9. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (2011b) Study on establishment planning of Period III National Comprehensive Development Plan of Nanotechnology
10. Ministry of Strategy and Finance (2013) Currently Discussed Trend and Suggestion Related to Technological Advancement
11. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (2010) 2010 Survey report on nano-convergence industry, MOTIE
12. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (2011) 2011 Survey report on nano-convergence industry, MOTIE
13. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (2012) 2012 Survey report on nano-convergence industry, MOTIE
14. Moore JF (1993) New ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, London, pp 75–86 May–June
15. National Nanotechnology Initiative (2013a) NNI Supplement to the President’s 2014 Budget
16. National Nanotechnology Initiative (2013b) NNI Budget List. http://nano.gov . Accessed 2013.01
17. National Nanotechnology Policy Center (2011a) Statistical survey of nano-convergence industry
18. National Nanotechnology Policy Center (2011b) Proposal with open hearing for Korean nanotechnology code of conduct
19. National Nanotechnology Policy Center (2012) National Nanotechnology Policy Direction for Global Competitiveness of Korea Economy
20. National Nanotechnology Policy Center (2013) 2012 Survey on Nanotechnology relevant organizations, NNPC
21. National Nanotechnology Policy Center (2013a) A study on national perception on nanotechnology, NNPC
22. NMP (2013) NMP Budget List. http://ec.europa.eu . Accessed 2013.01
23. NTIS (2012) National Science and Technology Information Service data
24. Park G (2012) Presidential election pledge of 18th president of Korea
25. Peter JW, Arnoud DM (2012) Ecosystem advantage: how to successfully harness the power of partners. California Management Review 55(1):24–4610.1525/cmr.2012.55.1.24 ↗
26. Roco MC (2011) The long view of nanotechnology development: the national nanotechnology initiative at 10 years. J Nanopart Res 13:427–44510.1007/s11051-010-0192-z ↗
27. Ron A, Rahul K (2010) Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strateg Manag J 31(3):306–33310.1002/smj.821 ↗
28. Sargent JE (2013) The National Nanotechnology Initiative: overview, reauthorization, and appropriations issues. Congressional Research Service RL-34401
29. U.S. Manufacturing Competitiveness Initiative (2011) Make: an American manufacturing movement, Council of Competitiveness
30. Wiggins R, Ruefli TW (2012) Schumpeter’s ghost: is hypercompetition making the best of times shorter? Strateg Manag J 26:887–91110.1002/smj.492 ↗
31. Woodrow Wilson Center (2011) Nanotechnology Consumer Product Inventory. http://www.nanotechproject.org/ inventories/consumer/
32. Yochai B (2001) THE battle over the institutional ecosystem in the digital environment. Commun ACM 44(2):84–9010.1145/359205.359235 ↗