journal article·2020-02

Three-dimensional printer emissions and employee exposures to ultrafine particles during the printing of thermoplastic filaments containing carbon nanotubes or carbon nanofibers

Kevin L. Dunn, Kevin H. Dunn, Duane Hammond, Samuel Lo

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 22· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Recent studies have reported emission rates of up to 1012 ultrafine particles/min from fused filament fabrication three-dimensional printers when operated in unventilated or minimally ventilated test chambers. However, in these studies, there are no data to relate this rate to airborne concentrations in a manufacturing environment. An assessment of particle exposures of workers was conducted at a three-dimensional printing shop using multiple fused filament printers with unfilled and carbon nanotube and/or carbon nanofiber-infused polyetheletherketone filaments. The study simultaneously evaluated emissions in two environments: (1) in a field portable test chamber with one three-dimensional printer and (2) in the manufacturing area with multiple printers in use. Emission rates were calculated for a variety of filaments and ranged from 1.21 to 33.5 × 1011 particles/min, with geometric mean diameters ranging from 11.4 to 33.3 nm. The emission rates estimated by a scanning mobility particle sizer were much lower than from the fast mobility particle sizer due to differences in the lower size resolution. Samples collected in the chamber and manufacturing area by thermophoretic sampling included free (no polymer) carbon nanotubes and nanofibers and their bundles. The company reportedly never handled free carbon nanotubes or nanofibers, and prior research has indicated that the release of free nanomaterials through three-dimensional printing or mechanical action is highly unlikely. This presents the possibility that these materials are being released from the matrix during use or that these materials were brought into the facility through the supply chain, or by other means.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Microplastics and Plastic Pollution · Recycling and Waste Management Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Afshar-Mohajer N, Wu C-Y, Ladun T, Rajon DA, Huang Y (2015) Characterization of particulate matters and total VOC emissions from a binder jetting 3D printer. Build Environ 93:293–30110.1016/j.buildenv.2015.07.013 ↗
2. Azimi P, Zhao D, Pouzet C, Crain NE, Stephens B (2016) Emissions of ultrafine particles and volatile organic compounds from commercially available desktop three-dimensional printers with multiple filaments. Environ Sci Technol 50:1260–126810.1021/acs.est.5b04983 ↗
3. Gu J, Wensing M, Uhde E, Salthammer T (2019) Characterization of particulate and gaseous pollutants emitted during operation of a desktop 3D printer. Environ Int 123:476–48510.1016/j.envint.2018.12.014 ↗
4. Huang G, Park JH, Cena LG, Shelton BL, Peters TM (2012) Evaluation of airborne particle emissions from commercial products containing carbon nanotubes. J Nanopart Res 14:123110.1007/s11051-012-1231-8 ↗
5. Kang J et al (2017) Generation and characterization of aerosols released from sanding composite nanomaterials containing carbon nanotubes. NanoImpact 5:41–5010.1016/j.impact.2016.12.006 ↗
6. Kim Y, Yoon C, Ham S, Park J, Kim S, Kwon O, Tsai P-J (2015) Emissions of nanoparticles and gaseous material from 3D printer operation. Environ Sci Technol 49:12044–1205310.1021/acs.est.5b02805 ↗
7. Klein RC, King C, Kosior A (2009) Laboratory air quality and room ventilation rates. J Chem Health Saf 16:36–4210.1016/j.jchas.2008.12.004 ↗
8. Kulkarni P, Baron PA, Willeke K (eds) (2011) Aerosol measurement: principles, techniques, and applications, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken
9. Leith D, Miller-Lionberg D, Casuccio G, Lersch T, Lentz H, Marchese A, Volckens J (2014) Development of a transfer function for a personal, thermophoretic nanoparticle sampler. Aerosol Sci Technol 48:81–8910.1080/02786826.2013.861593 ↗
10. Mendes L et al (2017) Characterization of emissions from a desktop 3D printer. J Ind Ecol 21:S94–S10610.1111/jiec.12569 ↗
11. NIOSH (2017) NIOSH manual of analytical methods (NMAM). 5th ed. O’Connor PF, Ashley K (eds) Cincinnati: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 2014-151
12. NRC (2011) Prudent practices in the laboratory: handling and management of chemical hazards. The National Academies Press, National Research Council, Updated Version Washington, DC
13. Schuyler G (2009) The effect of air change rate on recovery from a spill. Seminar
14. Steinle P (2016) Characterization of emissions from a desktop 3D printer and indoor air measurements in office settings. J Occup Environ Hyg 13:121–13210.1080/15459624.2015.1091957 ↗
15. Stephens B, Azimi P, El Orch Z, Ramos T (2013) Ultrafine particle emissions from desktop 3D printers. Atmos Environ 79:334–33910.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.06.050 ↗
16. Yi J, LeBouf R, Duling MG, Nurkiewicz T, Chen BT, Schwegler-Berry D, Virji MA, Stefaniak AB (2016) Emission of particulate matter from a desktop three-dimensional (3D) printer. J Toxic Environ Health A 79:453–46510.1080/15287394.2016.1166467 ↗
17. Zhang Q, Wong JP, Davis AY, Black MS, Weber RJ (2017) Characterization of particle emissions from consumer fused deposition modeling 3D printers. Aerosol Sci Technol 51:1275–128610.1080/02786826.2017.1342029 ↗
18. Zhang Q, Sharma G, Wong JPS, Davis AY, Black MS, Biswas P, Weber RJ (2018) Investigating particle emissions and aerosol dynamics from a consumer fused deposition modeling 3D prtinted with a lognormal moment aerosol model. Aerosol Sci Technol 52:1099–111110.1080/02786826.2018.1464115 ↗
19. Zhou Y, Kong X, Chen A, Cao S (2015) Investigation of ultrafine particle emissions of desktop 3D printers in the clean room. Proc Eng 121:506–51210.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.1099 ↗