journal article·2022-03

Photocatalytic degradation efficiency of Cu/Cu2O core–shell structured nanoparticles for endosulfan mineralization

Puja Goel, Manju Arora

Journal of Nanoparticle Research· Volume 24· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Solar light-driven photocatalytic degradation of endosulfan pesticide (ESP) by copper nanoparticles (Cu NPs) based on Cu:Cu2O core–shell model is reported in this work. Localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) transition of Cu NPs generates hot electrons which are transferred to Cu2O shell’s conduction band, leaving positive charges on Cu NPs and alignment of electronic states. The positively charged Cu core accepts electrons from electron donors to reduce electron–hole recombination rate. The photo-generated electrons/holes from Cu2O shell along with Cu core LSPR transferred electrons produce –OH(ullet), O2−(ullet), and –OH− reactive oxygen species for photocatalytic degradation of surface adsorbed ES molecules via oxidation, reduction, and hydrolysis reactions. The structure, morphology, and size of Cu NPs are revealed from XRD, TEM, and SEM studies. The photocatalytic degradation of ES by Cu/Cu2O NP dispersion is revealed from FTIR, UV–Vis, and electron spin resonance (ESR) investigations. IR transmittance spectra in 4000–500 cm−1 region showed the absence of chloro carbon (–C–Cl), sulfite (–SO3) functional groups, and their bonding to ES skeleton stretching/bending modes in ES-treated solutions. UV–Vis spectra have the strong broad absorption peak of Cu NP core and an additional shoulder of Cu2O shell in UV and visible regions respectively, in treated samples. ESR spectra exhibit the broad ferromagnetic resonance signal pertaining to Cu2O shell in powdered Cu NPs and ESP-treated solutions, while Cu:Cu2O dispersion showed the very strong narrow signal superimposed over broad resonance signal owing to the free radicals of solvent used for preparing dispersion.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. Abhinav KV, Rao RVK, Karthik PS, Singh SP (2015) Copper conductive inks: synthesis and utilization in flexible electronics. RSC Adv 5:63985–6403010.1039/C5RA08205F ↗
2. Salgueiro AM, Daniel-da-Silva AL, Girão AV, Pinheiro PC, Trindade T (2013) Unusual dye adsorption behavior of kappa-carrageenan coated superparamagnetic nanoparticles. Chem Eng J 229:276‒28410.1016/j.cej.2013.06.015 ↗
3. Serra A, Gomez E, Michler J , Philippe L (2021) Facile cost-effective fabrication of Cu@Cu2O@CuO–microalgae photocatalyst with enhanced visible light degradation of tetracycline. Chem Eng J 413:127477 (13 pp)10.1016/j.cej.2020.127477 ↗
4. Gilchuk AV, Perekos AO, Bacherikov Y, Zhuk AG, Vorona IP, Romanyuk VR, Romanenko YM (2019) Functional Materials 26:489–494. https://doi.org/10.15407/fm26.03.48910.15407/fm26.03.489 ↗
5. Bacherikov YuYu, Vorona IP, Konchits AA (2010) Functional Materials 17:158–163
6. Bansal V, Mishra NK, Kumar A, Mozumdar S (2007) Copper-nanoparticle-catalyzed A3 coupling via C-H activation. Synlett 10:1581–1584
7. Chan GH, Zhao J, Hicks EM, Schatz GC, Van Duyne RP (2007) Plasmonic properties of copper nanoparticles fabricated by nanosphere lithography. Nano Lett 7:1947–195210.1021/nl070648a ↗
8. Colthrup NB, Daly LH, Wiberley SE (1990) Introduction to infrared and Raman spectroscopy. Academic Press, San Diego, CA
9. Devaraj M, Saravanan R, Deivasigamani RK, Gupta VK, Gracia F, Jayadevan S (2016) Fabrication of novel shape Cu and Cu/Cu2O nanoparticles modified electrode for the determination of dopamine and paracetamol. J Mol Liq 221:930–94110.1016/j.molliq.2016.06.028 ↗
10. Diaz-Droguetta DE, Espinozab R, Fuenzalida VM (2011) Copper nanoparticles grown under hydrogen: study of the surface oxide. Appl Surf Sci 257:4597–460210.1016/j.apsusc.2010.12.082 ↗
11. Dhas NA, Raj CP, Gedanken A (1998) Synthesis, characterization, and properties of metallic copper nanoparticles. Chem Mater 10:1446–145210.1021/cm9708269 ↗
12. Fang M, Tan X, Liu Z, Hu B, Wang, X (2021) Recent progress on metal-enhanced photocatalysis: a review on the mechanism. Research ID 9794329, 16 pages10.34133/2021/9794329 ↗
13. Fox MA, Dulay MT (1993) Heterogeneous photocatalysis. Chem Rev 93:341–35710.1021/cr00017a016 ↗
14. Herrmann J-M (1999) Heterogeneous photocatalysis: fundamentals and applications to the removal of various types of aqueous pollutants. Catal Today 53:115–12910.1016/S0920-5861(99)00107-8 ↗
15. Gusain R, Gupta K, Joshi P, Khatri OP (2019) Adsorptive removal and photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants using metal oxides and their composites: a comprehensive review. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 272:102009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2019.102009 (Epub 2019 Aug 8 PMID: 31445351)10.1016/j.cis.2019.102009 ↗
16. Gautam S, Agrawal H, Thakur M, Akbari A, Sharda H, Kaur R, Amini M (2020) Metal oxides and metal organic frameworks for the photocatalytic degradation: a review. J Environ Chem Eng 8:10372610.1016/j.jece.2020.103726 ↗
17. Goel P, Arora M, Biradar AM (2015) Mechanism of photoluminescence enhancement and quenching in Nd2O3 nanoparticles–ferroelectric liquid crystal nanocomposites. RSC Adv 5:14974–1498110.1039/C4RA14204G ↗
18. Goel P, Arora M (2018) Fabrication of Chemical Sensor for Organochlorine Pesticide Detection Using Colloidal Gold Nanoparticles MRS Commun 8:1000–1007
19. Goel P, Arora M (2020) Remediation of wastewater from chlorpyrifos pesticide by nano-gold photocatalyst. MRS Adv 5:2661–266710.1557/adv.2020.264 ↗
20. Goel P, Arora M (2021) Photocatalytically driven mineralization of chlorpyrifos pesticide by copper nanoparticles. MRS Advances. https://doi.org/10.1557/s43580-021-00109-x10.1557/s43580-021-00109-x ↗
21. Fujishima A, Honda K (1972) Photolysis-decomposition of water at the surface of an irradiated semiconductor. Nature 238(610):37− 3810.1038/238037a0 ↗
22. Fu Q, Wagner T (2007) Interaction of nanostructured metal overlayers with oxide surfaces. Surf Sci Rep 62:431–49810.1016/j.surfrep.2007.07.001 ↗
23. Hou W, Cronin SB (2012) A review of surface plasmon resonance-enhanced photocatalysis. Adv Funct Mater 23:1612–161910.1002/adfm.201202148 ↗
24. Huang T-K, Lin K-W, Tung S-P, Cheng T-M, Chang I, Hsieh Y-Z, Lee C-Y, Chiu H-T (2009) Glucose sensing by electrochemically grown copper nanobelt electrode. J Electroanal Chem 636:123–12710.1016/j.jelechem.2009.08.011 ↗
25. Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards (1989) International Centre for Diffraction Data, Swarthmore
26. Jo S (2021) Hyeon Gwon Jeong. Yo Han Kim, Dragos Neagu, Jaeha Myung, Stability and Activity Controls of Cu Nanoparticles for High-Performance Solid Oxide Fuel Cells, Applied Catalysis b: Environmental 285:119828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.11982810.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119828 ↗
27. Oritz JR, Ogura T, Medina-Valtierra J, Acosta-Ortiz SE, Bosh P, De las Reyes JA, Lara VH (2001) A catalytic application of Cu2O and CuO films deposited over fiberglass. Appl Surf Sci 174:177–18410.1016/S0169-4332(00)00822-9 ↗
28. Kantam ML, Jaya VS, Lakshmi MJ, Reddy BR, Choudary B, Bhargava S (2007) Alumina supported copper nanoparticles for aziridination and cyclopropanation reactions. Catal Commun 8:1963–196810.1016/j.catcom.2007.03.012 ↗
29. Karthik AD, Geetha K (2013) Synthesis of copper precursor, copper and its oxide nanoparticles by green chemical reduction method and its antimicrobial activity. J Appl Pharm Sci 3:16–21
30. Khanehzaei H, Ahmad MB, Shameli K, Ajdari Z (2014) Synthesis and characterization of Cu@Cu2O core shell nanoparticles prepared in seaweed Kappaphycus alvarezii media. Int J Electrochem Sci 9:8189–819810.1016/S1452-3981(23)11039-X ↗
31. Khanna PK, Gaikwad S, Adhyapak PV, Singh N, Marimuthu R (2007) Synthesis and characterization of copper nanoparticles. Mater Lett 61:4711–471410.1016/j.matlet.2007.03.014 ↗
32. Kim H-S, Dhage SR, Shim D-E, Hahn HT (2009) Intense pulsed light sintering of copper nanoink for printed electronics. Appl Phys 97:791–79810.1007/s00339-009-5360-6 ↗
33. Kim DY, Kim CW, Sohn JH et al (2015) J Phys Chem C 119:13350–1335610.1021/acs.jpcc.5b02762 ↗
34. Kisiel R, Szczepański Z (2009) Die-attachment solutions for SiC power devices. Microelectron Reliab 49:627–62910.1016/j.microrel.2009.03.009 ↗
35. Lambert S, Cellier C, Gaigneaux EM, Pirard JP, Heinrichs B (2007) Ag/SiO2, Cu/SiO2 and Pd/SiO2cogelledxerogel catalysts for benzene combustion: relationships between operating synthesis variables and catalytic activity. Catal Commun 8:1244–124810.1016/j.catcom.2006.11.018 ↗
36. Link S, El-Sayed MA (2000) Shape and size dependence of radiative, non-radiative and photothermal properties of gold nanocrystals. Int Rev Phys Chem 19:409–45310.1080/01442350050034180 ↗
37. Lin-Vien D, Colthup NB, Fateley WG, Grasselli JG (1991) Infrared and Raman characteristic frequencies of organic molecules. Academic Press, San Diego, CA
38. López ER, Ortega H, Cadenas G et al (2018) Foliar application of copper nanoparticles increases the fruit quality and the content of bioactive compounds in tomatoes. Appl Sci 8:1020. https://doi.org/10.3390/app807102010.3390/app8071020 ↗
39. Manikam VR, Kuan Yew C (2011) Die Attach materials for high temperature applications: a review. IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology 1:457–47810.1109/TCPMT.2010.2100432 ↗
40. Meshram SP, Adhyapak PV, Mulik UP, Amalnerkar DP (2012) Facile synthesis of CuO nanomorphs and their morphology dependent sunlight driven photocatalytic properties. Chem Eng J 204–205:158–16810.1016/j.cej.2012.07.012 ↗
41. Janczarek M, Kowalska E (2017) On the origin of enhanced photocatalytic activity of copper-modified titania in the oxidative reaction systems. Catalysts 7:317 (26 pages)10.3390/catal7110317 ↗
42. Monshi A (2012) Modified Scherrer equation to estimate more accurately nano-crystallite size using XRD. World Journal of Nano Science and Engineering 2:154–16010.4236/wjnse.2012.23020 ↗
43. Nowak A, Szade J, Talik E, Zubko M, Wasikowski D, Dulski M (2016) Physicochemical and antibacterial characterization of ionocity Ag/Cu powder nanoparticles. Mater Charact 117:9–1610.1016/j.matchar.2016.04.013 ↗
44. Pariona N, Mtz-Enriquez AI, Sánchez-Rangel D, Carrión G, Paraguay-Delgado F, Rosas-Saito G (2019) Green-synthesized copper nanoparticles as a potential antifungal against plant pathogens. RSC Adv 9:18835–1884310.1039/C9RA03110C ↗
45. Pestryakov AN, Petranovskii VP, Kryazhov A, Ozhereliev O, Pfcander N, Knop-Gericke A (2004) Study of copper nanoparticles formation on supports of different nature by UV–Vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. Chem Phys Lett 385:173–17610.1016/j.cplett.2003.12.077 ↗
46. Goel P, Arora M (2020b) Mechanism of visible-light-driven photocatalytic degradation of endosulfan pesticide by gold nanoparticles. Environ Res Commun 2:075004 (11 pages)10.1088/2515-7620/aba440 ↗
47. Li Q, Chen Z, Wang H, Yang H, Wen T, Wang S, Hu B, Wang X (2021) Removal of organic compounds by nanoscale zero-valent iron and its composites. Sci Total Environ 792: 148546 (14 pp.)10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148546 ↗
48. Ranu BC, Dey R, Chatterjee T, Ahammed S (2012) Copper nanoparticle-catalyzed carbon-carbon and carbon-heteroatom bond formation with a greener perspective. Chemsuschem 5:22–4410.1002/cssc.201100348 ↗
49. Ruparelia JP, Chatterjee AK, Duttagupta SP, Mukherji S (2008) Strain specificity in antimicrobial activity of silver and copper nanoparticles. Acta Biomater 4:707–71610.1016/j.actbio.2007.11.006 ↗
50. Kalidhasan S, Dror I, Berkowitz B (2017) Atrazine degradation through PEI-copper nanoparticles deposited onto montmorillonite and sand. Sci Rep 7:1415 (13 pages)10.1038/s41598-017-01429-5 ↗
51. Socrates G (1994) Infrared characteristic group frequencies. John Wiley & Sons, New York
52. Zhang S, Wang J, Zhang Y, Ma J, Huang L, Yu S, Chen L, Song G, Qiu M, Wang M (2021) Applications of water-stable metal-organic frameworks in the removal of water pollutants: a review. Environ Pollut 291:118076 (29 pp.)10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118076 ↗
53. Ueno K, Misawa H (2013) Surface plasmon-enhanced photochemical reactions. J Photochem Photobiol Photochem Rev 15:31–5210.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2013.04.001 ↗
54. Ursino C, Castro R, Drioli E, Lassaad G, Albeirutty MH, Figoli A (2018) Progress of nanocomposite membranes for water treatment. Membranes 8(2):18. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes8020018.PMID:29614045;PMCID:PMC602724110.3390/membranes8020018.PMID:29614045;PMCID:PMC6027241 ↗
55. Waseda Y, Matsubara E, Shinoda K (2011) X-ray diffraction crystallography: introduction, examples and solved problems. Springer, Berlin10.1007/978-3-642-16635-8 ↗
56. Weil JA, Bolton JR, Wertz JE (1994) Electron paramagnetic resonance—elementary theory and practical applications. Wiley, New York, NY, USA
57. Xuan Y, Li Q (2000) Heat transfer enhancement of nanofluids. Int J Heat and Fluid Flow 21:58–6410.1016/S0142-727X(99)00067-3 ↗
58. Yang J, Wang D, Han H, Li C (2013) Roles of cocatalysts in photocatalysis and photoelectrocatalysis. Acc Chem Res 46:1900–190910.1021/ar300227e ↗
59. Zhang Y, Cui C, Yang B, Zhang K, Zhu P, Li G, Sun R, Wong C (2018a) Size-controllable copper nanomaterials for flexible printed electronics. J Mater Sci 53:12988–1299510.1007/s10853-018-2564-1 ↗
60. Zhang Y, Ye C, Guo C, Gan C, Tong X (2018) In2O3-modified Cu/SiO2 as an active and stable catalyst for the hydrogenation of methyl acetate to ethanol. Chinese J Catalysis 39:99–10810.1016/S1872-2067(17)62932-2 ↗
61. Zou Y, Hu Y, Shen Z, Yao L, Tang D, Zhang S, Wang S, Hu B, Zhao G, Wang X (2022) Application of aluminosilicate clay mineral-based composites in photocatalysis. J Environ Sci 115:190–21410.1016/j.jes.2021.07.015 ↗