journal article·2016-10

Importance of material matching in the calibration of asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation: material specificity and nanoparticle surface coating effects on retention time

Haiou Qu, Ivan R. Quevedo, Sean W. Linder, Andrew Fong, Thilak K. Mudalige

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 18· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

Asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation (AF4) coupled with dynamic light scattering or multiangle light scattering detectors is a promising technique for the size-based separation of colloidal particles (nano- and submicron scale) and the online determination of the particle size of the separated fractions in aqueous suspensions. In most cases, the applications of these detectors are problematic due to the material-specific properties of the analyte that results in erroneous calculations, and as an alternative, different nanoparticle size standards are required to properly calibrate the size-based retention in AF4. The availability of nanoparticle size standards in different materials is limited, and this deviation from ideal conditions of retention is mainly due to material-specific and particle coating-specific membrane–particle interactions. Here, we present an experimental method on the applicability of polystyrene nanoparticles (PS NP) as standard for AF4 calibration and compare with gold nanoparticle (Au NP) standards having different nominal sizes and surface functionalities.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Field-Flow Fractionation Techniques · Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Ariza MJ, Benavente J (2001) Streaming potential along the surface of polysulfone membranes: a comparative study between two different experimental systems and determination of electrokinetic and adsorption parameters. J Membrane Sci 190:119–13210.1016/S0376-7388(01)00430-6 ↗
2. Bendixen N, Losert S, Adlhart C, Lattuada M, Ulrich A (2014) Membrane–particle interactions in an asymmetric flow field flow fractionation channel studied with titanium dioxide nanoparticles. J Chromatogr A 1334:92–10010.1016/j.chroma.2014.01.066 ↗
3. Chithrani BD, Ghazani AA, Chan WCW (2006) Determining the size and shape dependence of gold nanoparticle uptake into mammalian cells. Nano Lett 6:662–668. doi: 10.1021/nl052396o10.1021/nl052396o ↗
4. De M, Ghosh PS, Rotello VM (2008) Applications of nanoparticles in biology. Adv Mater 20:4225–424110.1002/adma.200703183 ↗
5. Du Q, Schimpf ME (2002) Correction for particle-wall interactions in the separation of colloids by flow field-flow fractionation. Anal Chem 74:2478–248510.1021/ac0200318 ↗
6. Elimelech M, Gregory J, Jia X, Williams RA (1995) Particle deposition and aggregation—measurement, modelling and simulation. Elsevier, New York
7. Gallego-Urrea JA, Tuoriniemi J, Hassellöv M (2011) Applications of particle-tracking analysis to the determination of size distributions and concentrations of nanoparticles in environmental, biological and food samples TrAC. Trends Anal Chem 30:473–48310.1016/j.trac.2011.01.005 ↗
8. Gigault J, Hackley V (2013) Observation of size-independent effects in nanoparticle retention behavior during asymmetric-flow field-flow fractionation. Anal Bioanal Chem 405:6251–625810.1007/s00216-013-7055-2 ↗
9. Hakkinen H (2012) The gold-sulfur interface at the nanoscale. Nat Chem 4:443–45510.1038/nchem.1352 ↗
10. Hotze EM, Phenrat T, Lowry GV (2010) Nanoparticle aggregation: challenges to understanding transport and reactivity in the environment. J Environ Qual 39:1909–192410.2134/jeq2009.0462 ↗
11. Lewinski N, Colvin V, Drezek R (2008) Cytotoxicity of nanoparticles. Small 4:26–4910.1002/smll.200700595 ↗
12. Lin SY, Tsai YT, Chen CC, Lin CM, Chen Ch (2004) Two-step functionalization of neutral and positively charged thiols onto citrate-stabilized Au nanoparticles. J Phys Chem B 108:2134–213910.1021/jp036310w ↗
13. Litzen A, Wahlund KG (1991) Effects of temperature, carrier composition and sample load in asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation. J Chromatogr A 548:393–40610.1016/S0021-9673(01)88622-2 ↗
14. Loeschner K et al (2013) Optimization and evaluation of asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation of silver nanoparticles. J Chromatogr A 1272:116–12510.1016/j.chroma.2012.11.053 ↗
15. Lopez-Serrano A, Olivas RM, Landaluze JS, Camara C (2014) Nanoparticles: a global vision. Characterization, separation, and quantification methods. Potential environmental and health impact. Anal Methods 6:38–5610.1039/C3AY40517F ↗
16. Mitrano DM, Barber A, Bednar A, Westerhoff P, Higgins CP, Ranville JF (2012) Silver nanoparticle characterization using single particle ICP-MS (SP-ICP-MS) and asymmetrical flow field flow fractionation ICP-MS (AF4-ICP-MS). J Anal Atom Spectrom 27:1131–114210.1039/c2ja30021d ↗
17. Mudalige TK, Qu H, Linder SW (2015a) Asymmetric flow field flow fractionation hyphenated ICP-MS as an alternative to cloud point extraction for quantification of silver nanoparticles and silver speciation: application for nanoparticles with protein corona. Anal Chem 87:7395–740110.1021/acs.analchem.5b01592 ↗
18. Mudalige TK, Qu H, Linder SW (2015b) An improved methodology of asymmetric flow field flow fractionation hyphenated with inductively coupled mass spectrometry for the determination of size distribution of gold nanoparticles in dietary supplements. J Chromatogr A 1420:92–9710.1016/j.chroma.2015.09.091 ↗
19. Mudalige TK, Qu H, Sánchez-Pomales G, Sisco PN, Linder SW (2015c) Simple functionalization strategies for enhancing nanoparticle separation and recovery with asymmetric flow field flow fractionation. Anal Chem 87:1764–177210.1021/ac503683n ↗
20. Petosa AR, Jaisi DP, Quevedo IR, Elimelech M, Tufenkji N (2010) Aggregation and deposition of engineered nanomaterials in aquatic environments: role of physicochemical interactions. Environ Sci Technol 44:6532–654910.1021/es100598h ↗
21. Qu H, Mudalige TK, Linder SW (2014) Capillary electrophoresis/inductively-coupled plasma-mass spectrometry: development and optimization of a high resolution analytical tool for the size-based characterization of nanomaterials in dietary supplements. Anal Chem 86:11620–1162710.1021/ac5025655 ↗
22. Salgýn S, Salgýn U, Soyer N (2013) Streaming potential measurements of polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes to determine salt effects on membrane zeta potential. Int J Electrochem Sc 8:4073–408410.1016/S1452-3981(23)14454-3 ↗
23. Sozer N, Kokini JL (2009) Nanotechnology and its applications in the food sector. Trends Biotechnol 27:82–8910.1016/j.tibtech.2008.10.010 ↗
24. Sze A, Erickson D, Ren L, Li D (2003) Zeta-potential measurement using the Smoluchowski equation and the slope of the current-time relationship in electroosmotic flow. J Colloid Interf Sci 261:402–41010.1016/S0021-9797(03)00142-5 ↗
25. Ulrich A et al (2012) Critical aspects of sample handling for direct nanoparticle analysis and analytical challenges using asymmetric field flow fractionation in a multi-detector approach. J Anal Atom Spectrom 27:1120–113010.1039/c2ja30024a ↗
26. Wahlund KG (2013) Flow field-flow fractionation: critical overview. J Chromatogr A 1287:97–11210.1016/j.chroma.2013.02.028 ↗
27. Westermark G, Kariis H, Persson I, Liedberg B (1999) An infrared study on the chemisorption of tertiary phosphines on coinage and platinum group metal surfaces. Colloid Surface A 150:31–4310.1016/S0927-7757(98)00536-6 ↗