Nanoscience and nanotechnology in the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences: bibliometric analysis and evaluation
Source abstract
Abstract
The multidimensional bibliometric analysis of publications on nanoscience and nanotechnology (NS&NT) produced by the researchers of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (SB RAS) in 2007–2012 has shown their growing publication activity and international visibility in the field and the main objects of research such as nanoparticles, nanostructures (nanostructured materials), nanotubes (especially carbon ones), nanocomposites, nanocrystals, nanotechnology, and nanoelectronics and identified the most productive authors and institutes, as well as the most cited publications. It was made using the data from multidisciplinary (Web of Science, Scopus, and Russian Index of Scientific Citation) and specialized (Chemical Abstracts Plus and Inspec) information resources, that is from international (WoS, Scopus, CAPlus, and Inspec) and national (RISC) data bases. The analysis has shown that most of the SB RAS research works on NS&NT are concentrated in Novosibirsk Scientific Centre.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Educational Innovations and Challenges
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Andrievski RA, Klyuchareva SV (2011) Journal information flow in nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 13(12):6221–623010.1007/s11051-011-0621-7 ↗
2. Arora SK, Porter AL, Youtie J, Shapira P (2013) Capturing new developments in an emerging technology: an updated search strategy for identifying nanotechnology research outputs. Scientometrics 95(1):351–37010.1007/s11192-012-0903-6 ↗
3. Braun T, Glänzel W, Grupp H (1995a) The scientometric weight of 50 nations in 27 science areas, 1989–1993. Part I. All fields combined mathematics, engineering, chemistry and physics. Scientometrics 33(3):263–29310.1007/BF02017332 ↗
4. Braun T, Glänzel W, Grupp H (1995b) The scientometric weight of 50 nations in 27 science areas, 1989–1993. Part II. Life sciences. Scientometrics 34(2):207–23710.1007/BF02020421 ↗
5. Braun T, Schubert A, Zsindely S (1997) Nanoscience and nanotechnology on the balance. Scientometrics 38(2):321–32510.1007/BF02457417 ↗
6. Busygina TV (2009) Bibliometric analysis of information flow on nanobiotechnologies based on Scopus. Bibliosphere 4:31–42
7. Busygina TV, Elepov BS, Zibareva IV, Lavrik OL, Shaburova NN (2013) Investigations carried out at the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences in the area of nanoscience and nanotechnology: bibliometric analysis. Khimiya v Interesakh Ustoichivogo Razvitiya (Chem Sustain Dev) 21(4):463–473
8. Busygina TV, Lavrik OL, Mandrinina LA, Balutkina NA (2010) Database “SB RAS Researchers’ publications on nanostructures, nanomaterials and nanotechnology”: structure and possibilities for scientometric research on its base. Bibliosphere 4:53–61
9. Grieneisen ML, Zhang M (2011) Nanoscience and nanotechnology: evolving definitions and growing footprint on the scientific landscape. Small 7(20):2836–283910.1002/smll.201100387 ↗
10. Huang C, Notten A, Rasters N (2011) Nanoscience and technology publications and patents: a review of social science studies and search strategies. J Technol Transfer 36(2):145–17210.1007/s10961-009-9149-8 ↗
11. Maghrebi M, Abbasi A, Amiri S, Monsefi R, Harati A (2011) A collective and abridged lexical query for delineation of nanotechnology publications. Scientometrics 86(1):15–2510.1007/s11192-010-0304-7 ↗
12. Markusova VA, Libkind AN, Varshavsky AE, Jansz CNM (2012) Research performance and collaboration in the Novosibirsk region. Scientometrics 91(2):513–52610.1007/s11192-011-0597-1 ↗
13. Markusova VA (2009) Industrial-developed countries and China in the struggle for leadership in nanotechnology development: Review of scientific literature on bibliometric analysis of publications in Web of Science and Scopus databases, 1997–2003. Naukovedcheskie issledovaniya (Sociology of Scientific Research). Institute for Scientific Information on Social Sciences of RAS, Moscow, pp 40–64
14. Milojevic S (2012) Multidisciplinary cognitive content of nanoscience and nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 14(1):1–2810.1007/s11051-011-0685-4 ↗
15. Mogoutov A, Kahane B (2007) Data search strategy for science and technology emergence: a scalable and evolutionary query for nanotechnology tracking. Res Policy 36:893–90310.1016/j.respol.2007.02.005 ↗
16. Porter AL, Youtie J (2009) How interdisciplinary is nanotechnology? J Nanopart Res 11(5):1023–104110.1007/s11051-009-9607-0 ↗
17. Reiss T, Thielmann A (2010) Nanotechnology research in Russia—an analysis of scientific publications and patent applications. Nanotechnol Law Bus 7(4):387–404
18. Roco MC (2011) The long view of nanotechnology development: The National Nanotechnology Initiative at 10 years. J Nanopart Res 2(13):427–44510.1007/s11051-010-0192-z ↗
19. Shaburova NN (2012) Directions of Russian physical nanothematic investigations in the beginning of the XXI century: Bibliometric indices. Chigisheva OP (ed) Brand New Research Aspects in the Beginning of the XXI Century. Collection of Scientific Proceedings, Part I. Rostov-on-Don, IRC Scientific Collaboration, pp 9–21
20. Shaburova NN, Golod SV, Gavrilova SN (2012) Some results of studying the documentation flow on nanotematics in the Siberian Branch of the RAS (based on the database Inspec). Bibliosphere 4:67–74
21. Shevchenko LB (2012) Information resources on nanotechnology. Bibliosphere, Special Issue, 46–50
22. Zibareva IV, Elepov BS (2012) Nanoscience and nanotechnology in Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences: bibliometric analysis based on Russian Index of Scientific Citation. Bibliosphere 4:39–48
23. Zibareva IV, Soloshenko NS (2011) Russian scientific publications 2005–2009 in the Science Citation Index, Scopus and Chemical Abstracts databases. Sci Tech Inf Process 38(3):212–22310.3103/S0147688211030178 ↗
24. Zibareva IV, Zibarev AV, Bouznik VM (2010) Russian nanoscience: bibliometric analysis relying on the STN International databases. Khimiya v Interesakh Ustoichivogo Razvitiya (Chem Sustain Dev) 18(2):201–219