journal article·2018-10

Magnetic micellar nanocarrier based on pH-sensitive PEG-PCL-PEG triblock copolymer: a potential carrier for hydrophobic anticancer drugs

Ali Pourjavadi, Lida Dastanpour, Zahra Mazaheri Tehrani

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 20· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

In this research, we report a magnetic pH-sensitive polymeric micelle designed for hydrophobic drug carrier in cancer treatment. This carrier was prepared by self-assembly of biodegradable triblock copolymer PEG-PCL-PEG coated on oleate-modified magnetic nanoparticles. The amphiphilic triblock copolymer was synthesized via reaction between the aldehyde group from the hydrophilic component with the amine group of the hydrophobic component. The resulting Schiff base linkage was sensitive to pH. The structure of nanocarrier was characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-NMR). Morphology and size of the magnetic micellar nanoparticles were characterized by high-resolution transmission microscope (HR-TEM), field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and dynamic light scattering (DLS). The size of magnetic micellar vehicle was observed to be about 90 nm. Nano-sized vehicles have made them suitable for prolonged circulation and accumulation in tumor tissue. Also, the drug release profile was studied at pH = 5.5 (tumor tissue) and pH = 7.4 (healthy tissue) at 37 °C during 80 h, showing a higher rate for drug release at acidic media. In addition, the comparison between the release profile of MNP@PEG-PCL-PEG and MNP@PEG-PCL revealed the superior performance of MNP@PEG-PCL-PEG in terms of its slow release feature. The cytotoxicity of the magnetic nanocarrier was evaluated using MTT assay on MCF-7 cells in vitro conditions, revealing the killing of cancer cells. Therefore, the carrier may have considerable potential as a hydrophobic drug carrier for cancer treatment.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery · Dendrimers and Hyperbranched Polymers · Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Ai H, Flask C, Weinberg B, Shuai XT (2005) Magnetite-loaded polymeric micelles as ultrasensitive magnetic-resonance probes. Adv Mater 17:1949–195210.1002/adma.200401904 ↗
2. Athanasiou KA, Niederauer GG (1996) Sterilization, toxicity, biocompatibility and clinical applications of polylactic acid/ polyglycolic acid copolymers. Biomaterials 17:93–10210.1016/0142-9612(96)85754-1 ↗
3. Cole AJ, David AE, Wang J, Galbán CJ, Yang VC (2011) Magnetic brain tumor targeting and biodistribution of long-circulating PEG-modified, cross-linked starch-coated iron oxide nanoparticles. Biomaterial 32:6291–630110.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.024 ↗
4. Dash TK, Konkimalla VB (2012) Poly-є-caprolactone based formulations for drug delivery and tissue engineering: a review. J Control Release 158:15–3310.1016/j.jconrel.2011.09.064 ↗
5. Gao W, Chan JM, Farokhzad OC (2010) pH-responsive nanoparticles for drug delivery. Mol Pharm 7:1913–192010.1021/mp100253e ↗
6. Ge Y, Zhang Y, He S, Nie F, Teng G, Gu N (2009) Fluorescence modified chitosan-coated magnetic nanoparticles for high-efficient cellular imaging. Nanoscale Res Lett 4:287–29510.1007/s11671-008-9239-9 ↗
7. Gillies ER, Fréchet JM (2005) Dendrimers and dendritic polymers in drug delivery. Drug Discov Today 10:35–4310.1016/S1359-6446(04)03276-3 ↗
8. Goya GF, Berquó TS, Fonseca FC, Morales MP (2003) Static and dynamic magnetic properties of spherical magnetite nanoparticles. J Appl Phys 94:3520–352810.1063/1.1599959 ↗
9. Harris JM, Struck EC, Case MG (1984) Synthesis and characterization of poly (ethylene glycol) derivatives. J Polym Sci 22:341–352
10. Izunobi JU, Higginbotham CL (2011) Polymer molecular weight analysis by 1H NMR Spectroscopy. J Chem Educ 88:1098–110410.1021/ed100461v ↗
11. Kwon GS, Kataoka K (1995) Block copolymer micelles as long-circulating drug vehicles. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 16:295–30910.1016/0169-409X(95)00031-2 ↗
12. Lan Q, Liu C, Yang F, Liu S, Xu J, Sun D (2007) Synthesis of bilayer oleic acid-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles and their application in pH-responsive Pickering emulsions. J Colloid Interface Sci 310:260–26910.1016/j.jcis.2007.01.081 ↗
13. Lee ES, Gao Z, Bae YH (2008) Recent progress in tumor pH targeting nanotechnology. J Control Release 132:164–17010.1016/j.jconrel.2008.05.003 ↗
14. Li Z, Chau Y (2009) Synthesis of linear polyether Polyol derivatives as new materials for bioconjugation. Bioconjug Chem 20:780–78910.1021/bc900036f ↗
15. Liu L, Zheng M, Librizzi D, Renette T, Merkel OM, Kissel T (2016) Efficient and tumor targeted siRNA delivery by Polyethylenimine-graft-polycaprolactone-block-poly (ethylene glycol)-folate (PEI–PCL–PEG–Fol). Mol Pharm 13:34–143
16. Liu XQ, Ma ZY, Xing JM, Liu HZ (2004) Preparation and characterization of amino–silane modified superparamagnetic silica nanospheres. J Magn Magn Mater 270:1–610.1016/j.jmmm.2003.07.006 ↗
17. Luo S, Zhang Y, Cao J, He B, Li S (2016) Arginine modified polymeric micelles as a novel drug delivery system with enhanced endocytosis efficiency. Colloids Surf B 148:181–19210.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.07.023 ↗
18. Mu C, Fan X, Tian W, Bai Y, Yang Z, Fan W, Chen H (2012) Synthesis and stimulus-responsive micellization of a well-defined H-shaped terpolymer. Polym Chem 3:3330–333910.1039/c2py20586f ↗
19. Oerlemans C, Bult W, Bos M, Storm G, Nijsen JFW, Hennink WE (2010) Polymeric micelles in anticancer therapy: targeting, imaging and triggered release. Pharm Res 27:2569–258910.1007/s11095-010-0233-4 ↗
20. Peng P, Wenshou W, Xuesi C, Xiabin J (2005) Poly(ε-caprolactone) polyurethane and its shape-memory property. Biomacromolecules 6:587–59210.1021/bm049477j ↗
21. Ranjha NM, Ayub G, Naseem S, Ansari MT (2010) Preparation and characterization of hybrid pH-sensitive hydrogels of chitosan-co-acrylic acid for controlled release of verapamil. J Mater Sci Mater Med 21:2805–281610.1007/s10856-010-4134-1 ↗
22. Rapoport N (2007) Physical stimuli-responsive polymeric micelles for anti-cancer drug delivery. Prog Polym Sci 32:962–99010.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.05.009 ↗
23. Reddy LH, Arias JL, Nicolas J, Couvreur P (2012) Magnetic nanoparticles: design and characterization, toxicity and biocompatibility, pharmaceutical and biomedical applications. Chem Rev 112:5818–587810.1021/cr300068p ↗
24. Rösler A, Vandermeulen GWM, Klok HA (2012) Advanced drug delivery devices via self-assembly of amphiphilic block copolymers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 64:270–27910.1016/j.addr.2012.09.026 ↗
25. Sharma A, Sharma US (1997) Liposomes in drug delivery: Progress and limitations. Int J Pharm 154:123–14010.1016/S0378-5173(97)00135-X ↗
26. Shete PB, Patil RM, Tiwale BM, Pawar SH (2015) Water dispersible oleic acid-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles for biomedical applications. J Magn Magn Mater 377:406–41010.1016/j.jmmm.2014.10.137 ↗
27. Singh R, Lillard JW (2009) Nanoparticle-based targeted drug delivery. Exp Mol Pathol 86:215–22310.1016/j.yexmp.2008.12.004 ↗
28. Smithlan A, Hunneyball M (1986) Evaluation of poly(lactic acid) as a biodegradable drug delivery system for parenteral administration. Int J Pharm 30:215–22010.1016/0378-5173(86)90081-5 ↗
29. Tang H, Guo J, Sun Y, Chang B, Ren Q, Yang W (2011) Facile synthesis of pH sensitie polymer-coated mesoporous silica nanoparticles and their application in drug delivery. Int J Pharm 421:388–39610.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.10.013 ↗
30. Veronese FM (2001) Peptide and protein PEGylation: a review of problems and solutions. Biomater 22:405–41710.1016/S0142-9612(00)00193-9 ↗
31. Vilara G, Tulla-Puchea J, Albericio F (2012) Polymers and drug delivery systems. Curr Drug Deliv 9:367–39410.2174/156720112801323053 ↗
32. Wang G, Yang S, Wei Z, Dong X, Wang H, Qi M (2013) Facile preparation of poly(ε-caprolactone)/Fe3O4@graphene oxide superparamagnetic nanocomposites. Polym Bull 70:2359–237110.1007/s00289-013-0957-5 ↗