Optimization of hydrophilic SiO2/SDS dispersions in decentralized system: experiments and RSM/CCD
Source abstract
Abstract
Foam plugging performance was of great significance for improving oil recovery in reservoir development. In view of the agglomeration phenomenon of SiO2, molecular dynamics simulation was used to verify whether hydrophilic or hydrophobic modification had better dispersion effect on nanoparticles. The effect of SiO2 dispersion was verified by establishing gas–liquid interface model based on molecular dynamics. Meanwhile, SiO2 nanoparticles were modified and the best modification effect was characterized compared with the first modification and the second modification. The dispersion effect of SiO2 nanoparticles was researched by measuring the particle size, observing the morphology by the TEM test and measuring the specific surface area. The foam performance stabilized by SiO2 was evaluated in terms of single factor and multi-factor experimental design through RSM/CCD. According to the result analysis, the modification effect represented hydrophilic was more suitable considering dispersion. Good dispersion of SiO2 nanoparticles was beneficial to slow the decay of foam dispersions and limit the diffusion of water molecules due to interfacial interaction. The effects of second modification were more hydrophilic than the first through FT-IR and TGA. The interfacial tension test showed that the hydrophilic foam dispersion had better foam stability. The optimum foaming condition for single factor was respectively achieved at hydrophilic SiO2 1.5 wt.%, the pH values with 7 and the temperature of 30 °C. The optimum conditions of the foaming volume for multi-factors were 1.506 wt.% hydrophilic SiO2, pH of 8.220 and 31.306 °C, respectively. The best conditions for the half-life were presented to be 1.352 wt.% hydrophilic SiO2, the pH of 7.884 and 26.139 °C, respectively. The maximum foam volume and foam half-life predicted by design 10.0 were 750.241 mL and 358.474 min. Therefore, it was significant to modify the surface of SiO2 nanoparticles (5–25 μm) for improving the dispersion and strengthening the foam stability in high permeability reservoir. Graphical abstract
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques · Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization · Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Silva AL, Farias AF, Pontes JR, Rodrigues AM, Costa AC (2020) Synthesis of the ZnO-Ni0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4-Fe2O3 magnetic catalyst in pilot-scale by combustion reaction and its application on the biodiesel production process from oil residual. Arab J Chem 13:7665–7679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2020.09.00310.1016/j.arabjc.2020.09.003 ↗
2. Liu N, Chen X, Ju B, He Y, Yang Y, Brantson E, Tian Y (2021) Microbubbles generation by an orifice spraying method in a water-gas dispersion flooding system for enhanced oil recovery. J Petrol Sci Eng 198:108196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.10819610.1016/j.petrol.2020.108196 ↗
3. Sonn JS, Lee JY, Jo SH, Yoon IH, Jung CH, Lim JC (2018) Effect of surface modification of silica nanoparticles by silane coupling agent on decontamination foam stability. Ann Nucl Energy 114:11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.12.00710.1016/j.anucene.2017.12.007 ↗
4. Liang SX, Tm F, Xiong W, Ding B, Yan YG, Zhang J (2019) Oil detachment by modified nanoparticles: a molecular dynamics simulation study. Comp Mater Sci 170:109177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.10917710.1016/j.commatsci.2019.109177 ↗
5. Dippong T, Levei EA, Goga F, Petean I, Avram A, Cadar O (2019) The impact of polyol structure on the formation of Zn0.6Co0.4Fe2O4 spinel-based pigments. J Sol-Gel Sci Techn 92:736–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10971-019-05140-x10.1007/s10971-019-05140-x ↗
6. Dippong T, Levei EA, Lengauer CL, Daniel A, Toloman D, Cadar O (2020) Investigation of thermal, structural, morphological and photocatalytic properties of CuxCo1-xFe2O4 (0 ≤ x ≤ 1) nanoparticles embedded in SiO2 matrix. Mater Charact 163:110268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2020.11026810.1016/j.matchar.2020.110268 ↗
7. Inan B, Özçimen D (2021) Preparation and characterization of microalgal oil loaded alginate/poly (vinyl alcohol) electrosprayed nanoparticles. Food Bioprod Process 129:105–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2021.07.00810.1016/j.fbp.2021.07.008 ↗
8. Jiang F, Yang L, Wang S, Ying X, Ling J (2021) Fabrication and characterization of zein-alginate oligosaccharide complex nanoparticles as delivery vehicles of curcumin. J MOL LIQ 8:116937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2021.11693710.1016/j.molliq.2021.116937 ↗
9. Yan X, Diao M, Yu Y, Gao F, Wang E, Wang Z, Zhang T, Zhao P (2021) Characterization of resistant starch nanoparticles prepared via debranching and nanoprecipitation. Food Chem 14:130824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.13082410.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130824 ↗
10. Dippong T, Levei EA, Borodi G, Firuta G, Lucian BT (2015) Influence of Co/Fe ratio on the oxide phases in nanoparticles of CoxFe3−xO4. J. Therm Anal Calorim 119:1001–1009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-014-4280-710.1007/s10973-014-4280-7 ↗
11. HurtadoY FCA, Riazi M, Cortés FB (2020) Improving the stability of nitrogen foams using silica nanoparticles coated with polyethylene glycol. J Contam Hydrol 300:112256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2019.11225610.1016/j.molliq.2019.112256 ↗
12. Abbas S, Allahyar D, Mohsen A (2022) Experimental investigation of the adsorption process of the surfactant-nanoparticle combination onto the carbonate reservoir rock surface in the enhanced oil recovery (EOR) process. J Chem Thermodyn 6:100036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctta.2022.10003610.1016/j.ctta.2022.100036 ↗
13. Li Q, Valentina P (2021) Measuring and modeling nanoparticle transport by foam in porous media. J Contam Hydrol 198:103881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2021.10388110.1016/j.jconhyd.2021.103881 ↗
14. Reza H, Saber M, Arash MD, Fatemeh MA (2021) Enhancement of smart water-based foam characteristics by SiO2 nanoparticles for EOR applications. Colloid Surface A 627:127143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.12714310.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.127143 ↗
15. Harati S, Bayat AE, Sarvestani MT (2021) Assessing the effects of different gas types on stability of SiO2 nanoparticle foam for enhanced oil recovery purpose. J Contam Hydrol 313:113521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2020.11352110.1016/j.molliq.2020.113521 ↗
16. Zhang Y, Liu Q, Ye H, Yang L, Luo D, Peng B (2021) Nanoparticles as foam stabilizer: mechanism, control parameters and application in foam flooding for enhanced oil recovery. J Petrol Sci Eng 202:108561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.10856110.1016/j.petrol.2021.108561 ↗
17. Takari A, Ghasemi AR, Hamadanian M, Sarafrazi M, Najafidoust A (2021) Molecular dynamics simulation and thermo-mechanical characterization for optimization of three-phase epoxy/TiO2/SiO2 nano-composites. Polym Test 193:106890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.10689010.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106890 ↗
18. Al-Raeei M, El-Daher MS (2018) Analytical static structure factor for a two-component system interacting via van der Waals potential. Pramana-J Phys 90:60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-018-1550-010.1007/s12043-018-1550-0 ↗
19. Donya P, Hosein R, Rafat P, Masoud R (2019) A pore-scale study on improving CTAB foam stability in heavy crude oil−water system using TiO2 nanoparticles. J Petrol Sci Eng 183:106411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.10641110.1016/j.petrol.2019.106411 ↗
20. Daria AG, Tamara SK, Olesia AR, Valery A (2021) Svetlichnyi, Water–ethanol CuOx nanoparticle colloids prepared by laser ablation: colloid stability and catalytic properties in nitrophenol hydrogenation. Colloid Surface A 613:126115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.12611510.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.126115 ↗
21. Gu CY, Di QF, Fang HP (2007) Slip velocity model of porous walls absorbed by hydrophobic nanoparticles SiO2. J Hydrodyn 19:365–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(07)60071-710.1016/S1001-6058(07)60071-7 ↗
22. Heydari-Farsani E, Neilson J, Alsop G, Hamidi H (2020) The effect of rock type on natural water flooding and residual oil saturation below free water level and oil water contact: a case study from the Middle East. J Pertol Sci Eng 193:107392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.10739210.1016/j.petrol.2020.107392 ↗
23. Jing W, Fu S, Zhang L, Li A, Ren X, Xu X, Gao Z (2021) Pore scale experimental and numerical study of surfactant flooding for enhanced oil recovery. J Pertol Sci Eng 196:107999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.10799910.1016/j.petrol.2020.107999 ↗
24. Mohammad S, Ahmad T, Lasse R (2020) Optimization of γ-alumina porosity via response surface methodology: the influence of engineering support on the performance of a residual oil hydrotreating catalyst. Micropor Mesopor Mat 299:110124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2020.11012410.1016/j.micromeso.2020.110124 ↗
25. Ramoni M, Bassi MJ, Wouk L, Pacheco KR, Fernández AB, Renzi W, Duarte JL, Rocco ML, Roman LS (2021) Morphology, photoexcitation dynamics and stability of water-dispersed nanoparticle films based on semiconducting copolymer. Thin Solid Films 721:138536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2021.13853610.1016/j.tsf.2021.138536 ↗
26. Sun Q, Li ZM, Wang JQ, Li SY, Li BF, Jiang L, Wang HY, Zhang C, Liu W (2015) Aqueous foam stabilized by partially hydrophobic nanoparticles in the presence of surfactant. Contents lists available at ScienceDirect. J Clean Prod 471:54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.02.00710.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.02.007 ↗
27. Nurudeen Y, Eswaran P, Ahmad KI (2019) Synergistic effects of nanoparticles and surfactants on n-decane-water interfacial tension and bulk foam stability at high temperature. J Petrol Sci Eng 179:814–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.04.10910.1016/j.petrol.2019.04.109 ↗
28. Pouya T, Seyed RS, Farzan H, Moslem F (2020) Effects of synthesized nanoparticles and Henna-Tragacanth solutions on oil/water interfacial tension: nanofluids stability considerations. Petroleum 6:293–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2020.03.00110.1016/j.petlm.2020.03.001 ↗
29. Ranjbarzadeh R, Moradikazerouni A, Bakhtiari R, Asadi A, Afrand M (2019) An experimental study on stability and thermal conductivity of water/silica nanofluid: eco-friendly production of nanoparticles. J Clean Prod 206:1089–1100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.20510.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.205 ↗
30. Taherialekouhi R, Rasouli S, Khosravi A (2019) An experimental study on stability and thermal conductivity of water-graphene oxide/aluminum oxide nanoparticles as a cooling hybrid nanofluid. Int J Heat Mass Tran 145:118751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.11875110.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.118751 ↗
31. Liu N, Ju B, Chen X, Brantson E, Wang J (2021) Experimental study of the dynamic mechanism on gas bubbles migration, fragment, coalescence and trapping in a porous media. J Petrol Sci Eng 181:106192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.10619210.1016/j.petrol.2019.106192 ↗