journal article·2022-10

Effect of real food matrix on the behavior and toxicity of TiO2 nanoparticles

Nurdan Ersöz, Emine Merve Çanga, Seda Yildirim-Elikoglu, Hafize Öz, Fahriye Ceyda Dudak

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 24· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

The interactions between nanoparticles (NPs) and the components of the surrounding environment have been reported to affect the physical and toxicological properties of NPs. In the present study, the effects of the presence of a real food matrix (milk) on the behavior and toxicity of "nano"-sized TiO2 (30 nm; Ti30 and 100 nm; Ti100) particles upon in vitro digestion simulation were evaluated. Before digestion, bare Ti30 and Ti100 were both in a highly aggregated state while the interaction with milk reduced the aggregate sizes, significantly. This reduction is considered to be caused by the steric effect of protein corona, mainly composed of caseins. Upon digestion, the aggregate size of Ti30 and Ti100 in a simplified simulated milk ultrafiltrate buffer (SMUB) remained nearly the same in the oral phase, while a further reduction was observed in gastric and intestinal phases. TiO2 NPs in SMUB did not cause any difference in cell viability while the milk-interacted TiO2 NPs had an adverse effect on cell viability. ROS generation was remarkably increased for high NP concentration which is more pronounced for Ti30. The presence of milk led to a reduction in ROS generation of TiO2 NPs which is more pronounced for Ti30. These findings show the importance of the presence of a real food matrix on the behavior and toxicity of NPs when digested.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Child Nutrition and Water Access · Microplastics and Plastic Pollution

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. Boutillier S, Fourmentin S, Laperche B (2020) Food additives and the future of health: an analysis of the ongoing controversy on titanium dioxide. Futures 122:102598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2020.10259810.1016/j.futures.2020.102598 ↗
2. Weir A, Westerhoff P, Fabricius L, Hristovski K, von Goetz N (2012) Titanium dioxide nanoparticles in food and personal care products. Environ Sci Technol 46:2242–2250. https://doi.org/10.1021/es204168d10.1021/es204168d ↗
3. Efsa Panel on Food Additives Flavourings (2021) Safety assessment of titanium dioxide (E171) as a food additive. EFSA J 19:e06585. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.658510.2903/j.efsa.2021.6585 ↗
4. U.v.d. Leyen (2022) Food safety: EU to ban the use of Titanium Dioxide (E171) as a food additive in 2022. Official Journal of the European Union. 2022/63.1-5
5. Chen Z, Han S, Zhou S, Feng H, Liu Y, Jia G (2020) Review of health safety aspects of titanium dioxide nanoparticles in food application. NanoImpact 18:100224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2020.10022410.1016/j.impact.2020.100224 ↗
6. Chen XX, Cheng B, Yang YX, Cao A, Liu JH, Du LJ, Liu Y, Zhao Y, Wang H (2013) Characterization and preliminary toxicity assay of nano-titanium dioxide additive in sugar-coated chewing gum. Small 9:1765–1774. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20120150610.1002/smll.201201506 ↗
7. Hwang JS, Yu J, Kim HM, Oh JM, Choi SJ (2019) Food additive titanium dioxide and its fate in commercial foods. Nanomaterials 9(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/nano908117510.3390/nano9081175 ↗
8. Athinarayanan J, Alshatwi AA, Periasamy VS, Al-Warthan AA (2015) Identification of nanoscale ingredients in commercial food products and their induction of mitochondrially mediated cytotoxic effects on human mesenchymal stem cells. J Food Sci 80:N459-464. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.1276010.1111/1750-3841.12760 ↗
9. Cao X, Zhang T, DeLoid GM, Gaffrey MJ, Weitz KK, Thrall BD, Qian WJ, Demokritou P (2020) Evaluation of the cytotoxic and cellular proteome impacts of food-grade TiO(2) (E171) using simulated gastrointestinal digestions and a tri-culture small intestinal epithelial model. NanoImpact 17:100202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2019.10020210.1016/j.impact.2019.100202 ↗
10. Medina C, Santos-Martinez MJ, Radomski A, Corrigan OI, Radomski MW (2007) Nanoparticles: pharmacological and toxicological significance. Br J Pharmacol 150:552–558. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.070713010.1038/sj.bjp.0707130 ↗
11. Proquin H, Rodríguez-Ibarra C, Moonen CG, Urrutia Ortega IM, Briedé JJ, de Kok TM, van Loveren H, Chirino YI (2017) Titanium dioxide food additive (E171) induces ROS formation and genotoxicity: contribution of micro and nano-sized fractions. Mutagenesis 32:139–149. https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/gew05110.1093/mutage/gew051 ↗
12. Smolkova B, El Yamani N, Collins AR, Gutleb AC, Dusinska M (2015) Nanoparticles in food. Epigenetic changes induced by nanomaterials and possible impact on health. Food Chem Toxicol 77:64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2014.12.01510.1016/j.fct.2014.12.015 ↗
13. Zhang H, Peng J, Li X, Liu S, Hu Z, Xu G, Wu R (2018) A nano-bio interfacial protein corona on silica nanoparticle. Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces 167:220–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.04.02110.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.04.021 ↗
14. Zhdanov VP (2019) Formation of a protein corona around nanoparticles. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 41:95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2018.12.00210.1016/j.cocis.2018.12.002 ↗
15. Li Y, Jiang K, Cao H, Yuan M, Xu F (2021) Influences of a standardized food matrix and gastrointestinal fluids on the physicochemical properties of titanium dioxide nanoparticles. RSC Adv 11:11568–11582. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA09706C10.1039/D0RA09706C ↗
16. McClements DJ, Xiao H (2017) Is nano safe in foods? Establishing the factors impacting the gastrointestinal fate and toxicity of organic and inorganic food-grade nanoparticles. npj Sci Food 1:6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-017-0005-110.1038/s41538-017-0005-1 ↗
17. Bing J, Xiao X, McClements DJ, Biao Y, Chongjiang C (2021) Protein corona formation around inorganic nanoparticles: food plant proteins-TiO2 nanoparticle interactions. Food Hydrocoll 115:106594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.10659410.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.106594 ↗
18. Cao X, Han Y, Li F, Li Z, McClements DJ, He L, Decker EA, Xing B, Xiao H (2019) Impact of protein-nanoparticle interactions on gastrointestinal fate of ingested nanoparticles: Not just simple protein corona effects. NanoImpact 13:37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2018.12.00210.1016/j.impact.2018.12.002 ↗
19. Coreas R, Cao X, Deloid GM, Demokritou P, Zhong W (2020) Lipid and protein corona of food-grade TiO(2) nanoparticles in simulated gastrointestinal digestion. NanoImpact 20:100272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2020.10027210.1016/j.impact.2020.100272 ↗
20. Zhou P, Guo M, Cui X (2021) Effect of food on orally-ingested titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticle behaviors in simulated digestive tract. Chemosphere 268:128843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.12884310.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128843 ↗
21. DeLoid GM, Wang Y, Kapronezai K, Lorente LR, Zhang R, Pyrgiotakis G, Konduru NV, Ericsson M, White JC, De La Torre-Roche R, Xiao H, McClements DJ, Demokritou P (2017) An integrated methodology for assessing the impact of food matrix and gastrointestinal effects on the biokinetics and cellular toxicity of ingested engineered nanomaterials. Part Fibre Toxicol 14:40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-017-0221-510.1186/s12989-017-0221-5 ↗
22. Spurr RA, Myers H (1957) Quantitative analysis of anatase-rutile mixtures with an X-ray diffractometer. Anal Chem 29:760–762. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60125a00610.1021/ac60125a006 ↗
23. Sohal IS, Cho YK, O’Fallon KS, Gaines P, Demokritou P, Bello D (2018) Dissolution behavior and biodurability of ingested engineered nanomaterials in the gastrointestinal environment. ACS Nano 12:8115–8128. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b0297810.1021/acsnano.8b02978 ↗
24. Minekus M, Alminger M, Alvito P, Ballance S, Bohn T, Bourlieu C, Carrière F, Boutrou R, Corredig M, Dupont D, Dufour C, Egger L, Golding M, Karakaya S, Kirkhus B, Le Feunteun S, Lesmes U, Macierzanka A, Mackie A, Marze S, McClements DJ, Ménard O, Recio I, Santos CN, Singh RP, Vegarud GE, Wickham MSJ, Weitschies W, Brodkorb A (2014) A standardised static in vitro digestion method suitable for food – an international consensus. Food Funct 5:1113–1124. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3FO60702J10.1039/C3FO60702J ↗
25. Guo Z, Martucci NJ, Liu Y, Yoo E, Tako E, Mahler GJ (2018) Silicon dioxide nanoparticle exposure affects small intestine function in an in vitro model. Nanotoxicology 12:485–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/17435390.2018.146340710.1080/17435390.2018.1463407 ↗
26. Dorier M, Tisseyre C, Dussert F, Béal D, Arnal ME, Douki T, Valdiglesias V, Laffon B, Fraga S, Brandão F, Herlin-Boime N, Barreau F, Rabilloud T, Carriere M (2019) Toxicological impact of acute exposure to E171 food additive and TiO(2) nanoparticles on a co-culture of Caco-2 and HT29-MTX intestinal cells. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 845:402980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2018.11.00410.1016/j.mrgentox.2018.11.004 ↗
27. Kim H, Xue X (2020) Detection of total reactive oxygen species in adherent cells by 2’,7’-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate staining. J Vis Exp 160:e60682. https://doi.org/10.3791/6068210.3791/60682 ↗
28. Ijadpanah-Saravy H, Safari M, Khodadadi-Darban A, Rezaei A (2014) Synthesis of titanium dioxide nanoparticles for photocatalytic degradation of cyanide in wastewater. Anal Lett 47:1772–1782. https://doi.org/10.1080/00032719.2014.88017010.1080/00032719.2014.880170 ↗
29. Thamaphat K, Limsuwan P, Ngotawornchai B (2008) Phase characterization of TiO2 powder by XRD and TEM. Kasetsart J (Nat Sci) 42:357–361
30. Chen Z, Han S, Zhou D, Zhou S, Jia G (2019) Effects of oral exposure to titanium dioxide nanoparticles on gut microbiota and gut-associated metabolism in vivo. Nanoscale 11:22398–22412. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NR07580A10.1039/C9NR07580A ↗
31. Zhou H, Pandya JK, Tan Y, Liu J, Peng S, Muriel Mundo JL, He L, Xiao H, McClements DJ (2019) Role of mucin in behavior of food-grade TiO(2) nanoparticles under simulated oral conditions. J Agric Food Chem 67:5882–5890. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.9b0173210.1021/acs.jafc.9b01732 ↗
32. Yusoff R, Nguyen LTH, Chiew P, Wang ZM, Ng KW (2018) Comparative differences in the behavior of TiO2 and SiO2 food additives in food ingredient solutions. J Nanopart Res 20:76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-018-4176-810.1007/s11051-018-4176-8 ↗
33. Jo MR, Yu J, Kim HJ, Song JH, Kim KM, Oh JM, Choi SJ (2016) Titanium dioxide nanoparticle-biomolecule interactions influence oral absorption. Nanomaterials 6:225. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano612022510.3390/nano6120225 ↗
34. Philippe A, Schaumann GE (2014) Interactions of dissolved organic matter with natural and engineered inorganic colloids: a review. Environ Sci Technol 48:8946–8962. https://doi.org/10.1021/es502342r10.1021/es502342r ↗
35. Beliciu CM, Moraru CI (2009) Effect of solvent and temperature on the size distribution of casein micelles measured by dynamic light scattering. J Dairy Sci 92:1829–1839. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-146710.3168/jds.2008-1467 ↗
36. Fox PF, McSweeney PLH (2003) Advanced dairy chemistry-l: proteins. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8602-310.1007/978-1-4419-8602-3 ↗
37. Parris N, White AE, Farrell HM (1990) Identification of altered proteins in nonfat dry milk powder prepared from heat-treated skim milk. J Agric Food Chem 38:824–829. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00093a05010.1021/jf00093a050 ↗
38. Singh H, Ye A (2010) Controlling milk protein interactions to enhance the reconstitution properties of whole milk powders — a minireview. Dairy Sci Technol 90:123–136. https://doi.org/10.1051/dst/200903810.1051/dst/2009038 ↗
39. Abbott Chalew TE, Schwab KJ (2013) Toxicity of commercially available engineered nanoparticles to Caco-2 and SW480 human intestinal epithelial cells. Cell Biol Toxicol 29:101–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10565-013-9241-610.1007/s10565-013-9241-6 ↗
40. Gerloff K, Fenoglio I, Carella E, Kolling J, Albrecht C, Boots AW, Förster I, Schins RP (2012) Distinctive toxicity of TiO2 rutile/anatase mixed phase nanoparticles on Caco-2 cells. Chem Res Toxicol 25:646–655. https://doi.org/10.1021/tx200334k10.1021/tx200334k ↗
41. Kose O, Stalet M, Leclerc L, Forest V (2020) Influence of the physicochemical features of TiO2 nanoparticles on the formation of a protein corona and impact on cytotoxicity. RSC Adv 10:43950–43959. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA08429H10.1039/D0RA08429H ↗
42. Dobrovolskaia MA, Patri AK, Zheng J, Clogston JD, Ayub N, Aggarwal P, Neun BW, Hall JB, McNeil SE (2009) Interaction of colloidal gold nanoparticles with human blood: effects on particle size and analysis of plasma protein binding profiles. Nanomed Nanotechnol Biol Med 5:106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2008.08.00110.1016/j.nano.2008.08.001 ↗