journal article·2025-05Open access

Non-destructive assessment of aligned carbon nanotube structures through correlation of polymer nanocomposite properties via ultrasonic testing

Ricardo Braga Nogueira Branco, Kohei Oyama, Olivia J. Cook, Grace M. Mu, Andrea P. Argüelles, Namiko Yamamoto, Charles E. Bakis

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 27· Issue 5

Abstract

Abstract Evaluation of nanoparticle distribution and orientation within polymer nanocomposites is critical to ascertaining structure–property relationships but has been a challenge. Nanoparticles form multi-scale structures consisting of nanometer- and micrometer-scale agglomerations, requiring inspection of high resolution and large field of view (FOV) at the same time. Electron microscopy provides high-resolution 2D images of small FOV. Micro-computed tomography provides 3D images of moderate resolution and FOV, but is limited in its ability to resolve regions of similar elements such as polymers and carbon-based nanoparticles. In this work, an ultrasonic testing (UT) technique of a moderate resolution (sub-millimeter) was used to indirectly assess microstructures of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) within an epoxy matrix over a sizable volume (~ mm in all directions). CNTs were magnetically aligned and agglomerated using two different field strengths, and such CNT micro-structure change affected the fracture toughness data of CNT-epoxy nanocomposites. The propagation speed and energy loss (attenuation) of the reflected wave were correlated to changes of CNT orientation and distribution by magnetic field application.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Thermal properties of materials · Smart Materials for Construction

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. Bauhofer W, Kovacs JZ (2009) A review and analysis of electrical percolation in carbon nanotube polymer composites. Compos Sci Technol 69(10):1486–149810.1016/j.compscitech.2008.06.018 ↗
2. Spitalsky Z, Tasis D, Papagelis K, Galiotis C (2010) Carbon nanotube–polymer composites: chemistry, processing, mechanical and electrical properties. Prog Polym Sci 35(3):357–40110.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.09.003 ↗
3. Eletskii AV, Knizhnik AA, Potapkin BVE, Kenny JM (2015) Electrical characteristics of carbon nanotube-doped composites. Physics-Uspekhi 58(3):20910.3367/UFNe.0185.201503a.0225 ↗
4. Marconnet AM, Panzer MA, Goodson KE (2013) Thermal conduction phenomena in carbon nanotubes and related nanostructured materials. Rev Mod Phys 85(3):129510.1103/RevModPhys.85.1295 ↗
5. Nan C-W, Birringer R, Clarke DR, Gleiter H (1997) Effective thermal conductivity of particulate composites with interfacial thermal resistance. J Appl Phys 81(10):6692–669910.1063/1.365209 ↗
6. Nan C-W, Liu G, Lin Y, Li M (2004) Interface effect on thermal conductivity of carbon nanotube composites. Appl Phys Lett 85(16):3549–355110.1063/1.1808874 ↗
7. Kumar S, Alam M, Murthy J (2007) “Effect of percolation on thermal transport in nanotube composites.” Appl Phys Lett 90(10)10.1063/1.2712428 ↗
8. Quaresimin M, Schulte K, Zappalorto M, Chandrasekaran S (2016) “Toughening mechanisms in polymer nanocomposites: from experiments to modelling.” Composites Sci Technol 123:187–20410.1016/j.compscitech.2015.11.027 ↗
9. Domun N, Hadavinia H, Zhang T, Sainsbury T, Liaghat G, Vahid S (2015) Improving the fracture toughness and the strength of epoxy using nanomaterials–a review of the current status. Nanoscale 7(23):10294–1032910.1039/C5NR01354B ↗
10. Li Y, Liu Y, Peng X, Yan C, Liu S, Hu N (2011) Pull-out simulations on interfacial properties of carbon nanotube-reinforced polymer nanocomposites. Comput Mater Sci 50(6):1854–186010.1016/j.commatsci.2011.01.029 ↗
11. Pal G, Kumar S (2016) Modeling of carbon nanotubes and carbon nanotube–polymer composites. Progress Aerospace Sci 80:33–5810.1016/j.paerosci.2015.12.001 ↗
12. Rahimian-Koloor SM, Hashemianzadeh SM, Shokrieh MM (2018) Effect of CNT structural defects on the mechanical properties of CNT/epoxy nanocomposite. Physica B: Condensed Matter 540:16–2510.1016/j.physb.2018.04.012 ↗
13. Gojny F, Wichmann M, Köpke U, Fiedler B, Schulte K (2004) Carbon nanotube-reinforced epoxy-composites: enhanced stiffness and fracture toughness at low nanotube content. Compos Sci Technol 64(15):2363–237110.1016/j.compscitech.2004.04.002 ↗
14. Chandra Shekar K, Anjaneya Prasad B, Eswara Prasad N (2016) Strengthening in and fracture behaviour of CNT and carbon-fibre-reinforced epoxy–matrix hybrid composite. Sādhanā 41(12):1443–146110.1007/s12046-016-0566-8 ↗
15. Zeinedini A, Shokrieh MM, Ebrahimi A (2018) The effect of agglomeration on the fracture toughness of CNTs-reinforced nanocomposites. Theoretical Appl Fracture Mechanics 94:84–9410.1016/j.tafmec.2018.01.009 ↗
16. Bisht A, Dasgupta K, Lahiri D (2018) Effect of graphene and cnt reinforcement on mechanical and thermomechanical behavior of epoxy—a comparative study. J Appl Polym Sci 135(14):4610110.1002/app.46101 ↗
17. Cha J, Jun GH, Park JK, Kim JC, Ryu HJ, Hong SH (2017) Improvement of modulus, strength and fracture toughness of CNT/epoxy nanocomposites through the functionalization of carbon nanotubes. Composites Part B: Eng 129:169–17910.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.070 ↗
18. Benra J, Forero S (2018) Epoxy resins reinforced with carbon nanotubes. Lightweight Design Worldwide 11(1):6–1110.1007/s41777-017-0063-8 ↗
19. Opelt CV, Becker D, Lepienski CM, Coelho LA (2015) Reinforcement and toughening mechanisms in polymer nanocomposites–carbon nanotubes and aluminum oxide. Composites Part B: Eng 75:119–12610.1016/j.compositesb.2015.01.019 ↗
20. Ayatollahi M, Shadlou S, Shokrieh M (2011) Fracture toughness of epoxy/multi-walled carbon nanotube nano-composites under bending and shear loading conditions. Mater Des 32(4):2115–212410.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.034 ↗
21. Ma C, Liu H-Y, Du X, Mach L, Xu F, Mai Y-W (2015) Fracture resistance, thermal and electrical properties of epoxy composites containing aligned carbon nanotubes by low magnetic field. Composites Sci Technol 114:126–13510.1016/j.compscitech.2015.04.007 ↗
22. Torabi A, Rahimi A, Ayatollahi M (2019) Elastic-plastic fracture assessment of CNT-reinforced epoxy/nanocomposite specimens weakened by U-shaped notches under mixed mode loading. Composites Part B: Eng 176:10711410.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107114 ↗
23. Xu T, Qi Z, Tan Y, Tian J, Li X (2021) Effect of multiwalled carbon nanotube diameter on mechanical behavior and fracture toughness of epoxy nanocomposites. Mater Res Express 8(1):01501410.1088/2053-1591/abd864 ↗
24. Mishra K, Singh RP (2019) Effect of APTMS modification on multiwall carbon nanotube reinforced epoxy nanocomposites. Composites Part B: Eng 162:425–43210.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.134 ↗
25. Natarajan B, Lachman N, Lam T, Jacobs D, Long C, Zhao M, Wardle BL, Sharma R, Liddle JA (2015) The evolution of carbon nanotube network structure in unidirectional nanocomposites resolved by quantitative electron tomography. ACS Nano 9(6):6050–605810.1021/acsnano.5b01044 ↗
26. Zhao M, Vladar AE, Cannara RJ, Liddle JA (2014) 3D characterization of carbon nanotube polymer composites using scanning electron microscopy and confocal Raman microscopy. in Technical Proceedings of the 2014 NSTI Nanotechnology Conference and Expo, NSTI-Nanotech.
27. Ni X, Kopp R, Kalfon-Cohen E, Furtado C, Lee J, Arteiro A, Borstnar G, Mavrogordato MN, Helfen L, Sinclair I (2021) In situ synchrotron computed tomography study of nanoscale interlaminar reinforcement and thin-ply effects on damage progression in composite laminates. Composites Part B: Eng 217:10862310.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108623 ↗
28. Kalfon-Cohen E, Kopp R, Furtado C, Ni X, Arteiro A, Borstnar G, Mavrogordato MN, Sinclair I, Spearing SM, Camanho PP (2018) Synergetic effects of thin plies and aligned carbon nanotube interlaminar reinforcement in composite laminates. Composites Sci Technol 166:160–16810.1016/j.compscitech.2018.01.007 ↗
29. Cook OJ, Huang N, Smithson RL, Kube CM, Beese AM, Argüelles AP (2023) Uncovering microstructural heterogeneities in binder jet printed Ss316l through ultrasonic testing and X-ray computed tomography. Mater Characterization 197:11269710.1016/j.matchar.2023.112697 ↗
30. Arguelles AP, Turner JA (2019) Generalized ultrasonic scattering model for arbitrary transducer configurations. J Acoustical Soc Am 146(6):4413–442410.1121/1.5139220 ↗
31. Jeong H, Hsu DK (1995) Experimental analysis of porosity-induced ultrasonic attenuation and velocity change in carbon composites. Ultrasonics 33(3):195–20310.1016/0041-624X(95)00023-V ↗
32. Lin L, Luo M, Tian H, Li X, Guo G (2008) Experimental investigation on porosity of carbon fiber-reinforced composite using ultrasonic attenuation coefficient. in Proceedings of the 17th World Conference on Nondestructive Testing, Shanghai, China
33. Stone D, Clarke B (1975) Ultrasonic attenuation as a measure of void content in carbon-fibre reinforced plastics. Non-Destr Test 8(3):137–14510.1016/0029-1021(75)90023-7 ↗
34. Reed FA, Batzinger TJ, Reed RW, Jönsson S (1993) “Porosity measurement in composites using ultrasonic attenuation methods.” Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation: Volumes 12A and 12B, pp. 1265–1272.10.1007/978-1-4615-2848-7_162 ↗
35. Munoz V, Perrin M, Pastor M-L, Welemane H, Cantarel A, Karama M (2015) Determination of the elastic properties in CFRP composites: comparison of different approaches based on tensile tests and ultrasonic characterization. Adv Aircraft Spacecraft Sci 2(3):24910.12989/aas.2015.2.3.249 ↗
36. Yuan S, Yu X (2020) Ultrasonic non-destructive evaluation of selectively laser-sintered polymeric nanocomposites. Polymer Testing 90:10670510.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106705 ↗
37. Castellano A, Foti P, Fraddosio A, Marzano S, Piccioni MD (2014) Mechanical characterization of CFRP composites by ultrasonic immersion tests: experimental and numerical approaches. Composites Part B: Eng 66:299–31010.1016/j.compositesb.2014.04.024 ↗
38. Haibat J, Ceneviva S, Spencer MP, Kwok F, Trivedi S, Mohney SE, Yamamoto N (2017) Preliminary demonstration of energy-efficient fabrication of aligned CNT-polymer nanocomposites using magnetic fields. Composites Sci Technol 152:27–3510.1016/j.compscitech.2017.09.006 ↗
39. Trivedi S, Rudolph M, Atescan Y, Dai J, Cooley K, Adair JH, Mohney SE, Yamamoto N (2019) Effect of diazotization and magnetic assembly on CNT dispersion observed with hardness and modulus measurement of their epoxy composite of low CNT volume fraction. J Nanopart Res 21(12):1–1010.1007/s11051-019-4697-9 ↗
40. Branco RBN (2021) “Scalable fabrication and characterization of magnetically aligned and diazotized CNT-epoxy composites for interlaminar reinforcement of aerospace composites.” Pennsylvania State University.
41. Laurent C, Flahaut E, Peigney A (2010) The weight and density of carbon nanotubes versus the number of walls and diameter. Carbon 48(10):2994–299610.1016/j.carbon.2010.04.010 ↗
42. Wang S, Liang Z, Liu T, Wang B, Zhang C (2006) Effective amino-functionalization of carbon nanotubes for reinforcing epoxy polymer composites. Nanotechnology 17(6):155110.1088/0957-4484/17/6/003 ↗
43. Abdalla AM, Sahu RP, Puri IK (2019) Tailoring the properties of a polymer nanocomposite with a magnetic field. Polym Compos 40(2):779–78810.1002/pc.24736 ↗
44. Choi E, Brooks J, Eaton D, Al-Haik M, Hussaini M, Garmestani H, Li D, Dahmen K (2003) Enhancement of thermal and electrical properties of carbon nanotube polymer composites by magnetic field processing. J Appl Phys 94(9):6034–603910.1063/1.1616638 ↗
45. Garmestani H, Al-Haik MS, Dahmen K, Tannenbaum R, Li D, Sablin SS, Hussaini MY (2003) Polymer-mediated alignment of carbon nanotubes under high magnetic fields. Adv Mater 15(22):1918–192110.1002/adma.200304932 ↗
46. Kimura T, Ago H, Tobita M, Ohshima S, Kyotani M, Yumura M (2002) Polymer composites of carbon nanotubes aligned by a magnetic field. Adv Mater 14(19):1380–138310.1002/1521-4095(20021002)14:19<1380::AID-ADMA1380>3.0.CO;2-V ↗
47. Piao G, Kimura F, Takahashi T, Moritani Y, Awano H, Nimori S, Tsuda K, Yonetake K, Kimura T (2007) Alignment and micropatterning of carbon nanotubes in polymer composites using modulated magnetic field. Polym J 39(6):589–59210.1295/polymj.PJ2006191 ↗
48. Fujiwara M, Oki E, Hamada M, Tanimoto Y, Mukouda I, Shimomura Y (2001) Magnetic orientation and magnetic properties of a single carbon nanotube. J Phys Chem A 105(18):4383–438610.1021/jp004620y ↗
49. Hone J, Llaguno M, Nemes N, Johnson A, Fischer J, Walters D, Casavant M, Schmidt J, Smalley R (2000) Electrical and thermal transport properties of magnetically aligned single wall carbon nanotube films. Appl Phys Lett 77(5):666–66810.1063/1.127079 ↗
50. Walters D, Casavant M, Qin X, Huffman C, Boul P, Ericson L, Haroz E, O’connell M, Smith K, Colbert D (2001) In-plane-aligned membranes of carbon nanotubes. Chem Phys Lett 338(1):14–2010.1016/S0009-2614(01)00072-0 ↗
51. Masotti A, Caporali A (2013) Preparation of magnetic carbon nanotubes (Mag-CNTs) for biomedical and biotechnological applications. Int J Mol Sci 14(12):24619–2464210.3390/ijms141224619 ↗
52. Liu X, Marangon I, Melinte G, Wilhelm C, Ménard-Moyon C, Pichon BP, Ersen O, Aubertin K, Baaziz W, Pham-Huu C (2014) Design of covalently functionalized carbon nanotubes filled with metal oxide nanoparticles for imaging, therapy, and magnetic manipulation. ACS Nano 8(11):11290–1130410.1021/nn5040923 ↗
53. Korneva G, Ye H, Gogotsi Y, Halverson D, Friedman G, Bradley J-C, Kornev KG (2005) Carbon nanotubes loaded with magnetic particles. Nano Lett 5(5):879–88410.1021/nl0502928 ↗
54. Yamamoto N, Manohara H, Platzman E (2016) Magnetically anisotropic additive for scalable manufacturing of polymer nanocomposite: iron-coated carbon nanotubes. Mater Res Express 3(2):02500410.1088/2053-1591/3/2/025004 ↗
55. Happel J, Brenner H (2012) Low Reynolds number hydrodynamics: with special applications to particulate media. Vol. 1: Springer Science & Business Media.
56. Cook O, Huang N, Smithson R, Kube CM, Beese A, Argüelles A (2022) Ultrasonic characterization of porosity in components made by binder jet additive manufacturing. Mater Eval 80(4):37–44
57. Stanke FE, Kino GS (1984) A unified theory for elastic wave propagation in polycrystalline materials. J Acoustical Soc Am 75(3):665–68110.1121/1.390577 ↗
58. Loos J, Alexeev A, Grossiord N, Koning CE, Regev O (2005) Visualization of single-wall carbon nanotube (SWNT) networks in conductive polystyrene nanocomposites by charge contrast imaging. Ultramicroscopy 104(2):160–16710.1016/j.ultramic.2005.03.007 ↗
59. Natarajan B, Stein IY, Lachman N, Yamamoto N, Jacobs DS, Sharma R, Liddle JA, Wardle BL (2019) “Aligned carbon nanotube morphogenesis predicts physical properties of their polymer nanocomposites.” Nanoscale. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NR03317C10.1039/C9NR03317C ↗
60. Cao Q, Han S-J, Tulevski GS, Zhu Y, Lu DD, Haensch W (2013) Arrays of single-walled carbon nanotubes with full surface coverage for high-performance electronics. Nat Nanotechnol 8(3):180–18610.1038/nnano.2012.257 ↗