journal article·2012-03

Modeling nanoparticle uptake and intracellular distribution using stochastic process algebras

M. P. D. Dobay, A. Piera Alberola, E. R. Mendoza, J. O. Rädler

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 14· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Computational modeling is increasingly important to help understand the interaction and movement of nanoparticles (NPs) within living cells, and to come to terms with the wealth of data that microscopy imaging yields. A quantitative description of the spatio-temporal distribution of NPs inside cells; however, it is challenging due to the complexity of multiple compartments such as endosomes and nuclei, which themselves are dynamic and can undergo fusion and fission and exchange their content. Here, we show that stochastic pi calculus, a widely-used process algebra, is well suited for mapping surface and intracellular NP interactions and distributions. In stochastic pi calculus, each NP is represented as a process, which can adopt various states such as bound or aggregated, as well as be passed between processes representing location, as a function of predefined stochastic channels. We created a pi calculus model of gold NP uptake and intracellular movement and compared the evolution of surface-bound, cytosolic, endosomal, and nuclear NP densities with electron microscopy data. We demonstrate that the computational approach can be extended to include specific molecular binding and potential interaction with signaling cascades as characteristic for NP-cell interactions in a wide range of applications such as nanotoxicity, viral infection, and drug delivery.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Molecular Communication and Nanonetworks · Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques · Gene Regulatory Network Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. Alberola AP, Radler JO (2009) The defined presentation of nanoparticles to cells and their surface controlled uptake. Biomaterials 30:3766–377010.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.03.031 ↗
2. Alivisatos AP, Gu W, Larabell C (2005) Quantum dots as cellular probes. Ann Rev Biomed Eng 7:55–7610.1146/annurev.bioeng.7.060804.100432 ↗
3. Bartczak D, Sanchez-Elsner T, Louafi F, Millar TM, Kanaras AG (2011) Receptor-mediated interactions between colloidal gold nanoparticles and human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Small 7:388–39410.1002/smll.201001816 ↗
4. Boeckle S, Wagner E (2006) Optimizing targeted gene delivery: chemical modification of viral vectors and synthesis of artificial virus vector systems. AAPS J 8:E731–E74210.1208/aapsj080483 ↗
5. Callahan J, Kopeckova P, Kopecek J (2009) Intracellular trafficking and subcellular distribution of a large array of HPMA copolymers. Biomacromolecules 10:1704–171410.1021/bm801514x ↗
6. Cardelli L (2005) Brane calculi—interactions of biological membranes. Lect Notes Comput Sci 3082:257–27810.1007/978-3-540-25974-9_24 ↗
7. Cedervall T et al (2007) Understanding the nanoparticle-protein corona using methods to quantify exchange rates and affinities of proteins for nanoparticles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:2050–205510.1073/pnas.0608582104 ↗
8. Chithrani BD, Chan WCW (2007) Elucidating the mechanism of cellular uptake and removal of protein-coated gold nanoparticles of different sizes and shapes. Nano Lett 7:1542–155010.1021/nl070363y ↗
9. Chithrani BD, Ghazani AA, Chan WCW (2006) Determining the size and shape dependence of gold nanoparticle uptake into mammalian cells. Nano Lett 6:662–66810.1021/nl052396o ↗
10. Danos V, Pradalier S (2005) Projective Brane calculus. Lect Notes Comput Sci 3082:134–14810.1007/978-3-540-25974-9_11 ↗
11. David MPC, Bantang JY, Mendoza ER (2009) A projective Brane calculus with activate, bud and mate as primitive actions. Trans Comput Syst Biol XI 5750:164–18610.1007/978-3-642-04186-0_8 ↗
12. de Bruin KG et al (2008) Dynamics of photoinduced endosomal release of polyplexes. J Control Release 130:175–18210.1016/j.jconrel.2008.06.001 ↗
13. Dell’Orco D, Lundqvist M, Oslakovic C, Cedervall T, Linse S (2010) Modeling the time evolution of the nanoparticle-protein corona in a body fluid. PLoS One 5(6):e1094910.1371/journal.pone.0010949 ↗
14. Dinh AT, Pangarkar C, Theofanous T, Mitragotri S (2007) Understanding intracellular transport processes pertinent to synthetic gene delivery via stochastic simulations and sensitivity analyses. Biophys J 92:831–84610.1529/biophysj.106.095521 ↗
15. Dobay MP, Dobay A, Bantang J, Mendoza E (2011) How many trimers? Modeling influenza virus fusion yields a minimum aggregate size of six trimers, three of which are fusogenic. Mol Biosys 7(10):2741–274910.1039/c1mb05060e ↗
16. Faller D, Klingmuller U, Timmer J (2003) Simulation methods for optimal experimental design in systems biology. Simul Trans Soc Model Simul 79:717–72510.1177/0037549703040937 ↗
17. Fisher J, Henzinger TA (2007) Executable cell biology. Nat Biotechnol 25:1239–124910.1038/nbt1356 ↗
18. Garcia-Garcia E et al (2005) A methodology to study intracellular distribution of nanoparticles in brain endothelial cells. Int J Pharm 298:310–31410.1016/j.ijpharm.2005.03.030 ↗
19. Gillespie DT (1977) Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical-reactions. J Phys Chem 81:2340–236110.1021/j100540a008 ↗
20. Haddish-Berhane N, Rickus JL, Haghighi K (2007) The role of multiscale computational approaches for rational design of conventional and nanoparticle oral drug delivery systems. Int J Nanomed 2:315–331
21. Hiemenz PC, Rajagopalan R (eds) (1997) Principles of colloid and surface chemistry, 3rd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York10.1201/9781315274287 ↗
22. Khan JA, Pillai B, Das TK, Singh Y, Maiti S (2007) Molecular effects of uptake of gold nanoparticles in HeLa cells. ChemBioChem 8:1237–124010.1002/cbic.200700165 ↗
23. Kim T, Lee CH, Joo SW, Lee K (2008) Kinetics of gold nanoparticle aggregation: experiments and modeling. J Colloid Interface Sci 318:238–24310.1016/j.jcis.2007.10.029 ↗
24. Kitano H (2002) Systems biology: a brief overview. Science 295:1662–166410.1126/science.1069492 ↗
25. Kjeken R et al (2004) Fusion between phagosomes, early and late endosomes: a role for actin in fusion between late, but not early endocytic organelles. Mol Biol Cell 15:345–35810.1091/mbc.E03-05-0334 ↗
26. Kneipp J, Kneipp H, McLaughlin M, Brown D, Kneipp K (2006) In vivo molecular probing of cellular compartments with gold nanoparticles and nanoaggregates. Nano Lett 6:2225–223110.1021/nl061517x ↗
27. Leduc C, Jung JM, Carney RR, Lounis B, Stellacci F (2011) Direct investigation of intracellular presence of gold nanoparticles via photothermal heterodyne imaging. ACS Nano 5:2587–259210.1021/nn1023285 ↗
28. Lévy R, Shaheen U, Cesbron Y, Sée V (2010) Gold nanoparticles delivery in mammalian live cells: a critical review. Nano Rev 110.3402/nano.v1i0.4889 ↗
29. Li N et al (2003) Ultrafine particulate pollutants induce oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage. Environ Health Perspect 111:455–46010.1289/ehp.6000 ↗
30. Luccardini C et al (2007) Getting across the plasma membrane and beyond: intracellular uses of colloidal semiconductor nanocrystals. J Biomed Biotechnol 2007:6896310.1155/2007/68963 ↗
31. Lundqvist M et al (2008) Nanoparticle size and surface properties determine the protein corona with possible implications for biological impacts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:14265–1427010.1073/pnas.0805135105 ↗
32. Lynch I et al (2007) The nanoparticle—protein complex as a biological entity; a complex fluids and surface science challenge for the 21st century. Adv Colloid Interface 134–35:167–17410.1016/j.cis.2007.04.021 ↗
33. Milner R (1999) Communicating and mobile systems: the pi-calculus. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England
34. Moles CG, Mendes P, Banga JR (2003) Parameter estimation in biochemical pathways: a comparison of global optimization methods. Genome Res 13:2467–247410.1101/gr.1262503 ↗
35. Moore NM, Sheppard CL, Barbour TR, Sakiyama-Elbert SE (2008) The effect of endosomal escape peptides on in vitro gene delivery of polyethylene glycol-based vehicles. J Gene Med 10:1134–114910.1002/jgm.1234 ↗
36. Muller L et al (2010) Oxidative stress and inflammation response after nanoparticle exposure: differences between human lung cell monocultures and an advanced three-dimensional model of the human epithelial airways. J R Soc Interface 7(Suppl 1):S27–S4010.1098/rsif.2009.0161.focus ↗
37. Murphy CJ et al (2008) Gold nanoparticles in biology: beyond toxicity to cellular imaging. Acc Chem Res 41:1721–173010.1021/ar800035u ↗
38. Nativo P, Prior IA, Brust M (2008) Uptake and intracellular fate of surface-modified gold nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2:1639–164410.1021/nn800330a ↗
39. Nel AE et al (2009) Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface. Nat Mater 8:543–55710.1038/nmat2442 ↗
40. Park EJ et al (2008) Oxidative stress and apoptosis induced by titanium dioxide nanoparticles in cultured BEAS-2B cells. Toxicol Lett 180:222–22910.1016/j.toxlet.2008.06.869 ↗
41. Phillips A, Cardelli L (2004) A correct abstract machine for the stochastic pi-calculus. In Proceedings of BioCONCUR 2004. London
42. Priami C (2009) Algorithmic systems biology. Commun ACM 52:80–8810.1145/1506409.1506427 ↗
43. Priami C, Quaglia P (2005) Beta binders for biological interactions. Lect Notes Comput Sci 3082:20–3310.1007/978-3-540-25974-9_3 ↗
44. Puzyn T et al (2011) Using nano-QSAR to predict the cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles. Nat Nanotechnol 6:175–17810.1038/nnano.2011.10 ↗
45. Regev A, Panina EM, Silverman W, Cardelli L, Shapiro E (2004) BioAmbients: an abstraction for biological compartments. Theor Comput Sci 325:141–16710.1016/j.tcs.2004.03.061 ↗
46. Salvati A et al (2011) Experimental and theoretical comparison of intracellular import of polymeric nanoparticles and small molecules: toward models of uptake kinetics. Nanomedicine 7(6):816–826
47. Sauer AM et al (2009) Dynamics of magnetic lipoplexes studied by single particle tracking in living cells. J Control Release 137:136–14510.1016/j.jconrel.2009.04.003 ↗
48. Schwake G et al (2010) Predictive modeling of non-viral gene transfer. Biotechnol Bioeng 105:805–81310.1002/bit.22604 ↗
49. Service RF (2011) Computer models coming soon to a lab near you: drag-and-drop virtual worlds. Science 331:669–67110.1126/science.331.6018.669 ↗
50. Singh S, Kumar A, Karakoti A, Seal S, Self WT (2010) Unveiling the mechanism of uptake and sub-cellular distribution of cerium oxide nanoparticles. Mol BioSyst 6:1813–182010.1039/c0mb00014k ↗
51. Sperling RA, Rivera Gil P, Zhang F, Zanella M, Parak WJ (2008) Biological applications of gold nanoparticles. Chem Soc Rev 37:1896–190810.1039/b712170a ↗
52. Stark WJ (2011) Nanoparticles in biological systems. Angew Chem Int Ed 50:1242–125810.1002/anie.200906684 ↗
53. Summers HD et al (2011) Statistical analysis of nanoparticle dosing in a dynamic cellular system. Nat Nanotechnol 6:170–17410.1038/nnano.2010.277 ↗
54. van de Waterbeemd H, Gifford E (2003) ADMET in silico modelling: towards prediction paradise? Nat Rev Drug Discov 2:192–20410.1038/nrd1032 ↗
55. Van Hoecke K et al (2009) Fate and effects of CeO2 nanoparticles in aquatic ecotoxicity tests. Environ Sci Technol 43:4537–454610.1021/es9002444 ↗
56. Xia T et al (2006) Comparison of the abilities of ambient and manufactured nanoparticles to induce cellular toxicity according to an oxidative stress paradigm. Nano Lett 6:1794–180710.1021/nl061025k ↗
57. Zhao J et al (2009) Titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles induce JB6 cell apoptosis through activation of the caspase-8/bid and mitochondrial pathways. J Toxicol Environ Health A 72:1141–114910.1080/15287390903091764 ↗