Thermophysics of pristine and functionalized carbon nanotube reinforced paraffin/EVA composites as phase change materials: a molecular dynamics study
Source abstract
Abstract
Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were conducted to investigate the thermophysical properties of paraffin/ethylene–vinyl acetate (EVA)/double-walled carbon nanotube (DWNT) composites as phase change materials (PCM). In an assessment of the mechanical properties and thermal conductivity of paraffin/EVA/DWNT composites, the effect of the mass fraction of DWNT was assessed microscopically. A total of five molecular models were constructed, ranging in DWNT content from 0 to 17.1 wt%. MD simulations show that DWNT has had a positive impact on heat transfer efficiency, according to the non-equilibrium simulation results, which could be probably attributed to the high thermal conductivity of DWNT. As the DWNT content increased, however, more interfaces would form, and the interfacial thermal resistance would increase, reducing the mean free path of phonon and hindering heat transfer. In addition, three types of functional groups attached to DWNT, including methyl, vinyl acetate, and pentadecane, were used to investigate the influence of functional groups on the thermophysical properties between DWNT and matrix. It reveals that the functional groups would increase higher defect density and cause stronger interfacial boundary scattering, thereby limiting the axial heat transfer of DWNT. Nevertheless, the functional group increases the contact area between DWNT and the matrix material. Thus, it elevates the adhesion at the interface, reducing the interfacial thermal resistances and improving the radial heat transfer of DWNT. Therefore, it is necessary to consider DWNT with the appropriate type and density of functional groups to maximize the PCM’s thermal performance.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Phase Change Materials Research · Thermal properties of materials · Nanofluid Flow and Heat Transfer
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. Babaei H, Keblinski P, Khodadadi JM (2013) Thermal conductivity enhancement of paraffins by increasing the alignment of molecules through adding CNT/graphene. Int J Heat Mass Transf 58(1–2):209–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.11.01310.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.11.013 ↗
2. Balandin AA, Ghosh S, Bao W et al (2008) Superior thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene. Nano Lett 8(3):902–907. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl073187210.1021/nl0731872 ↗
3. Balasubramanian K, Burghard M (2005) Chemically functionalized carbon nanotubes. Small 1(2):180–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20040011810.1002/smll.200400118 ↗
4. Barthwal M, Dhar A, Powar S (2021) Effect of nanomaterial inclusion in phase change materials for improving the thermal performance of heat storage: a review. ACS Appl Energy Mater 4(8):7462–7480. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.1c0126810.1021/acsaem.1c01268 ↗
5. Berendsen HJC, Postma JPM, van Gunsteren WF et al (1984) Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J Chem Phys 81(8):3684–3690. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.44811810.1063/1.448118 ↗
6. Bhaskar S, Ramamurthy SS (2021) Synergistic coupling of titanium carbonitride nanocubes and graphene oxide for 800-fold fluorescence enhancements on smartphone based surface plasmon-coupled emission platform. Mater Lett 298:130008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2021.13000810.1016/j.matlet.2021.130008 ↗
7. Bhaskar S, Jha P, Subramaniam C et al (2021a) Multifunctional hybrid soret nanoarchitectures for mobile phone-based picomolar Cu2+ ion sensing and dye degradation applications. Physica E 132:114764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2021.11476410.1016/j.physe.2021.114764 ↗
8. Bhaskar S, Visweswar Kambhampati NS, Ganesh KM et al (2021b) Metal-Free, graphene oxide-based tunable soliton and plasmon engineering for biosensing applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 13(14):17046–17061. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c0102410.1021/acsami.1c01024 ↗
9. Byrne MT, McNamee WP, Gun'ko YK (2008) Chemical functionalization of carbon nanotubes for the mechanical reinforcement of polystyrene composites. Nanotechnology 19(41):415707. http://iopscience.iop.org/0957-4484/19/41/41570710.1088/0957-4484/19/41/415707 ↗
10. Cao A, Qu J (2012) Size dependent thermal conductivity of single-walled carbon nanotubes. J Appl Phys 112(1):13503. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.473090810.1063/1.4730908 ↗
11. Chen F, Wolcott M (2015) Polyethylene/paraffin binary composites for phase change material energy storage in building: a morphology, thermal properties, and paraffin leakage study. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 137:79–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2015.01.01010.1016/j.solmat.2015.01.010 ↗
12. Chen S, Sun S, Li C et al (2016) Behavior of protruding lateral plane graphene sheets in liquid dodecane: molecular dynamics simulations. J Nanopart Res 18(11). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-016-3645-110.1007/s11051-016-3645-1 ↗
13. Clancy TC, Gates TS (2006) Modeling of interfacial modification effects on thermal conductivity of carbon nanotube composites. Polymer 47(16):5990–5996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2006.05.06210.1016/j.polymer.2006.05.062 ↗
14. Dassault Systèmes BIOVIA, Materials Studio, Release 2017, San Diego: Dassault Systèmes, 2017.[M]
15. Drissi S, Ling T-C, Mo KH (2019) Thermal efficiency and durability performances of paraffinic phase change materials with enhanced thermal conductivity – a review. Thermochim Acta 673:198–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2019.01.02010.1016/j.tca.2019.01.020 ↗
16. Farid MM, Khudhair AM, Razack SAK et al (2004) A review on phase change energy storage: materials and applications. Energy Convers Manage 45(9–10):1597–1615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2003.09.01510.1016/j.enconman.2003.09.015 ↗
17. Fethi A, Mohamed L, Mustapha K et al (2015) Investigation of a graphite/paraffin phase change composite. Int J Therm Sci 88:128–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2014.09.00810.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2014.09.008 ↗
18. Fourier JB, Baron J (1878) The analytical theory of heat. The University Press
19. Gojny FH, Wichmann MH, Fiedler B et al (2006) Evaluation and identification of electrical and thermal conduction mechanisms in carbon nanotube/epoxy composites. Polymer 47(6):2036–2045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2006.01.02910.1016/j.polymer.2006.01.029 ↗
20. Gong F, Duong HM, Papavassiliou DV (2015) Inter-carbon nanotube contact and thermal resistances in heat transport of three-phase composites. J Phys Chem C 119(14):7614–7620. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0065110.1021/acs.jpcc.5b00651 ↗
21. Guthy C, Du F, Brand S et al (2007) Thermal conductivity of single-walled carbon nanotube/PMMA nanocomposites. J Heat Transfer 129(8):1096–1099. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.273748410.1115/1.2737484 ↗
22. He B, Martin V, Setterwall F (2003) Liquid–solid phase equilibrium study of tetradecane and hexadecane binary mixtures as phase change materials (PCMs) for comfort cooling storage. Fluid Phase Equilib 212(1–2):97–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3812(03)00270-X10.1016/S0378-3812(03)00270-X ↗
23. Huang Y-R, Chuang P-H, Chen C-L (2015) Molecular-dynamics calculation of the thermal conduction in phase change materials of graphene paraffin nanocomposites. Int J Heat Mass Transf 91:45–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.07.11010.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.07.110 ↗
24. Jang H-L, Kim J-H, Kang S-H et al (2018) Optimal mass distribution in carbon nanotubes for extreme thermal conductivity: analytical manipulation of isotope effects. Comput Mater Sci 150:273–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.04.01810.1016/j.commatsci.2018.04.018 ↗
25. Jiang J-W, Chen J, Wang J-S et al (2009) Edge states induce boundary temperature jump in molecular dynamics simulation. Phys Rev B 80(5). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.05230110.1103/PhysRevB.80.052301 ↗
26. Ju S-P, Haung T-J, Liao C-H et al (2013) Investigation of thermal conductivity of graphite flake/poly (p-phenylene sulfide) composite by experimental measurement and non-equilibrium molecular dynamics simulation. Polymer 54(17):4702–4709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2013.06.01310.1016/j.polymer.2013.06.013 ↗
27. Kenisarin M, Mahkamov K (2016) Passive thermal control in residential buildings using phase change materials. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 55:371–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.12810.1016/j.rser.2015.10.128 ↗
28. Koval’chuk AA, Shevchenko VG, Shchegolikhin AN et al (2008) Effect of carbon nanotube functionalization on the structural and mechanical properties of polypropylene/MWCNT composites. Macromolecules 41(20):7536–7542. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma801599q10.1021/ma801599q ↗
29. Li M, Mu B (2019) Effect of different dimensional carbon materials on the properties and application of phase change materials: a review. Appl Energy 242:695–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.08510.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.085 ↗
30. Li X, Fan X, Zhu Y et al (2012) Computational modeling and evaluation of the thermal behavior of randomly distributed single-walled carbon nanotube/polymer composites. Comput Mater Sci 63:207–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.06.03410.1016/j.commatsci.2012.06.034 ↗
31. Li Y, Li J, Feng W et al (2017) Design and preparation of the phase change materials paraffin/porous Al 2 O 3 @Graphite foams with enhanced heat storage capacity and thermal conductivity. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5(9):7594–7603. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b0088910.1021/acssuschemeng.7b00889 ↗
32. Liu, Rinzler, Dai et al (1998) Fullerene pipes. Science (New York, N.Y.) 280(5367):1253–1256. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5367.125310.1126/science.280.5367.1253 ↗
33. Ma PC, Tang BZ, Kim J-K (2008) Effect of CNT decoration with silver nanoparticles on electrical conductivity of CNT-polymer composites. Carbon 46(11):1497–1505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2008.06.04810.1016/j.carbon.2008.06.048 ↗
34. Ma P-C, Siddiqui NA, Marom G et al (2010) Dispersion and functionalization of carbon nanotubes for polymer-based nanocomposites: a review. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 41(10):1345–1367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.07.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2010.07.003 ↗
35. Mu C, Sze JY, Chen X et al (2019) Effect of two-dimensional graphene oxide on the phase change stability of carbon nanotubes and their application for thermal energy storage. J Nanopart Res 21(2):1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-019-4460-210.1007/s11051-019-4460-2 ↗
36. Müller-Plathe F (1997) A simple nonequilibrium molecular dynamics method for calculating the thermal conductivity. J Chem Phys 106(14):6082–6085. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.47327110.1063/1.473271 ↗
37. Müller-Plathe F, Bordat P. Reverse non-equilibrium molecular dynamics[M] // Karttunen, M; Vattulainen, I; Lukkarinen, A. Novel methods in soft matter simulations. Berlin, Great Britain: Springer, 2004: 310–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-39895-0_1010.1007/978-3-540-39895-0_10 ↗
38. Nazarychev VM, Glova AD, Volgin IV et al (2021) Evaluation of thermal conductivity of organic phase-change materials from equilibrium and non-equilibrium computer simulations: paraffin as a test case. Int J Heat Mass Transf 165:120639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.12063910.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120639 ↗
39. Nie C, Tong X, Wu S et al (2015) Paraffin confined in carbon nanotubes as nano-encapsulated phase change materials: experimental and molecular dynamics studies. RSC Adv 5(113):92812–92817. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA17152K10.1039/C5RA17152K ↗
40. Papageorgiou DG, Kinloch IA, Young RJ (2015) Graphene/elastomer nanocomposites. Carbon 95:460–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2015.08.05510.1016/j.carbon.2015.08.055 ↗
41. Pires L, Silva PD, Castro Gomes JP (2013) Experimental study of an innovative element for passive cooling of buildings. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 4:29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2013.08.00210.1016/j.seta.2013.08.002 ↗
42. Pomianowski M, Heiselberg P, Zhang Y (2013) Review of thermal energy storage technologies based on PCM application in buildings. Energy Build 67:56–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.08.00610.1016/j.enbuild.2013.08.006 ↗
43. Qu Y, Wang S, Zhou D et al (2020) Experimental study on thermal conductivity of paraffin-based shape-stabilized phase change material with hybrid carbon nano-additives. Renew Energy 146:2637–2645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.08.09810.1016/j.renene.2019.08.098 ↗
44. Rahmani F, Jeon J, Jiang S et al (2018) Melting and solidification behavior of Cu/Al and Ti/Al bimetallic core/shell nanoparticles during additive manufacturing by molecular dynamics simulation. J Nanopart Res 20(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-018-4237-z10.1007/s11051-018-4237-z ↗
45. Rai A, Bhaskar S, Ganesh KM et al (2021) Engineering of coherent plasmon resonances from silver soret colloids, graphene oxide and Nd2O3 nanohybrid architectures studied in mobile phone-based surface plasmon-coupled emission platform. Mater Lett 304:130632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2021.13063210.1016/j.matlet.2021.130632 ↗
46. Rappe AK, Casewit CJ, Colwell KS et al (1992) UFF, a full periodic table force field for molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics simulations. J Am Chem Soc 114(25):10024–10035. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00051a04010.1021/ja00051a040 ↗
47. Rathod MK, Banerjee J (2013) Thermal stability of phase change materials used in latent heat energy storage systems: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 18:246–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.10.02210.1016/j.rser.2012.10.022 ↗
48. Sharma S, Tiwari SK, Shakya S (2021) Mechanical properties and thermal conductivity of pristine and functionalized carbon nanotube reinforced metallic glass composites: a molecular dynamics approach. Defence Technol 17(1):234–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2020.04.00410.1016/j.dt.2020.04.004 ↗
49. Tang Q, Sun J, Yu S et al (2014) Improving thermal conductivity and decreasing supercooling of paraffin phase change materials by n-octadecylamine-functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes. RSC Adv 4(69):36584–36590. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA04225E10.1039/C4RA04225E ↗
50. Theodorou DN, Suter UW (1985) Detailed molecular structure of a vinyl polymer glass. Macromolecules 18(7):1467–1478. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma00149a01810.1021/ma00149a018 ↗
51. Vahedi A, Lahidjani MHS, Shakhesi S (2018) Multiscale modelling of thermal conductivity of carbon nanotube paraffin nanocomposites. Mater Res Express 5(11):115026. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aade7210.1088/2053-1591/aade72 ↗
52. Wang J, Xie H, Xin Z (2009) Thermal properties of paraffin-based composites containing multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Thermochim Acta 488(1–2):39–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2009.01.02210.1016/j.tca.2009.01.022 ↗
53. Wang M, Galpaya D, Lai ZB et al (2014) Surface functionalization on the thermal conductivity of graphene–polymer nanocomposites. Int J Smart Nano Mater 5(2):123–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475411.2014.90482810.1080/19475411.2014.904828 ↗
54. Warzoha RJ, Fleischer AS (2014) Heat flow at nanoparticle interfaces. Nano Energy 6:137–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.03.01410.1016/j.nanoen.2014.03.014 ↗
55. Xie T, Liu C, Zhang X (2017) Molecular dynamics simulation in the application of direct air dehumidification by electrodialysis method. Procedia Eng 205:116–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.94210.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.942 ↗
56. Xiong T, Zheng L, Shah KW (2020) Nano-enhanced phase change materials (NePCMs): a review of numerical simulations. Appl Therm Eng 178:115492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.11549210.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.115492 ↗
57. Xu L, Wei N, Zheng Y et al (2012) Graphene-nanotube 3D networks: intriguing thermal and mechanical properties. J Mater Chem 22(4):1435–1444. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1JM13799A10.1039/C1JM13799A ↗
58. Xuemao G, Qian S, Jianping Z et al (2013) Review on thermal conductivity and lipuid phase leakage of paraffin based phase change material. New Chem Mater 41:146–148
59. Yang B-X, Pramoda KP, Xu GQ et al (2007) Mechanical reinforcement of polyethylene using polyethylene-grafted multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Adv Funct Mater 17(13):2062–2069. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20060059910.1002/adfm.200600599 ↗
60. Yang B-X, Shi J-H, Li X et al (2009) Mechanical reinforcement of poly(1-butene) using polypropylene-grafted multiwalled carbon nanotubes. J Appl Polym Sci 113(2):1165–1172. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.3005610.1002/app.30056 ↗
61. Zhang J, Xu F, Hong Y et al (2015) A comprehensive review on the molecular dynamics simulation of the novel thermal properties of graphene. RSC Adv 5(109):89415–89426. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra18579c10.1039/c5ra18579c ↗
62. Zhang D, Liang R, Liu Z et al (2020a) Formation of polynylon12/carbon nanotubes composites through self-coiling process: a molecular dynamic simulation. J Nanopart Res 22(7):1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-020-04909-410.1007/s11051-020-04909-4 ↗
63. Zhang M, Wang C, Luo A et al (2020b) Molecular dynamics simulation on thermophysics of paraffin/EVA/graphene nanocomposites as phase change materials. Appl Therm Eng 166:114639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.11463910.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.114639 ↗