The sensitivity and dynamic response of field ionization gas sensor based on ZnO nanorods
Source abstract
Abstract
Field ionization gas sensors based on ZnO nanorods (50–300 nm in diameter, and 3–8 μm in length) with and without a buffer layer were fabricated, and the influence of the orientation of nano-ZnO on the ionization response of devices was discussed, including the sensitivity and dynamic response of the ZnO nanorods with preferential orientation. The results indicated that ZnO nanorods as sensor anode could dramatically decrease the breakdown voltage. The XRD and SEM images illustrated that nano-ZnO with a ZnO buffer layer displayed high c-axis orientation, which helps to significantly reduce the breakdown voltage. Device A based on ZnO nanorods with a ZnO buffer layer could distinguish toluene and acetone. The dynamic responses of device A to the NO x compounds presented the sensitivity of 0.045 ± 0.007 ppm/pA and the response speed within 17–40 s, and indicated a linear relationship between NO x concentration and current response at low NO x concentrations. In addition, the dynamic responses to benzene, isopropyl alcohol, ethanol, and methanol reveals that the device has higher sensitivity to gas with larger static polarizability and lower ionization energy.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors · Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (11)
Show source-provided references
1. Akiyama M, Tamaki J, Miura N, Yamazoe N (1991) Tungsten oxide based semiconductor sensor highly sensitive to NO and NO2. Chem Lett 20:1611–161410.1246/cl.1991.1611 ↗
2. Baughman RH, Zakhidov AA, de Heer WA (2002) Carbon nanotubes—the route towards applications. Science 297:787–79210.1126/science.1060928 ↗
3. Choopun S, Vispute RD, Noch W, Balsamo A, Sharma RP, Venkatesan T, Iliadis A, Look DC (1999) Oxygen pressure-tuned epitaxy and optoelectronic properties of laser-deposited ZnO films on sapphire. Appl Phys Lett 75:3947–394910.1063/1.125503 ↗
4. Chukichev MV, Ataev BM, Mamedov VV, Alivov YaI, Khodos II (2002) Cathodoluminescence of ZnO/GaN/α-Al2O3 heteroepitaxial structures grown by chemical vapor deposition. Semiconductors 36:977–98010.1134/1.1507276 ↗
5. Collins PG, Bradley K, Ishigami M, Zettl A (2000) Extreme oxygen sensitivity of electronic properties of carbon nanotubes. Science 287:1084–180110.1126/science.287.5459.1801 ↗
6. Dresselhaus MS, Dresselhaus G, Avouris P (2001) Carbon nanotubes synthesis, structure, properties, and applications. Top Appl Phys 80:391–42510.1007/3-540-39947-X_14 ↗
7. Kong J, Franklin N, Zhou C, Peng S, Cho JJ, Dai H (2000) Nanotube molecular wires as chemical sensors. Science 287:622–62510.1126/science.287.5453.622 ↗
8. Kong XY, Ding Y, Yang RS, Wang ZL (2004) Single-crystal nanorings formed by epitaxial self-coiling of polar-nanobelts. Science 303:1348–135110.1126/science.1092356 ↗
9. Modi A, Koratkar N, Lass E, Wei B, Ajayan PM (2003) Miniaturized gas ionization sensors using carbon nanotubes. Nature 424:171–17410.1038/nature01777 ↗
10. Rinzler AG, Hafner JH, Nikolaev P, Lou L, Kim SG, Tománek D, Nordlander P, Colbert DT, Smalley RE (1995) Unravelingnanotubes: field emission from an atomic wire. Science 269:1550–155310.1126/science.269.5230.1550 ↗
11. Wang B, Zhao Y, Min JH, Sang Wb (2009) Ag-N dual-accept doping for the fabrication of p-type ZnO. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process 94:715–71810.1007/s00339-008-5028-7 ↗