Inertial deposition of nanoparticle chain aggregates: Theory and comparison with impactor data for ultrafine atmospheric aerosols
Source abstract
Abstract
Nanoparticle chain aggregates (NCAs) are often sized and collected using instruments that rely on inertial transport mechanisms. The instruments size segregate aggregates according to the diameter of a sphere with the same aerodynamic behavior in a mechanical force field. A new method of interpreting the aerodynamic diameter of NCAs is described. The method can be used to calculate aggregate surface area or volume. This is useful since inertial instruments are normally calibrated for spheres, and the calibrations cannot be directly used to calculate aggregate properties. A linear relationship between aggregate aerodynamic diameter and primary particle diameter based on published Monte-Carlo drag calculations is derived. The relationship shows that the aggregate aerodynamic diameter is independent of the number of primary particles that compose an aggregate, hence the aggregate mass. The analysis applies to aggregates with low fractal dimension and uniform primary particle diameter. This is often a reasonable approximation for the morphology of nanoparticles generated in high temperature gases. An analogy is the use of the sphere as an approximation for compact particles. The analysis is applied to the collection of NCAs by a low-pressure impactor. Our results indicate the low-pressure impactor collects aggregates with a known surface area per unit volume on each stage. Combustion processes often produce particles with aggregate structure. For diesel exhaust aggregates, the surface area per unit volume calculated by our method was about twice that of spheres with diameter equal to the aerodynamic diameter. Measurements of aggregates collected near a major freeway and at Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) were made for two aerodynamic cutoff diameter diameters (d a,50), 50 and 75 nm. (Aerodynamic cutoff diameter refers to the diameter of particles collected with 50% efficiency on a low-pressure impactor stage.) Near-freeway aggregates were probably primarily a mixture of diesel and internal combustion engine emissions. Aggregates collected at LAX were most likely present as a result of aircraft emissions. In both measurements, the aggregate aerodynamic diameters calculated from the primary particle diameter were fairly close to the stage cutoff diameter. The number of primary particles per aggregate varied one order of magnitude for particles depositing on the same stage. The average aggregate surface area per unit volume was 2.41 × 106 cm−1 and 2.59 × 106 cm−1 (50 nm d a,50) and 1.81 × 106 cm−1 and 1.68 × 106 cm−1 (75 nm d a,50) for near-freeway and LAX measurements, respectively. These preliminary measurements are consistent with values calculated from theory.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Particle Dynamics in Fluid Flows · Air Quality and Health Impacts · Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Barone T., 2004. The Nature of Ultrafine Atmospheric Aerosol: A Comparison of the Aerodynamic and Electrical Mobility Diameters. M.S. Thesis, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
2. Bérubé K.A., Jones T.P., Williamson B.J., Winters C., Morgan A.J., Richards R.J. (1999). Physicochemical characterisation of diesel exhaust particles: Factors for assessing biological activity. Atmos. Environ. 33:1599–161410.1016/S1352-2310(98)00384-7 ↗
3. Blevins L.G., G.W. Mulholland, B.A. Benner & E.B. Steel, 2002. Morphology and chemistry of aircraft engine soot. In: Proceedings of the 2002 Spring Technical Meeting of the Western States Section of the Combustion Institute, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburg, PA, MS014
4. Blevins L.G., 2003. Particulate matter emitted from aircraft engines. AIAA Paper 2003–276410.2514/6.2003-2764 ↗
5. Brasil A.M., Farias T.L., Carvalho M.G. (2000) Evaluation of the fractal properties of cluster-cluster aggregates. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 33: 440–45410.1080/02786820050204682 ↗
6. Cass G.R., Hughes L.S., Bhave P., Kleeman M.J., Allen J.O., Salmon L.G. (2000). The chemical composition of atmospheric ultrafine particles. Philos. Trans. Roy Soc. Lond. a Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 358(1775):2581–259210.1098/rsta.2000.0670 ↗
7. Chan P., Dahneke B. (1981) Free-molecule drag on straight chains of uniform spheres. J. Appl. Phys. 52(5):3106–311010.1063/1.329173 ↗
8. Dahneke B. (1982) Viscous resistance of straight-chain aggregates of uniform spheres. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 1: 179–18510.1080/02786828208958586 ↗
9. Davies C.N. (1945) Definitive equations for the fluid resistance of spheres. Proc. Phys. Soc. 57(4): 259–27010.1088/0959-5309/57/4/301 ↗
10. Dye A.L., Rhead M.M., Trier C.J. (2000) The quantitative morphology of roadside and background urban aerosol in Plymouth, UK. Atmos. Environ. 34: 3139–314810.1016/S1352-2310(99)00437-9 ↗
11. Fenton D.L., E.H. Luebcke & E. Norstrom, 1979. Physical characterization of particle material from a turbine engine. ASME 79-GT-179
12. Friedlander S.K. (2000) Smoke, Dust and Haze: Fundamentals of Aerosol Dynamics (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press, New York
13. Fuchs, N.A., 1964. The Mechanics of Aerosols. Oxford: Pergamon. Republished by Dover, New York (1989)
14. Goschnick J., Natzeck C., & Sommer M. (2004) Depth-resolved analysis of traffic soot sampled in the vicinity of a German motorway. Surf. Interf. Anal. 36: 857–86110.1002/sia.1786 ↗
15. Harrison R.M., Tilling R., Romero M.S.C., Harrad S., Jarvis K. (2003) A study of trace metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the roadside environment. Atmos. Environ. 37(17):2391–240210.1016/S1352-2310(03)00122-5 ↗
16. Hering S.V., Flagan R.C., Friedlander S.K. (1978). Design and evaluation of a new low-pressure impactor. Environ. Sci. Technol. 12(6): 667–67210.1021/es60142a004 ↗
17. Hering S.V., Collins J.J., Richards W.L., Friedlander S.K. (1979). Design and evaluation of a new low-pressure impactor. 2. Environ. Sci. Technol. 13(2):184–18810.1021/es60150a009 ↗
18. Jung H., Kittelson D.B., Zachariah M.R. (2004) Kinetics and visualization of soot oxidation using transmission electron microscopy. Combust. Flame 136: 445–45610.1016/j.combustflame.2003.10.013 ↗
19. Kasper G. (1982). Dynamics and measurement of smokes. 2. The aerodynamic diameter of chain aggregates in the transition regime. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 1(2):201–21410.1080/02786828208958588 ↗
20. Kasper G., Shaw D.T. (1983). Comparative size distribution measurements on chain aggregates. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 2:369–38110.1080/02786828308958641 ↗
21. Kaye B.H. (1995) Applied fractal geometry and powder technology. Chaos, Solitons Fract. 6: 245–25310.1016/0960-0779(95)80031-B ↗
22. Kendall M., Brown L., Trought K. (2004) Molecular adsorption at particle surfaces: A PM toxicity mediation mechanism. Inhal. Toxicol. 16(Suppl. 1):99–10510.1080/08958370490443187 ↗
23. Kim S., Jaques P.A., Chang M.C., Barone T., Xiong C., Friedlander S.K., Sioutas C. (2001) Versatile aerosol concentration enrichment system (VACES) for simultaneous in vivo and in vitro evaluation of toxic effects of ultrafine, fine and coarse ambient particles. 2. Field evaluation. J. Aerosol Sci. 32:1299–131410.1016/S0021-8502(01)00058-1 ↗
24. Kleeman M.J., Schauer J.J., Cass G.R. (2000). Size and composition of fine particulate matter emitted from motor vehicles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 34(7): 1132–114210.1021/es981276y ↗
25. Kodas T.T., Hampden-Smith M. (1999). Aerosol Processing of Materials. Wiley-VCH, New York
26. Kops J., Dibbets G., Hermans L., Van De Vate J.F. (1975). The aerodynamic diameter of branched chain-like aggregates. J. Aerosol Sci. 6: 329–33310.1016/0021-8502(75)90021-X ↗
27. Köylü ü.ö., Faeth G.M., Farias T.L., Carvalho M.G. (1995) Fractal and projected structure properties of soot aggregates. Combust. Flame 100: 621–63310.1016/0010-2180(94)00147-K ↗
28. Kütz S., 1994. In-situ Methoden zur Bestimmung von Struktureigenschaften gasgetragener Agglomerate, PhD Thesis, University of Duisburg, Duisburg
29. Lall A.A., Friedlander S.K. (2006). On-line measurement of ultrafine aggregate surface area and volume distributions by electrical mobility analysis. 1. Theoretical analysis. J. Aerosol Sci. 37(3): 260–27110.1016/j.jaerosci.2005.05.021 ↗
30. Li X.Y., Gilmour P.S., Donaldson K., MacNee W. (1996) Free radical activity and pro-inflammatory effects of particulate air pollution (PM10) in vivo and in vitro. Thorax 51: 1216–122210.1136/thx.51.12.1216 ↗
31. Liscinsky D.S., M.B. Colket, D.J. Hautman & B. True, 2001. Particle formation in gas turbine combustors. AIAA Paper 2001–374510.2514/6.2001-3745 ↗
32. Liu B.B., S. Srinivasachar, & J.J. Helble (2000). The effect of chemical composition on the fractal-like structure of combustion-generated inorganic aerosols. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 33: 459–46910.1080/02786820050195322 ↗
33. Marple V.A., Rubow K.L., Behm S.M. (1991) A miroorifice uniform deposition impactor (MOUDI): Description, calibration, and use. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 14: 434–44510.1080/02786829108959504 ↗
34. Marple V.A., Rubow K.L., Olson B.A. (2001). Inertial, gravitational, centrifugal, and thermal collection techniques. In: Willeke K., Baron P.A. (eds) Aerosol Measurement. Principles, Techniques and Applications. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York
35. Miguel A.H., Eiguren-Fernandez A., Sioutas C., Fine P.M., Geller M., Mayo P.R. (2005). Observations of twelve USEPA priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the Aitken size range (10–32 nm Dp). Aerosol Sci. Technol. 39(5): 415–41810.1080/027868290950338 ↗
36. Oberdörster G., Gelein R., Johnston C.J., Mercer P., Corson N., Finkelstein J.N. (1998). Ambient ultrafine particles: Inducers of acute lung injury?. In: Dungworth D.L. et al (eds) Relationships between Respiratory Disease and Exposure to Air Pollution. ILSI Press, Washington
37. Park K., Kittelson D.B., Zachariah M.R., McMurry P.H. (2004). Measurement of inherent material density of nanoparticle agglomerates. J. Nanoparticle Res. 6(2): 267–27210.1023/B:NANO.0000034657.71309.e6 ↗
38. Pratsinis S.E. (1998). Flame aerosol synthesis of ceramic powders. Progress Energy Combust. Sci. 24(3): 197–21910.1016/S0360-1285(97)00028-2 ↗
39. Renwick L.C., Brown D., Clouter A., Donaldson K. (2005). Increased inflammation and altered macrophage chemotactic responses caused by two ultrafine particle types. Occup. Environ. Med. 61:442–44710.1136/oem.2003.008227 ↗
40. Samson R.J., Mulholland G.W., Gentry J.W. (1987) Structural analysis of soot agglomerates. Langmuir 3: 272–28110.1021/la00074a022 ↗
41. Schmidt-Ott A., Baltensperger U., Gaggeler H.W., Jost D.T. (1990). Scaling behavior of physical parameters describing agglomerates. J. Aerosol Sci. 21(6): 711–71710.1016/0021-8502(90)90037-X ↗
42. Seagrave J., Knall C., McDonald J., Mauderly J. (2004). Diesel particulate material binds and concentrates a proinflammatory cytokine that causes neutrophil migration. Inhal. Toxicol. 16(Suppl. 1):93–9810.1080/08958370490443178 ↗
43. Singh M., Jaques P.A., Sioutas C. (2002). Size distribution and diurnal characteristics of particle-bound metals in source and receptor sites of the Los Angeles Basin. Atmos. Environ. 36: 1675–168910.1016/S1352-2310(02)00166-8 ↗
44. Stöber W., Berner A., Blaschke R. (1969) The aerodynamic diameter of aggregates of uniform spheres. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 29(4): 710–71910.1016/0021-9797(69)90225-2 ↗
45. Van Gulijk C., Marijnissen J.C.M., Makkee M., Moulijn J.A., Schmidt-Ott A. (2004). Measuring diesel soot with a scanning mobility particle sizer and an electrical low-pressure impactor: Performance assessment with a model for fractal like aggregates. J. Aerosol Sci. 35: 633–65510.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.11.004 ↗
46. Wang C.S., Friedlander S.K., Mädler L. (2005). Nanoparticle aerosol science and technology: An overview. China Particuol. 3: 243–25410.1016/S1672-2515(07)60196-1 ↗
47. Xiong C., Friedlander S.K. (2001). Morphological properties of atmospheric aerosol aggregates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 98(21): 11851–1185610.1073/pnas.211376098 ↗
48. Zhu Y.F., Hinds W.C., Kim S., Sioutas C. (2002). Concentration and size distribution of ultrafine particles near a major highway. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 52: 1032–104210.1080/10473289.2002.10470842 ↗