Dispersion quality of amine functionalized multiwall carbon nanotubes plays critical roles in polymerase chain reaction enhancement
Source abstract
Abstract
Impact of dispersion quality of NH2-MWCNTs (13–18 nm in diameter with a length between 1 and 12 µm, >99 % purity) in the amplification efficiency of a random DNA oligonucleotide library (96 bp) was investigated. Amplification yield in the presence of non-filtered NH2-MWCNT dispersion, filtered NH2-MWCNT dispersion and surface-attached NH2-MWCNTs was explored, and physical interactions between NH2-MWCNTs and major PCR reagents including DNA template, wild type Taq DNA polymerase enzyme and primers were determined using high resolution polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, dynamic light scattering, UV–Vis-NIR spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy techniques. The results revealed that presence of NH2-MWCNT dispersion which was sonicated, centrifuged and filtered, enhanced the total PCR efficiency up to 70 % while the presence of NH2-MWCNT only centrifuged after sonication, inhibited the reaction significantly at similar concentrations. Furthermore, the NH2-MWCNTs coupled covalently onto magnetic microspheres, contributed for the specificity enhancement whilst decreasing the amplification efficiency by 30 % at the maximum concentration, which suggests a removable enhancement system for sensitive applications. On the other hand, the relative hydrodynamic size distribution measurements displayed a clear difference between the filtered NH2 and non-filtered NH2-MWCNT water dispersions, which justifies the inhibition of the amplification by the non-filtered NH2-MWCNTs containing big agglomerates and bundles. Finally, we demonstrated that major PCR components adsorb onto the NH2-MWCNTs with diverse affinities, and maintain their functions after adsorption, which provides a good framework to further develop tunable NH2-MWCNT-carriers to be utilized in various nanobiotechnology and material science applications.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Abdul Khaliq R, Sonawane PJ, Sasi BK et al (2010) Enhancement in the efficiency of polymerase chain reaction by TiO2 nanoparticles: crucial role of enhanced thermal conductivity. Nanotechnology 21:255704. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/21/25/25570410.1088/0957-4484/21/25/255704 ↗
2. Belyanskaya L, Manser P, Spohn P et al (2007) The reliability and limits of the MTT reduction assay for carbon nanotubes-cell interaction. Carbon N Y 45:2643–2648. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2007.08.01010.1016/j.carbon.2007.08.010 ↗
3. Cai X, Ramalingam R, Wong HS et al (2013) Characterization of carbon nanotube protein corona by using quantitative proteomics. Nanomedicine 9:583–593. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2012.09.00410.1016/j.nano.2012.09.004 ↗
4. Cao X, Chen J, Wen S et al (2011) Effect of surface charge of polyethyleneimine-modified multiwalled carbon nanotubes on the improvement of polymerase chain reaction. Nanoscale 3:1741–1747. doi: 10.1039/c0nr00833h10.1039/c0nr00833h ↗
5. Che G, Lakshmi BB, Fisher ER, Martin CR (1998) Carbon nanotubule membranes for electrochemical energy storage and production. Nature 393:346–34910.1038/30694 ↗
6. Cui D, Tian F, Kong Y et al (2004) Effects of single-walled carbon nanotubes on the polymerase chain reaction. Nanotechnology 15:154–157. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/15/1/03010.1088/0957-4484/15/1/030 ↗
7. Dai H, Hafner JH, Rinzler AG et al (1996) Nanotubes as nanoprobes in scanning probe microscopy. Nature 384:147–15010.1038/384147a0 ↗
8. De Heer WA, Chetelain A, Ugarte D (1995) A carbon nanotube field-emission electron source. Science 270(80):1179–1180. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5239.117910.1126/science.270.5239.1179 ↗
9. Dumée L, Sears K, Schütz J et al (2013) Influence of the sonication temperature on the debundling kinetics of carbon nanotubes in propan-2-ol. Nanomaterials 3:70–85. doi: 10.3390/nano301007010.3390/nano3010070 ↗
10. Haggenmueller R, Rahatekar SS, Fagan JA et al (2008) Comparison of the quality of aqueous dispersions of single wall carbon nanotubes using surfactants and biomolecules. Langmuir 24:5070–5078. doi: 10.1021/la703008r10.1021/la703008r ↗
11. Hone J, Whitney M, Piskoti C, Zettl A (1999) Thermal conductivity of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev B 59:2514–2516. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.R251410.1103/PhysRevB.59.R2514 ↗
12. Hüttel AK, Steele GA, Witkamp B et al (2009) Carbon nanotubes as ultrahigh quality factor mechanical resonators. Nano Lett 9:2547–2552. doi: 10.1021/nl900612h10.1021/nl900612h ↗
13. Hwang S-H, Im S-G, Hah SS et al (2013) Effects of upconversion nanoparticles on polymerase chain reaction. PLoS ONE 8:e73408. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.007340810.1371/journal.pone.0073408 ↗
14. Iijima S, Ichihashi T (1993) Single-shell carbon nanotubes of 1-nm diameter. Nature 363:603–60510.1038/363603a0 ↗
15. Isobe H, Tanaka T, Maeda R et al (2006) Preparation, purification, characterization, and cytotoxicity assessment of water-soluble, transition-metal-free carbon nanotube aggregates. Angew Chem 118:6828–6832. doi: 10.1002/ange.20060171810.1002/ange.200601718 ↗
16. Jia J, Sun L, Hu N et al (2012) Graphene enhances the specificity of the polymerase chain reaction. Small 8:2011–2015. doi: 10.1002/smll.20120013910.1002/smll.201200139 ↗
17. Karajanagi SS, Yang H, Asuri P et al (2006) Protein-assisted solubilization of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Langmuir 22:1392–1395. doi: 10.1021/la052820110.1021/la0528201 ↗
18. Krause B, Mende M, Pötschke P, Petzold G (2010) Dispersability and particle size distribution of CNTs in an aqueous surfactant dispersion as a function of ultrasonic treatment time. Carbon N Y 48:2746–2754. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2010.04.00210.1016/j.carbon.2010.04.002 ↗
19. Lauret J-S, Voisin C, Cassabois G et al (2003) Ultrafast carrier dynamics in single-wall carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev Lett 90:057404. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.05740410.1103/PhysRevLett.90.057404 ↗
20. Liang Y, Luo F, Lin Y et al (2009) C60 affects DNA replication in vitro by decreasing the melting temperature of DNA templates. Carbon N Y 47:1457–1465. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.01.03810.1016/j.carbon.2009.01.038 ↗
21. Liao JZ, Tan MJ (2012) Improved tensile strength of carbon nanotube reinforced aluminum composites processed by powder metallurgy. Adv Mater Res 500:651–65610.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.500.651 ↗
22. Lin YC, Wu HL (2007) NANO-PCR: breaking the bottom limit of the PCR denaturation temperature using nanogold. Transducers 2007 - Int. Solid-State Sensors, Actuators Microsystems Conf. IEEE, pp 391–394
23. Lou X, Zhang Y (2013) Mechanism studies on nanoPCR and applications of gold nanoparticles in genetic analysis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:6276–6284. doi: 10.1021/am401320910.1021/am4013209 ↗
24. Ma L, He S, Huang J et al (2009) Maximizing specificity and yield of PCR by the quantum dot itself rather than property of the quantum dot surface. Biochimie 91:969–97310.1016/j.biochi.2009.04.020 ↗
25. Martin CR, Kohli P (2003) The emerging field of nanotube biotechnology. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2:29–3710.1038/nrd988 ↗
26. Minati L, Antonini V, Dalla Serra M, Speranza G (2012) Multifunctional branched gold-carbon nanotube hybrid for cell imaging and drug delivery. Langmuir 28:15900–15906. doi: 10.1021/la303298u10.1021/la303298u ↗
27. Moon YK, Lee J, Lee JK et al (2009) Synthesis of length-controlled aerosol carbon nanotubes and their dispersion stability in aqueous solution. Langmuir 25:1739–1743. doi: 10.1021/la803136810.1021/la8031368 ↗
28. Mu Q, Liu W, Xing Y et al (2008) Protein binding by functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes is governed by the surface chemistry of both parties and the nanotube diameter. J Phys Chem C 112:3300–3307. doi: 10.1021/jp710541j10.1021/jp710541j ↗
29. Nair N, Kim W-J, Braatz RD, Strano MS (2008) Dynamics of surfactant-suspended single-walled carbon nanotubes in a centrifugal field. Langmuir 24:1790–1795. doi: 10.1021/la702516u10.1021/la702516u ↗
30. Nie H, Yang Z, Huang S et al (2012) DNA-wrapped carbon nanotubes as sensitive electrochemical labels in controlled-assembly-mediated signal transduction for the detection of sequence-specific DNA. Small 8:1407–1414. doi: 10.1002/smll.20110207110.1002/smll.201102071 ↗
31. Pease LF, Tsai D-H, Fagan JA et al (2009) Length distribution of single-walled carbon nanotubes in aqueous suspension measured by electrospray differential mobility analysis. Small 5:2894–290110.1002/smll.200900928 ↗
32. Quaglio M, Bianco S, Castagna R et al (2011) Elastomeric nanocomposite based on carbon nanotubes for polymerase chain reaction device. Microelectron Eng 88:1860–1863. doi: 10.1016/j.mee.2011.01.03210.1016/j.mee.2011.01.032 ↗
33. Rahman M, Laurent S, Tawil N et al (2013) Protein–nanoparticle interactions. Chem Rev 15:5610–5637. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-37555-2
34. Rastogi R, Kaushal R, Tripathi SK et al (2008) Comparative study of carbon nanotube dispersion using surfactants. J Colloid Interface Sci 328:421–42810.1016/j.jcis.2008.09.015 ↗
35. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671–67510.1038/nmeth.2089 ↗
36. Sinani VA, Gheith MK, Yaroslavov AA et al (2005) Aqueous dispersions of single-wall and multiwall carbon nanotubes with designed amphiphilic polycations. J Am Chem Soc 127:3463–3472. doi: 10.1021/ja045670+10.1021/ja045670+ ↗
37. Staii C, Johnson AT, Chen M, Gelperin A (2005) DNA-decorated carbon nanotubes for chemical sensing. Nano Lett 5:1774–1778. doi: 10.1021/nl051261f10.1021/nl051261f ↗
38. Strano MS, Zheng M, Jagota A et al (2004) Understanding the nature of the DNA-assisted separation of single-walled carbon nanotubes using fluorescence and Raman spectroscopy. Nano Lett 4:543–550. doi: 10.1021/nl034937k10.1021/nl034937k ↗
39. Tong W, Cao X, Wen S et al (2012) Enhancing the specificity and efficiency of polymerase chain reaction using polyethyleneimine-based derivatives and hybrid nanocomposites. Int J Nanomed 7:1069–1078. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S28947
40. Vroman L, Adams AL, Fischer GC, Munoz PC (1980) Interaction of high molecular weight kininogen, factor XII, and fibrinogen in plasma at interfaces. Blood 55:156–15910.1182/blood.V55.1.156.156 ↗
41. Wei C, Srivastava D, Cho K (2002) Thermal expansion and diffusion coefficients of carbon nanotube-polymer composites. Nano Lett 2:647–65010.1021/nl025554+ ↗
42. Wen D, Ding Y (2004) Effective thermal conductivity of aqueous suspensions of carbon nanotubes (carbon nanotube nanofluids). J Thermophys Heat Transf 18:481–485. doi: 10.2514/1.993410.2514/1.9934 ↗
43. Wick P, Manser P, Limbach LK et al (2007) The degree and kind of agglomeration affect carbon nanotube cytotoxicity. Toxicol Lett 168:121–131. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2006.08.01910.1016/j.toxlet.2006.08.019 ↗
44. Williams RM, Nayeem S, Dolash BD, Sooter LJ (2014) The effect of DNA-dispersed single-walled carbon nanotubes on the polymerase chain reaction. PLoS ONE 9:e94117. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.009411710.1371/journal.pone.0094117 ↗
45. Yang W, Ratinac KR, Ringer SP et al (2010) Carbon nanomaterials in biosensors: should you use nanotubes or graphene? Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 49:2114–2138. doi: 10.1002/anie.20090346310.1002/anie.200903463 ↗
46. Yi C, Fong C-C, Chen W et al (2007) Interactions between carbon nanotubes and DNA polymerase and restriction endonucleases. Nanotechnology 18:025102. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/18/2/02510210.1088/0957-4484/18/2/025102 ↗
47. Yu J, Grossiord N, Koning CE, Loos J (2007) Controlling the dispersion of multi-wall carbon nanotubes in aqueous surfactant solution. Carbon N Y 45:618–62310.1016/j.carbon.2006.10.010 ↗
48. Yuce M, Kurt H, Budak H (2014a) Characterization of a dual biotin tag for improved single stranded DNA production. Anal Methods 6:548–557. doi: 10.1039/c3ay41899e10.1039/C3AY41899E ↗
49. Yuce M, Kurt H, Mokkapati VRSS, Budak H (2014b) Employment of nanomaterials in polymerase chain reaction: insight into the impacts and putative operating mechanisms of nano-additives in PCR. RSC Adv. doi: 10.1039/C4RA06144F
50. Zhang Z, Shen C, Wang M, et al. (2008) Aqueous suspension of carbon nanotubes enhances the specificity of long PCR. Biotechniques 44:537–8, 540, 542. doi: 10.2144/00011269210.2144/000112692 ↗
51. Zheng M, Jagota A, Semke ED et al (2003) DNA-assisted dispersion and separation of carbon nanotubes. Nat Mater 2:338–342. doi: 10.1038/nmat87710.1038/nmat877 ↗