journal article·2025-06

Synthesis, characterization, and their electrokinetic properties of functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes

Zeynep Bicil

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 27· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Firstly, MWCNT-OH and MWCNT-COOH were synthesized from MWCNT by oxidation reactions. The samples were characterized by BET, FTIR, DTA/TG, NMR, SEM/EDX, and TEM devices. The electrokinetic properties of MWCNTs were investigated as a function of solid/liquid ratio, suspension pH, and electrolyte concentration, type, and valence. Changes in surface area, presence of carbonyl, and hydroxyl groups, changes in thermal decomposition steps and morphological properties proved that functionalized MWCNT structures were synthesized. While zeta potential did not show a significant change with increasing solid/liquid ratio, it changed with the initial pH of the suspension. While all carbon nanotubes had positive zeta potential at pH = 2, it was determined that zeta potential decreased and changed sign with increasing pH. The isoelectric points of MWCNT, MWCNT-OH, and MWCNT-COOH suspensions are pH 9, 4.2, and 2.8, respectively. While there was no change in the sign of the zeta potential of carbon nanotube suspensions of monovalent electrolytes, the zeta potentials of divalent and trivalent electrolyte suspensions changed sign with increasing concentration. While monovalent electrolytes acted as indifferent electrolytes, divalent and trivalent electrolytes adsorbed specifically on the carbon nanotube surface. The presence of CO32- ions in MWCNT suspensions transformed the zeta potential from positive to negative with increasing concentration. In conclusion, since the electrokinetic properties of functionalized MWCNTs vary depending on pH and electrolyte concentration, accurate tuning of these parameters is critical for the stability and performance of MWCNT-based systems in industrial applications.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (74)

Show source-provided references
1. Lyklema J, Rovillard S, De Coninck J (1998) Electrokinetics: the properties of the stagnant layer unraveled. Langmuir 14:5659–5663. https://doi.org/10.1021/LA980399T10.1021/LA980399T ↗
2. Serrano-Lotina A, Portela R, Baeza P, Alcolea-Rodríguez V, Villarroel M, Ávila P (2023) Zeta potential as a tool for functional materials development. Catal Today 423:113862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2022.08.00410.1016/j.cattod.2022.08.004 ↗
3. Gil-Llambias FJ, Castro ME, McLeod LB (1984) Electrophoretic characterization of unsupported Co–Mo sulfided catalysts prepared by different methods. J Catal 88:222–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9517(84)90066-610.1016/0021-9517(84)90066-6 ↗
4. Larsson M, Hill A, Duffy J (2012) Suspension stability; why particle size, zeta potential and rheology are important. Annu Trans Nord Rheol Soc 20:6
5. Stelzer JB, Nitzsche R, Caro J (2005) Zeta potential measurement in catalyst preparations. Chem Eng Technol 28:182–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/CEAT.20040212310.1002/CEAT.200402123 ↗
6. Morfesis A, Jacobson AM, Frollini R, Helgeson M, Billica J, Gertig KR (2009) Role of zeta (ζ) potential in the optimization of water treatment facility operations. Ind Eng Chem Res 48:2305–2308. https://doi.org/10.1021/IE800524X10.1021/IE800524X ↗
7. Ucar A, Koçak Y, Dorum A (2010) Çimento sektöründe zeta potansiyel. Eng Sci 5:308–318
8. Liu X, Mäki-Arvela P, Aho A, Vajglova Z, Gun’ko VM, Heinmaa I, Murzin DY, (2018) Zeta potential of beta zeolites: influence of structure, acidity, pH, temperature and concentration. Molecules 23:946. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2304094610.3390/molecules23040946 ↗
9. Doğan M, Alkan M, Çakır Ü (1997) Electrokinetic properties of perlite. J Colloid Interface Sci 192:114–118. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.1997.491310.1006/jcis.1997.4913 ↗
10. Alkan M, Demirbaş Ö, Doğan M (2005) Electrokinetic properties of kaolinite in mono- and multivalent electrolyte solutions. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 83:51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2005.03.01110.1016/j.micromeso.2005.03.011 ↗
11. Alkan M, Demirbaş Ö, Doğan M (2005) Electrokinetic properties of sepiolite suspensions in different electrolyte media. J Colloid Interface Sci 281:240–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2004.08.03610.1016/j.jcis.2004.08.036 ↗
12. Alkan M, Demirbaş Ö, Doğan M (2005) Zeta potential of unexpanded and expanded perlite samples in various electrolyte media. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 84:192–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2005.05.02310.1016/j.micromeso.2005.05.023 ↗
13. Alkan M, Karadaş M, Doğan M, Demirbaş Ö (2005) Zeta potentials of perlite samples in various electrolyte and surfactant media. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 259:155–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.02.02410.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.02.024 ↗
14. Sato Y, Kusaka Y, Kobayashi M (2017) Charging and aggregation behavior of cellulose nanofibers in aqueous solution. Langmuir 33:12660–12669. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b0274210.1021/acs.langmuir.7b02742 ↗
15. Dikmen S, Yilmaz G, Yorukogullari E, Korkmaz E (2012) Zeta potential study of natural and acid-activated sepiolites in electrolyte solutions. Can J Chem Eng 90:785–792. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.2057310.1002/cjce.20573 ↗
16. Dorum A, Koçak Y, Yilmaz B, Uçar A (2010) The effect of electrokinetic specification features to hydration development in fly ash blended cement. J Fac Eng Archit Gazi Univ 25:449–457
17. Tekin G (2004) Perlit ve sepiyolit’in amonyumheptamolibdat ile modifikasyonu ve elektrokinetik özellikleri. Balıkesir Univ Sci Inst J 6:35–49
18. Önen V, Göçer M (2016) Simektit süspansiyonlarının bazı elektrolit ve polimer solüsyonları içerisinde sedimantasyon ve elektrokinetik özellikleri. Afyon Kocatepe Univ Sci Eng J 16:399–408. https://doi.org/10.5578/FMBD.2770910.5578/FMBD.27709 ↗
19. Grancaric AM, Tarbuk A, Pusic T (2005) Electrokinetic properties of textile fabrics. Color Technol 121:221–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-4408.2005.tb00277.x10.1111/j.1478-4408.2005.tb00277.x ↗
20. Hai C, Zhang G, Liu J, Zhou Y, Dong S, Zeng J, Li X, Sun Y, Shen Y (2020) ζ-potential variations of micro-nano sized hexagram-like α-Al₂O₃ particles. J Nanopart Res 22:65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-020-04786-x10.1007/s11051-020-04786-x ↗
21. Goldstein N, Greenlee LF (2012) Influence of synthesis parameters on iron nanoparticle size and zeta potential. J Nanopart Res 14:760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-012-0760-510.1007/s11051-012-0760-5 ↗
22. Turan Beyli P, Doğan M, Alkan M, Türkyılmaz A, Turhan Y, Demirbaş Ö, Namli H (2016) Characterization, adsorption, and electrokinetic properties of modified sepiolite. Desalination Water Treat 57:19248–19261. https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2015.110277310.1080/19443994.2015.1102773 ↗
23. Dai M (1994) The effect of zeta potential of activated carbon on the adsorption of dyes from aqueous solution: I. The adsorption of cationic dyes: methyl green and methyl violet. J Colloid Interface Sci 164:223–228. https://doi.org/10.1006/JCIS.1994.116010.1006/JCIS.1994.1160 ↗
24. Park KH, Lee CH, Ryu SK, Yang X (2007) Zeta-potentials of oxygen and nitrogen enriched activated carbons for removal of copper ion. Carbon Lett 8:321–325. https://doi.org/10.5714/CL.2007.8.4.32110.5714/CL.2007.8.4.321 ↗
25. Kazak Ö, Sungur F (2020) Thuja orientalis bitkisi kozalığından aktif karbon hazırlanması ve sudaki reaktif mavisi 49 giderimi için kullanılması. Eskisehir Tech Univ Sci Technol J B-Theor Sci 8:281–292. https://doi.org/10.20290/estubtdb.65148510.20290/estubtdb.651485 ↗
26. Bahreini M, Movahedi M, Peyvandi M, Nematollahi F, Sepasi Tehrani H (2018) Correlation assessment of zeta potential and catalytic activity of graphene nano sheets as nanozyme. Eurasian J Anal Chem 13:47. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejac/9445110.29333/ejac/94451 ↗
27. Chen KL, Elimelech M (2009) Relating colloidal stability of fullerene (C60) nanoparticles to nanoparticle charge and electrokinetic properties. Environ Sci Technol 43:7270–7276. https://doi.org/10.1021/ES900185P10.1021/ES900185P ↗
28. Srivastava AK, Kim M, Kim SM, Kim M-K, Lee K, Lee YH, Lee M-H, Lee SH (2009) Dielectrophoretic and electrophoretic force analysis of colloidal fullerenes in a nematic liquid-crystal medium. Phys Rev E 80:051702. https://doi.org/10.1103/PHYSREVE.80.05170210.1103/PHYSREVE.80.051702 ↗
29. Moradi O, Yari M, Zare K, Mirza B, Najafi F (2012) Carbon nanotubes: a review of chemistry principles and reactions. Fullerenes, Nanotubes Carbon Nanostruct 20:138–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/1536383X.2010.53331210.1080/1536383X.2010.533312 ↗
30. Hirlekar R, Yamagar M, Garse H, Vij M, Kadam V (2009) Carbon nanotubes and its applications: a review. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2:17–27
31. Singh I, Rehni AK, Kumar P, Kumar M, Aboul-Enein HY (2009) Carbon nanotubes: synthesis, properties and pharmaceutical applications. Fullerenes, Nanotubes Carbon Nanostruct 17:361–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/1536383090300801810.1080/15363830903008018 ↗
32. Dresselhaus MS, Dai H (2004) Carbon nanotubes: continued innovations and challenges. MRS Bull 29:237–243. https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs2004.7410.1557/mrs2004.74 ↗
33. Vijayalakshmi V, Sadanandan B, Raghu AV (2022) Single-walled carbon nanotubes in high concentrations is cytotoxic to the human neuronal cell LN18. Results Chem 4:100484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2022.10048410.1016/j.rechem.2022.100484 ↗
34. Vijayalakshmi V, Sadanandan B, Anjanapura RV (2023) In vitro comparative cytotoxic assessment of pristine and carboxylic functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes on LN18 cells. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 37:e23283. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbt.2328310.1002/jbt.23283 ↗
35. White B, Banerjee S, O’Brien S, Turro NJ, Herman IP (2007) Zeta-potential measurements of surfactant-wrapped individual single-walled carbon nanotubes. J Phys Chem C 111:13684–13690. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp070853e10.1021/jp070853e ↗
36. Hu H, Yu A, Kim E, Zhao B, Itkis ME, Bekyarova E, Haddon RC (2005) Influence of the zeta potential on the dispersability and purification of single-walled carbon nanotubes. J Phys Chem B 109:11520–11524. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp050781w10.1021/jp050781w ↗
37. Sun Z, Nicolosi V, Rickard D, Bergin SD, Aherne D, Coleman JN (2008) Quantitative evaluation of surfactant-stabilized single-walled carbon nanotubes: dispersion quality and its correlation with zeta potential. J Phys Chem C 112:10692–10699. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp802163410.1021/jp8021634 ↗
38. Zaman AC, Kaya F, Kaya C (2020) A study on optimum surfactant to multiwalled carbon nanotube ratio in alcoholic stable suspensions via UV–Vis absorption spectroscopy and zeta potential analysis. Ceram Int 46:29120–29129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.08.08510.1016/j.ceramint.2020.08.085 ↗
39. Doğan M, Turan M, Beyli PT, Bicil Z, Kızılduman BK (2021) Thermal and kinetic properties of poly(vinylacetate)/modified MWCNT nanocomposites. Fullerenes, Nanotubes Carbon Nanostruct 29:475–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/1536383X.2020.186094510.1080/1536383X.2020.1860945 ↗
40. Doğan M, Selek A, Turhan O, Kızılduman BK, Bicil Z (2021) Different functional groups functionalized hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) nanoparticles and multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) for hydrogen storage. Fuel 303:121335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.12133510.1016/j.fuel.2021.121335 ↗
41. Chakraborty S, Chattopadhyay J, Peng H, Chen Z, Mukherjee A, Arvidson RS, Hauge RH, Billups WE (2006) Surface area measurement of functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes. J Phys Chem B 110:24812–24815. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp065044u10.1021/jp065044u ↗
42. Yudianti R, Onggo H, Saito Y, Iwata T, Azuma JI (2011) Analysis of functional group sited on multi-wall carbon nanotube surface. Open Mater Sci J 5. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874088X0110501024210.2174/1874088X01105010242 ↗
43. Çakir Ü, Doğan M, Koçer Kizilduman B, Bicil Z (2024) Functionalized and Schiff base based multi-walled carbon nanotubes for hydrogen storage. J Alloys Compd Article in Press:17729010.1016/j.jallcom.2024.177290 ↗
44. Syuhaidah R, Norani MM, Sufian S (2014) The effect of surface area, pore volume, and pore size distribution on the modified multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Appl Mech Mater 625:148–151. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.625.14810.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.625.148 ↗
45. Sarode VB, Patil RD, Chaudhari GE (2023) Characterization of functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Mater Today Proc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.06.28810.1016/j.matpr.2023.06.288 ↗
46. Grobert N (2007) Carbon nanotubes—becoming clean. Mater Today 10:28–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(06)71789-810.1016/S1369-7021(06)71789-8 ↗
47. Yalçinkaya FN, Doğan M, Bicil Z, Kizilduman BK (2024) Effect of functionalization and Li-doping methods to hydrogen storage capacities of MWCNTs. Fuel 372:132274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2024.13227410.1016/j.fuel.2024.132274 ↗
48. Saadatkhah N, Carillo Garcia A, Ackermann S, Leclerc P, Latifi M, Samih S, Chaouki J (2020) Experimental methods in chemical engineering: thermogravimetric analysis—TGA. Can J Chem Eng 98:34–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.2367310.1002/cjce.23673 ↗
49. Mallakpour S, Zadehnazari A (2014) A facile, efficient, and rapid covalent functionalization of multi-walled carbon nanotubes with natural amino acids under microwave irradiation. Prog Org Coat 77:679–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2013.12.00310.1016/j.porgcoat.2013.12.003 ↗
50. Zhang Y, Li Y, Zhan P (2014) De novo growth of poly(amidoamine) dendrimers on the surface of multi-walled carbon nanotubes. J Mater Sci 49:3469–3477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-014-8059-910.1007/s10853-014-8059-9 ↗
51. do Amaral Montanheiro TL, Cristóvan FH, Machado JPB, Tada DB, Durán N, Lemes AP (2015) Effect of MWCNT functionalization on thermal and electrical properties of PHBV/MWCNT nanocomposites. J Mater Res 30:55–65. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2014.30310.1557/jmr.2014.303 ↗
52. Li S, Wang Z, Jia J, Hou C, Hao X, Zhang H (2018) Preparation of hydroxyl and (3-aminopropyl) triethoxysilane functionalized multiwall carbon nanotubes for use as conductive fillers in the polyurethane composite. Polym Compos 39:1212–1222. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.2405410.1002/pc.24054 ↗
53. Liu CX, Choi JW (2012) Improved dispersion of carbon nanotubes in polymers at high concentrations. Nanomaterials 2:329–347. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano204032910.3390/nano2040329 ↗
54. Gommes C, Blacher S, Masenelli-Varlot K, Bossuot C, McRae E, Fonseca A, Pirard JP (2003) Image analysis characterization of multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Carbon 41:2561–2572. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(03)00375-010.1016/S0008-6223(03)00375-0 ↗
55. Hunter RJ, Midmore BR, Zhang H (2001) Zeta potential of highly charged thin double-layer systems. J Colloid Interface Sci 237:147–149. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.2001.742310.1006/jcis.2001.7423 ↗
56. Kaszuba M, Corbett J, Watson FM, Jones A (2010) High-concentration zeta potential measurements using light-scattering techniques. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 368:4439–4451. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.017510.1098/rsta.2010.0175 ↗
57. Skwarek E, Bolbukh Y, Tertykh V, Janusz W (2016) Electrokinetic properties of the pristine and oxidized MWCNT depending on the electrolyte type and concentration. Nanoscale Res Lett 11:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-016-1367-z10.1186/s11671-016-1367-z ↗
58. Lee D, Cui T (2009) pH-dependent conductance behaviors of layer-by-layer self-assembled carboxylated carbon nanotube multilayer thin-film sensors. J Vac Sci Technol B 27:842–848. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.300238610.1116/1.3002386 ↗
59. de la Cruz EF, Zheng Y, Torres E, Li W, Song W, Burugapalli K (2012) Zeta potential of modified multi-walled carbon nanotubes in presence of poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogel. Int J Electrochem Sci 7:3577–3590. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1452-3981(23)13979-410.1016/S1452-3981(23)13979-4 ↗
60. Rajendran D, Ramalingame R, Adiraju A, Nouri H, Kanoun O (2022) Role of solvent polarity on dispersion quality and stability of functionalized carbon nanotubes. J Compos Sci 6:26. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs601002610.3390/jcs6010026 ↗
61. Wright DS, Flavel BS, Quinton JS (2006) Streaming zeta potential measurements of surface-bound organosilane molecular species. In: Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICONN.2006.34069810.1109/ICONN.2006.340698 ↗
62. Hunter RJ, Wright HJL (1971) The dependence of electrokinetic potential on concentration of electrolyte. J Colloid Interface Sci 37:564–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(71)90334-110.1016/0021-9797(71)90334-1 ↗
63. Dong S, Zeng Z, Cai W, Zhou Z, Dou C, Liu H, Xia J (2019) The zeta potentials of g-C₃N₄ nanoparticles: Effect of electrolyte, ionic strength, pH, and humic acid. J Nanopart Res 21:233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-019-4686-z10.1007/s11051-019-4686-z ↗
64. Jiang W, Wang Q, Qu X, Wang L, Wei X, Zhu D, Yang K (2017) Effects of charge and surface defects of multi-walled carbon nanotubes on the disruption of model cell membranes. Sci Total Environ 574:771–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.15010.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.150 ↗
65. Nyström R, Lindén M, Rosenholm JB (2001) The influence of Na+, Ca2+, Ba2+, and La3+ on the ζ potential and the yield stress of calcite dispersions. J Colloid Interface Sci 242:259–263. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.2001.776610.1006/jcis.2001.7766 ↗
66. Thompson DW, Pownall PG (1989) Surface electrical properties of calcite. J Colloid Interface Sci 131:74–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(89)90147-110.1016/0021-9797(89)90147-1 ↗
67. Cicerone DS, Regazzoni AE, Blesa MA (1992) Electrokinetic properties of the calcite/water interface in the presence of magnesium and organic matter. J Colloid Interface Sci 154:423–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(92)90158-I10.1016/0021-9797(92)90158-I ↗
68. Davis JA, James RO, Leckie JO (1978) Surface ionization and complexation at the oxide/water interface: I. Computation of electrical double layer properties in simple electrolytes. J Colloid Interface Sci 63:480–499. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9797(78)80009-510.1016/S0021-9797(78)80009-5 ↗
69. Yalçınkaya EE, Güler Ç (2010) Electrokinetic properties of acid-activated montmorillonite dispersions. Sep Sci Technol 45:635–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/0149639090352661810.1080/01496390903526618 ↗
70. Hiçyilmaz C, Özbayoglu G (1992) The effects of amine and electrolytes on the zeta-potential of scheelite from Uludag, Turkey. Miner Eng 5:945–951. https://doi.org/10.1016/0892-6875(92)90261-710.1016/0892-6875(92)90261-7 ↗
71. Song J, Zeng Y, Wang L, Duan X, Puerto M, Chapman WG, Hirasaki GJ (2017) Surface complexation modeling of calcite zeta potential measurements in brines with mixed potential determining ions (Ca2⁺, CO₃2⁻, Mg2⁺, SO₄2⁻) for characterizing carbonate wettability. J Colloid Interface Sci 506:169–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2017.06.09610.1016/j.jcis.2017.06.096 ↗
72. Gupta A, Govind Rajan A, Carter EA, Stone HA (2020) Ionic layering and overcharging in electrical double layers in a Poisson-Boltzmann model. Phys Rev Lett 125:188004. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.18800410.1103/PhysRevLett.125.188004 ↗
73. Usui S (1984) Variation of the potential of the stern plane with interaction of dissimilar flat electrical double layers. J Colloid Interface Sci 97:247–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(84)90290-X10.1016/0021-9797(84)90290-X ↗
74. Ma K, Pierre AC (1999) Clay sediment-structure formation in aqueous kaolinite suspensions. Clays Clay Miner 47:522–526. https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1999.047041510.1346/CCMN.1999.0470415 ↗