Enhanced carbon dioxide absorption capacity of Cu-BTC through the combination of Cu-g-C3N4 at room temperature
Source abstract
Abstract
The growing concern about the environmental consequences of anthropogenic CO2 emissions significantly stimulated the research of low-cost, efficient, and recyclable solid adsorbents of CO2 capture. Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are a promising porous material for CO2 adsorption. Hybrid materials consisting in copper benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate (Cu-BTC) and Cu doped graphitic-carbon nitride (Cu-g-C3N4) were prepared through solvothermal method as CO2 adsorbent. The size range of Cu-BTC@1.8%Cu-g-C3N4 was 9.0 ~ 19.4 μm, which was lower than the size range of Cu-BTC (14.6 ~ 29.6 μm). The hybrid adsorbents had lower Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface areas and pole volume due to the combination with Cu-g-C3N4. The CO2 adsorption capacity of Cu-BTC@1.8%Cu-g-C3N4 increased by 49.5% compared with that of pure Cu-BTC because of more adsorption sites including unsaturated metal centers and N atoms. Moreover, the Cu-BTC@1.8%Cu-g-C3N4 had good stability in CO2 adsorption capacity after multiple adsorption cycles. Graphical abstract
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications · Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies · Covalent Organic Framework Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Ghommem M, Hajj MR, Puri IK (2012) Influence of natural and anthropogenic carbon dioxide sequestration on global warming. Ecol Modell 235:1–710.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.04.005 ↗
2. Chang RB, Wu XY, Cheung O et al (2022) Synthetic solid oxide sorbents for CO2 capture: state-of-the art and future perspectives. J Mater Chem A 10(4):1682–170510.1039/D1TA07697C ↗
3. Zhao PY, Yin YC, Xu XM et al (2022) Facile fabrication of mesoporosity silica as support for solid amine CO2 adsorbents with enhanced adsorption capacity and kinetics. Energy 253:12416210.1016/j.energy.2022.124162 ↗
4. Park DJ, Choi JH, Kim YE et al (2017) Chemical absorption of carbon dioxide using aqueous piperidine derivatives. Chem Eng Technol 40(12):2266–227310.1002/ceat.201700375 ↗
5. Elhambakhsh A, Mousavi SM, Ghasemi MN et al (2022) Absorption increment of various physical/chemical CO2 absorbents using CeO2/SiO2/TiO2 nanocomposite. Chem Pap 76(8):4817–483410.1007/s11696-022-02214-z ↗
6. Sharma H, Dhir A (2021) Capture of carbon dioxide using solid carbonaceous and non-carbonaceous adsorbents: a review. Environ Chem Lett 19(2):851–87310.1007/s10311-020-01118-2 ↗
7. Akeeb O, Wang L, Xie WG et al (2022) Post-combustion CO2 capture via a variety of temperature ranges and material adsorption process: A review. J Environ Manage 313:11502610.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115026 ↗
8. Jiang T, Wei X, Wang S, Ma X (2022) Research progress on solid sorbents for CO2 capture. Clean Coal Technol 28:42–57
9. Usman M, Iqbal N, Noor T et al (2021) Advanced strategies in metal-organic frameworks for CO2 capture and separation. Chem Rec 22(7):SI10.1002/tcr.202100230 ↗
10. Liu YY, Ghimire P, Jaroniec M (2019) Copper benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate (Cu-BTC) metal-organic framework (MOF) and porous carbon composites as efficient carbon dioxide adsorbents. J Colloid Interface Sci 535:122–13210.1016/j.jcis.2018.09.086 ↗
11. Lai NJ, Zhu QR, Qiao DY et al (2020) CO2 capture with absorbents of tertiary amine functionalized nano-SiO2. Front Chem 8:14610.3389/fchem.2020.00146 ↗
12. Boer DG, Langerak J, Pescarmona PP (2023) Zeolites as selective adsorbents for CO2 separation. ACS Appl Energy Mater 6(5):2634–265610.1021/acsaem.2c03605 ↗
13. Zhang YF, Shi WW, Zhang SR et al (2022) Rational design of beta-cyclodextrins-derived hierarchically porous carbons for CO2 capture. J CO2 Util 66:10224410.1016/j.jcou.2022.102244 ↗
14. Wang S, Zhang ZH, Dai S et al (2020) Insights into CO2/N2 selectivity in porous carbons from deep learning. ACS Mater Lett 1:558–56310.1021/acsmaterialslett.9b00374 ↗
15. Wu HX, Yuan YN, Chen YW et al (2021) Highly efficient capture of postcombustion generated CO2 through a copper-based metal-organic framework. Energy Fuels 35(1):610–61710.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c03144 ↗
16. Zhang ZQ, Ding Q, Peh SB et al (2020) Mechano-assisted synthesis of an ultramicroporous metal-organic framework for trace CO2 capture. Chem Commun 56(56):7726–772910.1039/D0CC03196H ↗
17. Agbaje TA, Singh S, Reddy KSK et al (2021) Salt-free synthesis of Cu-BTC metal-organic framework exhibiting mesoporosity and enhanced carbon dioxide adsorption. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 324:11126510.1016/j.micromeso.2021.111265 ↗
18. Bao ZB, Yu LA, Ren QL et al (2011) Adsorption of CO2 and CH4 on a magnesium-based metal organic framework. J Colloid Interface Sci 353(2):549–55610.1016/j.jcis.2010.09.065 ↗
19. Chaemchuen S, Kabir NA, Zhou K et al (2013) Metal-organic frameworks for upgrading biogas via CO2 adsorption to biogas green energy. Chem Soc Rev 42(24):9304–933210.1039/c3cs60244c ↗
20. Petit C, Bandosz TJ (2009) MOF-graphite oxide composites: combining the uniqueness of graphene layers and metal-organic frameworks. Adv Mater 21(46):4753–475710.1002/adma.200901581 ↗
21. Li B, Yang QQ, Xu ZQ et al (2020) Tuning the interpenetration of metal-organic frameworks through changing ligand functionality: effect on gas adsorption properties. CrystEngComm 22(3):506–51410.1039/C9CE01309A ↗
22. Zhou LL, Niu ZD, Jin X et al (2018) Effect of lithium doping on the structures and CO2 adsorption properties of metal-organic frameworks HKUST-1. ChemistrySelect 3(45):12865–1287010.1002/slct.201803164 ↗
23. Ferreira TJ, de Moura BA, Esteves LM et al (2023) Biocompatible ammonium-based ionic liquids/ZIF-8 composites for CO2/CH4 and CO2/N2 separations. Sustain Mater Technol 35:e00558
24. Zhang Y, Wibowo H, Zhong L et al (2021) Cu-BTC-based composite adsorbents for selective adsorption of CO2 from syngas. Sep Purif Technol 279:11964410.1016/j.seppur.2021.119644 ↗
25. Varghese AM, Reddy KSK, Bhoria N et al (2021) Enhancing effect of UV activation of graphene oxide on carbon capture performance of metal-organic framework/graphene oxide hybrid adsorbents. Chem Eng J 420:12967710.1016/j.cej.2021.129677 ↗
26. Zhu CM, Zhang ZZ, Wang BD et al (2016) Synthesis of HKUST-1#MCF compositing materials for CO2 adsorption. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 226:476–48110.1016/j.micromeso.2016.02.029 ↗
27. Chen C, Li BX, Zhou LJ et al (2017) Synthesis of hierarchically structured hybrid materials by controlled self-assembly of metal-organic framework with mesoporous silica for CO2 adsorption. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9(27):23060–2307110.1021/acsami.7b08117 ↗
28. Homlamai K, Maihom T, Choomwattana S et al (2020) Single-atoms supported (Fe Co, Ni, Cu) on graphitic carbon nitride for CO2 adsorption and hydrogenation to formic acid: first-principles insights. Appl Surf Sci 499:14392810.1016/j.apsusc.2019.143928 ↗
29. Fang HB, Luo Y, Zheng YZ et al (2016) Facile large-scale synthesis of urea-derived porous graphitic carbon nitride with extraordinary visible-light spectrum photodegradation. Ind Eng Chem Res 55(16):4506–451410.1021/acs.iecr.6b00041 ↗
30. Sanjay BP, Swamy NK, Yashas SR et al (2021) Design of an electrochemical sensor using 2D sheet-like Cu@g-C3N4 transducer matrix for electroanalysis of catechol. J Electrochem Soc 168(7):07651110.1149/1945-7111/ac1495 ↗
31. Deng T, Men XL, Jiao XC et al (2022) CNTs decorated Cu-BTC with catalytic effect for high-stability lithium-sulfur batteries. Ceram Int 48(3):4352–436010.1016/j.ceramint.2021.10.230 ↗
32. Zhou X, Huang WY, Shi J et al (2014) A novel MOF/graphene oxide composite GrO@MIL-101 with high adsorption capacity for acetone. J Mater Chem A 2(13):4722–473010.1039/C3TA15086K ↗
33. Li X, Wan JQ, Ma YW et al (2020) Mesopores octahedron GCNOX/Cu2O@C inhibited photo-corrosion as an efficient visible-light catalyst derived from oxidized g-C3N4/HKUST-1 composite structure. Appl Surf Sci 510:14545910.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145459 ↗
34. Qian D, Lei C, Hao GP et al (2012) Synthesis of hierarchical porous carbon monoliths with incorporated metal-organic frameworks for enhancing volumetric based CO2 capture capability. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4(11):6125–613210.1021/am301772k ↗
35. Balde A, Kim SK, Abdul NR (2022) Carb (Charybdis natator) exoskeleton derived chitosan nanoparticles for the in vivo delivery of poorly water-soluble drug: ibuprofen. Int J Biol Macromol 212:283–29310.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.05.131 ↗
36. Klimakow M, Klobes P, Rademann K et al (2012) Characterization of mechanochemically synthesized MOFs. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 154:113–11810.1016/j.micromeso.2011.11.039 ↗
37. Singh MP, Dhumal NR, Kim HJ et al (2016) Influence of water on the chemistry and structure of the metal-organic framework Cu-3(btc)(2). J Phys Chem C 120(31):17323–1733310.1021/acs.jpcc.6b02906 ↗
38. Zhang Y, Li YH, Wang MZ et al (2022) Adsorption capacity of tetracycline in solution by Cu-BTC@carboxyl-functionalized carbon nanotubes@copper alginate composite aerogel beads. Coatings 12(9):129810.3390/coatings12091298 ↗
39. Zhou CG, Cao LJ, Wei SH et al (2011) A first principles study of gas adsorption on charged Cu-BTC. Comput Theor Chem 976(1–3):153–16010.1016/j.comptc.2011.08.018 ↗
40. Hedlund J, Garcia G, Balsamo M et al (2021) Microchannel zeolite 13X adsorbent with high CO2 separation performance. Sep Purif Technol 277:11948310.1016/j.seppur.2021.119483 ↗
41. Abdeljaoued A, Querejeta N, Duran I et al (2018) Preparation and evaluation of a coconut shell-based activated carbon for CO2/CH4 separation. Energies 11(7):174810.3390/en11071748 ↗
42. Missaoui N, Kahri H, Demirci UB (2022) Rapid room-temperature synthesis and characterizations of high-surface-area nanoparticles of zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (ZIF-8) for CO2 and CH4 adsorption. J Mater Sci 57(34):16245–1625710.1007/s10853-022-07676-w ↗
43. Lou WL, Yang JF, Li LB et al (2014) Adsorption and separation of CO2 on Fe(II)-MOF-74: effect of the open metal coordination site. J Solid State Chem 213:224–22810.1016/j.jssc.2014.03.005 ↗
44. Zhou ZY, Mei L, Ma C et al (2016) A novel bimetallic MIL-101(Cr, Mg) with high CO2 adsorption capacity and CO2/N2 selectivity. Chem Eng Sci 147:109–11710.1016/j.ces.2016.03.035 ↗
45. Cao Y, Zhang HM, Song FJ et al (2018) UiO-66-NH2/GO composite: synthesis, characterization and CO2 adsorption performance. Materials 11(4):58910.3390/ma11040589 ↗
46. Sun JQ, Shang MG, Zhang MN et al (2022) Konjac glucomannan/cellulose nanofibers composite aerogel supported HKUST-1 for CO2 adsorption. Carbohydr Polym 293:11972010.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119720 ↗
47. Zhao HH, Zhao N, Matus EV et al (2022) Preparation and modulation of Cu-BTC-(n)Br/MCFs with water stability and its application for CO2 capture. J Environ Chem Eng 10(3):10756410.1016/j.jece.2022.107564 ↗
48. Al-Janabi N, Hill P, Torrente-Murciano L et al (2015) Mapping the Cu-BTC metal-organic framework (HKUST-1) stability envelope in the presence of water vapour for CO2 adsorption from flue gases. Chem Eng J 281:669–67710.1016/j.cej.2015.07.020 ↗
49. Policicchio A, Zhao YX, Zhong Q et al (2014) Cu-BTC/aminated graphite oxide composites as high-efficiency CO2 capture media. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6(1):101–10810.1021/am404952z ↗
50. Yang P, Zhou RJ, Zhang YH et al (2023) Enhanced CO2/N2 separation performance in HP-Cu-BTCs by modifying the open-metal sites and porosity using added templates. Korean J Chem Eng 40(3):675–69210.1007/s11814-022-1223-z ↗