Quantification of the efficiency of magnetic targeting of nanoparticles using finite element analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The lack of efficient drug delivery to tumor cells has led to investigations into the administration of magnetic drugs, which use magnetic fields to target treatment to specific organs, thereby reducing side effects compared to traditional treatments. The dynamics of MTD in breast arteries are currently unknown and can be modeled using second-order differential equations. Blood flow is generally assumed to be a non-Newtonian fluid due to its viscosity characteristics. In this study, we modeled the targeting efficiency of magnetic nanoparticles with sizes of 50 nm, 100 nm, and 200 nm under a constant magnetic field of 0.12 T using a computational tool based on the finite element technique. Our results showed that magnetic nanoparticle targeting efficiency was highest with simulated magnetic fields located 5 cm, 7.5 cm, and 15 cm away from the tumor when using nanoparticles of 50 nm and 100 nm.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery · Characterization and Applications of Magnetic Nanoparticles · Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Alexiou C, Arnold W, Klein RJ, Parak FG, Hulin P, Bergemann C, Erhardt W, Wagenpfeil S, Lubbe AS (2002) Locoregional cancer treatment with magnetic drug targeting. Cancer Res 60(23):6641–6648
2. Alexiou C, Schmidt A, Klein R, Hulin P, Bergemann C, Arnold W (2002) Magnetic drug targeting: biodistribution and dependency on magnetic field strength. J Magn Magn Mater 252(1-3 SPEC. ISS): 363-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-8853(02)00605-4-1110.1016/S0304-8853(02)00605-4-11 ↗
3. Berry CC, Curtis ASG (2003) Functionalisation of magnetic nanoparticles for applications in biomedicine. J Phys D Appl Phys 36(13). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/36/13/20310.1088/0022-3727/36/13/203 ↗
4. Grief AD, Richardson G (2005) Mathematical modelling of magnetically targeted drug delivery. J Magn Magn Mater 293(1):455–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2005.02.04010.1016/j.jmmm.2005.02.040 ↗
5. Nacev A, Beni C, Bruno O, Shapiro B (2011) The behaviors of ferromagnetic nano-particles in and around blood vessels under applied magnetic fields. J Magn Magn Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2010.09.00810.1016/j.jmmm.2010.09.008 ↗
6. Chen J, Yuan M, Madison CA, Eitan S, Wang Y (2022) Blood-brain barrier crossing using magnetic stimulated nanoparticles. J Control Release 345(March):557–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.03.00710.1016/j.jconrel.2022.03.007 ↗
7. Senyei AE, Widder KJ, Reich SD, Gonczy C (1981) In vivo kinetics of magnetically targeted low-dose doxorubicin. J Pharm Sci 70(4):389–391. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.260070041210.1002/jps.2600700412 ↗
8. Morsi SA, Alexander AJ (1972) An investigation of particle trajectories in two-phase flow systems. J Fluid Mech 55(2):193-208 (1972) https://doi.org/10.1017/S002211207200180610.1017/S0022112072001806 ↗
9. Lubbe AS, Alexiou C, Bergemann C (2001) Clinical applications of magnetic drug targeting. J Surg Res 95(2):200-206. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsre.2000.603010.1006/jsre.2000.6030 ↗
10. Chen J, Lu XY (2004) Numerical investigation of the non-Newtonian blood flow in a bifurcation model with a non-planar branch. J Biomech 37(12):1899–1911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.03010.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.030 ↗
11. Avilés MO, Ebner AD, Chen H, Rosengart AJ, Kaminski MD, Ritter JA (2005) Theoretical analysis of a transdermal ferromagnetic implant for retention of magnetic drug carrier particles. J Magn Magn Mater 293(1):605–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2005.01.08910.1016/j.jmmm.2005.01.089 ↗
12. Maier-Hauff K, Ulrich F, Nestler D, Niehoff H, Wust P, Thiesen B, Orawa H, Budach V, Jordan A (2011) Efficacy and safety of intratumoral thermotherapy using magnetic iron-oxide nanoparticles radiotherapy on patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. J Neuro-Oncol 103(2):317–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-010-0389-010.1007/s11060-010-0389-0 ↗
13. Wang C, Sun X, Cheng L, Yin S, Yang G, Li Y, Liu Z (2014) Multifunctional theranostic red blood cells for magnetic-field-enhanced in vivo combination therapy of cancer. Adv Mater 26(28):4794–4802. https://doi.org/10.121002/adma.20140015810.1002/adma.201400158 ↗
14. Pouponneau P, Soulez G, Beaudoin G, Leroux JC, Martel S (2014) MR imaging of therapeutic magnetic microcarriers guided by magnetic resonance navigation for targeted liver chemoembolization. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 37(3):784–790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-013-0770-410.1007/s00270-013-0770-4 ↗
15. Bharai Vaj y BK, Mabon RF, Giddens DP (1982) Steady flow in a model of the human carotid bifurcation. Part I-Flow Visualization* J Biomechanics 15(5), 349-36210.1016/0021-9290(82)90057-4 ↗
16. Palmen DEM, Gijsen FJH, Van De Vosse FN, Janssen JD, Palmen DEM, Gijsen FJH, Janssen FN (1997) Diagnostic minor stenoses in carotid artery bifurcation models using the disturbed velocity field. J Vasc Investig
17. Ritter JA, Ebner AD, Daniel KD, Stewart KL (2004) Application of high gradient magnetic separation principles to magnetic drug targeting. J Magn Magn Mater 280(2–3):184–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2004.03.01210.1016/j.jmmm.2004.03.012 ↗
18. Haverkort JW, Kenjerěs S, Kleijn CR (2009) Computational simulations of magnetic particle capture in arterial flows. Ann Biomed Eng 37(12):2436–2448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-009-9786-y10.1007/s10439-009-9786-y ↗
19. Tan J, Thomas A, Liu Y (2012) Influence of red blood cells on nanoparticle targeted delivery in microcirculation. Soft Matter 8(6), 1934. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2sm06391c10.1039/c2sm06391c ↗
20. Riaño Rivera A, Francisco PB (2019) Rodríguez Patarroyo JD (2019) Kinetic model of the dispersive interaction between a particle with an erythrocyte. Visión Electrónica Visión Electrónica Más que un estado soólido 13(1):33–38
21. Roa-Barrantes LM, Rodríguez Patarroyo DJ (2022) Magnetic field effect on the magnetic nanoparticles trajectories in pulsating blood flow: a computational model. BioNanoSci 12:571–58110.1007/s12668-022-00949-3 ↗
22. Camargo LH, Pacheco J, Rodriguez DJ (2021) Simulation of magnetic particle capture in the breast. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1730(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1730/1/01200410.1088/1742-6596/1730/1/012004 ↗
23. Lunnoo T, Puangmali T (2015) Capture efficiency of biocompatible magnetic nanoparticles in arterial flow: a computer simulation for magnetic drug targeting. Nanoscale Res Lett 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-015-1127-510.1186/s11671-015-1127-5 ↗
24. COMSOL I (2012) Introduction to COMSOL Multiphysics 13
25. Cregg PJ, Murphy K, Mardinoglu A (2012) Inclusion of interactions in mathematical modelling of implant assisted magnetic drug targeting. Appl Math Model 36(1):1–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2011.05.03610.1016/j.apm.2011.05.036 ↗
26. Sharma S, Katiyar VK, Singh U (2015) Mathematical modelling for trajectories of magnetic nanoparticles in a blood vessel under magnetic field. J Magn Magn Mater 379:102–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.12.01210.1016/j.jmmm.2014.12.012 ↗
27. Rukshin I, Mohrenweiser J, Yue P, Afkhami S (2017) Modeling superparamagnetic particles in blood flow for applications in magnetic drug targeting. Fluids 2(2):1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids202002910.3390/fluids2020029 ↗
28. Mohammed L, Gomaa HG, Ragab D, Zhu J (2017) Magnetic nanoparticles for environmental and biomedical applications: a review. Particuology 30:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2016.06.00110.1016/j.partic.2016.06.001 ↗
29. Morega AM, Dobre AA, Morega M (2010) Numerical simulation of magnetic drug targeting with flow - structural interaction in an arterial branchin. Romania10.1109/ITAB.2010.5687648 ↗
30. Cherry E, Eaton J (2013) Simulation of magnetic particles in the bloodstream for magnetic drug targeting applications. 8th International Conference on Multiphase Flow, 12
31. Calvo Plaza FJ (2006) Simulación del flujo sanguíneo y su interacción con la pared arterial mediante modelos de elementos finitos. PhD thesis, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
32. Apostolidis AJ, Moyer AP, Beris AN (2015) Non-Newtonian effects in simulations of coronary arterial blood flow. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 233:155–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnnfm.2016.03.00810.1016/j.jnnfm.2016.03.008 ↗
33. Kayal S, Bandyopadhyay D, Mandal TK, Ramanujan RV (2011) The flow of magnetic nanoparticles in magnetic drug targeting. RSC Adv 1(2):238. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1ra00023c10.1039/c1ra00023c ↗
34. Zhang X, Zheng L, Luo M, Shu C, Wang E (2020) Evaluation of particle shape, size and magnetic field intensity for targeted delivery efficiency and plaque injury in treating atherosclerosis. Powder Technol 366:63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2020.02.00310.1016/j.powtec.2020.02.003 ↗
35. Larimi MM, Ramiar A, Ranjbar AA (2014) Numerical simulation of magnetic nanoparticles targeting in a bifurcation vessel. J Magn Magn Mater 362:58–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.03.00210.1016/j.jmmm.2014.03.002 ↗
36. Gupta AK, Gupta M (2005) Synthesis and surface engineering of iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Biomaterials 26(18):3995-4021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.10.01210.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.10.012 ↗
37. Socoliuc V, Peddis D, Petrenko V, Avdeev M, Susan-Resiga D, Szabó T, Turcu R, Tombácz E, Vékás L (2020) Magnetic nanoparticle systems for nanomedicine-a materials science perspective. Magnetochemistry 6(1):2. https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry601000210.3390/magnetochemistry6010002 ↗