Genotoxic effects of copper nanoparticles on Vicia pannonica Crantz. root meristem cells
Source abstract
Abstract
With the increasing use of metal nanoparticles, their access to the food chain has become the main concern for scientists. The present study sheds light on the copper nanoparticles (Cu NPs), which are widely used in many industries today. For this purpose, Vicia pannonica Crantz., a common fodder plant, was used and exposed to metal-based Cu NPs. To determine the genotoxic effects on root meristem cells, total of 3 different concentrations (50 ppm, 150 ppm, and 300 ppm) of Cu NPs and the control in deionized water solutions were prepared. The determination of the accumulation and elimination of Cu NPs in Vicia pannonica used in the study was carried out using with X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), SEM element mapping, and energy dispersive X-ray diffraction (EDS) characteristic spectrum analysis. All doses of Cu NPs caused significant decreases in the Mitotic index of V. pannonica meristem cells compared to the control. Multiple analyzes carried out in the study showed that Cu NPs caused abnormalities in cell division such as C-metaphase, polar aberration, deconstructed anaphase, chromosome breakage, loss of genetic material, failure to assemble in the metaphase plate, deconstructed metaphase, asynchronous division remaining chromosome in metaphase, adhesion, deconstructed prophase, advanced chromosomes, and chromosome bridges in anaphase. Results support that Cu NPs have a genotoxic effect on V. pannonica .
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Aluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants and animals · Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. Gottschalk F, Nowack B (2011) The release of engineered nanomaterials to the environment. J Environ Monit 13:1145–1155. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0EM00547A10.1039/C0EM00547A ↗
2. Musee N (2010) Nanotechnology risk assessment from a waste management perspective: are the current tools adequate. Hum Exp Toxicol 30(8):820–83510.1177/0960327110384525 ↗
3. Elemike EE, Uzoh IM, Onwudiwe DC, Babalola OO (2019) The role of nanotechnology in the fortification of plant nutrients and improvement of crop production. Appl Sci 9:499. https://doi.org/10.3390/APP903049910.3390/APP9030499 ↗
4. White JC, Gardea-Torresdey J (2018) Achieving food security through the very small. Nat Nanotechnol 138(13):627–629. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-018-0223-y10.1038/s41565-018-0223-y ↗
5. Nimmo DWR, Preul MA, Castle CJ, Self JR, Pillsbury RW, Bergey EA (2003) Effect of excess copper on growth of wild rice (Zizania palustris) seedlings tested in reconstituted and natural waters. Environ Manag 32(4):466–47510.1007/s00267-003-2899-4 ↗
6. Sheldon AR, Menzies NW (2005) The effect of copper toxicity on the growth and root morphology of Rhodes grass (Chloris gayana Knuth) in resin buffered solution culture. Plant Soil 278:341–34910.1007/s11104-005-8815-3 ↗
7. Bouazizi H, Jouili H, Geitmann A, El Ferjani E (2011) Cell wall accumulation of Cu ions and modulation of lignifying enzymes in primary leaves of bean seedlings exposed to excess copper. Biol Trace Elem Res 139:97–10710.1007/s12011-010-8642-0 ↗
8. Pourakbar L, Khayami M, Khara J, Farbodnia T (2007) Physiological effects of copper on some biochemical parameters in Zea mays L. seedlings. Pak J Biol Sci 10(22):4092–409610.3923/pjbs.2007.4092.4096 ↗
9. Kumbhakar DV, Datta AK, Mandal A, Das D, Gupta S, Ghosh B, Halder S, Dey S (2016) Effectivity of copper and cadmium sulphide nanoparticles in mitotic and meiotic cells of Nigella sativa L. (black cumin) – can nanoparticles act as mutagenic agents. J Exp Nanosci 11(11):823–83910.1080/17458080.2016.1149236 ↗
10. Zhu H, Han J, Xiao JQ, Jin Uptake Y (2008) Translocation, and accumulation of manufactured iron oxide nanoparticles by pumpkin plants. J Environ Monit 10:713–71710.1039/b805998e ↗
11. Croteau MN, Misra SK, Luoma SN, Valsami-Jones E (2014) Bioaccumulation and toxicity of CuO nanoparticles by a freshwater invertebrate after waterborne and Dietborne exposures. Environ Sci Technol 48:10929–10937. https://doi.org/10.1021/ES501870310.1021/ES5018703 ↗
12. Shaw AK, Hossain Z (2013) Impact of nano-CuO stress on rice (Oryza sativa L) seedlings. Chemosphere 93:906–91510.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.05.044 ↗
13. Kim S, Lee S, Lee I (2012) Alteration of phytotoxicity and oxidant stress potential by metal oxide nanoparticles in Cucumis sativus. Water Air Soil Pollut 223:2799–280610.1007/s11270-011-1067-3 ↗
14. Atha DH, Wang H, Petersen EJ, Cleveland D, Holbrook RD, Jaruga P, Dizdaroglu M, Nelson BC (2012) Copper oxide nanoparticle mediated DNA damage in terrestrial plant models. Environ Sci Technol 46:1819–182710.1021/es202660k ↗
15. Nizam I, Cubuk MG, Moralar E (2011) Genotype × environment interaction and stability analysis of some Hungarian vetch (Vicia pannonica Crantz.) genotypes. Afr J Agric Res 6(28):6119–6125. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR11.122810.5897/AJAR11.1228 ↗
16. Broughton WJ, Hernandez G, Blair M, Beebe S, Gepts P, Vanderleyden J (2003) Beans (Phaseolus spp.): model food legumes. Plant Soil (Netherlands) 252(1):55–12810.1023/A:1024146710611 ↗
17. Gedik O, Kıran Y, Arabacı T, Kostekci S (2014) Karyological studies on the annual members of the genus Carduus L. (Asteraceae, Cardueae) from Turkey. Caryologia 67(2):135–13910.1080/00087114.2014.931634 ↗
18. Cimen IC, Danabas D, Ates M (2020) Comparative effects of Cu (60–80 nm) and CuO (40 nm) nanoparticles in Artemia salina: Accumulation, elimination and oxidative stress. Sci Total Environ 717:13723010.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137230 ↗
19. Gedik O, Kiran Y, Emre İ, Kurşat M (2016) Karyological Notes for Seven Salvia L. Taxa Grown in Turkey. Cytologia 81(4):395–40210.1508/cytologia.81.395 ↗
20. Tasar N, Dogan G, Kiran Y, Rahman MO, Cakilcioglu U (2018) Morphological, anatomical, and cytological investigatıons on three taxa of Centaurea L. (Asteraceae) from Turkey. Bangladesh J Plant Taxon 25(2):215–22610.3329/bjpt.v25i2.39527 ↗
21. Kurşat M, Emre İ, Gedik O, Kiran Y (2018) Karyological reports for some Salvia taxa from Turkey. Caryologia 71(2):120–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.2018.144762810.1080/00087114.2018.1447628 ↗
22. Tasar N (2022) Mitotic effects of copper oxide nanoparticle on root development and root tip cells of Phaseolus vulgaris L. seeds. Microsc Res Tech 85(12):3895–3907. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.2423910.1002/jemt.24239 ↗
23. Tekin M, Gedik O, Kiran Y, Kurşat M (2016) Karyological studies on six endemic plant taxa in Turkey. Cytologia 81(4):363–370. https://doi.org/10.1508/cytologia.81.36310.1508/cytologia.81.363 ↗
24. Rank J, Nielsen MH (1993) A modified allium test as a tool in the screening of the genotoxicity of complex mixtures. Hereditas 118(1):49–5310.1111/j.1601-5223.1993.t01-3-00049.x ↗
25. Theivasanthi T, Alagar M (2011) Nano sized coper particles by electrolytic Synthesis and Characterizations. Int J Phys Sci 6:3662–3671. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJPS10.11610.5897/IJPS10.116 ↗
26. Genç H, Yildirim B, Açar M, Çetin T (2021) Statistical evaluation of chromosomes of some Lathyrus L. taxa growing in Turkey. Caryologia 74(3):107–117. https://doi.org/10.36253/caryologia112410.36253/caryologia1124 ↗
27. Açar M, Taşar N (2022) A statistical overview to the chromosome characteristics of some Centaurea L. taxa distributed in the Eastern Anatolia (Turkey). Caryologia 75(2):129–141. https://doi.org/10.36253/caryologia-156210.36253/caryologia-1562 ↗
28. Bharathi D, Vasantharaj S, Bhuvaneshwari V (2018) Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Cordia dichotoma fruit extract and its enhanced antibacterial, anti-biofilm and photo catalytic activity. Mater Res Express 5:05540410.1088/2053-1591/aac2ef ↗
29. Nel A, Xia T, Mädler L, Li N (2006) Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 311(5761):622–62710.1126/science.1114397 ↗
30. Bakand S, Hayes A, Dechsakulthorn F (2012) Nanoparticles: a review of particle toxicology following inhalation exposure. Inhal Toxicol 24(2):125–13510.3109/08958378.2010.642021 ↗
31. Zhang R, Zhang H, Tu C, Hu X, Li L, Luo Y, Christie P (2015) Phytotoxicity of ZnO nanoparticles and the released Zn(II) ion to corn (Zea mays L.) and cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) during germination. Environ Sci Pollut R 22:11109–1111710.1007/s11356-015-4325-x ↗
32. Fahmy HM, Ebrahim NM, Gaber MH (2020) In-vitro evaluation of copper/copper oxide nanoparticles cytotoxicity and genotoxicity in normal and cancer lung cell lines. J Trace Elem Med Biol 60:12648110.1016/j.jtemb.2020.126481 ↗
33. Liman R (2013) Genotoxic effects of bismuth (III) oxide nanoparticles by Allium and comet assay. Chemosphere 93(2):269–27310.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.04.076 ↗
34. Karlsson HL, Gustafsson J, Cronholm P, Möller L (2009) Size-dependent toxicity of metal oxide particles a comparison between nano and micrometer size. Toxicol Lett 188(2):112–11810.1016/j.toxlet.2009.03.014 ↗
35. Ghosh M, Bandyopadhyay M, Mukherjee A (2010) Genotoxicity of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles at two trophic levels: plant and human lymphocytes. Chemosphere 81(10):1253–126210.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.09.022 ↗
36. Semisch A, Ohle J, Witt B, Hartwig A (2014) Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of nano-and microparticulate copper oxide: role of solubility and intracellular bioavailability. Part Fibre Toxicol 11(10). https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-11-1010.1186/1743-8977-11-10 ↗
37. Kumari M, Mukherjee A, Chandrasekaran N (2009) Genotoxicity of silver nanoparticles in Allium cepa. Sci Total Environ 407(19):5243–524610.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.06.024 ↗
38. Ghosh M, Chakraborty A, Bandyopadhyay M, Mukherjee A (2011) Multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT): induction of DNA damage in plant and mammalian cells. J Hazard Mater 197:327–33610.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.09.090 ↗
39. Schwerdtle T, Hamann I, Jahnke G, Walter I, Richter C, Parsons JL, Dianov G, Hartwig A (2007) Impact of copper on the induction and repair of oxidative DNA damage, poly (ADP ribosyl) ation and PARP1 activity. Mol Nutr Food Res 51(2):201–21010.1002/mnfr.200600107 ↗
40. Rank J, Nielsen MH (1997) Allium cepa anaphase–telophase root tip chromosome aberration assay on N-methyl-N-nitrosourea, maleic hydrazide, sodium azide, and ethyl methanesulfonate. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 390(1):121–12710.1016/S0165-1218(97)00008-6 ↗
41. Goujon E, Sta C, Trivella A, Goupil P, Richard C, Ledoigt G (2014) Genotoxicity of sulcotrione pesticide and photoproducts on Allium cepa root meristem. Pestic Biochem Physiol 113:47–5410.1016/j.pestbp.2014.06.002 ↗
42. Webster PL, Davidson D (1969) Changes in the duration of the mitotic cycle induced by colchicine and indol-3yl-acetic acid in Vicia faba roots. J Exp Bot 20(3):671–68510.1093/jxb/20.3.671 ↗
43. Dietz KJ, Herth S (2011) Plant nanotoxicology. Trends Plant Sci 16(11):582–58910.1016/j.tplants.2011.08.003 ↗
44. Magdolenova Z, Collins A, Kumar A, Dhawan A, Stone V, Dusinska M (2014) Mechanisms of genotoxicity. A review of in vitro and in vivo studies with engineered nanoparticles. Nanotoxicology 8(3):233–27810.3109/17435390.2013.773464 ↗
45. Vodicka P, Kumar R, Stetina R, Sanyal S, Soucek P, Haufroid V, Maria Dusinska M, Kuricova M, Zamecnikova M, Musak L, Buchancova J, Norppa H, Hirvonen A, Vodickova L, Naccarati A, Matousu Z, Hemminki K (2004) Genetic polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and possible links with DNA repair rates, chromosomal aberrations and single-strand breaks in DNA. Carcinogenesis 25(5):757–76310.1093/carcin/bgh064 ↗
46. Biswas MS, Hassan J, Hossain MM (2010) Assessment of genetic diversity in French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) based on RAPD marker. Afr J Biotechnol 9(32):5073–5077
47. Patil BC, Bhat GI (1992) A comparative study of MH and EMS in the induction of chromosomal aberrations on lateral root meristem in Clitoria ternatea L. Cytologia 57(2):259–26410.1508/cytologia.57.259 ↗
48. Badr A (1983) Mitodepressive and chromotoxic activities of two herbicides in Allium cepa. Cytologia 48(3):451–45710.1508/cytologia.48.451 ↗
49. Shahin SA, El-Amoodi KH (1991) Induction of numerical chromosomal aberrations during DNA synthesis using the fungicides nimrod and rubigan-4 in root tips of Vicia faba L. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol 261(3):169–17610.1016/0165-1218(91)90064-S ↗
50. Voutsinas G, Zarani FE, Kappas A (1997) The effect of environmental aneuploidy inducing agents on the microtubule architecture of mitotic meristematic root cells in Hordeum vulgare. Cell Biol Int 21(7):411–41810.1006/cbir.1997.0171 ↗
51. Gaulden ME (1987) Hypothesis: some mutagens directly alter specific chromosomal proteins (DNA topoisomerase II and peripheral proteins) to produce chromosome stickiness, which causes chromosome aberrations. Mutagenesis 2(5):357–36510.1093/mutage/2.5.357 ↗
52. Chandirasekar R, Kumar BL, Sasikala K, Jayakumar R, Suresh K, Venkatesan R, Jacob R, Krishnapriya EK, Kavitha H, Ganesh GK (2014) Assessment of genotoxic and molecular mechanisms of cancer risk in smoking and smokeless tobacco users. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 767:21–2710.1016/j.mrgentox.2014.04.007 ↗