journal article·2023-03

Tunable microwave susceptibility of thin truncated conical permalloy nanodisks : a micromagnetic investigation

Akhila Priya Kotti, Rahul Sahu, Prerit Tandon, Amaresh Chandra Mishra

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 25· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Dynamic susceptibility of thin truncated conical permalloy nanodisk with height 20 nm is simulated using micromagnetic simulations. Starting from a relaxed magnetic vortex state, the effect of tapering on the resonant modes is analyzed by changing the bottom radius (R = 50 nm to 100 nm) and top radius (r = 10 nm to R − 10 nm) of the conical nanodisk. When an in-plane excitation field pulse is applied, the lowest resonant peak frequency increases with increase in r. This mode is originated due to vortex core translation and the variation of the resonant peak with r is well explained using Thiele’s equation. Other resonant modes appear at higher excitation frequencies which are identified as azimuthal modes. When an out-of-plane excitation field is applied, all the spin wave modes appear to be axially symmetric. Appearance of new resonant modes and shifting of the resonant frequency is recorded by changing either of the parameter r or R for both the excitation field directions. The spatial distribution of FFT of magnetization at each resonant mode links the area of nanodisk that has maximum contribution to each mode and combining this with average center of magnetization perturbation, shifting of resonance frequency is explained successfully. The findings from this study prove that tunable resonant frequency can be achieved by tapering of truncated conical nanodisks.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. Parkin S, Yang SH (2015) Memory on the racetrack. Nat Nanotechnol 10(3):195–198. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2015.4110.1038/nnano.2015.41 ↗
2. Dieny B, Prejbeanu IL, Garello K et al (2020) Opportunities and challenges for spintronics in the microelectronics industry. Nat Electron 3(8):446–459. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-020-0461-510.1038/s41928-020-0461-5 ↗
3. Cowburn R (2002) Magnetic nanodots for device applications. J Magn Magn Mater 242:505–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-8853(01)01086-110.1016/S0304-8853(01)01086-1 ↗
4. Eichwald I, Bartel A, Kiermaier J et al (2012) Nanomagnetic logic: error-free, directed signal transmission by an inverter chain. IEEE Trans Magn 48(11):4332–4335. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2012.219603010.1109/TMAG.2012.2196030 ↗
5. Liu J, Su D, Wu K et al (2020) High-moment magnetic nanoparticles. J Nanoparticle Res 22(3):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-020-4758-010.1007/s11051-020-4758-0 ↗
6. Merbouche H, Collet M, Evelt M et al (2021) Frequency filtering with a magnonic crystal based on nanometer-thick yttrium iron garnet films. ACS Appl Nano Mater 4(1):121–128. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.0c0238210.1021/acsanm.0c02382 ↗
7. Guerra Y, Viana BC, Padron-Hernandez E (2022) FMR by micromagnetic simulation in modulated FeCo nanowires. J Supercond Nov Magn 35(3):825–831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10948-021-06114-310.1007/s10948-021-06114-3 ↗
8. Saavedra E, Saez G, Diaz P et al (2019) Dynamic susceptibility of modulated magnetic nanowires. AIP Adv 9(6). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.509181310.1063/1.5091813 ↗
9. Bisero D, Cremon P, Madami M et al (2011) Effect of dipolar interaction on the magnetization state of chains of rectangular particles located either head-to-tail or side-by-side. J Nanoparticle Res 13(11):5691–5698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-011-0288-010.1007/s11051-011-0288-0 ↗
10. Krone P, Makarov D, Cattoni A et al (2011) Investigation of the magnetization reversal of a magnetic dot array of Co/Pt multilayers. J Nanoparticle Res 13(11):5587–5593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-010-0123-z10.1007/s11051-010-0123-z ↗
11. Guimaraes AP (2009) Principles of nanomagnetism, vol 7. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59409-510.1007/978-3-642-01482-6 ↗
12. Mu C, Jing J, Dong J et al (2019) Static and dynamic characteristics of magnetism in permalloy oval nanoring by micromagnetic simulation. J Magn Magn Mater 474:301–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.11.04910.1016/j.jmmm.2018.11.049 ↗
13. XianYu ZN, Du A (2020) Dynamic susceptibility in torus nanoring with canted external dc magnetic field. J Magn Magn Mater 511:166,955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.16695510.1016/j.jmmm.2020.166955 ↗
14. Boust F, Vukadinovic N, Labbe S (2004) High-frequency susceptibility of soft ferromagnetic nanodots. J Magn Magn Mater 272:708–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2003.11.25710.1016/j.jmmm.2003.11.257 ↗
15. Vigo-Cotrina H, Guimaraes A (2021) Spin wave modes of nanoellipses with a magnetic radial vortex configuration. J Magn Magn Mater 518:167,377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.16737710.1016/j.jmmm.2020.167377 ↗
16. Taurel B, Valet T, Naletov VV et al (2016) Complete mapping of the spin-wave spectrum in a vortex-state nanodisk. Phys Rev B 93(18):184,427. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.18442710.1103/PhysRevB.93.184427 ↗
17. Peng Y, Zhao G, Morvan F et al (2017) Dynamic micromagnetic simulation of the magnetic spectrum of permalloy nanodot array with vortex state. J Magn Magn Mater 422:57–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.08.06010.1016/j.jmmm.2016.08.060 ↗
18. Luo J, Zheng H, Chen W et al (2019a) Conical-shaped hexagonal barium ferrite nanodot arrays on an alumina substrate based on an ultrathin alumina mask method. J Magn Magn Mater 489:165,449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.16544910.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165449 ↗
19. Luo J, Zheng H, Deng J et al (2019b) Micromagnetic simulation of dynamic magnetic susceptibility and magnetostatic interaction fields of conical-shaped barium ferrite nanodot arrays. J Phys D Appl Phys 52(40):405,001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ab313710.1088/1361-6463/ab3137 ↗
20. Sahu R, Mishra AC (2022) Magnetization reversal and ground states in thin truncated conical nanodisks: analytical and micromagnetic modelling approach. J Magn Magn Mater 556:169,356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2022.16935610.1016/j.jmmm.2022.169356 ↗
21. Ma Y, Song C, Jin C et al (2019) Microwave-driven dynamic switching of the radial vortex in a nanodot by micromagnetic simulation. J Phys D Appl Phys 52(19):195,001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ab035610.1088/1361-6463/ab0356 ↗
22. Kumar D, Adeyeye A (2017) Techniques in micromagnetic simulation and analysis. J Phys D Appl Phys 50(34):343,001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/aa7c0410.1088/1361-6463/aa7c04 ↗
23. Iacob N, Kuncser A, Comanescu C et al (2020) Optimization of magnetic fluid hyperthermia with respect to nanoparticle shape-related parameters: case of magnetite ellipsoidal nanoparticles. J Nanoparticle Res 22(6):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-020-04842-610.1007/s11051-020-04842-6 ↗
24. Schoberl J (1997) NETGEN an advancing front 2D/3D-mesh generator based on abstract rules. Comput Vis Sci 1(1):41–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00791005000410.1007/s007910050004 ↗
25. Renuka Balakrishna A, James RD (2021) A solution to the permalloy problem—a micromagnetic analysis with magnetostriction. Appl Phys Lett 118(21):212,404. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.005136010.1063/5.0051360 ↗
26. Coey JMD (2001) Materials for spin electronics. Springer, Berlin, pp 277–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45258-3_1210.1007/3-540-45258-3_12 ↗
27. Bozorth RM (1993) Ferromagnetism. D. Van Nostrand Company10.1109/9780470544624 ↗
28. Valletta R, Guthmiller G, Gorman G (1991) Relation of thickness and some physical properties of nife thin films. J Vacuum Sci Technol A Vacuum Surf Films 9(4):2093–2098. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.57723210.1116/1.577232 ↗
29. Wei J, Zhu Z, Song C et al (2016) Annealing influence on the exchange stiffness constant of permalloy films with stripe domains. J Phys D Appl Phys 49(26):265,002. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/49/26/26500210.1088/0022-3727/49/26/265002 ↗
30. Sipr O, Mankovsky S, Ebert H (2019) Spin wave stiffness and exchange stiffness of doped permalloy via ab initio calculations. Phys Rev B 100(2):024,435. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.02443510.1103/PhysRevB.100.024435 ↗
31. Venkat G, Venkateswarlu D, Joshi R et al (2018) Enhanced spin wave propagation in magnonic rings by bias field modulation. AIP Adv 8(5):056,006. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.500657610.1063/1.5006576 ↗
32. Rao S, Rhensius J, Bisig A et al (2015) Time-resolved imaging of pulse-induced magnetization reversal with a microwave assist field. Sci Rep 5(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep1069510.1038/srep10695 ↗
33. Fischbacher T, Franchin M, Bordignon G et al (2007) A systematic approach to multiphysics extensions of finite-element-based micromagnetic simulations: NMAG. IEEE Trans Magn 43 (6):2896–2898. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2007.89384310.1109/TMAG.2007.893843 ↗
34. Baker A, Beg M, Ashton G et al (2017) Proposal of a micromagnetic standard problem for ferromagnetic resonance simulations. J Magn Magn Mater 421:428–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.08.00910.1016/j.jmmm.2016.08.009 ↗
35. McMichael RD, Stiles MD (2005) Magnetic normal modes of nanoelements. J Appl Phys 97(10):10J901. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.185219110.1063/1.1852191 ↗
36. Djuhana D, Rohman L, Kim D (2017) Micromagnetic calculation of the dynamic susceptibility spectra in LSMO ferromagnetic nanopillars. J Magn 22(3):364–368. https://doi.org/10.4283/JMAG.2017.22.3.36410.4283/JMAG.2017.22.3.364 ↗
37. Ramachandran P, Varoquaux G (2011) Mayavi: 3D visualization of scientific data. Comput Sci Eng 13(2):40–51. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2011.3510.1109/MCSE.2011.35 ↗
38. Ahrens J, Geveci B, Law C (2005) Paraview: An end-user tool for large data visualization. Vis Handbook 717(8)10.1016/B978-012387582-2/50038-1 ↗
39. Ayachit U (2015) The paraview guide: a parallel visualization application. Kitware, Inc
40. Boust F, Vukadinovic N (2004) Micromagnetic simulations of vortex-state excitations in soft magnetic nanostructures. Phys Rev B 70(17):172,408. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.70.17240810.1103/PhysRevB.70.172408 ↗
41. Feldtkeller E, Thomas H (1965) Struktur und energie von blochlinien in dunnen ferromagnetischen schichten. Phys der kondensierten Materie 4(1):8–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0242325610.1007/BF02423256 ↗
42. Guslienko KY, Ivanov B, Novosad V et al (2002) Eigenfrequencies of vortex state excitations in magnetic submicron-size disks. J Appl Phys 91(10):8037–8039. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.145081610.1063/1.1450816 ↗
43. Guslienko KY, Han X, Keavney D et al (2006) Magnetic vortex core dynamics in cylindrical ferromagnetic dots. Phys Rev Lett 96(6):067,205. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.06720510.1103/PhysRevLett.96.067205 ↗
44. Park J, Crowell P (2005) Interactions of spin waves with a magnetic vortex. Phys Rev Lett 95(16):167,201. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.16720110.1103/PhysRevLett.95.167201 ↗
45. Neudecker I, Perzlmaier K, Hoffmann F et al (2006) Modal spectrum of permalloy disks excited by in-plane magnetic fields. Phys Rev B 73(13):134,426. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.73.13442610.1103/PhysRevB.73.134426 ↗
46. Guslienko KY, Slavin AN, Tiberkevich V et al (2008) Dynamic origin of azimuthal modes splitting in vortex-state magnetic dots. Phys Rev Lett 101(24):247,203. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.24720310.1103/PhysRevLett.101.247203 ↗
47. Liu Y, Lake RK, Zang J (2018) Shape dependent resonant modes of skyrmions in magnetic nanodisks. J Magn Magn Mater 455:9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2017.07.00710.1016/j.jmmm.2017.07.007 ↗
48. Heinonen O, Schreiber D, Petford-Long A (2007) Micromagnetic modeling of spin-wave dynamics in exchange-biased permalloy disks. Phys Rev B 76 (14):144,407. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.76.14440710.1103/PhysRevB.76.144407 ↗
49. Saavedra E, Palma JL, Escrig J (2022) Dynamic susceptibility spectra of stadium-shaped and elliptical nanostructures. J Magn Magn Mater 541:168,493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2021.16849310.1016/j.jmmm.2021.168493 ↗
50. Khanal S, Sherpa P, Spinu L (2019) Study of static and dynamic properties of planar dumbbell shaped structure of Ni80Fe20. AIP Adv 9(12):125,030. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.512976010.1063/1.5129760 ↗
51. Zaspel C, Wright ES, Galkin AY et al (2009) Frequencies of radially symmetric excitations in vortex state disks. Phys Rev B 80(9):094,415. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.09441510.1103/PhysRevB.80.094415 ↗