journal article·2014-01

The dominant deformation mechanism of nanocrystalline materials with the finest grains: grain boundary sliding or grain boundary migration?

Xueping Han, Jianqiu Zhou, Hongxi Liu, Shu Zhang, Ying Wang, Shuhong Dong

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 16· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

This paper proposes a new composite model which contains two types of grains: the normal nanograins (ranging from 20 to 100 nm) and the finest grains (ranging from 2 to 4 nm). The finest grains were considered to be a part of the triple junctions, denoted as super triple junctions (STJs). The model describes the competition of deformation mechanism between stress-driven migration of grain boundary (GB) and GB sliding in mechanically loaded nanocrystalline materials. In the model, the enhanced strengthening occurs due to the effects of STJs as obstacles for GB sliding; the stress-driven migration of GB lead to the grain growth, which gives rise to a good ductility for nanocrystalline samples under plastic deformation. The dependences of the critical shear stress and energy difference for GB dislocations traversing through STJs and GB migration on some characteristic parameter rs were calculated and analyzed. The analysis demonstrates that the existence of the finest grains will simultaneously lead to good strength and good ductility.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Electromagnetic Effects on Materials · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. Asaro RJ, Krysl P, Kad B (2003) Deformation mechanism transitions in nanoscale fcc metals. Phil Mag Lett 83:733–743. doi: 10.1080/0950083031000161454010.1080/09500830310001614540 ↗
2. Bobylev SV, Gutkin MY, Ovid’ko IA (2004) Transformations of grain boundaries in deformed nanocrystalline materials. Acta Mater 52:3793–3805. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.04.02910.1016/j.actamat.2004.04.029 ↗
3. Carsley J, Fisher A (1998) Mechanical behavior of a bulk nanostructured iron alloy. Metall Mater A 29:2261–227110.1007/s11661-998-0104-3 ↗
4. Carsley J, Milligan W (1995) Glasslike behavior in a nanostructured Fe/Cu alloy. Mater Trans A 26:2479–248110.1007/BF02671262 ↗
5. Chen Y, Schuh CA (2007) Geometric considerations for diffusion in polycrystalline solids. J Appl Phys 101:063524. doi: 10.1063/1.271182010.1063/1.2711820 ↗
6. Chen J, Lu L, Lu K (2006) Hardness and strain rate sensitivity of nanocrystalline Cu. Scripta Mater 54:1913–1918. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.02.02210.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.02.022 ↗
7. Cheng S, Ma E, Trociewitz UP, Han K, Wang Y, Kecskes L, Youssef KM, Koch CC (2005) Tensile properties of in situ consolidated nanocrystalline Cu. Acta Mater 53:1521–1533. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.12.00510.1016/j.actamat.2004.12.005 ↗
8. Dao M, Lu L, Asaro RJ, Dehosson J, Ma E (2007) Toward a quantitative understanding of mechanical behavior of nanocrystalline metals. Acta Mater 55:4041–4065. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.03810.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.038 ↗
9. Falvo M, Superfine R (2000) Mechanics and friction at the nanometer scale. J Nanopart Res 2:237–24810.1023/A:1010017130136 ↗
10. Fan GJ, Fu L, Choo H, Liaw P, Browning N (2006) Uniaxial tensile plastic deformation and grain growth of bulk nanocrystalline alloys. Acta Mater 54:4781–4792. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.01610.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.016 ↗
11. Fang T, Li W, Tao N (2011) Revealing extraordinary intrinsic tensile plasticity in gradient nano-grained copper. Science 331(6024):1587–159010.1126/science.1200177 ↗
12. Farkas D, Frøseth A, Van Swygenhoven H (2006) Grain boundary migration during room temperature deformation of nanocrystalline Ni. Scripta Mater 55:695–698. doi: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.06.03210.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.06.032 ↗
13. Fedorov AA, Gutkin MY, Ovid’ko IA (2003) Transformations of grain boundary dislocation pile-ups in nano- and polycrystalline materials. Acta Mater 51:887–898. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00433-010.1016/S1359-6454(02)00433-0 ↗
14. Gianola DS, Van Petegem S, Legros M, Brandstetter S, Van Swygenhoven H, Hemker KJ (2006) Stress-assisted discontinuous grain growth and its effect on the deformation behavior of nanocrystalline aluminum thin films. Acta Mater 54:2253–2263. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.01.02310.1016/j.actamat.2006.01.023 ↗
15. Gleiter H (1989) Nanocrystalline materials. Prog Mater Sci 33:223–31510.1016/0079-6425(89)90001-7 ↗
16. Gleiter H (2008) Our thoughts are ours, their ends none of our own: are there ways to synthesize materials beyond the limitations of today? Acta Mater 56:5875–5893. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.08.02810.1016/j.actamat.2008.08.028 ↗
17. Gutkin MY, Mikaelyan K (2002) Disclination models of misorientation band generation and propagation. Physica Status Solidi (A) 193(1):35–5210.1002/1521-396X(200209)193:1<35::AID-PSSA35>3.0.CO;2-Y ↗
18. Gutkin MY, Ovid’ko IA (2005) Grain boundary migration as rotational deformation mode in nanocrystalline materials. Appl Phys Lett 87:251916. doi: 10.1063/1.214772110.1063/1.2147721 ↗
19. Gutkin MY, Ovid’ko IA, Skiba NV (2003) Crossover from grain boundary sliding to rotational deformation in nanocrystalline materials. Acta Mater 51:4059–4071. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00226-X10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00226-X ↗
20. Gutkin MY, Ovid’ko IA, Skiba NV (2004) Strengthening and softening mechanisms in nanocrystalline materials under superplastic deformation. Acta Mater 52:1711–1720. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2003.12.01410.1016/j.actamat.2003.12.014 ↗
21. Haslam AJ, Moldovan D, Yamakov V, Wolf D, Phillpot SR, Gleiter H (2003) Stress-enhanced grain growth in a nanocrystalline material by molecular-dynamics simulation. Acta Mater 51:2097–2112. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00011-910.1016/S1359-6454(03)00011-9 ↗
22. Hirth JP, Lothe J (1982) Theory of dislocations. Wiley, Hoboken
23. Hu L, Huo R, Zhou J, Wang Y, Zhang S (2012) The effects of the finest grains on the mechanical behaviours of nanocrystalline materials. J Nanopart Res 14:677–693. doi: 10.1007/s11051-011-0677-410.1007/s11051-011-0677-4 ↗
24. Jia D, Ramesh KT, Ma E (2003) Effects of nanocrystalline and ultrafine grain sizes on constitutive behavior and shear bands in iron. Acta Mater 51:3495–3509. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00169-110.1016/S1359-6454(03)00169-1 ↗
25. Jin M, Minor AM, Stach EA, Morris JW (2004) Direct observation of deformation-induced grain growth during the nanoindentation of ultrafine-grained Al at room temperature. Acta Mater 52:5381–5387. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.07.04410.1016/j.actamat.2004.07.044 ↗
26. Joseph Nathanael A, Mangalaraj D, Chi Chen P, Ponpandian N (2010) Enhanced mechanical strength of hydroxyapatite nanorods reinforced with polyethylene. J Nanopart Res 13:1841–1853. doi: 10.1007/s11051-010-9932-310.1007/s11051-010-9932-3 ↗
27. Li X, Zhou J, Zhu R, Liu Y, Jiang H (2010) Grain rotation dependent non-homogeneous deformation behavior in nanocrystalline materials. Mat Sci Eng A 527:5677–5685. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2010.05.05410.1016/j.msea.2010.05.054 ↗
28. Lu L, Sui M, Lu K (2000) Superplastic extensibility of nanocrystalline copper at room temperature. Science (New York, NY) 287:1463–146610.1126/science.287.5457.1463 ↗
29. Malow T, Koch C (1998) Mechanical properties, ductility, and grain size of nanocrystalline iron produced by mechanical attrition. Metall Mater Trans A 29(9):2285–229510.1007/s11661-998-0106-1 ↗
30. Masumura R, Hazzledine P, Pande C (1998) Yield stress of fine grained materials. Acta Mater 46:4527–453410.1016/S1359-6454(98)00150-5 ↗
31. Meyers MA, Mishra A, Benson DJ (2006) Mechanical properties of nanocrystalline materials. Prog Mater Sci 51(4):427–556. doi: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.08.00310.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.08.003 ↗
32. Morozov NF, Ovid’ko IA, Sheinerman aGA, Aifantis EC (2010) Special rotational deformation as a toughening mechanism in nanocrystalline solids. J Mech Phys Solids 58:1088–1099. doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2010.04.00310.1016/j.jmps.2010.04.003 ↗
33. Morris SJS, Jackson I (2009) Diffusionally assisted grain-boundary sliding and viscoelasticity of polycrystals. J Mech Phys Solids 57:744–761. doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2008.12.00610.1016/j.jmps.2008.12.006 ↗
34. Mukherjee AK (2002) An examination of the constitutive equation for elevated temperature plasticity. Mat Sci Eng A 322:1–22. doi: 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01115-710.1016/S0921-5093(01)01115-7 ↗
35. Murayama M, Howe JM, Hidaka H, Takaki S (2002) Atomic-level observation of disclination dipoles in mechanically milled, nanocrystalline Fe. Science (New York, NY) 295:2433–2435. doi: 10.1126/science.106743010.1126/science.1067430 ↗
36. Narayan J, Venkatesan R, Kvit A (2002) Structure and properties of nanocrystalline zinc films. J Nanopart Res 4(3):265–26910.1023/A:1019925315398 ↗
37. Ovid’ko IA (2002) Deformation of nanostructures. Science (New York, NY) 295:2386. doi: 10.1126/science.107106410.1126/science.1071064 ↗
38. Panigrahi BB, Godkhindi MM (2006) Grain growth in ultrafine titanium powders during sintering. J Nanopart Res 8:627–633. doi: 10.1007/s11051-005-9031-z10.1007/s11051-005-9031-z ↗
39. Sansoz F, Dupont V (2006) Grain growth behavior at absolute zero during nanocrystalline metal indentation. Appl Phys Lett 89:111901. doi: 10.1063/1.235272510.1063/1.2352725 ↗
40. Satta A, Pisanu E, Colombo L, Cleri F (2002) Microstructure evolution at a triple junction in polycrystalline silicon. J Phys 14:13003–13008. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/14/48/344
41. Schiøtz J, Jacobsen KW (2003) A maximum in the strength of nanocrystalline copper. Science (New York, NY) 301:1357–1359. doi: 10.1126/science.108663610.1126/science.1086636 ↗
42. Sergueeva A, Mukherjee A (2006) Crystalline plasticity of nanocrystalline materials at elevated temperatures. Rev Adv Mater Sci 13:1–5
43. Trelewicz JR, Schuh CA (2007) The Hall–Petch breakdown in nanocrystalline metals: a crossover to glass-like deformation. Acta Mater 55:5948–5958. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.07.02010.1016/j.actamat.2007.07.020 ↗
44. Van Vliet KJ, Tsikata S, Suresh S (2003) Model experiments for direct visualization of grain boundary deformation in nanocrystalline metals. Appl Phys Lett 83:1441. doi: 10.1063/1.159741710.1063/1.1597417 ↗
45. Wang H-T, Yang W (2004) Constitutive modeling for nanocrystalline metals based on cooperative grain boundary mechanisms. J Mech Phys Solids 52:1151–1173. doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2003.08.00510.1016/j.jmps.2003.08.005 ↗
46. Wei Y (2004) Grain-boundary sliding and separation in polycrystalline metals: application to nanocrystalline fcc metals. J Mech Phys Solids 52:2587–2616. doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2004.04.00610.1016/j.jmps.2004.04.006 ↗
47. Yamakov V, Wolf D, Phillpot SR, Gleiter H (2002) Grain-boundary diffusion creep in nanocrystalline palladium by molecular-dynamics simulation. Acta Mater 50:61–73. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00329-910.1016/S1359-6454(01)00329-9 ↗
48. Youssef KM, Scattergood RO, Murty KL, Horton Ja, Koch CC, Carolina N (2005) Ultrahigh strength and high ductility of bulk nanocrystalline copper. Appl Phys Lett 87:091904. doi: 10.1063/1.203412210.1063/1.2034122 ↗
49. Zhang K, Weertman JR, Eastman Ja (2005) Rapid stress-driven grain coarsening in nanocrystalline Cu at ambient and cryogenic temperatures. Appl Phys Lett 87:061921. doi: 10.1063/1.200837710.1063/1.2008377 ↗
50. Zheng C, Zhang YW (2006) Atomistic simulations of mechanical deformation of high-angle and low-angle nanocrystalline copper at room temperature. Mat Sci Eng A 423:97–101. doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.01.04010.1016/j.msea.2006.01.040 ↗
51. Zhu B, Asaro RJ, Krysl P, Bailey R (2005) Transition of deformation mechanisms and its connection to grain size distribution in nanocrystalline metals. Acta Mater 53:4825–4838. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.06.03310.1016/j.actamat.2005.06.033 ↗