Diffusion transport of nanoparticles at nanochannel boundaries
Source abstract
Abstract
The manipulation of matter at the nanoscale has unleashed a great potential for engineering biomedical drug carriers, but the transport of nanoparticles (NPs) under nanoscale confinement is still poorly understood. Using colloidal physics to describe NP interactions, we have computationally studied the passive transport of NPs using experimentally relevant conditions from bulk into a nanochannel of 60–90 nm height. NP size, channel height, and the Debye length are comparable so that changes in nanoscale dimensions may induce substantial changes in NP transport kinetics. We show that subtle changes in nanochannel dimensions may alter the energy barrier by about six orders of magnitude resulting in different NP penetration depths and diffusion mechanisms: ballistic, first-order and quasi zero-order transport regimes. The analysis of NP diffusion by continuum methods reveals that apparent diffusivity is reduced by decreasing channel size. The continuum finite element (FE) numerical method reproduced the colloidal model results only when surface interactions were accounted for. These results give a new insight into NP passive transport at the boundaries of nanoconfined domains, and have implications on the design of nanoscale fluidics and NP systems for biomedical and engineering applications.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions · Groundwater flow and contamination studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Abràmoff MD, Magalhães PJ et al (2004) Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics int 11(7):36–42
2. Arya G, Chang CH et al (2001) A critical comparison of equilibrium, non-equilibrium and boundary-driven molecular dynamics techniques for studying transport in microporous materials. J Chem Phys 115(17):8112–812410.1063/1.1407002 ↗
3. Arya G, Chang H-C et al (2003) Knudsen diffusivity of a hard sphere in a rough slit pore. Phys Rev Lett 91(2):026102–02610410.1103/PhysRevLett.91.026102 ↗
4. Bhattacharjee S, Elimelech M et al (1998) DLVO interaction between colloidal particles: beyond derjaguin’s approximation. Croat Chem Acta 71(4):883–903
5. Biggs S, Mulvaney P et al (1994) Study of anion adsorption at the gold-aqueous solution interface by atomic force microscopy. J Am Chem Soc 116(20):9150–915710.1021/ja00099a033 ↗
6. Boujday S, Blanchard J et al (2007) Polyoxomolybdate-stabilized Ru(0) nanoparticles deposited on mesoporous silica as catalysts for aromatic hydrogenation. Chem Phys Chem 8(18):2636–264210.1002/cphc.200700533 ↗
7. Delgado AV, Gonzalez-Caballero F et al (2005) Measurement and interpretation of electrokinetic phenomena. Pure Appl Chem 77(10):1753–180510.1351/pac200577101753 ↗
8. Fine D, Grattoni A et al (2010) A robust nanofluidic membrane with tunable zero-roder release for implantable dose specific drug delivery. Lab Chip 10(22):3074–308310.1039/c0lc00013b ↗
9. Gapinski J, Patkowski A et al (2007) Collective diffusion in charge-stabilized suspensions: concentration and salt effects. J Chem Phys 126:10490510.1063/1.2538891 ↗
10. Grattoni A, Fine D et al (2011) Gated and near-surface diffusion of charged fullerenes in nanochannels. ACS Nano 5(12):9382–939110.1021/nn2037863 ↗
11. Heinen M, Holmqvist P et al (2011) Pair structure of the hard-sphere Yukawa fluid: an improved analytic method versus simulations, Rogers-Young scheme, and experiment. J Chem Phys 134(4):04453210.1063/1.3524309 ↗
12. Hillier AC, Kim S et al (1996) Measurement of double-layer forces at the electrode/electrolyte interface using the atomic force microscope: potential and anion dependant interactions. J Phys Chem 100:18808–1881710.1021/jp961629k ↗
13. Hoover WG, Hoover CG (2005) Nonequilibrium molecular dynamics. Condens Matter Phys 8(2(42)):247–26010.5488/CMP.8.2.247 ↗
14. Hunenberger P (2005) Thermostat algorithms for molecular dynamics simulations. In: Advanced computer simulation approaches for soft matter sciences I, vol 173. Springer, Berlin, pp 105–14710.1007/b99427 ↗
15. Iacovella CR, Rogers RE et al (2010) Pair interaction potentials of colloids by extrapolation of confocal microscopy measurements of collective suspension structure. J Chem Phys 133:164903–16493810.1063/1.3498746 ↗
16. Keblinski P, Eastman JA et al (2005) Nanofluids for thermal transport. Mater Today 8(6):36–4410.1016/S1369-7021(05)70936-6 ↗
17. Kirby B (2009) Micro and nanoscale fluid mechanics: transport in microfluidic devices. Cambridge University Press, London10.1017/CBO9780511760723 ↗
18. Kojic M, Milosevic M et al (2011) On diffusion in nanospace. J Serbian Soc Comput Mech 5(1):104–118
19. Li Y, Je Zhou et al (2009) A review on development of nanofluidi preparation and characterization. Powder Technol 196:89–10110.1016/j.powtec.2009.07.025 ↗
20. Malek K, Coppens M-O (2003) Knudsen self and Fickian diffusion in rough nanoporous media. J Chem Phys 119(5):2801–281110.1063/1.1584652 ↗
21. Masliyah JH, Bhattacharjee S et al (2006) Electrokinetic and colloid transport phenomena. Wiley Online Library10.1002/0471799742 ↗
22. Mellaerts R, Jammaer JA et al (2008) Physical state of poorly water soluble therapeutic molecules loaded into SBA-15 ordered mesoporous silica carriers: a case study with itraconazole and ibuprofen. Langmuir 24(16):8651–865910.1021/la801161g ↗
23. Phillips RJ (2000) A hydrodynamic model for hindered diffusion of proteins and micelles in hydrogels. Biophys J 79(6):3350–335410.1016/S0006-3495(00)76566-0 ↗
24. Plimpton SJ (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comp Phys 117(1):1–1910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
25. Pusey PN (2011) Physics. Brownian motion goes ballistic. Science 332(6031):802–80310.1126/science.1192222 ↗
26. Sakamoto JH, van de Ven AL et al (2010) Enabling individualized therapy through nanotechnology. Pharmacol Res 62:57–8910.1016/j.phrs.2009.12.011 ↗
27. Plimpton S (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J Comp Phys 117:1–19. http://lammps.sandia.gov10.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
28. Serda RE, Mack A et al (2010) Cellular association and assembly of a multistage delivery system. Small 6(12):1329–134010.1002/smll.201000126 ↗
29. Son SJ, Lee SB (2006) Controlled gold nanoparticle diffusion in nanotubes: platform of partial functionalization and gold capping. J Am Chem Soc 128(50):15974–1597510.1021/ja0663632 ↗
30. Vanapalli SA, Iacovella CR et al (2008) Fluidic assembly and packing of microspheres in confined channels. Langmuir 24:3661–367010.1021/la703840w ↗
31. Zhang X, Zhang C et al (2005) Optical spectra of a novel polyoxometalate occluded within modified MCM-41. J Phys Chem B 109(41):19156–1916010.1021/jp052858m ↗
32. Zhuravlev LT (2000) The surface chemistry of amorphous silica. Zhuravlev model. Colloids Surf A 173(1–3):1–3810.1016/S0927-7757(00)00556-2 ↗
33. Ziemys A, Kojic M et al (2011) Hierarchical modeling of diffusive transport through nanochannels by coupling molecular dynamics with finite element method. J Comput Phys 230(14):5722–573110.1016/j.jcp.2011.03.054 ↗