Ag-TiO2 nanotube arrays prepared by electrochemical deposition with high photocatalytic hydrogen evolution efficiency
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Wang W, Tang L, Chen C et al (2024) Engineering Pt–S–Mo and Pd–S–Mo sites in hierarchical porous MoS2 for boosted oxygen reduction activity in microbial fuel cell. J Power Sources 598:234143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.23414310.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.234143 ↗
2. Ibrahim YO, Hezam A, Qahtan TF et al (2020) Laser-assisted synthesis of Z-scheme TiO2/rGO/gC3N4 nanocomposites for highly enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Appl Surf Sci 534:147578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14757810.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147578 ↗
3. Wang X, Qiao P, Chen Q et al (2023) Electrochemically deposited Cu2O-doped TiO2 nanotube photoanodes for hydrogen evolution. Catal Lett 153:1689–1695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-022-04121-010.1007/s10562-022-04121-0 ↗
4. Duan L, Zhu H, Li M et al (2021) Atom substitution method to construct full-solar-spectrum absorption MoSeS/TiO2 nanotube arrays for highly efficient hydrogen evolution. Alloy Compd 889:161694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.16169410.1016/j.jallcom.2021.161694 ↗
5. Zhou Q, Zhao D, Sun Y et al (2020) g–C3N4–and polyaniline-co-modified TiO2 nanotube arrays for significantly enhanced photocatalytic degradation of tetrabromobisphenol A under visible light. Chemosphere 252:126468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.12646810.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126468 ↗
6. Rambabu Y, Kumar U, Singhal N et al (2019) Photocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide using graphene oxide wrapped TiO2 nanotubes. Appl Surf Sci 485:48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.04.04110.1016/j.apsusc.2019.04.041 ↗
7. Moon HS, Yong K (2020) Noble-metal free photocatalytic hydrogen generation of CuPc/TiO2 nanoparticles under visible-light irradiation. Appl Surf Sci 530:147215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14721510.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147215 ↗
8. David TM, Wilson P, Mahesh R et al (2018) Photocatalytic water splitting of TiO2 nanotubes powders prepared via rapid breakdown anodization sensitized with Pt, Pd and Ni nanoparticles. Mater Technol 33:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10667857.2018.143334910.1080/10667857.2018.1433349 ↗
9. Viet PV, Huy TH, Sang NX et al (2017) One-step hydrothermal synthesis and characterisation of SnO2 nanoparticle-loaded TiO2 nanotubes with high photocatalytic performance under sunlight. J Mater Sci 3364–3374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1762-610.1007/s10853-017-1762-6 ↗
10. Wang H, Han B, Lu J et al (2020) Excellent photoelectrocatalytic degradation and superior charge separation of polyaniline nanosheets wrapped TiO2 nanotube arrays. Mater Lett 260:126906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2019.12690610.1016/j.matlet.2019.126906 ↗
11. Hou J, Yang Y, Zhou J et al (2020) Flexible CdS and PbS nanoparticles sensitized TiO2 nanotube arrays lead to significantly enhanced photocatalytic performance. Ceram Int 46:28785–28791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.08.04110.1016/j.ceramint.2020.08.041 ↗
12. Plodinec M, Grčić I, Willinger MG et al (2019) Black TiO2 nanotube arrays decorated with Ag nanoparticles for enhanced visible-light photocatalytic oxidation of salicylic acid. J Alloy Compd 776:883–896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.10.24810.1016/j.jallcom.2018.10.248 ↗
13. Hu J, Liu S, Wu D et al (2021) Fabrication of bacterial cellulose with high efficient loading of Ag and TiO2 nanoparticles for removing organic dyes. J Vinyl Addit Techn 27:655–665. https://doi.org/10.1002/vnl.2184010.1002/vnl.21840 ↗
14. Jiang X, Xu W, Yu L (2019) Photocatalytic decomposition of gaseous HCHO over Ag modified TiO2 nanosheets at ambient temperature. Nanomaterials-Basel 9:338. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano903033810.3390/nano9030338 ↗
15. Liu X, Liu Z, Lu J et al (2014) Electrodeposition preparation of Ag nanoparticles loaded TiO2 nanotube arrays with enhanced photocatalytic performance. Appl Surf Sci 288:513–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.10.06210.1016/j.apsusc.2013.10.062 ↗
16. Kong D, Tan JZY, Yang F et al (2013) Electrodeposited Ag nanoparticles on TiO2 nanorods for enhanced UV visible light photoreduction CO2 to CH4. Appl Surf Sci 277:105–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.04.01010.1016/j.apsusc.2013.04.010 ↗
17. Baran E, Yazici B (2016) Effect of different nano-structured Ag doped TiO2-NTs fabricated by electrodeposition on the electrocatalytic hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 41:2498–2511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.12.02810.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.12.028 ↗
18. Wang X, Cheng K, Dou S et al (2019) Enhanced photoelectrochemical performance of CdO-TiO2 nanotubes prepared by direct impregnation. Appl Surf Sci 476:136–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.01.04410.1016/j.apsusc.2019.01.044 ↗
19. Li J, Chen W, Yu H et al (2014) Contact potential barriers and characterization of Ag-doped composite TiO2 nanotubes. J Phys Chem Solids 7:505–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2013.12.01110.1016/j.jpcs.2013.12.011 ↗
20. Peerakiatkhajohn P, Yun J, Butburee T et al (2022) Surface plasmon-driven photoelectrochemical water splitting of a Ag/TiO2 nanoplate photoanode. Rsc Adv 12:2652–2661. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ra09070d10.1039/d1ra09070d ↗
21. Fan X, Wan J, Liu E et al (2015) High-efficiency photoelectrocatalytic hydrogen generation enabled by Ag deposited and Ce doped TiO2 nanotube arrays. Ceram Int 41:5107–5116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.12.08310.1016/j.ceramint.2014.12.083 ↗
22. Najafidoust A, Allahyari S, Rahemi N et al (2020) Uniform coating of TiO2 nanoparticles using biotemplates for photocatalytic wastewater treatment. Ceram Int 46:4707–4719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.10.20210.1016/j.ceramint.2019.10.202 ↗
23. Alamelu K, Ali BMJ (2020) Au nanoparticles decorated sulfonated graphene-TiO2 nanocomposite for sunlight driven photocatalytic degradation of recalcitrant compound. Sol Energy 211:1194–1205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.10.05810.1016/j.solener.2020.10.058 ↗
24. Sun Q, Peng Y, Chen H et al (2023) Photoelectrochemical oxidation of ibuprofen via Cu2O-doped TiO2 nanotube arrays. J Hazard Mater 476:121–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.02.07810.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.02.078 ↗
25. Zhao H, Liang Z, Liu X et al (2020) Noble metal-like behavior of plasmonic Bi particles deposited on reduced TiO2 microspheres for efficient full solar spectrum photocatalytic oxygen evolution. Chin J Catal 41:333–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1872-2067(20)63547-110.1016/s1872-2067(20)63547-1 ↗
26. Peng Y, Zhang E, Chen C et al (2022) Photoelectrochemical degradation of trichloroethylene by iron modified TiO2 nanotube arrays. Chemosphere 308:136217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.13621710.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136217 ↗
27. Handoko C, Moustakas N, Peppel T et al (2019) Characterization and effect of Ag(0) vs. Ag(I) species and their localized plasmon resonance on photochemically inactive TiO2. Catalysts 9:323. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal904032310.3390/catal9040323 ↗
28. Mao K, Li Y,Zhang H et al (2013) Photocatalytic degradation of 17α‐ethinylestradiol and inactivation of Escherichia coli using Ag‐modified TiO2 nanotube arrays. Clean-Soil Air Water 41. https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.20110069810.1002/clen.201100698 ↗
29. Le TNT, Ton NQT, Tran VM et al (2017) TiO2 nanotubes with different Ag loading to enhance visible-light photocatalytic activity. J Nanomater 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.20110069810.1002/clen.201100698 ↗