Is there an optimal topographical surface in nanoscale affecting protein adsorption and cell behaviors?
Source abstract
Abstract
With the development of nanotechnology, nano-structured surfaces exhibit superior biological activities to the smooth or micro-structured surfaces. To study whether or not there is an optimal topographical surface in nano-scale affecting protein adsorption and cell behaviors, aluminum oxide membranes with different topographical structures in nano-scale were prepared by anodic oxidation technique. The surface morphology, topography, and wettability were analyzed by atomic force microscopy and water contact angle measurement, respectively. These membranes surfaces were dominated by hill-shaped grains with different diameters ranging from 20 to 120 nm. With the increase of diameters, the average surface roughness and mean square roughness of membranes surfaces varied from 1.1 ± 0.1 to 12.6 ± 0.9 nm and from 4.4 ± 0.3 to 16.5 ± 1.2 nm, respectively. A dynamic albumin adsorption analysis indicated that the membrane containing grains with 40 nm in diameter had a weaker ability of protein adsorption at the early stage; but the final amount of adsorbed protein had no significant differences compared with other membranes. Additionally, the morphological, metabolic and cell counting methods showed no significant effects of the aluminum oxide membranes on the viability and proliferation of rat mesenchymal stem cells.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Andersson AS, Backhed F, von Euler A, Richter-Dahlfors A, Sutherland D, Kasemo B (2003) Nanoscale features influence epithelial cell morphology and cytokine production. Biomaterials 24:3427–343610.1016/S0142-9612(03)00208-4 ↗
2. Anselme K, Davidson P, Popa AM, Giazzon M, Liley M, Ploux L (2010) The interaction of cells and bacteria with surfaces structured at the nanometer scale. Acta Biomater 6:3824–384610.1016/j.actbio.2010.04.001 ↗
3. Arima Y, Iwata H (2007) Effect of wettability and surface functional groups on protein adsorption and cell adhesion using well-defined mixed self-assembled monolayers. Biomaterials 28(20):3074–308210.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.03.013 ↗
4. Bakeine GJ, Ban J, Grenci G, Pozzato A, Zilio SD (2009) Design, fabrication and evaluation of nanoscale surface topography as a tool in directing differentiation and organisation of embryonic stem-cell-derived neural precursors. Microelectron Eng 86:1435–143810.1016/j.mee.2009.01.032 ↗
5. Biela SA, Su Y, Spatz JP, Kemkemer R (2009) Different sensitivity of human endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts to topography in the nano-micro range. Acta Biomater 5:2460–246610.1016/j.actbio.2009.04.003 ↗
6. Briggs EP, Walpore AR, Wilshaw PR, Karlsson M, Palsgard E (2004) Formation of highly adherent nano-porous alumina on Ti-based substrates: a novel bone implant coating. J Mater Sci Mater Med 15:1021–102910.1023/B:JMSM.0000042688.33507.12 ↗
7. Busing CM, d’Hoedt B, Schulte W, Heimke G (1983) Morphological demonstration of direct deposition of bone on human aluminum oxide ceramic dental implants. Biomaterials 4(2):125–12710.1016/0142-9612(83)90052-2 ↗
8. Cai KY, Bossert J, Jandt KD (2006) Does the nanometer scale topography of titanium influence protein adsorption and cell proliferation? Colloids Surfaces B 49:136–14410.1016/j.colsurfb.2006.02.016 ↗
9. Chvedov D, Arnold A (2004) Effect of surface topography of a rolled sheet on contact angle. Ind Eng Chem Res 43:1459–154110.1021/ie0307131 ↗
10. Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Riehle MO, Wilkinson CDW, Curtis ASG (2004) Investigating filopodia sensing using arrays of defined nano-pits down to 35 nm diameter in size. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 36:2005–201510.1016/j.biocel.2004.03.001 ↗
11. Faibish RS, Yoshida W, Cohen Y (2002) Contact angle study on polymer-grafted silicon wafers. J Colloid Interface Sci 256:341–35010.1006/jcis.2002.8612 ↗
12. Farrell M, Beaudoin S (2010) Surface forces and protein adsorption on dextran- and polyethylene glycol modified polydimethylsiloxane. Colloids Surfaces B 81:468–47510.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.07.059 ↗
13. Fujii H, Nakae H (1996) Equilibrium contact angle in the magnesium oxide/aluminium system. Acta Mater 44(9):3567–357310.1016/1359-6454(96)00017-1 ↗
14. Galli C, Coen MC, Hauert R, Katanaev VL, Groning P, Schlapbach L (2002) Creation of nanostructures to study the topographical dependency of protein adsorption. Colloids Surfaces B 26:255–26710.1016/S0927-7765(02)00015-2 ↗
15. Gong SJ, Wang HJ, Sun QS, Xue ST, Wang JY (2006) Mechanical properties and in vivo biocompatibility of porous zein scaffolds. Biomaterials 27:3793–379910.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.02.019 ↗
16. Hench LL (1991) Bioceramics: from concept to clinic. J Am Ceram Soc 74:1487–151010.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb07132.x ↗
17. Hoess A, Teuscher N, Thormann A, Aurich H, Heilmann A (2007) Cultivation of hepatoma cell line HepG2 on nanoporous aluminum oxide membranes. Acta Biomater 3:43–5010.1016/j.actbio.2006.07.007 ↗
18. Karlsson M, Palsgard E, Wilshaw PR, Silvio LD (2003) Initial in vitro interaction of osteoblasts with nano-porous alumina. Biomaterials 24:3039–304610.1016/S0142-9612(03)00146-7 ↗
19. Khan W, Kapoor M, Kumar N (2007) Covalent attachment of proteins to functionalized polypyrrole-coated metallic surfaces for improved biocompatibility. Acta Biomater 3:541–54910.1016/j.actbio.2007.01.006 ↗
20. Konno T, Kurita K, Iwasaki Y, Nakabayashi N, Ishihara K (2001) Preparation of nanoparticles composed with bioinspired 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine polymer. Biomaterials 22:1883–188910.1016/S0142-9612(00)00373-2 ↗
21. Lee JH, Lee SJ, Khang G, Lee HB (2000) The effect of fluid shear stress on endothelial cell adhesiveness to polymer surfaces with wettability gradient. J Colloid Interface Sci 230:84–9010.1006/jcis.2000.7080 ↗
22. Lee JW, Lee KS, Cho N, Ju BK, Lee KB, Lee SH (2007) Topographical guidance of mouse neuronal cell on SiO2 microtracks. Sensor Actuators B 128:252–25710.1016/j.snb.2007.06.017 ↗
23. Lin Z, Lee GH, Liu CM, Lee IS (2010) Controls in wettability of TiO x films for biomedical applications. Surf Coat Technol. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.08.05210.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.08.052 ↗
24. Lipski AM, Pino CJ, Haselton FR, Chen IW, Shastri VP (2008) The effect of silica nanoparticle-modified surfaces on morphology, cytoskeletal organization and function. Biomaterials 29:3836–384610.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.06.002 ↗
25. Lord MS, Foss M, Besenbacher F (2010) Influence of nanoscale surface topography on protein adsorption and cellular response. Nano Today 5:66–7810.1016/j.nantod.2010.01.001 ↗
26. Lukin ES, Tarasova SV, Korolev AV (2007) Application of ceramics based on aluminum oxide in medicine. Glass Ceram 58:105–10710.1023/A:1010999432041 ↗
27. Messina GML, Satriano C, Marletta G (2009) A multitechnique study of preferential protein adsorption on hydrophobic and hydrophilic plasma-modified polymer surfaces. Colloids Surfaces B 70:76–8310.1016/j.colsurfb.2008.12.013 ↗
28. Miller DC, Thapa A, Haberstroh KM, Webster TJ (2004) Endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cell function on poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) with nano-structured surface features. Biomaterials 25:53–6110.1016/S0142-9612(03)00471-X ↗
29. Noh H, Vogler EA (2006) Volumetric interpretation of protein adsorption: partition coefficients, interphase volumes, and free energies of adsorption to hydrophobic surfaces. Biomaterials 27:5780–579310.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.07.038 ↗
30. Popat KC, Swan EEL, Mukhatyar V, Chatvanichkul KI, Mor GK, Grimes CA, Desai TA (2005) Influence of nanoporous alumina membranes on long-term osteoblast response. Biomaterials 26:4516–452210.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.026 ↗
31. Prabhu KN, Fernades P, Kumar G (2009) Effect of substrate surface roughness on wetting behaviour of vegetable oils. Mater Des 30(2):297–30510.1016/j.matdes.2008.04.067 ↗
32. Ravindran A, Singh A, Raichur AM, Chandrasekaran N, Mukherjee A (2010) Studies on interaction of colloidal Ag nanoparticles with Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA). Colloid Surfaces B 76(1):32–3710.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.10.005 ↗
33. Rosales-Leal JI, Rodrguez-Valverde MA, Mazzaglia G, Ramon-Torregrosa PJ, Diaz-Rodriguez L, Garcia-Martinez O, Vallecillo-Capilla M, Ruiz C, Cabrerizo-Vilchez MA (2010) Effect of roughness, wettability and morphology of engineered titanium surfaces on osteoblast-like cell adhesion. Colloids Surfaces A 365:222–22910.1016/j.colsurfa.2009.12.017 ↗
34. Sawitowski T (2000) New drug delivery systems-examples of applied nanotechnology. Proc Int Conf Microtech 1:343–346
35. Shen JW, Wu T, Wang Q, Pan HH (2008) Molecular simulation of protein adsorption and desorption on hydroxyapatite surfaces. Biomaterials 29:513–53210.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.10.016 ↗
36. Tangpasuthadol V, Ponchaisirkul N, Hoven VP (2003) Surface modification of chitosan films. Effects of hydrophobicity on protein adsorption. Carbohydr Res 338:937–94210.1016/S0008-6215(03)00038-7 ↗
37. Thapa A, Miller DC, Webster TJ, Haberstroh KM (2003) Nano-structured polymers enhance bladder smooth muscle cell function. Biomaterials 24:2915–292610.1016/S0142-9612(03)00123-6 ↗
38. Thomas P, Barnstorf S, Summer B, Willmann G, Przybilla B (2003) Immuno-allergological properties of aluminium oxide (Al2O3) ceramics and nickel sulfate in humans. Biomaterials 24:959–96610.1016/S0142-9612(02)00432-5 ↗
39. Toshev BV, Platikanov D (2006) Wetting: Gibbs’ superficial tension revisited. Colloids Surfaces A 291(1–3):177–18010.1016/j.colsurfa.2006.06.013 ↗
40. Wang HJ, Liu XM, Ji LW, Ma DL, Ren QS, Wang JY (2006) Film from peroxidation of an amino phospholipids and its biocompatibility. J Biomed Mater Res B 79(2):411–41910.1002/jbm.b.30555 ↗
41. Wang HJ, Gong SJ, Lin ZX, Fu JX, Xue ST, Huang JC, Wang JY (2007) In vivo biocompatibility and mechanical properties of porous zein scaffolds. Biomaterials 28:3952–396410.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.05.017 ↗