Nano-Evaluris: an inhalation and explosion risk evaluation method for nanoparticle use. Part I: description of the methodology
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper, an inhalation health and explosion safety risk assessment methodology for nanopowders is described. Since toxicological threshold limit values are still unknown for nanosized substances, detailed risk assessment on specific plants may not be carried out. A simple approach based on occupational hazard/exposure band expressed in mass concentrations is proposed for nanopowders. This approach is consolidated with an iso surface toxicological scaling method, which has the merit, although incomplete, to provide concentration threshold levels for which new metrological instruments should be developed for proper air monitoring in order to ensure safety. Whenever the processing or use of nanomaterials is introducing a risk to the worker, a specific nano pictogram is proposed to inform the worker. Examples of risk assessment of process equipment (i.e., containment valves) processing various nanomaterials are provided. Explosion risks related to very reactive nanomaterials such as aluminum nanopowders can be assessed using this new analysis methodology adapted to nanopowders. It is nevertheless found that to formalize and extend this approach, it is absolutely necessary to develop new relevant standard apparatuses and to qualify individual and collective safety barriers with respect to health and explosion risks. In spite of these uncertainties, it appears, as shown in the second paper (Part II) that health and explosion risks, evaluated for given MWCNTs and aluminum nanoparticles, remain manageable in their continuous fabrication mode, considering current individual and collective safety barriers that can be put in place. The authors would, however, underline that peculiar attention must be paid to non-continuous modes of operations, such as process equipment cleaning steps, that are often under-analyzed and are too often forgotten critical steps needing vigilance in order to minimize potential toxic and explosion risks.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications · Chemical Safety and Risk Management · Risk and Safety Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (64)
Show source-provided references
1. 1999/92/EC (1999) Directive 1999/92/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1999 on minimum requirements for improving the safety and health protection of workers potentially at risk from explosive atmospheres (15th individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC). Off J Eur Communities, L 23/57
2. Amyotte PR, Chippett S, Pegg J (1989) Effects of Turbulence on Dust Explosion. Prog Energy Sci Combust 293–310
3. ANSES (2010) Development of a specific control banding tool for nanomaterials, request No. 2008-SA-0407 relating to control banding. French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES)
4. Baran E, Özer N, Hasirci V (2002) In vivo half life of nanoencapsulated l-asparaginase. J Mater Sci Mater Med 13:1113–112110.1023/A:1021125617828 ↗
5. Berge TWF, Zwaert A, Appelman LM (1986) Concentration time mortality response relationship of irritant systemic acting vapours and gases. J Hazard Mater 13:301–30910.1016/0304-3894(86)85003-8 ↗
6. Bouillard J, Vignes A, Dufaud O, Perrin L, Thomas D (2010) Ignition and explosion risks of nanopowders. J Hazard Mater 181:873–88010.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.05.094 ↗
7. Bouillard J, Frejafon E, R’mili B, Fleury D (2011) Device for the characterization of the particulate release from combustion or thermal constraints upon materials containing nano-objects. INERIS, France
8. Brouwer DH (2012) Control banding approaches for nanomaterials. Ann Occup Hyg 56:506–51410.1093/annhyg/mer099 ↗
9. Bunce NJ, Remillard J (2003) Haber’s rule: the search for quantitative relationships in toxicology. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 9:973–98510.1080/713610018 ↗
10. Cascone MG, Lazzeri L, Carmignani C, Zhu Z (2002) Gelatin nanoparticles produced by a simple W/O emulsion as delivery system for methotrexate. J Mater Sci Mater Med 13:523–52610.1023/A:1014791327253 ↗
11. Cornelissen R, Jongeneelen F, Van Broekhuizen F (2011) Guidance working safely with nanomaterials and products, the guide for employers and employees. Document 113. IVAM, Amsterdam
12. Council directive 96/82/EC of 9 december 1996 on the control of major accident hazards involving dangerous sunstances
13. Dahoe AE, Cant RS, Pegg MJ, Scarlett B (2001) On the transient flow in the 20-liter explosion sphere. J Loss Prev Process Ind 14:475–48710.1016/S0950-4230(01)00052-3 ↗
14. de Dianous V, Fiévez C (2006) ARAMIS project: a more explicit demonstration of risk control through the use of bow-tie diagrams and the evaluation of safety barrier performance. J Hazard Mater 130:220–23310.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.010 ↗
15. Delvosalle C, Fievez C, Pipart A, Debray B (2006) ARAMIS project: a comprehensive methodology for the identification of reference accident scenarios in process industries. J Hazard Mater 130:200–21910.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.005 ↗
16. Directive 2012/18/UE of July 4 2012 on the control of major accident hazards involving dangerous substances, amending and subsequently repealing council directive 96/82/EC
17. Eckoff RK (2003) Dust explosions in the process industries. Gulf Professional Publishing, New York
18. Elgrabli D, Floriani M, Abella-Gallart S, Meunier L, Gamez C, Delalain P, Rogerieux F, Boczkowski J, Lacroix G (2008) Biodistribution and clearance of instilled carbon nanotubes in rat lung. Part Fibre Toxicol 5:2010.1186/1743-8977-5-20 ↗
19. EN 143: 2000 Respiratory Protective Devices: Particle filters- Requirements , testing, marking
20. Ferrari M (2005) Cancer nanotechnology: opportunities and challenges. Nat Rev Cancer 5:161–17110.1038/nrc1566 ↗
21. Fleury DB, João AS, Metz S, Bouillard JX, Brignon J-M (2011) Nanoparticle risk management and cost evaluation: a general framework. J Phys Conf Ser 304:01208410.1088/1742-6596/304/1/012084 ↗
22. Gemeinhart RA, Luo D, Saltzman WM (2005) Cellular fate of modular DNA delivery system mediated by silica nanoparticles. Biotechnol Prog 21:532–53710.1021/bp049648w ↗
23. Glor M (1988) Electrostatic hazards in powder handling. In: Research Studies press Ltd., Wiley, New York
24. Gowland R (2006) The accidental risk assessment methodology for industries (ARAMIS)/layer of protection analysis (LOPA) methodology: a step forward towards convergent practices in risk assessment? J Hazard Mater 130:307–31010.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.007 ↗
25. Groso A, Petri-fink A, Magrez A, Riediker M, Meyer T (2010) Management of nanomaterials safety in research environment. Part Fibre Toxicol 7:4010.1186/1743-8977-7-40 ↗
26. Hock JHHHK (2008) Precautionary matrix for synthethic nanomaterials. Federal Office for Public Health and Federal Office for the Environment, Bern
27. HSE (2004) Nanomaterials—a risk to health at work? First International Symposium on Occupational Health Implications of Nanomaterials—Report of Presentations at Plenary and Workshop Sessions and Summary of Conclusions, HSE Workshops
28. INNOVEST (2005) Nanotechnology—non-traditional methods for valuation of nanotechnology producers—introducing the Innovest Nanotechnology Index for the value investor
29. ISO/TS-27687 (2008) International Standards Organization, Nanotechnologies—terminology and definitions for nano-objects—nanoparticle, nanofibre and nanoplate
30. ISO/TS-80004-1 (2010) Nanotechnologies—Vocabulary Part 1: core terms. ISO/TS 80004-1:201O(E)
31. ISO/TS-80004-4 (2011) Nanotechnologies—Vocabularly: Part 4: nanostructures materials. ISO/TS 80004-4:2011(E)
32. Kalkert N, Schecker H-G (1979) Theoretiche Uberlegungen zum Einflub der Teilchengrobe auf die Mindstzundenergie von Stauben . Chemie Ingenieur Technik 51, 1248–124910.1002/cite.330511222 ↗
33. Kipp JE (2004) The role of solid nanoparticle technology in the parental delivery of poorly water-soluble drugs. Int J Pharm 284:109–12210.1016/j.ijpharm.2004.07.019 ↗
34. Kneuer C, Sameti M, Bakowsky U, Schiestel T, Scirra H, Schmidt H, Lehr CM (2000) A nonviral delivery system based on surface modified silica-nanoparticles can efficiently transfect cells in vitro. Bioconj Chem 2000(11):926–93210.1021/bc0000637 ↗
35. Laurent A (2003) Sécurité des Procédés Chimiques—connaissances de base et méthodes d’analyse de risques. Chapitre 6 : Explosions de poussières. Tec&Doc, Paris
36. Le Nguyen T, Adjadj A, Chaumette S, Bouchet S, de Dianous, V (2008) Evaluation des performances des Barrières Techniques de Sécurité (DCE DRA-73) Evaluation des Barrières Techniques de Sécurité—Ω 10
37. Marquart H, Heussen H, Le Feber M, Noy D, Tielemans E, Schinkel J, West J, Van Der Schaaf D (2008) ‘Stoffenmanager’, a web-based control banding tool using an exposure process model. Ann Occup Hyg 52:429–44110.1093/annhyg/men032 ↗
38. Nandiyanto ABD, Okuyama K (2011) Progress in developing spray-drying methods for the production of controlled morphology particles: from the nanometer to submicrometer size ranges. Adv Powder Technol 22:1–1910.1016/j.apt.2010.09.011 ↗
39. NFPA (1962) Fire Protection Handbook. National Fire Protection Association, Boston
40. NIOSH—Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2005) Approaches to Safe Nanotechnology—an information exchange with NIOSH
41. NIOSH (2009) Qualitative Risk Characterisation and Management of Occupational Hazards: Control Banding (CB) : A literature Review and Critical Analysis DHHS (NIOSH) Publication N° 2009-152
42. Oberdoester G, Oberdorster E, Oberdorster J (2005) Nanotoxicology : an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles. Environ Health Perspect 113:823–83910.1289/ehp.7339 ↗
43. OECD (2008) List of manufactured nanomaterials and list of endpoints for phase one of the OECD testing programme. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development ENV/JM/MONO(2008)13/REV
44. Paik SY, Zalk DM, Swuste P (2008) Application of a pilot control banding tool for risk level assessment and control of nanoparticle exposures. Ann Occup Hyg 52:419–42810.1093/annhyg/men041 ↗
45. Peter Van Broekhuizen WVV, Willem-Henk S, Paul S, Lucas R (2012) Exposure limits for nanoparticles: report of an international workshop on nanoreference values. Ann Occup Hyg 56:515–524
46. Peukert W (1996) Trends in solids process engineering (in German). Chemie Ingenieur Technik 66:1254–126310.1002/cite.330681004 ↗
47. Ravi KMN, Sameti M, Mohapatra SS, Kong X, Lockey RF, Bakowsky U, Lindenblatt G, Schmidt H, Lehr CM (2004) Cationic silica nanoparticles as gene carriers: synthesis, characterization and transfection efficiency in vitro and in vivo. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 4:876–88110.1166/jnn.2004.120 ↗
48. Roy I, Ohulchanskyy TY, Bharali DJ, Pudavar HE, Mistretta RA, Kaur N, Prasad PN (2005) Optimal tracking of organically modfied silica nanoparticles as DNA carriers: a nonviral, nanomedicine approach for gene delivery. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:29710.1073/pnas.0406352102 ↗
49. Salem AK, Searson PC, Leong KW (2003) Multifunctional nanorods for gene delivery. Nat Mater 2:668–67110.1038/nmat974 ↗
50. Salvi O, Debray B (2006) A global view on ARAMIS, a risk assessment methodology for industries in the framework of the SEVESO II directive. J Hazard Mater 130:187–19910.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.034 ↗
51. SCENIHR (2005) Opinion on the appropriateness of existing methodologies to assess the potential risks associated with engineered and adventitious products of nanotechnologies Scenihr (Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks) In: 7th plenary meeting of 28–29 September 2005. EU—Health & Consumer Protection Directorate-General—Directorate C—Public Health and Risk Assessment
52. Seveso Directive (1982) Council Directive 82/501/EEC on the major-accident hazards of certain industrial activities. (OJ No L 230 of 5 August 1982)
53. Traoré M, Dufaud O, Perrin L, Chazelet S, THomas D (2009) Duste Explosions: How should the influence of humidity be taken into account? Process Safe and Environ Prot 87:14–2010.1016/j.psep.2008.08.001 ↗
54. Van Broekhuizen P, Veelen WV, Willem-Henk S, Paul S, Lucas R (2012) Exposure limits for nanoparticles: report of an international workshop on nanoreference values. Ann Occup Hyg 56:515–524
55. Van Duuren-Stuurman BS, Vink R, Verbist KJM, Heussen HGA, Brouwer DH, Kroese DED, Van Niftrik MFJ, Tielemans E, Fransman W (2012) Stoffenmanager Nano Version 1.0: a web-based tool for risk prioritization of airborne manufactured nano objects. Ann Occup Hyg 56:525–541
56. Veronesi B, Oortgiesen M, Carter JD, Delvin RB (1999) Particulate matter initiates inflammatory cytokine release by activation of capsaicin and acid receptors in a human bronchial epithelial cell line. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 154:106–11510.1006/taap.1998.8567 ↗
57. Veronesi B, Haar C, Lee L, Oortgiesen M (2002) The surface charge of visible particulate matter predicts biological activation in human bronchial epithelial cells. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 178:144–15410.1006/taap.2001.9341 ↗
58. Vignes A, Munoz F, Bouillard J, Dufaud O, Perrin L, Laurent A, Thomas D (2012) Risk assessment of the ignitability and explosivity of aluminum nanopowders. Process Saf Environ Prot 90:304–31010.1016/j.psep.2011.09.008 ↗
59. Wang J et al (2008a) Time-dependent translocation and potential impairment on central nervous system by intranasally instilled TiO2 nanoparticles. Toxicology 254(1–2):82–9010.1016/j.tox.2008.09.014 ↗
60. Wang J et al (2008b) Potential neurological lesion after nasal instillation of TiO2 nanoparticles in the anatase and rutile crystal phases. Toxicol Lett 183(1–3):72–8010.1016/j.toxlet.2008.10.001 ↗
61. Witschger O, Fabries J-F (2005a) Particules ultra-fines et santé au travail 1—Caractéristiques et effets potentiels sur la santé. Hygiène et sécurité du travail—Cahiers de notes documentaires INRS 2ème trimestre ND 2227-199-05 :21–35
62. Witschger O, Fabries J-F (2005b) Particules ultra-fines et santé au travail 2—sources et caractérisation de l’exposition. Hygiène et sécurité du travail—Cahiers de notes documentaires INRS ND 2228-199-05 :37–54
63. Yoo HS, Lee JE, Chung H, Kwon IC, Jeong SY (2005) Self-assembled nanoparticles containing hydrophobically modified glycol chitosan for gene delivery. J Control Release 103:235–24310.1016/j.jconrel.2004.11.033 ↗
64. Zalk DM, Nelson DI (2008) History and evolution of control banding: a review. J Occup Environ Hyg 5:330–34610.1080/15459620801997916 ↗