The effect of the averaged structural and energetic features on the cohesive energy of nanocrystals
Source abstract
Abstract
The size dependency of the cohesive energy of nanocrystals is obtained in terms of their averaged structural and energetic properties, which are in direct proportion with their cohesive energies. The significance of the effect of the geometrical shape of nanoparticles on their thermal stability has been discussed. The model has been found to have good prediction for the case of Cu and Al nanoparticles, with sizes in the ranges of 1–22 nm and 2–22 nm, respectively. Defining a new parameter, named as the surface-to-volume energy-contribution ratio, the relative thermal stabilities of different nanoclusters and their different surface-crystalline faces are discussed and compared to the molecular dynamic (MD) simulation results of copper nanoclusters. Finally, based on the size dependency of the cohesive energy, a formula for the size-dependent diffusion coefficient has been presented which includes the structural and energetic effects. Using this formula, the faster-than-expected interdiffusion/alloying of Au(core)–Ag(shell) nanoparticles with the core–shell structure, the Au-core diameter of 20 nm and the Ag-shell thickness of 2.91 nm, has been discussed and the calculated diffusion coefficient has been found to be consistent with its corresponding experimental value.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions · Advanced Chemical Physics Studies · Material Dynamics and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Attarian Shandiz M (2008) Effective coordination number model for the size dependency of physical properties of nanocrystals. J Phys Condens Matter 20:325237–325245. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/20/32/32523710.1088/0953-8984/20/32/325237 ↗
2. Attarian Shandiz M, Safaei A, Sanjabi S, Barber ZH (2008) Modeling the cohesive energy and melting point of nanoparticles by their average coordination number. Solid State Commun 145:432–437. doi: 10.1016/j.ssc.2007.12.02110.1016/j.ssc.2007.12.021 ↗
3. Buffat P, Borel J-P (1976) Size effect on the melting temperature of gold particles. Phys Rev A 13:2287–2298. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.13.228710.1103/PhysRevA.13.2287 ↗
4. Chacko S, Kanhere DG, Blundell SA (2005) First principles calculations of melting temperature for free Na clusters. Phys Rev B 71:155407–155412. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.15540710.1103/PhysRevB.71.155407 ↗
5. Daff TD, Saadoune I, Lisiecki I, de Leeuw NH (2009) Computer simulations of the effect of atomic structure and coordination on the stabilities and melting behaviour of copper surfaces and nano-particles. Surf Sci 603:445–454. doi: 10.1016/j.susc.2008.11.03110.1016/j.susc.2008.11.031 ↗
6. Delogu F (2005) Structural and energetic properties of unsupported Cu nanoparticles from room temperature to the melting point: molecular dynamics simulations. Phys Rev B 72:205418–205426. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.20541810.1103/PhysRevB.72.205418 ↗
7. DiCenzo SB, Berry SD, Hartford EH (1988) Photoelectron spectroscopy of single-size Au clusters collected on a substrate. Phys Rev B 38:8465–8468. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.38.846510.1103/PhysRevB.38.8465 ↗
8. Dick K, Dhanasekaran T, Zhang Z, Meisel D (2002) Size-dependent melting of silica-encapsulated gold nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc 124:2312–2317. doi: 10.1021/ja017281a10.1021/ja017281a ↗
9. Hanszen K-J (1960) Theoretische untersuchungen uber den schmelzpunkt kleiner kugelchen-ein beitrag zurthermodynamic der grenzflachen. Z Phys 157:523–55310.1007/BF01340711 ↗
10. Hodak JH, Henglein A, Giersig M, Hartland GV (2000) Laser-induced inter-diffusion in AuAg core-shell nanoparticles. J Phys Chem B 104:11708–1171810.1021/jp002438r ↗
11. Jiang Q, Zhang Z, Wang YW (2000) Thermal stability of low dimensional crystals. Mater Sci Eng A 286:139–143. doi: 10.1016/S0921-5093(00)00718-810.1016/S0921-5093(00)00718-8 ↗
12. Jiang Q, Zhang S, Zhao M (2003) Size-dependent melting point of noble metals. Mater Chem Phys 82:225–227. doi: 10.1016/S0254-0584(03)00201-310.1016/S0254-0584(03)00201-3 ↗
13. Lai SL, Carlsson JRA, Allen LH (1998) Melting point depression of Al clusters generated during the early stages of film growth: nanocalorimetry measurements. Appl Phys Lett 72:1098–1100. doi: 10.1063/1.12094610.1063/1.120946 ↗
14. Lide DR (ed) (2005) CRC Handbook of chemistry and physics. Internet Version 2005 http://www.hbcpnetbase.com . Thermal and physical properties of pure metals. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 12-219–12-220
15. Lopez N, Janssens TVW, Clausen BS, Xu Y, Mavrikakis M, Bligaard T, Nørskov JK (2004) On the origin of the catalytic activity of gold nanoparticles for low-temperature CO oxidation. J Catal 223:232–235. doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2004.01.00110.1016/j.jcat.2004.01.001 ↗
16. Mansfield M, Needs RJ (1991) Surface energy and stress of lead (111) and (110) surfaces. Phys Rev B 43:8829–8833. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.43.882910.1103/PhysRevB.43.8829 ↗
17. Mirjalili M, Vahdati-Khaki J (2008) Prediction of nanoparticles’ size-dependent melting temperature using mean coordination number concept. J Phys Chem Solids 69:2116–2123. doi: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2008.03.01410.1016/j.jpcs.2008.03.014 ↗
18. Montejano-Carrizales JM, Aguilera-Granja F, Moran-Lopez JL (1997) Direct enumeration of the geometrical characteristics of clusters. Nanostruct Mater 8:269–287. doi: 10.1016/S0965-9773(97)00168-210.1016/S0965-9773(97)00168-2 ↗
19. Nanda KK, Sahu SN, Behera SN (2002) Liquid-drop model for the size-dependent melting of low-dimensional systems. Phys Rev A 66:013208–013215. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.01320810.1103/PhysRevA.66.013208 ↗
20. Needs RJ, Mansfield M (1989) Calculations of the surface stress tensor and surface energy of the (111) surfaces of iridium, platinum and gold. J Phys Condens Matter 1:7555–7563. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/1/41/00610.1088/0953-8984/1/41/006 ↗
21. Pawlow P (1909) Über die abhängigkeit des schmelzpunktes von der oberflächenenergie eines festen körpers. Z Phys Chem 65:545–54810.1515/zpch-1909-6532 ↗
22. Rao CNR, Kulkarni GU, Thomas PJ, Edwards PP (2002) Size-dependent chemistry: properties of nanoparticles. Chem Eur J 8:28–35. doi: 10.1002/1521-3765(20020104)8:1<28:AID-CHEM28>3.0.CO;2-B10.1002/1521-3765(20020104)8:1<28::AID-CHEM28>3.0.CO;2-B ↗
23. Safaei A, Attarian Shandiz M, Sanjabi S, Barber ZH (2007) Modelling the size effect on the melting temperature of nanoparticles, nanowires and nanofilms. J Phys Condens Matter 19:216216–216224. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/19/21/21621610.1088/0953-8984/19/21/216216 ↗
24. Safaei A, Attarian Shandiz M, Sanjabi S, Barber ZH (2008) Modeling the melting temperature of nanoparticles by an analytical approach. J Phys Chem C 112:99–105. doi: 10.1021/jp074468110.1021/jp0744681 ↗
25. Salomons E, Griessen R, de Groot DG, Magerl A (1988) Surface tension and subsurface sites of metallic nanocrystals determined from H-absorption. Europhys Lett 5:449–454. doi: 10.1088/0305-4608/16/12/00910.1209/0295-5075/5/5/012 ↗
26. Solliard C, Flueli M (1985) Surface stress and size effect on the lattice parameter in small particles of gold and platinum. Surf Sci 156:487–494. doi: 10.1016/0039-6028(85)90610-710.1016/0039-6028(85)90610-7 ↗
27. Sun J, Simon SL (2007) The melting behavior of aluminum nanoparticles. Thermochim Acta 463:32–40. doi: 10.1016/j.tca.2007.07.00710.1016/j.tca.2007.07.007 ↗
28. Wang L, Zhang Y, Bian X, Chen Y (2003) Melting of Cu nanoclusters by molecular dynamics simulation. Phys Lett A 310:197–202. doi: 10.1016/S0375-9601(03)00263-910.1016/S0375-9601(03)00263-9 ↗
29. Wautelet M (1998) On the shape dependence of the melting temperature of small particles. Phys Lett A 246:341–342. doi: 10.1016/S0375-9601(98)00538-610.1016/S0375-9601(98)00538-6 ↗
30. Yang CC, Li S (2007) Investigation of cohesive energy effects on size-dependent physical and chemical properties of nanocrystals. Phys Rev B 75:165413–165417. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.165413 (and references therein)10.1103/PhysRevB.75.165413 ↗