Synthesis, characterization, and ecotoxicity of CeO2 nanoparticles with differing properties
Source abstract
Abstract
CeO2 nanoparticles with various characteristics find an increasing number of applications in the electronic, medical, and other industries and are therefore likely released in the environment. This calls for investigations linking the physicochemical properties of these particles with their potential environmental impacts. In this study, CeO2 nanoparticle powders were prepared using three different precursors [Ce(NO3)3, CeCl3, and Ce(CH3COO)3] and annealing temperatures (300, 500, and 700 °C). This procedure resulted in nine different types of nanoparticles with differing size (5–90 nm), morphology, surface Ce3+/Ce4+ ratio, and slightly different crystal structures as characterized using transmission electron microscopy, dynamic light scattering, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and X-ray diffraction measurements with Rietveld refinement. These CeO2 nanoparticles underwent toxicity testing at concentrations up to 64 mg L−1 using Daphnia magna. Toxic effects were observed for three particle types with EC50 values between 5 and 64 mg L−1. No clear correlation was observed between the physicochemical properties (size, shape, oxygen occupancy, Ce3+/Ce4+ ratio) of the nanoparticles and their toxicity. However, toxicity was correlated with the amount of Ce remaining suspended in the test medium after 24 h. This indicated that toxic effects may depend on the colloidal stability of CeO2 nanoparticles during the first day of exposure. Therefore, being readily suspended and remaining stable for several days in the aquatic media increases the likelihood that CeO2 nanoparticles will cause unwanted adverse effects.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis · Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Artells E, Issartel J, Auffan M, Borschneck D, Thill A, Tella M et al (2013) Exposure to cerium dioxide nanoparticles differently affect swimming performance and survival in two daphnid species. PLoS ONE 8(8):e7126010.1371/journal.pone.0071260 ↗
2. ASTM (2014) E729–96. Standard guide for conducting acute toxicity tests on test materials with fishes, macroinvertebrates, and amphibians. doi: 10.1520/E0729-96R1410.1520/E0729-96R14 ↗
3. Avgouropoulos G, Ioannides T, Papadopoulou C, Batista J, Hocevar S, Matralis H (2002) A comparative study of Pt/γ-Al2O3, Au/α-Fe2O3 and CuO–CeO2 catalysts for the selective oxidation of carbon monoxide in excess hydrogen. Catal Today 75(1):157–16710.1016/S0920-5861(02)00058-5 ↗
4. Balzar D, Audebrand N, Daymond M, Fitch A, Hewat A, Langford J et al (2004) Size-strain line-broadening analysis of the ceria round-robin sample. J Appl Crystallogr 37(6):911–92410.1107/S0021889804022551 ↗
5. Bêche E, Charvin P, Perarnau D, Abanades S, Flamant G (2008) Ce 3d XPS investigation of cerium oxides and mixed cerium oxide (CexTiyOz). Surf Interface Anal 40(3–4):264–26710.1002/sia.2686 ↗
6. Bundschuh M, Seitz F, Rosenfeldt RR, Schulz R (2016) Effects of nanoparticles in fresh waters: risks, mechanisms and interactions. Freshw Biol. doi: 10.1111/fwb.1270110.1111/fwb.12701 ↗
7. Cornelis G, Ryan B, McLaughlin MJ, Kirby JK, Beak D, Chittleborough D (2011) Solubility and batch retention of CeO2 nanoparticles in soils. Environ Sci Technol 45(7):2777–278210.1021/es103769k ↗
8. Cuahtecontzi-Delint R, Mendez-Rojas MA, Bandala ER, Quiroz MA, Recillas S, Sanchez-Salas JL (2013) Enhanced antibacterial activity of CeO2 nanoparticles by surfactants. Int J Chem React Eng 11(2):1–5
9. Dabrunz A, Duester L, Prasse C, Seitz F, Rosenfeldt R, Schilde C et al (2011) Biological surface coating and molting inhibition as mechanisms of TiO2 nanoparticle toxicity in Daphnia magna. PLoS One 6(5):e2011210.1371/journal.pone.0020112 ↗
10. Dahle JT, Livi K, Arai Y (2015) Effects of pH and phosphate on CeO2 nanoparticle dissolution. Chemosphere 119:1365–137110.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.02.027 ↗
11. Deshpande S, Patil S, Kuchibhatla SV, Seal S (2005) Size dependency variation in lattice parameter and valency states in nanocrystalline cerium oxide. Appl Phys Lett 87(13):13311310.1063/1.2061873 ↗
12. Fisichella M, Berenguer F, Steinmetz G, Auffan M, Rose J, Prat O (2014) Toxicity evaluation of manufactured CeO2 nanoparticles before and after alteration: combined physicochemical and whole-genome expression analysis in Caco-2 cells. BMC Genom 15(1):110.1186/1471-2164-15-700 ↗
13. Gaiser BK, Fernandes TF, Jepson M, Lead JR, Tyler CR, Stone V (2009) Assessing exposure, uptake and toxicity of silver and cerium dioxide nanoparticles from contaminated environments. Environ Health 8(Suppl 1):S210.1186/1476-069X-8-S1-S2 ↗
14. Garcia A, Espinosa R, Delgado L, Casals E, González E, Puntes V et al (2011) Acute toxicity of cerium oxide, titanium oxide and iron oxide nanoparticles using standardized tests. Desalination 269(1):136–14110.1016/j.desal.2010.10.052 ↗
15. Hunter RJ (2001) Foundations of colloid science. (Oxford University, Ed.), 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
16. Keller AA, Lazareva A (2013) Predicted releases of engineered nanomaterials: from global to regional to local. Environ Sci Technol Lett 1(1):65–7010.1021/ez400106t ↗
17. Kim Y-H, Kim S-K, Kim N, Park J-G, Paik U (2008) Crystalline structure of ceria particles controlled by the oxygen partial pressure and STI CMP performances. Ultramicroscopy 108(10):1292–129610.1016/j.ultramic.2008.04.079 ↗
18. Korsvik C, Patil S, Seal S, Self WT (2007) Superoxide dismutase mimetic properties exhibited by vacancy engineered ceria nanoparticles. Chem Commun 10:1056–105810.1039/b615134e ↗
19. Lin W, Huang Y, Zhou X-D, Ma Y (2006) Toxicity of cerium oxide nanoparticles in human lung cancer cells. Int J Toxicol 25(6):451–45710.1080/10915810600959543 ↗
20. Liu HH, Cohen Y (2014) Multimedia environmental distribution of engineered nanomaterials. Environ Sci Technol 48(6):3281–329210.1021/es405132z ↗
21. Liu X, Ray JR, Neil CW, Li Q, Jun Y-S (2015) Enhanced colloidal stability of CeO2 nanoparticles by ferrous ions: adsorption, redox reaction, and surface precipitation. Environ Sci Technol 49(9):5476–548310.1021/es506363x ↗
22. López-Moreno ML, de la Rosa G, Hernández-Viezcas JA, Peralta-Videa JR, Gardea-Torresdey JL (2010) XAS corroboration of the uptake and storage of CeO2 nanoparticles and assessment of their differential toxicity in four edible plant species. J Agric Food Chem 58(6):368910.1021/jf904472e ↗
23. Manier N, Bado-Nilles A, Delalain P, Aguerre-Chariol O, Pandard P (2013) Ecotoxicity of non-aged and aged CeO2 nanomaterials towards freshwater microalgae. Environ Pollut 180:63–7010.1016/j.envpol.2013.04.040 ↗
24. Patil S, Sandberg A, Heckert E, Self W, Seal S (2007) Protein adsorption and cellular uptake of cerium oxide nanoparticles as a function of zeta potential. Biomaterials 28(31):4600–460710.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.029 ↗
25. Quik JTK, Lynch I, Van Hoecke K, Miermans CJH, Schamphelaere KACD, Janssen CR et al (2010) Effect of natural organic matter on cerium dioxide nanoparticles settling in model fresh water. Chemosphere 81(6):711–71510.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.07.062 ↗
26. Seitz F, Bundschuh M, Rosenfeldt RR, Schulz R (2013) Nanoparticle toxicity in Daphnia magna reproduction studies: the importance of test design. Aquat Toxicol 126:163–16810.1016/j.aquatox.2012.10.015 ↗
27. Seitz F, Rosenfeldt R, Müller M, Lüderwald S, Schulz R, Bundschuh M (2016) Quantity and quality of natural organic matter influence the ecotoxicity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Nanotoxicology 1. doi: 10.1080/17435390.2016.122245810.1080/17435390.2016.1222458 ↗
28. Tarnuzzer RW, Colon J, Patil S, Seal S (2005) Vacancy engineered ceria nanostructures for protection from radiation-induced cellular damage. Nano Lett 5(12):2573–257710.1021/nl052024f ↗
29. Thompson P, Cox D, Hastings J (1987) Rietveld refinement of Debye–Scherrer synchrotron X-ray data from Al2O3. J Appl Crystallogr 20(2):79–8310.1107/S0021889887087090 ↗
30. Van Hoecke K, Quik JT, Mankiewicz-Boczek J, Schamphelaere KAD, Elsaesser A, der Meeren PV et al (2009) Fate and effects of CeO2 nanoparticles in aquatic ecotoxicity tests. Environ Sci Technol 43(12):4537–454610.1021/es9002444 ↗
31. Van Hoecke K, De Schamphelaere KA, Van der Meeren P, Smagghe G, Janssen CR (2011) Aggregation and ecotoxicity of CeO2 nanoparticles in synthetic and natural waters with variable pH, organic matter concentration and ionic strength. Environ Pollut 159(4):970–97610.1016/j.envpol.2010.12.010 ↗
32. Zhang F, Chan S-W, Spanier JE, Apak E, Jin Q, Robinson RD, Herman IP (2002) Cerium oxide nanoparticles: size-selective formation and structure analysis. Appl Phys Lett 80(1):127–12910.1063/1.1430502 ↗